Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

The true weight thread

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

The true weight thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-19, 03:03 PM
  #1  
styggno1
Steel is real
Thread Starter
 
styggno1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,106

Bikes: 40 - accumulated over 40 years

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 375 Post(s)
Liked 1,083 Times in 304 Posts
The true weight thread

Bought a scale yesterday. Thought it would be fun to weigh my bikes.

Here is the 1989 Bridgestone MB-1 with a 1994 XT group except FC M563 LX cranks and "modern" Shimano M324 spd/cage pedals (filled with lead I suspect...). On the other hand it does not have a bottlecage.


styggno1 is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 03:09 PM
  #2  
mgopack42 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Los Banos, CA
Posts: 887

Bikes: 2020 Argon 18 Krypton Pro, 1985 Masi 3V Volumetrica, 3Rensho Super Record Aero, 2022 Trek District 4.

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 343 Post(s)
Liked 424 Times in 206 Posts
195? oh the bike! I have no idea, because the bike isn't the problem!
mgopack42 is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 03:13 PM
  #3  
styggno1
Steel is real
Thread Starter
 
styggno1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,106

Bikes: 40 - accumulated over 40 years

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 375 Post(s)
Liked 1,083 Times in 304 Posts
Originally Posted by mgopack42
195? oh the bike! I have no idea, because the bike isn't the problem!
Sorry - bare in mind I am not English speaking - What does your comment mean - "195?"?
styggno1 is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 03:17 PM
  #4  
Wileyone 
Senior Member
 
Wileyone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: GWN
Posts: 2,538
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 606 Times in 403 Posts
Originally Posted by styggno1
Bought a scale yesterday. Thought it would be fun to weigh my bikes.

Here is the 1989 Bridgestone MB-1 with a 1994 XT group except FC M563 LX cranks and "modern" Shimano M324 spd/cage pedals (filled with lead I suspect...). On the other hand it does not have a bottlecage.


I have the same scale. My advice would be to buy a better one. They are anything but accurate.
Wileyone is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 03:17 PM
  #5  
ksryder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,537

Bikes: yes

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1281 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 329 Posts
Originally Posted by styggno1
Sorry - bare in mind I am not English speaking - What does your comment mean - "195?"?
He's making a joke about how he weighs 195 pounds, and that the weight of the bike isn't as important because his own weight is more relevant to his overall speed.

Admittedly, it gets lost a bit in translation.

Nice Bridgestone, though. Thanks for posting!
ksryder is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 03:18 PM
  #6  
TXsailor
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Bowie Texas
Posts: 681

Bikes: Origin-8 Lactic Acid Giant Escape 2 Centurian Lemans 12 Kuwahara Tandem 1989 Ironman Expert 1988 Ironman Master

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 241 Post(s)
Liked 82 Times in 59 Posts
He means he weighs 195 lbs (88.4) Kilograms so the weight of the bike doesn't matter
TXsailor is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 03:21 PM
  #7  
Andy_K 
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times in 1,439 Posts
I weigh my bikes on a scale very similar to that. It was sold on eBay as a fish scale. I don't have a good way to hang it, so I typically just hold it and lift the bike with the hook. It doesn't stabilize to a single number that way, but I can usually figure out about more or less what it's telling me, probably within the accuracy of the scale. In addition to pounds, ounces, and kilograms, mine will tell me the weight of things in Jin. I haven't had a use for that, but I could do it if I did. Also, the ghost of my freshman college physics professor insists on reminding me that kilograms are a measure of mass, not weight.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 03:21 PM
  #8  
trailangel
Senior Member
 
trailangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 4,848

Bikes: Schwinn Varsity

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1931 Post(s)
Liked 742 Times in 422 Posts
Those pedals are good but heavy.... steel cages.
Those who post the weight of their bikes without a picture with the scale... well, they are liars.
trailangel is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 03:23 PM
  #9  
styggno1
Steel is real
Thread Starter
 
styggno1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,106

Bikes: 40 - accumulated over 40 years

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 375 Post(s)
Liked 1,083 Times in 304 Posts
Originally Posted by TXsailor
He means he weighs 195 lbs (88.4) Kilograms so the weight of the bike doesn't matter
Aha! Thanks. Well I am well over 90 kg... I am not weighing my vintage bikes because it would matter in any perfomance kind of way. I do it because 1 - It is fun to know and 2 - there are a lot of fantasy weight quotes floating around on the net.
styggno1 is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 03:26 PM
  #10  
Andy_K 
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by Wileyone
I have the same scale. My advice would be to buy a better one. They are anything but accurate.
But it's very precise.

I kind of look at this like I do the pressure gauge on my pump. As long as it's consistent, I'm happy. I can weigh a new bike and know which of my other bikes are about the same weight. Usually all of them, +/- 2 pounds. Within that range I don't think weight is even the dominant factor in the way the ride of the bike feels.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 03:34 PM
  #11  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy_K
I weigh my bikes on a scale very similar to that. It was sold on eBay as a fish scale. I don't have a good way to hang it, so I typically just hold it and lift the bike with the hook. It doesn't stabilize to a single number that way, but I can usually figure out about more or less what it's telling me, probably within the accuracy of the scale. In addition to pounds, ounces, and kilograms, mine will tell me the weight of things in Jin. I haven't had a use for that, but I could do it if I did. Also, the ghost of my freshman college physics professor insists on reminding me that kilograms are a measure of mass, not weight.
I don't see the problem. Stygg's scale says 12.18, and it is reasonable to assume it is indicating kilograms. The conversion factor for kilograms (mass) to pounds (force) is 2.2 kg per pound. The calculation of that factor includes the conversion from mass to force. The necessary factor is the acceleration due to gravity, which is usually considered a standard value. Multiply 2.2 times 12.18. So the resulting weight of Stygg's mountain bike is 26.8 pounds, which is certainly plausible for a mountain bike.

Again, I don't see a problem. It seems to be a 27# bicycle.

What kind of errors are we worried about, and are they large enough to challenge this answer for any practical purpose?
Road Fan is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 03:35 PM
  #12  
styggno1
Steel is real
Thread Starter
 
styggno1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,106

Bikes: 40 - accumulated over 40 years

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 375 Post(s)
Liked 1,083 Times in 304 Posts
I will check my scale for accuracy.

Here is another frame+fork i did today:
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...l#post20729554

Cannot be that far off.

PS - please do not make this thread about performance. It is not.
PS II of course it is kilograms - I am European.

Last edited by styggno1; 01-02-19 at 03:39 PM.
styggno1 is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 03:39 PM
  #13  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,471 Times in 1,435 Posts
I have that same scale. I wonder how accurate it is. It seems very cheap.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 03:40 PM
  #14  
Andy_K 
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by trailangel
Those who post the weight of their bikes without a picture with the scale... well, they are liars.
I thought I had a picture in my Flickr stream. Here's what I found.



What? I should have shown the bike in the picture too? Well, it's too late for that now. It was this one.



Non-vintage bike for comparison. I did it again.



But trust me, it was this one.

__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 03:48 PM
  #15  
Andy_K 
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by Road Fan
I don't see the problem. Stygg's scale says 12.18, and it is reasonable to assume it is indicating kilograms. The conversion factor for kilograms (mass) to pounds (force) is 2.2 kg per pound. The calculation of that factor includes the conversion from mass to force. The necessary factor is the acceleration due to gravity, which is usually considered a standard value.
There's your problem. The acceleration due to gravity is not constant. It varies based on location. On the moon, for instance, that's still a 12.18 kg bike, but it's weight would only be about 4.5 pounds. Even just taking it to Mexico City would drop the weight to about 26.7 pounds. BTW, it is clear that I was joking, right?
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 03:54 PM
  #16  
nomadmax 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 2,397
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1104 Post(s)
Liked 1,825 Times in 878 Posts
Anybody have any experience with the Park Tool hanging scale? I'm thinking of getting one.
nomadmax is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 03:55 PM
  #17  
styggno1
Steel is real
Thread Starter
 
styggno1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,106

Bikes: 40 - accumulated over 40 years

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 375 Post(s)
Liked 1,083 Times in 304 Posts
Haha! Next bike I weigh I will let you know both pounds and Kg. So you who are stuck in medieval times can relate...

I am really curious on some of the bikes - the Masi/Ferretti/Monark (with a lot of light stuff and tricks) and the Merckx MX Leader with modern Super Record 11. They feel light but it could just be my wishful thinking/feeling.

Last edited by styggno1; 01-02-19 at 03:58 PM.
styggno1 is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 03:55 PM
  #18  
merziac
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,045

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4512 Post(s)
Liked 6,385 Times in 3,670 Posts
This all brings up a good point, I have a Berkley fish scale I use. Got a frame the seller was very detailed with the weight of, 4lb 12.7 oz frame and 1lb 8.8oz fork = 6lb 5.5oz total on his "Postal scale". Frame came and weighs 7lb on my scale, checked my scale with 1, 2 and 10lb weights and it is spot on. By itself not a huge deal or deal breaker per se, but why is nothing ever straightforward? The weight was just one of several things that collectively add up to quite a bit more than I like to let go.
merziac is online now  
Old 01-02-19, 04:07 PM
  #19  
merziac
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,045

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4512 Post(s)
Liked 6,385 Times in 3,670 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy_K
I weigh my bikes on a scale very similar to that. It was sold on eBay as a fish scale. I don't have a good way to hang it, so I typically just hold it and lift the bike with the hook. It doesn't stabilize to a single number that way, but I can usually figure out about more or less what it's telling me, probably within the accuracy of the scale. In addition to pounds, ounces, and kilograms, mine will tell me the weight of things in Jin. I haven't had a use for that, but I could do it if I did. Also, the ghost of my freshman college physics professor insists on reminding me that kilograms are a measure of mass, not weight.
Screw an eye bolt into a stud in the garage ceiling, loop of rope, zip ties, wire to adjust drop with a carabiner so you can move the scale.
merziac is online now  
Old 01-02-19, 04:10 PM
  #20  
merziac
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,045

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4512 Post(s)
Liked 6,385 Times in 3,670 Posts
Originally Posted by nomadmax
Anybody have any experience with the Park Tool hanging scale? I'm thinking of getting one.
No experience, they should be good for the $$$. I think a fishing scale should be fine, mine is spot on after years of use and was very cheap when I bought it.
merziac is online now  
Old 01-02-19, 04:44 PM
  #21  
Wileyone 
Senior Member
 
Wileyone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: GWN
Posts: 2,538
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 606 Times in 403 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
I have that same scale. I wonder how accurate it is. It seems very cheap.
Yes I paid 6 bucks for mine they are cheap. I can weigh the same bike 3 times and weight can vary as much as a kilo and a half.
Wileyone is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 04:49 PM
  #22  
Andy_K 
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by merziac
Screw an eye bolt into a stud in the garage ceiling, loop of rope, zip ties, wire to adjust drop with a carabiner so you can move the scale.
In addition to the method of clamping the scale in my workstand (as seen in my pictures above), I've also had success hanging it from a U-lock hanging from the stand.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 05:56 PM
  #23  
Chombi1 
Senior Member
 
Chombi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,488
Mentioned: 102 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1641 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 831 Times in 540 Posts
Yes, the scale does not lie, but you do have to get a decent enough scale, or suffer the doubts from others when you call out your bike's weight in any forum.....

Case in point, my recently finished Davidson build. I myself couldn't believe the sub 20 pound weight, considering it's a steel bike with a Brooks saddle and steel epinrpes and adpes.....but there it is,........ on my overpriced digital bike scale I just bought last summer (used to weigh my bike on a digital luggage scale)....
Chombi1 is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 07:45 PM
  #24  
jamesdak 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,672

Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,

Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,990 Times in 1,777 Posts
Originally Posted by trailangel
Those pedals are good but heavy.... steel cages.
Those who post the weight of their bikes without a picture with the scale... well, they are liars.




__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
jamesdak is offline  
Old 01-02-19, 08:12 PM
  #25  
Fahrenheit531 
52psi
 
Fahrenheit531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,015

Bikes: Schwinn Volare ('78); Raleigh Competition GS ('79)

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 802 Times in 391 Posts
Originally Posted by Chombi1
Yes, the scale does not lie, but you do have to get a decent enough scale, or suffer the doubts from others when you call out your bike's weight in any forum.....

Case in point, my recently finished Davidson build. I myself couldn't believe the sub 20 pound weight, considering it's a steel bike with a Brooks saddle and steel epinrpes and adpes.....but there it is,........ on my overpriced digital bike scale I just bought last summer (used to weigh my bike on a digital luggage scale)....
HAHAHAHA due to the reflection I kept reading that as 13.89 lbs and thought this a supremely clever joke post. Was trying to figure out what might really be hanging on there, just out of frame. My favorite was a big ol' fish.
__________________
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
Fahrenheit531 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.