Quick release vs. bolt axle
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 522
Bikes: Downtube IX NS&FS, Dahon Speed8Pro/Matrix/Curve, Brom S2L,Montague Para, ICE-XL w/Rollie/Schlumpf, Trident Spike, ebikes, BFSatRDay
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 172 Post(s)
Liked 95 Times
in
81 Posts
Quick release vs. bolt axle
This is probably necro as hell, but to be honest I couldn't find any information on the topic.
A friend had a hub fail and I started rethinking a lot of my assumptions, and this was one.
As I use more IGH I am reassessing my use of bolt on axles. I know with the new Thru-Axle tech that this is even more archaic , but still interesting.
Bolt ons were the hallmark for a while of cheap bikes, and this skewed (sorry) the attitude towards the bikes they were on and prolly prejudiced them towards failure/ out of spec, as they were possibly low end and price sensitive items.
Yes , QR are easier to swap, but if I need to change a tire, I need tools and a pump, so a dogbone or other light wrench isn't hard to toss in, and I may have IGH that need a wrench, anyway.
Bolt ons are not as purdy, but is there much weight differential, and bearing issues in the non race world?
I understand that cargo bikes and fixies also have a preference for bolt ons, but are they just sort of farkle, like reduced spoke hubs? with 32 spokes and a solid axle being stronger, without much of a weight penalty.
I don't have any weight comparisons, if that is felt to add to the issue, but low and central non revolving weight is probably a factor that doesn't detract much for bolt ons.
I was looking at some hubs that may have a longer life , being left as they are.
Thanks
A friend had a hub fail and I started rethinking a lot of my assumptions, and this was one.
As I use more IGH I am reassessing my use of bolt on axles. I know with the new Thru-Axle tech that this is even more archaic , but still interesting.
Bolt ons were the hallmark for a while of cheap bikes, and this skewed (sorry) the attitude towards the bikes they were on and prolly prejudiced them towards failure/ out of spec, as they were possibly low end and price sensitive items.
Yes , QR are easier to swap, but if I need to change a tire, I need tools and a pump, so a dogbone or other light wrench isn't hard to toss in, and I may have IGH that need a wrench, anyway.
Bolt ons are not as purdy, but is there much weight differential, and bearing issues in the non race world?
I understand that cargo bikes and fixies also have a preference for bolt ons, but are they just sort of farkle, like reduced spoke hubs? with 32 spokes and a solid axle being stronger, without much of a weight penalty.
I don't have any weight comparisons, if that is felt to add to the issue, but low and central non revolving weight is probably a factor that doesn't detract much for bolt ons.
I was looking at some hubs that may have a longer life , being left as they are.
Thanks
Last edited by bikebikebike; 03-08-20 at 12:12 PM.
#2
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,463 Times
in
1,433 Posts
As you are noticing, a lot of this is a matter of style or preference rather than real difference. I prefer quick release but so what. And it's not practical for every type of hub, certainly IGH. Needing one fewer tool is definitely nice but not a deal breaker.
Quick release hubs are not less durable however.
Quick release hubs are not less durable however.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,071
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4199 Post(s)
Liked 3,851 Times
in
2,301 Posts
This is probably necro as hell, but to be honest I couldn't find any information on the topic.
A friend had a hub fail and I started rethinking a lot of my assumptions, and this was one.
As I use more IGH I am reassessing my use of bolt on axles. I know with the new Thru-Axle tech that this is even more archaic , but still interesting.
Bolt ons were the hallmark for a while of cheap bikes, and this skewed (sorry) the attitude towards the bikes they were on and prolly prejudiced them towards failure/ out of spec, as they were possibly low end and price sensitive items.
Yes , QR are easier to swap, but if I need to change a tire, I need tools and a pump, so a dogbone or other light wrench isn't hard to toss in, and I may have IGH that need a wrench, anyway.
Bolt ons are not as purdy, but is there much weight differential, and bearing issues in the non race world?
I understand that cargo bikes and fixies also have a preference for bolt ons, but are they just sort of farkle, like reduced spoke hubs? with 32 spokes and a solid axle being stronger, without much of a weight penalty.
I don't have any weight comparisons, if that is felt to add to the issue, but low and central non revolving weight is probably a factor that doesn't detract much for bolt ons.
I was looking at some hubs that may have a longer life , being left as they are.
Thanks
A friend had a hub fail and I started rethinking a lot of my assumptions, and this was one.
As I use more IGH I am reassessing my use of bolt on axles. I know with the new Thru-Axle tech that this is even more archaic , but still interesting.
Bolt ons were the hallmark for a while of cheap bikes, and this skewed (sorry) the attitude towards the bikes they were on and prolly prejudiced them towards failure/ out of spec, as they were possibly low end and price sensitive items.
Yes , QR are easier to swap, but if I need to change a tire, I need tools and a pump, so a dogbone or other light wrench isn't hard to toss in, and I may have IGH that need a wrench, anyway.
Bolt ons are not as purdy, but is there much weight differential, and bearing issues in the non race world?
I understand that cargo bikes and fixies also have a preference for bolt ons, but are they just sort of farkle, like reduced spoke hubs? with 32 spokes and a solid axle being stronger, without much of a weight penalty.
I don't have any weight comparisons, if that is felt to add to the issue, but low and central non revolving weight is probably a factor that doesn't detract much for bolt ons.
I was looking at some hubs that may have a longer life , being left as they are.
Thanks
Having said that as a pro shop guy I have gotten tired of servicing my personal bikes any more then I have to. So for hubs I have chosen Phil Wood. Sure not light weight or mega engagement points sexy. Just well made and easy to replace their parts as needed, which is not often to say the least. Still like any component they like attention every so often. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#6
Full Member
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,071
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4199 Post(s)
Liked 3,851 Times
in
2,301 Posts
Horizontal drop outs have been used with QR axles for many decades with no problems. What has changed this recently is the poor QR skewers that are too common. The exposed cam design with the cam riding on a plastic seating piece has less clamping capacity. The enclosed cam designs are better at holding the wheel in place, regardless of the drop out type.
It's my opinion that the whole nutted axle on the fancy bikes (trendy single speeds as an example) comes from believing that what a track racer is required to use by rules is also the best for the streets. Track racing has required a nutted axle more due to entanglements with another bike while competing, nuts have no hand lever sticking out acting like a claw. To further drive home the point of what's good for the racer is always best for the streets is that on the track if you stop you loose the race. So the need for the axle to repeatedly resist the forces of a skid stop is pretty much a non issue. However on the streets this stopping by using the pedals happens many times a day. This is why my fixed gear bike has rim brakes too, on both wheels. Andy
It's my opinion that the whole nutted axle on the fancy bikes (trendy single speeds as an example) comes from believing that what a track racer is required to use by rules is also the best for the streets. Track racing has required a nutted axle more due to entanglements with another bike while competing, nuts have no hand lever sticking out acting like a claw. To further drive home the point of what's good for the racer is always best for the streets is that on the track if you stop you loose the race. So the need for the axle to repeatedly resist the forces of a skid stop is pretty much a non issue. However on the streets this stopping by using the pedals happens many times a day. This is why my fixed gear bike has rim brakes too, on both wheels. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#9
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
215 Posts
It is a myth that solid axles are stronger than QR axles - maybe a bare QR axle, but once the skewer is installed it replaces any strength lost by having a hollow axle. That's what they teach you in materials class when studying to be an engineer, anyways.
QR axles also have the benefit of being held together by the skewer in the unlikely event of axle breakage. The hub isn't going to perform very well, but you can continue to ride to safety or a repair shop. I had the faxle break on my c. 1991 Shimano 105 front hub a couple years ago. I didn't even notice until I remove the wheels to change tires.
QR axles also have the benefit of being held together by the skewer in the unlikely event of axle breakage. The hub isn't going to perform very well, but you can continue to ride to safety or a repair shop. I had the faxle break on my c. 1991 Shimano 105 front hub a couple years ago. I didn't even notice until I remove the wheels to change tires.
#10
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
What's not strong is a 7-speed freewheel hub on 135 spacing, as commonly found on those extra-cheap bikes.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
Likes For Darth Lefty:
#11
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
215 Posts
A few months ago while helping a buddy with a customer's bike with an 8 speed freewheel, we realized it had no splines or other features to allow removal or servicing of the hub.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,371
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2482 Post(s)
Liked 2,952 Times
in
1,677 Posts
I lost a Campy Record tubular track wheel by following that reasoning.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,071
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4199 Post(s)
Liked 3,851 Times
in
2,301 Posts
Story- I owned a bike shop in Cleveland for 15 years, about a mile from Case Western Reserve University. needless to say I was the "college" bike shop and had many student and staff as customers. One Spring day a customer came in with a bike missing it's front wheel, the wheel hadn't been locked and was swiped. We talked about bike theft and locking one's bike (that campus was the shopping mall for the local thieves). He mentioned that the replacement wheel/tire/tube was his cost of a education in the school of hard knocks. he also mentioned that he could have just waited for the owner of the front wheel that was still locked to the bike rack only a few feet from his bike. We joked about which owner would get the other's part(s) and become whole and which would suffer the complete loss Obviously a thief had found one bike that had only the front wheel locked and a nearby bike whose ft wheel wasn't locked and "made a bike" to steal. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#14
Full Member