[trike] Two wheel-drive = more effort?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 2,497
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 573 Post(s)
Liked 118 Times
in
99 Posts
[trike] Two wheel-drive = more effort?
Hello,
Denmark's BellaBike trikes are unusual with their two front wheel-drive, and the rear wheel that steers.
Empty, the bike weighs about 40 kg/80 lbs. It comes with a Nexus 7 gear hub.
Out of curiosity, do you think it takes more effort to move that bike compared to regular trikes because of the two wheel-drives in the front instead of one in the rear as usual?
Thank you.
Denmark's BellaBike trikes are unusual with their two front wheel-drive, and the rear wheel that steers.
Empty, the bike weighs about 40 kg/80 lbs. It comes with a Nexus 7 gear hub.
Out of curiosity, do you think it takes more effort to move that bike compared to regular trikes because of the two wheel-drives in the front instead of one in the rear as usual?
Thank you.
#2
Bikes are okay, I guess.
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 6,938
Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2647 Post(s)
Liked 2,446 Times
in
1,557 Posts
Interesting configuration. I suspect turning both those drive wheels isn't significantly more difficult than turning one of them and there might be benefits to the setup.
Last edited by thumpism; 02-20-21 at 08:09 AM.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 2,497
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 573 Post(s)
Liked 118 Times
in
99 Posts
Rather than steering, I'm concerned about the effort required to spin the two front wheels (instead of just one).
Or maybe with "turning", you meant what I just wrote :-p
Or maybe with "turning", you meant what I just wrote :-p
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Golden, CO and Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,835
Bikes: 2016 Fuji Tread, 1983 Trek 520
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 674 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times
in
430 Posts
The added weight and extra work on turns is probably negligible. I wonder what the added cost is, how reliable the differential is, and if there are any servicing issues.
Likes For andrewclaus:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times
in
723 Posts
I would think that the 2 front wheel "tadpole" design would be safer against overturning when braking during turns than the 1 front wheel "delta" design.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times
in
723 Posts
I do not see a differential in the photo, I wonder if both wheels are driven or just one. That silver cylinder is the multispeed hub.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
I didn't see one either and, yes, that is the Nexus hub. It does seem to be an awkward and excessively complex design. Front steering, even if it has two front wheels and requires Ackerman linkage, and rear drive makes more sense.
#8
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,779
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3583 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times
in
1,929 Posts
I don't see one, either. Without a differential, one of the driven wheels must lose traction in corners. A differential will prevent that, but at the cost of additional weight and mechanical friction.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Golden, CO and Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,835
Bikes: 2016 Fuji Tread, 1983 Trek 520
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 674 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times
in
430 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,801
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
The steering (turning) aspect aside, the pedaling effort of two wheels vs. one can probably be realized by comparing a bicycle to a rear drive tricycle.
Rear drive tricycles have been around for a long time and the additional dual wheel weight and if any more effort is needed can give that answer.
John
Rear drive tricycles have been around for a long time and the additional dual wheel weight and if any more effort is needed can give that answer.
John
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
In this case the differential seems to be small mechanism just above the brake rotor and driven by the short chain.
Likes For HillRider:
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 2,497
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 573 Post(s)
Liked 118 Times
in
99 Posts
How does the differential work? Is the magic all into that part?
Is a rear drive trike (delta) harder to move than a front drive (tadpole)?
Is a rear drive trike (delta) harder to move than a front drive (tadpole)?
Likes For Winfried:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
Why are you so fixated on which is harder to move? Given the weight and extra drag I have to think neither style would make any difference.
A differential allows one driven wheel to rotate at a different speed than the other. When going around a corner, the outside wheel has to travel further than the inside wheel so it has to rotate faster. A differential allows this to happen.
A differential allows one driven wheel to rotate at a different speed than the other. When going around a corner, the outside wheel has to travel further than the inside wheel so it has to rotate faster. A differential allows this to happen.
Likes For HillRider:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,760
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times
in
760 Posts
Tadpole recumbents are generally (single) rear wheel drive and (dual) front wheel steering and braking. The crank goes through a long chain w/ idler to the rear derailleur and cassette. On my tadpole, the drive train, with the exception of the incredibly long chain run, had a common triple crank with derailleur and 9 speed cassette on the rear hub with long cage derailleur.
Last edited by Camilo; 02-20-21 at 03:11 PM.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 580
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 254 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 182 Times
in
141 Posts
To answer the original question, the effort required to pedal a bike is almost all due to the total weight and what gear you are in relative to how fast you are trying to go, with a little contribution from wind resistance and rolling resistance. So whether you are driving one or two wheels really doesn’t matter. I presume a cargo trike like that is pretty heavy, though, so it’ll be slow to get moving and tough to go uphill, but that has little to do with driving two wheels vs one.
#17
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,779
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3583 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times
in
1,929 Posts
#18
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,779
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3583 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times
in
1,929 Posts