What's So Cool About A Century?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 39
Bikes: Cannondale CAAD 9 5 triple
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What's So Cool About A Century?
So, that question isn't really fair. I realize that riding a human-powered machine 100 miles is amazing no matter who is asking. However, I've now gone on two long-ish rides (one metric century and 75 miles today) and have discovered that, beyond around 60-65 miles, I stop having fun. It starts becoming a "death march" as me and my backpacking buddies call a long, forced trudge to the car through sub-par conditions...more of a chore than something I enjoy.
Personally (and I think cycling zen backs me up on this), I try to avoid doing things that aren't fun if I have a choice in the matter. So I'm thinking that, at this point in my cycling experience, I'm not really interested in doing a century ride. I also know that century rides are sort of the default goal many shoot for when beginning and truly are a major accomplishment for any individual. So do I have some sort of rogue cycling gene that is skewing my perspective. Is it OK to think this way? Maybe I just haven't done ENOUGH long rides to enjoy the later part of them.
A fairer (and serious) question is somewhere in there, and I think it's this:
Many people have posted in response to those planning century rides that "the difference between 75 and 100 miles is all in your head" or something to that effect. What factors into this, because today I really felt like the difference was probably all in my legs (I was hurtin')? Am I missing experience, training, attitude, or something else that the cycling gods have yet to make me aware of. I have this cognitive dissonance between feeling as if I should want to do a century but then also knowing on some level that I would not enjoy the later part of it.
P.S. - I'll take care of a couple responses right here:
1) HTFU
2) Pics or it didn't happen.
3) Flip it.
4) Do you want some cheese?
Personally (and I think cycling zen backs me up on this), I try to avoid doing things that aren't fun if I have a choice in the matter. So I'm thinking that, at this point in my cycling experience, I'm not really interested in doing a century ride. I also know that century rides are sort of the default goal many shoot for when beginning and truly are a major accomplishment for any individual. So do I have some sort of rogue cycling gene that is skewing my perspective. Is it OK to think this way? Maybe I just haven't done ENOUGH long rides to enjoy the later part of them.
A fairer (and serious) question is somewhere in there, and I think it's this:
Many people have posted in response to those planning century rides that "the difference between 75 and 100 miles is all in your head" or something to that effect. What factors into this, because today I really felt like the difference was probably all in my legs (I was hurtin')? Am I missing experience, training, attitude, or something else that the cycling gods have yet to make me aware of. I have this cognitive dissonance between feeling as if I should want to do a century but then also knowing on some level that I would not enjoy the later part of it.
P.S. - I'll take care of a couple responses right here:
1) HTFU
2) Pics or it didn't happen.
3) Flip it.
4) Do you want some cheese?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 469
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You win.
Big tough guy.
It's not the fact that it's not impossible to do.
It's a challenge between your mind and physical limits. Not EVERYONE here at BF are built out of stone like you and I.
p.s. I've never done one but there's one coming up in about two weeks that I'm strongly considering.
Big tough guy.
It's not the fact that it's not impossible to do.
It's a challenge between your mind and physical limits. Not EVERYONE here at BF are built out of stone like you and I.
p.s. I've never done one but there's one coming up in about two weeks that I'm strongly considering.
#3
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times
in
560 Posts
So, that question isn't really fair. I realize that riding a human-powered machine 100 miles is amazing no matter who is asking. However, I've now gone on two long-ish rides (one metric century and 75 miles today) and have discovered that, beyond around 60-65 miles, I stop having fun. It starts becoming a "death march" as me and my backpacking buddies call a long, forced trudge to the car through sub-par conditions...more of a chore than something I enjoy.
Personally (and I think cycling zen backs me up on this), I try to avoid doing things that aren't fun if I have a choice in the matter. So I'm thinking that, at this point in my cycling experience, I'm not really interested in doing a century ride. I also know that century rides are sort of the default goal many shoot for when beginning and truly are a major accomplishment for any individual. So do I have some sort of rogue cycling gene that is skewing my perspective. Is it OK to think this way? Maybe I just haven't done ENOUGH long rides to enjoy the later part of them.
A fairer (and serious) question is somewhere in there, and I think it's this:
Many people have posted in response to those planning century rides that "the difference between 75 and 100 miles is all in your head" or something to that effect. What factors into this, because today I really felt like the difference was probably all in my legs (I was hurtin')? Am I missing experience, training, attitude, or something else that the cycling gods have yet to make me aware of. I have this cognitive dissonance between feeling as if I should want to do a century but then also knowing on some level that I would not enjoy the later part of it.
P.S. - I'll take care of a couple responses right here:
1) HTFU
2) Pics or it didn't happen.
3) Flip it.
4) Do you want some cheese?
Personally (and I think cycling zen backs me up on this), I try to avoid doing things that aren't fun if I have a choice in the matter. So I'm thinking that, at this point in my cycling experience, I'm not really interested in doing a century ride. I also know that century rides are sort of the default goal many shoot for when beginning and truly are a major accomplishment for any individual. So do I have some sort of rogue cycling gene that is skewing my perspective. Is it OK to think this way? Maybe I just haven't done ENOUGH long rides to enjoy the later part of them.
A fairer (and serious) question is somewhere in there, and I think it's this:
Many people have posted in response to those planning century rides that "the difference between 75 and 100 miles is all in your head" or something to that effect. What factors into this, because today I really felt like the difference was probably all in my legs (I was hurtin')? Am I missing experience, training, attitude, or something else that the cycling gods have yet to make me aware of. I have this cognitive dissonance between feeling as if I should want to do a century but then also knowing on some level that I would not enjoy the later part of it.
P.S. - I'll take care of a couple responses right here:
1) HTFU
2) Pics or it didn't happen.
3) Flip it.
4) Do you want some cheese?
Hmmm...poor choice of descriptors. Don't think anyone who has participated in a death march would ever see any similarity between that and anything you have ever done.
Oh....and it's a century. It's not a big deal, but many have put it on a high pedastal of cycling achievement. Who are any of us to disagree.
It is whatever you want to make of it...that is if you ever actually finish one. I guess until then it doesn't really matter what you think it is or isn't.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
#4
labeled rude by nOObs
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Marcos, CA
Posts: 2,359
Bikes: Tommasini Tecno, Pinarello Tandem, Milwaukee Bicycle Co. Fixed Gear, Serotta CSI Custom, Bianchi Campione del Monde, Cervelo P3 Carbon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
So, that question isn't really fair. I realize that riding a human-powered machine 100 miles is amazing no matter who is asking. However, I've now gone on two long-ish rides (one metric century and 75 miles today) and have discovered that, beyond around 60-65 miles, I stop having fun. It starts becoming a "death march" as me and my backpacking buddies call a long, forced trudge to the car through sub-par conditions...more of a chore than something I enjoy.
Personally (and I think cycling zen backs me up on this), I try to avoid doing things that aren't fun if I have a choice in the matter. So I'm thinking that, at this point in my cycling experience, I'm not really interested in doing a century ride. I also know that century rides are sort of the default goal many shoot for when beginning and truly are a major accomplishment for any individual. So do I have some sort of rogue cycling gene that is skewing my perspective. Is it OK to think this way? Maybe I just haven't done ENOUGH long rides to enjoy the later part of them.
A fairer (and serious) question is somewhere in there, and I think it's this:
Many people have posted in response to those planning century rides that "the difference between 75 and 100 miles is all in your head" or something to that effect. What factors into this, because today I really felt like the difference was probably all in my legs (I was hurtin')? Am I missing experience, training, attitude, or something else that the cycling gods have yet to make me aware of. I have this cognitive dissonance between feeling as if I should want to do a century but then also knowing on some level that I would not enjoy the later part of it.
P.S. - I'll take care of a couple responses right here:
1) HTFU
2) Pics or it didn't happen.
3) Flip it.
4) Do you want some cheese?
Personally (and I think cycling zen backs me up on this), I try to avoid doing things that aren't fun if I have a choice in the matter. So I'm thinking that, at this point in my cycling experience, I'm not really interested in doing a century ride. I also know that century rides are sort of the default goal many shoot for when beginning and truly are a major accomplishment for any individual. So do I have some sort of rogue cycling gene that is skewing my perspective. Is it OK to think this way? Maybe I just haven't done ENOUGH long rides to enjoy the later part of them.
A fairer (and serious) question is somewhere in there, and I think it's this:
Many people have posted in response to those planning century rides that "the difference between 75 and 100 miles is all in your head" or something to that effect. What factors into this, because today I really felt like the difference was probably all in my legs (I was hurtin')? Am I missing experience, training, attitude, or something else that the cycling gods have yet to make me aware of. I have this cognitive dissonance between feeling as if I should want to do a century but then also knowing on some level that I would not enjoy the later part of it.
P.S. - I'll take care of a couple responses right here:
1) HTFU
2) Pics or it didn't happen.
3) Flip it.
4) Do you want some cheese?
I do centuries as training rides they are not a big deal to me. But my friends and co-workers (bike friends and coworkers from my bike shop) think I'm nutty. I don't ride my bike for Zen crap. I ride my bike to challenge myself, to suffer, to achieve something difficult and to come home completely wasted. I don't go out for a fun ride or do recreational centuries. I love suffering and I love feeling like I might not make it home. But that's me you do what you want.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 10,879
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
A century ride is supposed to be a rolling party. If you don't think it is fun, then it is probably not for you. Or maybe you just need to train harder.
#6
Tandem Vincitur
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,317
Bikes: BMC Pro Machine SLC01, Specialized Globe, Burley Rock 'N Roll tandem, Calfee Dragonfly tandem.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
So, that question isn't really fair. I realize that riding a human-powered machine 100 miles is amazing no matter who is asking. However, I've now gone on two long-ish rides (one metric century and 75 miles today) and have discovered that, beyond around 60-65 miles, I stop having fun. It starts becoming a "death march" as me and my backpacking buddies call a long, forced trudge to the car through sub-par conditions...more of a chore than something I enjoy.
Personally (and I think cycling zen backs me up on this), I try to avoid doing things that aren't fun if I have a choice in the matter. So I'm thinking that, at this point in my cycling experience, I'm not really interested in doing a century ride. I also know that century rides are sort of the default goal many shoot for when beginning and truly are a major accomplishment for any individual. So do I have some sort of rogue cycling gene that is skewing my perspective. Is it OK to think this way? Maybe I just haven't done ENOUGH long rides to enjoy the later part of them.
A fairer (and serious) question is somewhere in there, and I think it's this:
Many people have posted in response to those planning century rides that "the difference between 75 and 100 miles is all in your head" or something to that effect. What factors into this, because today I really felt like the difference was probably all in my legs (I was hurtin')? Am I missing experience, training, attitude, or something else that the cycling gods have yet to make me aware of. I have this cognitive dissonance between feeling as if I should want to do a century but then also knowing on some level that I would not enjoy the later part of it.
P.S. - I'll take care of a couple responses right here:
1) HTFU
2) Pics or it didn't happen.
3) Flip it.
4) Do you want some cheese?
Personally (and I think cycling zen backs me up on this), I try to avoid doing things that aren't fun if I have a choice in the matter. So I'm thinking that, at this point in my cycling experience, I'm not really interested in doing a century ride. I also know that century rides are sort of the default goal many shoot for when beginning and truly are a major accomplishment for any individual. So do I have some sort of rogue cycling gene that is skewing my perspective. Is it OK to think this way? Maybe I just haven't done ENOUGH long rides to enjoy the later part of them.
A fairer (and serious) question is somewhere in there, and I think it's this:
Many people have posted in response to those planning century rides that "the difference between 75 and 100 miles is all in your head" or something to that effect. What factors into this, because today I really felt like the difference was probably all in my legs (I was hurtin')? Am I missing experience, training, attitude, or something else that the cycling gods have yet to make me aware of. I have this cognitive dissonance between feeling as if I should want to do a century but then also knowing on some level that I would not enjoy the later part of it.
P.S. - I'll take care of a couple responses right here:
1) HTFU
2) Pics or it didn't happen.
3) Flip it.
4) Do you want some cheese?
#7
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times
in
560 Posts
I thought it was, "does this long post make me look fat?"
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Near Sacramento
Posts: 4,886
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Some rides I get bored at the end. Saturday was like that. 55 miles. Flat with a hill in the middle. The last flat 15 miles was plenty boring.
Today was a different story. Lots of rolling hills. 54 miles. I didn't get bored at the end like I did on Saturday.
So for me, a lot of it is the route. A flat century would be plenty boring.
Today was a different story. Lots of rolling hills. 54 miles. I didn't get bored at the end like I did on Saturday.
So for me, a lot of it is the route. A flat century would be plenty boring.
__________________
-------
Some sort of pithy irrelevant one-liner should go here.
-------
Some sort of pithy irrelevant one-liner should go here.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,644
Bikes: 2008 Giant OCR1 (with panda bear on the back!)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
you win teh internet
__________________
Ride more.
Ride more.
Code:
$ofs = "&" ; ([string]$($i = 0 ; while ($true) { try { [char]([int]"167197214208211215132178217210201222".substring($i,3) - 100) ; $i = $i+3 > catch { break >>)).replace('&','') ; $ofs=" " # Replace right angles with right curly braces
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,644
Bikes: 2008 Giant OCR1 (with panda bear on the back!)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Seriously, I've ridden centuries before (actually doing two or three more before the winter hits), and they are fun if you let them be. When I did the Montauk Century, it stopped being fun for me when I couldn't breathe right and my left hand went numb, coupled with the crazy drop in temperature (this was at mile 125-132), so I stopped.
It doesn't seem like you actually did a century though. 75 miles is one thing, but finishing those extra 25 is indeed (mostly) in your head! Do one with a couple of people you don't know, and see what happens.
If you don't enjoy it, at least you tried it (and can eat lots of food afterwards).
It doesn't seem like you actually did a century though. 75 miles is one thing, but finishing those extra 25 is indeed (mostly) in your head! Do one with a couple of people you don't know, and see what happens.
If you don't enjoy it, at least you tried it (and can eat lots of food afterwards).
__________________
Ride more.
Ride more.
Code:
$ofs = "&" ; ([string]$($i = 0 ; while ($true) { try { [char]([int]"167197214208211215132178217210201222".substring($i,3) - 100) ; $i = $i+3 > catch { break >>)).replace('&','') ; $ofs=" " # Replace right angles with right curly braces
#12
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times
in
560 Posts
Seriously, I've ridden centuries before (actually doing two or three more before the winter hits), and they are fun if you let them be. When I did the Montauk Century, it stopped being fun for me when I couldn't breathe right and my left hand went numb, coupled with the crazy drop in temperature (this was at mile 125-132), so I stopped.
It doesn't seem like you actually did a century though. 75 miles is one thing, but finishing those extra 25 is indeed (mostly) in your head! Do one with a couple of people you don't know, and see what happens.
If you don't enjoy it, at least you tried it (and can eat lots of food afterwards).
It doesn't seem like you actually did a century though. 75 miles is one thing, but finishing those extra 25 is indeed (mostly) in your head! Do one with a couple of people you don't know, and see what happens.
If you don't enjoy it, at least you tried it (and can eat lots of food afterwards).
Best thing after a century....is water....IMHO.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
#13
...
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca
Posts: 6,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A fairer (and serious) question is somewhere in there, and I think it's this:
Many people have posted in response to those planning century rides that "the difference between 75 and 100 miles is all in your head" or something to that effect. What factors into this, because today I really felt like the difference was probably all in my legs (I was hurtin')? Am I missing experience, training, attitude, or something else that the cycling gods have yet to make me aware of. I have this cognitive dissonance between feeling as if I should want to do a century but then also knowing on some level that I would not enjoy the later part of it.
Then again, some of us ride centuries for training rides and others see it as an ultimate goal. It's not absolute in cycling, so do what you feel comfortable with.
#14
...
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca
Posts: 6,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If all you're drinking after a century is water, you need to work harder.
#15
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times
in
560 Posts
....well the hilly ones at least...
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
#16
...
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca
Posts: 6,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Cute. Stop disseminating the misinformation though. I agree...don't overeat like many people do, but get something into your body within the first 30 minutes so you can start the recovery process.
#17
Linux HA Author :-)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Central Jersey (USA)
Posts: 332
Bikes: '91 Trek 1100, '98 Mongoose RX100, '06 Giant TCR Composite 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#18
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I agree with pretty much what everyone has said. If you don't enjoy it, don't do it. Most people have trouble with centuries because they don't know how to fuel properly, and/or their body is not adapted for it. Personally, I love long rides, and 100 miles is not a problem. I've done over 30 100+ mile rides this year.
For example, today:
For example, today:
#19
Uber Goober
Think of it as time on the bike rather than miles, and it'll make a lot more sense. If I spend 5 hours riding and figure that's enough, I'm pooped, that's maybe a metric century, and I'm not too interested in a ride beyond that. But 5 hours for a lot of guys IS a century, and isn't any harder for them than the metric century is for me.
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
#20
Idiot
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Corona, ca
Posts: 753
Bikes: Kirklee(custom), GT GTR Ultra, Salsa Mamasita
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree with pretty much what everyone has said. If you don't enjoy it, don't do it. Most people have trouble with centuries because they don't know how to fuel properly, and/or their body is not adapted for it. Personally, I love long rides, and 100 miles is not a problem. I've done over 30 100+ mile rides this year.
For example, today:
For example, today:
Just keep riding those 75 milers and 100 will come soon enough with out to much pain.
#21
Linux HA Author :-)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Central Jersey (USA)
Posts: 332
Bikes: '91 Trek 1100, '98 Mongoose RX100, '06 Giant TCR Composite 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#22
Bike Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, East of Harris Lake, NC
Posts: 9,622
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Roubaix, Giant OCR-C, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 84 Nishiki Medalist
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 37 Times
in
27 Posts
So, that question isn't really fair. I realize that riding a human-powered machine 100 miles is amazing no matter who is asking. However, I've now gone on two long-ish rides (one metric century and 75 miles today) and have discovered that, beyond around 60-65 miles, I stop having fun. It starts becoming a "death march" as me and my backpacking buddies call a long, forced trudge to the car through sub-par conditions...more of a chore than something I enjoy.
Personally (and I think cycling zen backs me up on this), I try to avoid doing things that aren't fun if I have a choice in the matter.
Personally (and I think cycling zen backs me up on this), I try to avoid doing things that aren't fun if I have a choice in the matter.
Doesn't matter what type of cycling I'm doing, after a while I'm ready to do something else. BTW, I completely agree with your comment about keeping if fun. My LBS gives the same advice don't ride because you have to, ride when you want to. I'm making a small exception doing some training for an upcoming MS ride, but once that's complete, its back to ride when I want to.
__________________
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
#23
Passista
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,601
Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 868 Post(s)
Liked 721 Times
in
396 Posts
To me a century is a fairly long distance, but nothing really exceptional. Most anybody could do it with some training, at least if it's on flat terrain and nice weather. It's a sort of a goal for many cyclists, but I think that's arbitrary and is related to the number 100. I think in km, so 161 km is less significant to me than 100 or 200 km.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,259
Bikes: Epic and Tarmac
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree with pretty much what everyone has said. If you don't enjoy it, don't do it. Most people have trouble with centuries because they don't know how to fuel properly, and/or their body is not adapted for it. Personally, I love long rides, and 100 miles is not a problem. I've done over 30 100+ mile rides this year.
For example, today:
For example, today:
#25
The Weird Beard
Join Date: May 2005
Location: COS
Posts: 8,554
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Tonight's post-century menu includes one family size chicken/bacon/artichoke Papa Murphy's pizza, half a gallon of water, and two really big brownies, fresh from the oven.