2009 Crosstown 1.0 vs 2005 Trek Navigator vs. 2008 Raleigh Detour 4.0
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
2009 Crosstown 1.0 vs 2005 Trek Navigator vs. 2008 Raleigh Detour 4.0
I have found a used tred navigator 200 for 250.00 or I have a bike shop that has a new fuji crosstown 1.0 2009 for 579.00 and I have also found a used 2009 Raleigh Detour 4.0 for 300.00 I mostly ride on streets in the small town I live in and I will also ride on the Katy trail in Missouri. Just wanting some input as I am just trying to figure out which one would be the best for me.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Vlaamse Ardennen, Belgium
Posts: 3,898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
It depends on your budget I guess...
Excuse me for being rude, but both the trek navigator and the raleigh detour look like crappy bikes to me.
The Fuji crosstown seems a lot better already, but I think there's better bikes outthere for the same amount ... like the "cube ltd cls pro" for instance.
Excuse me for being rude, but both the trek navigator and the raleigh detour look like crappy bikes to me.
The Fuji crosstown seems a lot better already, but I think there's better bikes outthere for the same amount ... like the "cube ltd cls pro" for instance.
#3
aka Phil Jungels
For that kind of price, you should also consider a new Specialized Sirrus, or Trek FX, which are both Performance Hybrids. Still get decent ride, and better performance from the bike.
A 500-600 budget open up a big selection in the new Hybrid categories..... I never rode a Detour, but that Navigator is firmly entrenched in the comfort category, and doesn't do real well at longer distances, IMHO.
A 500-600 budget open up a big selection in the new Hybrid categories..... I never rode a Detour, but that Navigator is firmly entrenched in the comfort category, and doesn't do real well at longer distances, IMHO.
#4
Homey
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,499
Mentioned: 56 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2427 Post(s)
Liked 1,403 Times
in
898 Posts
It depends on your budget I guess...
Excuse me for being rude, but both the trek navigator and the raleigh detour look like crappy bikes to me.
The Fuji crosstown seems a lot better already, but I think there's better bikes outthere for the same amount ... like the "cube ltd cls pro" for instance.
Excuse me for being rude, but both the trek navigator and the raleigh detour look like crappy bikes to me.
The Fuji crosstown seems a lot better already, but I think there's better bikes outthere for the same amount ... like the "cube ltd cls pro" for instance.
#5
aka Phil Jungels
They may be crappy for YOUR uses but my Navigator got me back into cycling again. It's a fine bike for cruising around town in with the family or friends. It's considered a comfort bike due to the wider 26 inch tires and a good mule for errands. Can take on some hardpack dirt/gravel as well as pavement. The geometry is not designed for speed or for being nimble but I consider it my basic "do it" bike.
The tradeoff being, uncomfortable on long distances due to the high seat pressure created by the very upright posture, slower thanks to the very wide tires, and kinda heavy due it being a good utility bike.
If you want it to ride around the neighborhood with the kids, carry groceries, and ride only on unpaved surfaces - this could be the bike for you.
But, the"Performance Hybrids,"with "relatively wide" tires, more aggressive geometry, and lighter frames, will do all of that, and more, - and be easier to handle longer rides. IMHO
It is a good bike for it's intended use - just not as flexible as a more performance oriented Hybrid.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Foothills of Appalachia.
Posts: 735
Bikes: Electra Townie crank forward, Specialized flat bar road bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
They may be crappy for YOUR uses but my Navigator got me back into cycling again. It's a fine bike for cruising around town in with the family or friends. It's considered a comfort bike due to the wider 26 inch tires and a good mule for errands. Can take on some hardpack dirt/gravel as well as pavement. The geometry is not designed for speed or for being nimble but I consider it my basic "do it" bike.
Find what suits you, feels like it will be fun to ride, fits in your budget, and will get you out riding! Good luck!
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 466
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
For that kind of price, you should also consider a new Specialized Sirrus, or Trek FX, which are both Performance Hybrids. Still get decent ride, and better performance from the bike.
A 500-600 budget open up a big selection in the new Hybrid categories..... I never rode a Detour, but that Navigator is firmly entrenched in the comfort category, and doesn't do real well at longer distances, IMHO.
A 500-600 budget open up a big selection in the new Hybrid categories..... I never rode a Detour, but that Navigator is firmly entrenched in the comfort category, and doesn't do real well at longer distances, IMHO.
My wife was riding a 2004 Trek Navigator with the step-through frame. When she needed a back up bike I bought her a step through frame Raleigh Detour 3.0. But after two years of use I would never buy another one. Compared to the Trek Navigator after 7,000 miles of use the Raleigh takes a good deal more maintenance. I have had to replace the complete rear wheel. The front wheel was a problem in that the rubber strip covering the spoke heads fell apart by the end of the first year. It came with Kenda tires and tubes. The tubes quickly failed where the schrader valve base patch was bonded to the tubes. Paper thin patches in the joint. The Raleigh cost a few dollars less than her Navigator but the Navigator has proven to be far more trouble free.