Tire size front & back
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 209
Bikes: Giant TCR Advanced Pro 0 Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times
in
35 Posts
Tire size front & back
I need some help with picking my next pair of tires. Currently, I run S-works Turbo Hell of the North (these are 28mm for the unfamiliar) on my Giant TCR stock SLR 1 wheelset. I am wondering if it makes sense to go different sizing for front and back. I read some use narrower in the front for aero gains. Is it worth taking that route or should I just keep them 28mm for both?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
I've been running 23/25, and 23/27, and happy with it.
Narrower front tire is close to the width of the rim, same pressure front & rear effectively gives higher pressure in the rear where needed,
and a bigger rear tire wears better.
Narrower front tire is close to the width of the rim, same pressure front & rear effectively gives higher pressure in the rear where needed,
and a bigger rear tire wears better.
Likes For woodcraft:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Aerodynamics is complicated. Tires that are sized appropriately for their rims will get you bigger aero gains than just using a smaller front. Either way at recreational speeds any aero gains from tires won't be as much as the difference in rolling resistance between good and bad ones.
If you need 28s for comfort or grip, keep using them. If you want your bike to ride harsher, switch to 25s or even 23s and blow then up to 120 psi.
If you need 28s for comfort or grip, keep using them. If you want your bike to ride harsher, switch to 25s or even 23s and blow then up to 120 psi.
Likes For Seattle Forrest:
#4
Non omnino gravis
A 23 in the front will probably match the PR-2 for aerodynamics reasonably well, as that wheel is 23mm wide (ext) and most tubeless 23s will mount to 24 or 25 wide on that width wheel.
My wheels are 18.5mm internal (25mm external,) and the two different 23s I've tried have both mounted to spot-on 25mm wide.
I've noticed absolutely no difference in road feel going down in size on the front tire, but I also absolutely did not pick up some 23s to chase marginal gains-- 23s are a dying breed, and can often be had on clearance on the cheap.
I picked up a Maxxis Padrone and an IRC Roadlite for a combined $33.
My wheels are 18.5mm internal (25mm external,) and the two different 23s I've tried have both mounted to spot-on 25mm wide.
I've noticed absolutely no difference in road feel going down in size on the front tire, but I also absolutely did not pick up some 23s to chase marginal gains-- 23s are a dying breed, and can often be had on clearance on the cheap.
I picked up a Maxxis Padrone and an IRC Roadlite for a combined $33.
Likes For DrIsotope:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,437
Bikes: SuperSix Evo | Revolt
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 733 Post(s)
Liked 815 Times
in
414 Posts
If your front tire isn't going to measure less than 23mm to optimize aero, might as well keep it at 28 for the grip/comfort.
Likes For Rides4Beer:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 850 Post(s)
Liked 344 Times
in
247 Posts
I think nobody in their right mind would tell you to go with the narrow rear.
If you don’t have a deep-ish front wheel (like 40mm+) then there is very, very little point in going with the narrower tire up front. May as well reap the comfort, grip and wear benefits of a wider tire.
But if I’m being honest... this is so nitpicky. What really matters is what’s gonna make you get stoked to ride in this case. The rest is nearly negligible. So just do what makes you happy.
If you don’t have a deep-ish front wheel (like 40mm+) then there is very, very little point in going with the narrower tire up front. May as well reap the comfort, grip and wear benefits of a wider tire.
But if I’m being honest... this is so nitpicky. What really matters is what’s gonna make you get stoked to ride in this case. The rest is nearly negligible. So just do what makes you happy.
Likes For smashndash:
#9
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
The latest aerodynamic research is fascinating, but remember that people managed to go fast on box-section rims back in the day...
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sunny so. cal.
Posts: 904
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 136 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times
in
31 Posts
I like the same size front and rear for the grip and comfort. I run 25mm Michelin Pro4s front and back; they caliper out to 28mm on Dura Ace C24 wheels. I had 23mm Pro4s before and I I'm going as fast or faster on the 25mm ones and I have great comfort on the 25mm, too.
Likes For bikeme:
Likes For smashndash:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,437
Bikes: SuperSix Evo | Revolt
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 733 Post(s)
Liked 815 Times
in
414 Posts
Taking my stock wheelset, vs the 50mm wheelset I'm moving to, and looking at my recent road race, a couple of things stand out. The gains during average race speeds will probably be around 10w, not earth shattering, but not insignificant either (some would say negligible in a pack, but def helps when you're up front). But what really hit me was when I looked at the test results for 50kmh. My first thought was, that doesn't apply to me, I can't hold that speed for any amount of time. Then I realized that I was sprinting at that speed at the end of the race, and the difference then is about 30w.
Likes For Rides4Beer:
#14
Globo Gym lifetime member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 5,204
Bikes: Fast ones
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 410 Post(s)
Liked 614 Times
in
306 Posts
Taking my stock wheelset, vs the 50mm wheelset I'm moving to, and looking at my recent road race, a couple of things stand out. The gains during average race speeds will probably be around 10w, not earth shattering, but not insignificant either (some would say negligible in a pack, but def helps when you're up front). But what really hit me was when I looked at the test results for 50kmh. My first thought was, that doesn't apply to me, I can't hold that speed for any amount of time. Then I realized that I was sprinting at that speed at the end of the race, and the difference then is about 30w.
__________________
#15
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
Deep rims didn't always exist. But you're determined to miss my point anyway, so I won't argue.
#16
Senior Member
If you're not rotating front to back how long are you willing to run on a front that is not going to wear out before it becomes a liability.