Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fifty Plus (50+)
Reload this Page >

Tubless Tires vs. Clinchers

Search
Notices
Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

Tubless Tires vs. Clinchers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-22-13, 08:42 AM
  #1  
Planemaker
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita, KS.
Posts: 861
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 5 Posts
Tubless Tires vs. Clinchers

LBS suggested after I wear out the clincher tires on my new bike that I consider tubeless tires (the wheelset is tubeless ready).

What are your thought?
Planemaker is offline  
Old 09-22-13, 09:46 AM
  #2  
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 364 Posts
My son used to run tubeless tires on his road bike but I don't know if he's still using them or not. I'll have a better answer for you later today.

Whatever his answer is, keep in mind that we live in St Louis which is out of the goat head thorn belt so we puncture nearly as frequently as some other folks. I'd think that frequency of punctures would be a big factor in that decision.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Old 09-22-13, 10:20 AM
  #3  
Looigi
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Yes. IMO you should give tubeless thorough and thoughtful consideration, then stick with tubes.
Looigi is offline  
Old 09-22-13, 12:50 PM
  #4  
mprelaw
Senior Member
 
mprelaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,318
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Watching a guy repair a tubeless flat on a group ride kind of soured me on the idea. Sealant all over him and the bike, and the real joy was watching him seat the tire back on the rim with a temporary tube inside. There was a pretty good gash in the tire. He booted it to get it back to the shop (it was a shop sponsored group ride) but methinks the tire was toast.

But they do have some advantages, so weigh the pros and cons carefully. Flats will still happen eventually. And I'm sure that as is the case with clinchers, some tubeless go on the rim easier than others.
mprelaw is offline  
Old 09-22-13, 02:13 PM
  #5  
Dunbar
Senior Member
 
Dunbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,078

Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
IMO, tubeless w/ sealant are good if you get a lot of puncture flats. Otherwise, the best clincher tires are better than the best tubeless tires and wide rims will allow one to get a similar ride quality on clinchers.
Dunbar is offline  
Old 09-22-13, 04:32 PM
  #6  
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 364 Posts
My son has used them on his mountain bike for years. The faster and harder you mountain bike, the more apt you are to pinch flat. No tube means the tube can't pinch flat.

A few years ago he started using Stans on his road bike. He says he's not using tubeless right now but his next set of tires he's going back. He likes being able to run lower air pressures for better ride quality. He says the downside is that if you get a big enough puncture the sealent will seal it up initially but it unseals if you hit a bump.

Hope you find his experience useful.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Old 09-23-13, 06:59 AM
  #7  
Artmo 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 1,673

Bikes: '06 Bianchi Pista; '57 Maclean; '10 Scott CR1 Pro; 2005 Trek 2000 Tandem; '09 Comotion Macchiato Tandem; 199? Novara Road; '17 Circe Helios e-tandem:1994 Trek 2300

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Liked 93 Times in 61 Posts
No personal experience, but a guy I ride with who does 300 mi per week (I don't) had them on his new Trek Domane for a few weeks, but had nothing but problems, so he's back to tubes.
Artmo is offline  
Old 09-23-13, 07:02 AM
  #8  
jolly_ross
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've used both extensively and have no religious affiliation with either. Tubeless is about as much total maintenance time as tubes - the difference is that mostly you choose where and when you do it. I choose in my warm workshop (as opposed to changing tubes beside the road in the p!ssing down rain). You still need to carry a tube because sometimes you will get a puncture too big for the sealant to heal - this is rare, messy, and not the end of the world. When it happens, all the tube users who are with you will snort and howl with glee - this is terribly unfair because when you get little thorn punctures that seal themselves as you ride along, it is completely unknown to them (and maybe even you).
jolly_ross is offline  
Old 09-23-13, 07:04 AM
  #9  
mkane77g
Senior Member
 
mkane77g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 712
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Running tubeless since they were introduced. I'll never go back to tubes.
mkane77g is offline  
Old 09-23-13, 10:35 AM
  #10  
Old_Roadie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Southern California
Posts: 64

Bikes: 2009 Specialized Roubaix Pro - Ultegra Drive train - Dura Ave 7900 C24 TLs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have about 10,000 miles on tubeless. I have had one flat where I had to install a tube and one puncture that the tire sealed with sealant.

I have used Hutchinson Fusion 3 and Schwalbe Ultremo ZX Tubeless The Schwalbe's are easier to install, the Fusions seem to wear a bit better. I do prefer the Ultremo ZX, for what it’s worth.

There are definite advantages in ride quality with tubeless, at least for me. And one flat in 10,000 miles ain't bad.
But it is more work and requires more maintenance. Be aware that the sealant will dry out. My experience is Caffe Latex dries out in around 4 weeks so you need to check it.
I bought a Kool-Stop Tire Bead Jack, cut the handle down so it fits in the seat pack, and I find it to be very helpful installing tubeless tires. It was especially helpful with the one flat I had on the road. I was at mile 63 of a 75 mile wide on a very windy day and was so glad I had it. I have installed tubeless by hand but was glad I had the tire jack that day.
My advice would to be - do your research and give it a try.

[h=1][/h]
Old_Roadie is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Iride01
Bicycle Mechanics
28
07-18-19 05:59 PM
yannisg
Bicycle Mechanics
19
03-06-19 04:41 PM
tsappenfield
Bicycle Mechanics
3
02-19-18 12:40 AM
Planemaker
Road Cycling
24
12-13-13 10:41 PM
jesseh627
Fifty Plus (50+)
20
08-06-13 10:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.