Why did they use caged bearings?
#27
Senior Member
I use Dura-Ace grease for bearings and never have a problem with the loose bearings falling out.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times
in
395 Posts
Does anyone know what would cause a problem with a headset constantly coming loose running loose bearings? That happened to me after I removed the cages and I ended up having to use locktite.
#29
What??? Only 2 wheels?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,434
Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10
Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 645 Times
in
232 Posts
If you are tightening the locknut securely to the race then it shouldn't come loose unless either something is wearing or the races are still seating themselves into the head tube.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
#30
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,410 Times
in
910 Posts
The tabbed washer is supposed to stop this from happening. Make sure you have a tabbed washer between the top cut nut and the top lock nut. That way, they cannot turn in unison. Then, when adjusting, you tight then very tight against each other (meaning hold the bottom one in place, adjusted right, and bring that top lock nut right down on it, tight. Without the tabbed washer, they will always work loose.
#32
Junior Member
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times
in
395 Posts
The tabbed washer is supposed to stop this from happening. Make sure you have a tabbed washer between the top cut nut and the top lock nut. That way, they cannot turn in unison. Then, when adjusting, you tight then very tight against each other (meaning hold the bottom one in place, adjusted right, and bring that top lock nut right down on it, tight. Without the tabbed washer, they will always work loose.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rhode Island (an obscure suburb of Connecticut)
Posts: 5,630
Bikes: one of each
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
12 Posts
I've been known to use a caged bearing on the fixed cup side and loose bearings on the easy to reach side. yeah, fat fingers.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,138
Bikes: 2 many
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1266 Post(s)
Liked 323 Times
in
169 Posts
Hello all, first post. I just got an old Nishiki Modulus with a rough BB and I'm working to bring it back to life. In my research about servicing the BB, I have seen several internet folks suggesting to toss the bearing cages. I'm interested in the idea, and I can see from an engineering standpoint how cageless might be beneficial. But it's left me wondering.. If caged bearings are so undesirable, why did the manufactures install them in the first place?
I'm usually one to trust the manufacturer, so I wanted to get a little insight on this before I make a final decision.
I'm usually one to trust the manufacturer, so I wanted to get a little insight on this before I make a final decision.
But lighter and less friction how can you go wrong?
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
My bottom bracket came loose during a ride. I was able to screw the fixed cup by hand and roll gently to the next bike shop. I would probably be in trouble if the bearings were not caged.
#37
Banned.
Join Date: May 2011
Location: on the beach
Posts: 4,816
Bikes: '73 falcon sr, '76 grand record, '84 davidson
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times
in
17 Posts
Caged bearings roll with a little less friction than loose balls. Two loose balls next to each other, if they bump one side is rotating one way and the side on the next ball is spinning the opposite direction. When a ball hits the cage it's one spinning ball against something stopped. A little better. That may not have anything to do with why the manufacturer uses caged bearings. I think it may be lighter too. but I don't know. There must be a weight weenie somewhere who knows the answer. It probably does have more to do with speed or ease of assembly.
But lighter and less friction how can you go wrong?
But lighter and less friction how can you go wrong?
#38
verktyg
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,030
Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro
Mentioned: 207 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 1,238 Times
in
654 Posts
@JohnDThompson +1
Original Campy BB bearing cages came stamped CAMPAGNOLO BREV. INTER.... They had 11 1/4" ball bearings.
Other sources made those type cages too. I've even seen a few BB bearing cages with 10 balls but most were 9. Back during the bike boom Gitane used plastic ball retainers with 9 balls.
But... as I mentioned above, aside from Campy caged retainers, there's no guarantee of what quality bearings were used in the cages.
I find it amusing to say the least that people fret over getting bearing retainers/caged bearings for their headsets and BBs. Any quick eBay search will net USED caged ball bearings for listed crazy prices! DOH!
When ever I bought a frame and the seller pulled the fork for shipping I've told them to throw away the old ball bearings! I buy Grade 25 Chrome Steel loose balls in bags of 100 dirt cheap on the Bay.
Reusing bicycle ball bearings is like taking a shower and putting on dirty clothes - or worse!
@MKahrl If I don't pull out the fixed cup, I turn the bike on it's side and use 9"-10" tweezers to put the balls into the BB. You can get these cheap on eBay.
verktyg
Chas.
Original Campy BB bearing cages came stamped CAMPAGNOLO BREV. INTER.... They had 11 1/4" ball bearings.
Other sources made those type cages too. I've even seen a few BB bearing cages with 10 balls but most were 9. Back during the bike boom Gitane used plastic ball retainers with 9 balls.
But... as I mentioned above, aside from Campy caged retainers, there's no guarantee of what quality bearings were used in the cages.
I find it amusing to say the least that people fret over getting bearing retainers/caged bearings for their headsets and BBs. Any quick eBay search will net USED caged ball bearings for listed crazy prices! DOH!
When ever I bought a frame and the seller pulled the fork for shipping I've told them to throw away the old ball bearings! I buy Grade 25 Chrome Steel loose balls in bags of 100 dirt cheap on the Bay.
Reusing bicycle ball bearings is like taking a shower and putting on dirty clothes - or worse!
@MKahrl If I don't pull out the fixed cup, I turn the bike on it's side and use 9"-10" tweezers to put the balls into the BB. You can get these cheap on eBay.
verktyg
Chas.
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
#39
Banned.
Join Date: May 2011
Location: on the beach
Posts: 4,816
Bikes: '73 falcon sr, '76 grand record, '84 davidson
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times
in
17 Posts
Originally Posted by verktyg
Reusing bicycle ball bearings is like taking a shower and putting on dirty clothes.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,930 Times
in
2,555 Posts
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,930 Times
in
2,555 Posts
Ben
#42
verktyg
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,030
Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro
Mentioned: 207 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 1,238 Times
in
654 Posts
Caged bearings roll with a little less friction than loose balls. Two loose balls next to each other, if they bump one side is rotating one way and the side on the next ball is spinning the opposite direction. When a ball hits the cage it's one spinning ball against something stopped. A little better. That may not have anything to do with why the manufacturer uses caged bearings. I think it may be lighter too. but I don't know. There must be a weight weenie somewhere who knows the answer. It probably does have more to do with speed or ease of assembly.
But lighter and less friction how can you go wrong?
But lighter and less friction how can you go wrong?
@2manybikes "Caged bearings roll with a little less friction than loose balls."
Water from the Nile River is wetter than water from the Amazon!
The rotational speed of ball bearings in bikes NEVER approach the RPMs that commercial cartridge bearing used in machinery and transportation application run at!
Even wheel bearings in a bike coming downhill at 40+ mph never get close to the 1,200 to 40,000+ rpms that commercial bearings are designed to operate at.
Bicycles were one of the first application for ball bearings. The cup and cone loose bearing design used in most bicycles dates back to the late 1800's.
"Jules Suriray, a Parisian bicycle mechanic, designed the first radial style ball bearing in 1869,[2] which was then fitted to the winning bicycle ridden by James Moore in the world's first bicycle road race, Paris-Rouen, in November 1869".
One of the advantages of cup and cone style of bearings is that they're self centering and they don't require accurately machined mounting surfaces.
Bottom bracket bearings undergo continuous loading and unloading side to side as we pedal. Having more balls in the BB distributes the reciprocating loads better.
Standard 9 ball BB cages/retainers concentrate the load over a smaller area of the bearing tracks in the cups and spindles resulting in faster wear.
Modern commercial bearing used in machinery and transportation applications use bearing retainers to keep the bearings separate to distribute forces over a wide area.
But... the balls rotate in a uniform direction but the contact points are continuously changing. Good video:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_b...allBearing.gif
verktyg
Chas.
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Last edited by verktyg; 04-09-16 at 10:45 PM.
#44
verktyg
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,030
Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro
Mentioned: 207 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 1,238 Times
in
654 Posts
Here's a headset with more stack height than steerer threads. There's only about 2 turns in this situation.
Figuring stack height:
Flicker album see details below pictures:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/282672...57625424641013
In the opposite situation it's possible that your top lock nut may be bottoming out on the steerer before it tightens against the spacer. A thicker space would fix the problem.
Another possibility, steerer threads were not always accurately machined. Also the top threads could have been damaged by cross threading or use of a poor quality headset or chased by someone with a steerer die.
You can check out the diameter of the threads at the top of the steerer and also at the bottom of the threads to make sure the steerer isn't tapered.
Loctite can fix a lot of these kinds of problems. If you use that method, carefully clean the headset and steerer threads with an evaporating solvent. I use 91% isopropyl alcohol.
Use a small amount of Loctite 242 Blue which is designed to be easily disassembled.
Loctite Threadlocker Blue 242 from Loctite Adhesives
verktyg
Chas.
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Last edited by verktyg; 04-10-16 at 12:40 AM.
#45
verktyg
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,030
Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro
Mentioned: 207 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 1,238 Times
in
654 Posts
verktyg
Chas.
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times
in
395 Posts
Several possibilities. First, the top lock nut should have the maximum amount of thread engagement. Ideally at least 5 turns minimum.
Here's a headset with more stack height than steerer threads. There's only about 2 turns in this situation.
Figuring stack height:
Flicker album see details below pictures:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/282672...57625424641013
In the opposite situation it's possible that your top lock nut may be bottoming out on the steerer before it tightens against the spacer. A thicker space would fix the problem.
Another possibility, steerer threads were not always accurately machined. Also the top threads could have been damaged by cross threading or use of a poor quality headset or chased by someone with a steerer die.
You can check out the diameter of the threads at the top of the steerer and also at the bottom of the threads to make sure the steerer isn't tapered.
Loctite can fix a lot of these kinds of problems. If you use that method, carefully clean the headset and steerer threads with an evaporating solvent. I use 91% isopropyl alcohol.
Use a small amount of Loctite 242 Blue which is designed to be easily disassembled.
Loctite Threadlocker Blue 242 from Loctite Adhesives
verktyg
Chas.
Here's a headset with more stack height than steerer threads. There's only about 2 turns in this situation.
Figuring stack height:
Flicker album see details below pictures:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/282672...57625424641013
In the opposite situation it's possible that your top lock nut may be bottoming out on the steerer before it tightens against the spacer. A thicker space would fix the problem.
Another possibility, steerer threads were not always accurately machined. Also the top threads could have been damaged by cross threading or use of a poor quality headset or chased by someone with a steerer die.
You can check out the diameter of the threads at the top of the steerer and also at the bottom of the threads to make sure the steerer isn't tapered.
Loctite can fix a lot of these kinds of problems. If you use that method, carefully clean the headset and steerer threads with an evaporating solvent. I use 91% isopropyl alcohol.
Use a small amount of Loctite 242 Blue which is designed to be easily disassembled.
Loctite Threadlocker Blue 242 from Loctite Adhesives
verktyg
Chas.
The only thing I can think of is that I may have put too many bearings in and that somehow it makes it come loose? I really don't know, it's weird. If I recall I put as many bearings as I could fit and then removed one.
#47
What??? Only 2 wheels?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,434
Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10
Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 645 Times
in
232 Posts
Have you changed the type of grease you use? Maybe the new stuff is thicker enough that when you installed the bearings you still had a pretty thick film of grease between the bearings and the races at any or all four of the bearing/race interfaces.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times
in
395 Posts
*edit* Maybe the threads are getting worn? I bought the bike in '99 and have had the headset apart maybe 10 times or so.
Last edited by Lazyass; 04-10-16 at 06:01 AM.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,138
Bikes: 2 many
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1266 Post(s)
Liked 323 Times
in
169 Posts
@eschlwc "not buying this." +1
@2manybikes "Caged bearings roll with a little less friction than loose balls."
Water from the Nile River is wetter than water from the Amazon!
The rotational speed of ball bearings in bikes NEVER approach the RPMs that commercial cartridge bearing used in machinery and transportation application run at!
Even wheel bearings in a bike coming downhill at 40+ mph never get close to the 1,200 to 40,000+ rpms that commercial bearings are designed to operate at.
Bicycles were one of the first application for ball bearings. The cup and cone loose bearing design used in most bicycles dates back to the late 1800's.
"Jules Suriray, a Parisian bicycle mechanic, designed the first radial style ball bearing in 1869,[2] which was then fitted to the winning bicycle ridden by James Moore in the world's first bicycle road race, Paris-Rouen, in November 1869".
One of the advantages of cup and cone style of bearings is that they're self centering and they don't require accurately machined mounting surfaces.
Bottom bracket bearings undergo continuous loading and unloading side to side as we pedal. Having more balls in the BB distributes the reciprocating loads better.
Standard 9 ball BB cages/retainers concentrate the load over a smaller area of the bearing tracks in the cups and spindles resulting in faster wear.
Modern commercial bearing used in machinery and transportation applications use bearing retainers to keep the bearings separate to distribute forces over a wide area.
But... the balls rotate in a uniform direction but the contact points are continuously changing. Good video:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_b...allBearing.gif
verktyg
Chas.
@2manybikes "Caged bearings roll with a little less friction than loose balls."
Water from the Nile River is wetter than water from the Amazon!
The rotational speed of ball bearings in bikes NEVER approach the RPMs that commercial cartridge bearing used in machinery and transportation application run at!
Even wheel bearings in a bike coming downhill at 40+ mph never get close to the 1,200 to 40,000+ rpms that commercial bearings are designed to operate at.
Bicycles were one of the first application for ball bearings. The cup and cone loose bearing design used in most bicycles dates back to the late 1800's.
"Jules Suriray, a Parisian bicycle mechanic, designed the first radial style ball bearing in 1869,[2] which was then fitted to the winning bicycle ridden by James Moore in the world's first bicycle road race, Paris-Rouen, in November 1869".
One of the advantages of cup and cone style of bearings is that they're self centering and they don't require accurately machined mounting surfaces.
Bottom bracket bearings undergo continuous loading and unloading side to side as we pedal. Having more balls in the BB distributes the reciprocating loads better.
Standard 9 ball BB cages/retainers concentrate the load over a smaller area of the bearing tracks in the cups and spindles resulting in faster wear.
Modern commercial bearing used in machinery and transportation applications use bearing retainers to keep the bearings separate to distribute forces over a wide area.
But... the balls rotate in a uniform direction but the contact points are continuously changing. Good video:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_b...allBearing.gif
verktyg
Chas.
Who said it was a big factor that made a big difference? I was very careful to say it is only a small effect.
#50
verktyg
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,030
Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro
Mentioned: 207 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 1,238 Times
in
654 Posts
No, I've always used the Park stuff. The bearings were good, the races weren't pitted, nothing. It turns perfectly smooth when it's adjusted. I just can't think of any logical explanation for it, I mean it got so loose I was literally tightening the upper race by hand while riding. I'm tearing the whole bike apart tomorrow so I'll look at everything again.
*edit* Maybe the threads are getting worn? I bought the bike in '99 and have had the headset apart maybe 10 times or so.
*edit* Maybe the threads are getting worn? I bought the bike in '99 and have had the headset apart maybe 10 times or so.
Zebra answers:
Is your headset alloy or steel? I have several bikes with alloy headsets that occasionally come loose. I've written it off as vibration or maybe worn and/or stretched headset threads. I'll probably Loctite them next time with a small amount of Threadlocker 242 Blue....
When I reassemble a headset I like to remove any grease off of the steerer threads above the upper adjustable cup. Water doesn't seem to get into headsets very often in the top end so rust in the threads isn't a much of a problem. No lube, no move!
Back in the 70's I ran across the problem pictured below several times. Once on one of my beater bikes and several customer's bikes. They were all lower priced bike boom models but it could happen on any bike:
Pictures I found on the web. The fist picture is a Cinelli fork, the next is was probably a late 60's Raleigh Pro???
I'd tighten the headset and after a short ride it would come loose again until finally all the was holding the fork on was the brake bolt through the fork crown!
The cause was poor brazing due to improperly cleaned steerer and fork crown. Some er, a... less skilled or knowledgeable people believed that brazing flux was enough to clean grease, rust and corrosion off of the parts when they reached brazing temperature.... On the right hand picture you can clearly see how little brass entered the joint!
Look under the crown to see if the steerer is pull up out of the crown.
The last zebra was a very rare case. I bought a late 60's Bertin partially equipped frame that had a late 80's Shimano alloy headset.
While assembling the bike I decided to pull the alloy headset and replace it with a proper Stronglight P3 headset. When I pulled the top lock nut and adjustable cup off I found someone had wrapped Teflon pipe tape around the steerer to make up for the gap! They put an Inch size headset on a 25mm French steerer! Shade tree mechanic!!!
With correct Stronglight headset:
Good like finding a solution....
verktyg
Chas.
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Last edited by verktyg; 04-10-16 at 08:03 AM.