Extended Layoff Repercussions
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Extended Layoff Repercussions
After not riding for awhile, which do you notice more... being unusually winded or legs just not having as much power and stamina?
Which suffers most, lungs or legs?
Which suffers most, lungs or legs?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hacienda Hgts
Posts: 2,100
Bikes: 1999 Schwinn Peloton Ultegra 10, Kestrel RT-1000 Ultegra, Trek Marlin 6 Deore 29'er
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 1,955 Times
in
941 Posts
Shoulders, neck and lower back for me. Stretching out in the drops actually helps to relieve those issues rather than staying on the hoods.
Likes For CAT7RDR:
#3
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
I can take time off from riding and don't notice any decrease in my fitness... I still continue to workout and exercise to maintain my fitness and conditioning even if I stop riding my bike for a while.
#4
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked 2,534 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Most immediately? I feel it in my leg muscles. So it is my leg strength that is my limiting factor.
But after just a few rides (like 3 To 5) my strength come back pretty quickly, and then it is my lungs that hold me back. That definitely takes me longer to get back.
This is based on the occasions when i have not ridden much over the winter and start going at it in the spring.
But after just a few rides (like 3 To 5) my strength come back pretty quickly, and then it is my lungs that hold me back. That definitely takes me longer to get back.
This is based on the occasions when i have not ridden much over the winter and start going at it in the spring.
#6
Senior Member
Likes For asgelle:
#7
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked 2,534 Times
in
1,433 Posts
First of all, who says we are just talking about road riding? I actually mountain bike more.
But also, it depends what scenario you are talking about. If the issue is how long of a ride I can do, sure, “strength” per se might not be the issue. But for intense and hard climbs, I think it is (or at least part of it).
If the issue is how long/far I can ride, or the steady pace I can maintain over a longer period... sure, that is pretty much always a muscle fatigue issue, regardless of what kind of shape I am in.
But what typically limits me on super steep (and typically short) climbs in the beginning of the spring definitely has to do with strength, because if I have been doing strength training, it is much less of an issue in the spring.
Remember, the scenario being asked about here is what happens immediately after a long hiatus off the bike. And some people will retain muscle endurance or muscle strength differently in that time off.
Last edited by Kapusta; 01-27-20 at 05:47 AM.
Likes For Kapusta:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,212
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18397 Post(s)
Liked 15,485 Times
in
7,316 Posts
Both. And my neck and shoulders.
#9
Senior Member
Well, you're entitled to your own opinion, just not your own facts. The fact is that we know the forces required to pedal a bike, road or mountain, and the fact is they are well below what a functional person is able to generate. If someone is able to walk up two or three steps, they are able to generate all the force necessary to produce the maximum power we see. Now, I notice you put strength in quotes. If you're doing that to indicate you define strength in some unique way known only to you, it's quite possible you're right; but I have no idea what you're talking about. I don't put it in quotes and use it in the way physiologists have always defined it; as the maximum force or tension a muscle or muscle group can generate. From that, it can easily be seen that if someone can turn the pedals over once, strength is not a limiter. For example, the only place where it mat be a limiting factor is for standing starts on the track where the rider can't generate enough force to get the bike moving.
Finally, the fact that your strength training improves your performance does not prove that was due to increased strength. Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Another fact is we know is that all training interventions have many cross-over benefits, so even pure strength training (and we don't know if that is what you were doing) can improve aerobic performance.
Finally, the fact that your strength training improves your performance does not prove that was due to increased strength. Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Another fact is we know is that all training interventions have many cross-over benefits, so even pure strength training (and we don't know if that is what you were doing) can improve aerobic performance.
Likes For asgelle:
#10
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked 2,534 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Well, you're entitled to your own opinion, just not your own facts. The fact is that we know the forces required to pedal a bike, road or mountain, and the fact is they are well below what a functional person is able to generate. If someone is able to walk up two or three steps, they are able to generate all the force necessary to produce the maximum power we see. Now, I notice you put strength in quotes. If you're doing that to indicate you define strength in some unique way known only to you, it's quite possible you're right; but I have no idea what you're talking about. I don't put it in quotes and use it in the way physiologists have always defined it; as the maximum force or tension a muscle or muscle group can generate. From that, it can easily be seen that if someone can turn the pedals over once, strength is not a limiter. For example, the only place where it mat be a limiting factor is for standing starts on the track where the rider can't generate enough force to get the bike moving.
Finally, the fact that your strength training improves your performance does not prove that was due to increased strength. Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Another fact is we know is that all training interventions have many cross-over benefits, so even pure strength training (and we don't know if that is what you were doing) can improve aerobic performance.
Finally, the fact that your strength training improves your performance does not prove that was due to increased strength. Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Another fact is we know is that all training interventions have many cross-over benefits, so even pure strength training (and we don't know if that is what you were doing) can improve aerobic performance.
I'm not even going to bother arguing with you about this. You are the one who decided to tell me I don't know what is going on with my own legs, even though you have admitted to not even fully understanding what I am talking about.
How about you do you, and I'll do me? Because I honestly do not care one whit about what hurts you most when you get on the bike after 5 months off of it. Why you are so concerned with me in this matter.... I have no idea.
Have a nice day. And congratulations for making the rare cut onto my ignore list.
Last edited by Kapusta; 01-27-20 at 08:26 AM.
#11
Senior Member
I'm not concerned with you in the least. I worry about the OP and other readers who might be mislead by all the misinformation in your posts. Confusing fatigue with lack of strength has caused many riders to train in ways that are not beneficial and may even be harmful.
Likes For asgelle: