The true weight thread
#1
Steel is real
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,106
Bikes: 40 - accumulated over 40 years
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 375 Post(s)
Liked 1,083 Times
in
304 Posts
The true weight thread
Bought a scale yesterday. Thought it would be fun to weigh my bikes.
Here is the 1989 Bridgestone MB-1 with a 1994 XT group except FC M563 LX cranks and "modern" Shimano M324 spd/cage pedals (filled with lead I suspect...). On the other hand it does not have a bottlecage.
Here is the 1989 Bridgestone MB-1 with a 1994 XT group except FC M563 LX cranks and "modern" Shimano M324 spd/cage pedals (filled with lead I suspect...). On the other hand it does not have a bottlecage.
#2
Senior Member
195? oh the bike! I have no idea, because the bike isn't the problem!
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: GWN
Posts: 2,538
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 606 Times
in
403 Posts
Bought a scale yesterday. Thought it would be fun to weigh my bikes.
Here is the 1989 Bridgestone MB-1 with a 1994 XT group except FC M563 LX cranks and "modern" Shimano M324 spd/cage pedals (filled with lead I suspect...). On the other hand it does not have a bottlecage.
Here is the 1989 Bridgestone MB-1 with a 1994 XT group except FC M563 LX cranks and "modern" Shimano M324 spd/cage pedals (filled with lead I suspect...). On the other hand it does not have a bottlecage.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,537
Bikes: yes
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1281 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
329 Posts
Admittedly, it gets lost a bit in translation.
Nice Bridgestone, though. Thanks for posting!
#6
Senior Member
He means he weighs 195 lbs (88.4) Kilograms so the weight of the bike doesn't matter
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts
I weigh my bikes on a scale very similar to that. It was sold on eBay as a fish scale. I don't have a good way to hang it, so I typically just hold it and lift the bike with the hook. It doesn't stabilize to a single number that way, but I can usually figure out about more or less what it's telling me, probably within the accuracy of the scale. In addition to pounds, ounces, and kilograms, mine will tell me the weight of things in Jin. I haven't had a use for that, but I could do it if I did. Also, the ghost of my freshman college physics professor insists on reminding me that kilograms are a measure of mass, not weight.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 4,848
Bikes: Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1931 Post(s)
Liked 742 Times
in
422 Posts
Those pedals are good but heavy.... steel cages.
Those who post the weight of their bikes without a picture with the scale... well, they are liars.
Those who post the weight of their bikes without a picture with the scale... well, they are liars.
#9
Steel is real
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,106
Bikes: 40 - accumulated over 40 years
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 375 Post(s)
Liked 1,083 Times
in
304 Posts
Aha! Thanks. Well I am well over 90 kg... I am not weighing my vintage bikes because it would matter in any perfomance kind of way. I do it because 1 - It is fun to know and 2 - there are a lot of fantasy weight quotes floating around on the net.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts
I kind of look at this like I do the pressure gauge on my pump. As long as it's consistent, I'm happy. I can weigh a new bike and know which of my other bikes are about the same weight. Usually all of them, +/- 2 pounds. Within that range I don't think weight is even the dominant factor in the way the ride of the bike feels.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
I weigh my bikes on a scale very similar to that. It was sold on eBay as a fish scale. I don't have a good way to hang it, so I typically just hold it and lift the bike with the hook. It doesn't stabilize to a single number that way, but I can usually figure out about more or less what it's telling me, probably within the accuracy of the scale. In addition to pounds, ounces, and kilograms, mine will tell me the weight of things in Jin. I haven't had a use for that, but I could do it if I did. Also, the ghost of my freshman college physics professor insists on reminding me that kilograms are a measure of mass, not weight.
Again, I don't see a problem. It seems to be a 27# bicycle.
What kind of errors are we worried about, and are they large enough to challenge this answer for any practical purpose?
#12
Steel is real
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,106
Bikes: 40 - accumulated over 40 years
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 375 Post(s)
Liked 1,083 Times
in
304 Posts
I will check my scale for accuracy.
Here is another frame+fork i did today:
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...l#post20729554
Cannot be that far off.
PS - please do not make this thread about performance. It is not.
PS II of course it is kilograms - I am European.
Here is another frame+fork i did today:
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...l#post20729554
Cannot be that far off.
PS - please do not make this thread about performance. It is not.
PS II of course it is kilograms - I am European.
Last edited by styggno1; 01-02-19 at 03:39 PM.
#13
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,471 Times
in
1,435 Posts
I have that same scale. I wonder how accurate it is. It seems very cheap.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts
What? I should have shown the bike in the picture too? Well, it's too late for that now. It was this one.
Non-vintage bike for comparison. I did it again.
But trust me, it was this one.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts
I don't see the problem. Stygg's scale says 12.18, and it is reasonable to assume it is indicating kilograms. The conversion factor for kilograms (mass) to pounds (force) is 2.2 kg per pound. The calculation of that factor includes the conversion from mass to force. The necessary factor is the acceleration due to gravity, which is usually considered a standard value.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#17
Steel is real
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,106
Bikes: 40 - accumulated over 40 years
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 375 Post(s)
Liked 1,083 Times
in
304 Posts
Haha! Next bike I weigh I will let you know both pounds and Kg. So you who are stuck in medieval times can relate...
I am really curious on some of the bikes - the Masi/Ferretti/Monark (with a lot of light stuff and tricks) and the Merckx MX Leader with modern Super Record 11. They feel light but it could just be my wishful thinking/feeling.
I am really curious on some of the bikes - the Masi/Ferretti/Monark (with a lot of light stuff and tricks) and the Merckx MX Leader with modern Super Record 11. They feel light but it could just be my wishful thinking/feeling.
Last edited by styggno1; 01-02-19 at 03:58 PM.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,045
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4512 Post(s)
Liked 6,385 Times
in
3,670 Posts
This all brings up a good point, I have a Berkley fish scale I use. Got a frame the seller was very detailed with the weight of, 4lb 12.7 oz frame and 1lb 8.8oz fork = 6lb 5.5oz total on his "Postal scale". Frame came and weighs 7lb on my scale, checked my scale with 1, 2 and 10lb weights and it is spot on. By itself not a huge deal or deal breaker per se, but why is nothing ever straightforward? The weight was just one of several things that collectively add up to quite a bit more than I like to let go.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,045
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4512 Post(s)
Liked 6,385 Times
in
3,670 Posts
I weigh my bikes on a scale very similar to that. It was sold on eBay as a fish scale. I don't have a good way to hang it, so I typically just hold it and lift the bike with the hook. It doesn't stabilize to a single number that way, but I can usually figure out about more or less what it's telling me, probably within the accuracy of the scale. In addition to pounds, ounces, and kilograms, mine will tell me the weight of things in Jin. I haven't had a use for that, but I could do it if I did. Also, the ghost of my freshman college physics professor insists on reminding me that kilograms are a measure of mass, not weight.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,045
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4512 Post(s)
Liked 6,385 Times
in
3,670 Posts
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts
In addition to the method of clamping the scale in my workstand (as seen in my pictures above), I've also had success hanging it from a U-lock hanging from the stand.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,488
Mentioned: 102 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1641 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 831 Times
in
540 Posts
Yes, the scale does not lie, but you do have to get a decent enough scale, or suffer the doubts from others when you call out your bike's weight in any forum.....
Case in point, my recently finished Davidson build. I myself couldn't believe the sub 20 pound weight, considering it's a steel bike with a Brooks saddle and steel epinrpes and adpes.....but there it is,........ on my overpriced digital bike scale I just bought last summer (used to weigh my bike on a digital luggage scale)....
Case in point, my recently finished Davidson build. I myself couldn't believe the sub 20 pound weight, considering it's a steel bike with a Brooks saddle and steel epinrpes and adpes.....but there it is,........ on my overpriced digital bike scale I just bought last summer (used to weigh my bike on a digital luggage scale)....
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,672
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,990 Times
in
1,777 Posts
#25
52psi
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,015
Bikes: Schwinn Volare ('78); Raleigh Competition GS ('79)
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 802 Times
in
391 Posts
Yes, the scale does not lie, but you do have to get a decent enough scale, or suffer the doubts from others when you call out your bike's weight in any forum.....
Case in point, my recently finished Davidson build. I myself couldn't believe the sub 20 pound weight, considering it's a steel bike with a Brooks saddle and steel epinrpes and adpes.....but there it is,........ on my overpriced digital bike scale I just bought last summer (used to weigh my bike on a digital luggage scale)....
Case in point, my recently finished Davidson build. I myself couldn't believe the sub 20 pound weight, considering it's a steel bike with a Brooks saddle and steel epinrpes and adpes.....but there it is,........ on my overpriced digital bike scale I just bought last summer (used to weigh my bike on a digital luggage scale)....
__________________
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera