Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

1985 Panasonic to fixed -- 52 up front?

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

1985 Panasonic to fixed -- 52 up front?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-08, 07:23 AM
  #1  
Flash
Are you with me
Thread Starter
 
Flash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 1,311

Bikes: Giant TCR Advanced SL, Blue T-14 TT bike

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
1985 Panasonic to fixed -- 52 up front?

All,

I'm preparing to convert a 1985 Panasonic to fixed and was hoping to use as many of the original parts as possible. Rear spacing is 126mm and I will likely go with a formula fixed/free in the back.

My question focuses on the front ring. I have noticed in pictures that several riders use a 52/19 or a 53/19 fixed setup. This is a preferred combination for me. I have read on sheldon's site about using the stock chainring during a conversion, but he speaks of using the 42t inner ring affixed with short stack bolts. I am curious: for those running the big ring up front (52 or 53), are you moving it to the inside to replace the inner chainring or are you simply removing the inner chainring and still managing to get proper chainline with the big ring in its normal "outside" position?

I'm guessing that some frames don't have enough clearance to handle a 52 or 53 ring affixed on the inside where the smaller 42 ring normally goes. I don't have the bike in hand yet, but it comes stock with the 42/52 up front, I believe.

thanks
Flash is offline  
Old 10-08-08, 07:28 AM
  #2  
ZiP0082
Senior Member
 
ZiP0082's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,703

Bikes: 2008 Mercier Kilo TT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I tried doing a conversion the same way, last year -- I didn't have clearance for the 52t chainring on the inside due to it rubbing against the chainstay. It was a 1976 Raleigh Record, so you could be in a different scenario. Good luck!
ZiP0082 is offline  
Old 10-08-08, 08:18 AM
  #3  
kyselad
extra bitter
 
kyselad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,584

Bikes: Miyata 210, Fuji Royale II, Bridgestone Kabuki, Miyata Ninety

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
For a conversion, clearance for a large chainring is likely to be a problem at the typical 42 mm chainline. Those large chainring setups you saw may well have been on track frames designed with greater chainring clearance. But is there something wrong with the 42 t inner ring? Can't you just use that with a smaller cog and be done?
kyselad is offline  
Old 10-08-08, 08:34 AM
  #4  
Hobartlemagne 
Spelling Snob
 
Hobartlemagne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 2,862

Bikes: Panasonic DX4000, Bianchi Pista

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
I converted an 87 Panasonic. I use the smaller chainring on the inside edge of the spider. This
is the only way for me to keep the chainline straight.
__________________

The first rule of flats is You don't talk about flats!
Hobartlemagne is offline  
Old 10-08-08, 08:53 AM
  #5  
ZiP0082
Senior Member
 
ZiP0082's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,703

Bikes: 2008 Mercier Kilo TT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
if you're really interested in the 52x19 ratio, it looks like 42x16 is going to be a little easier/shorter than you want, and 42x15 is going to be a touch harder/higher than you want.

https://software.bareknucklebrigade.c...it.applet.html
ZiP0082 is offline  
Old 10-08-08, 09:00 AM
  #6  
extremenergy3
...
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ZiP0082
I tried doing a conversion the same way, last year -- I didn't have clearance for the 52t chainring on the inside due to it rubbing against the chainstay. It was a 1976 Raleigh Record, so you could be in a different scenario. Good luck!
teehee! I just converted my raleigh record and I use the 42 because it let's me have a straight chainline. Plus I don't think I could handle a 52/16 lol (yes too poor to get a bigger cog) but 42/16 is great here.
extremenergy3 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.