Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fitting Your Bike
Reload this Page >

Cranks: $100 for a lousy 2.5mm

Notices
Fitting Your Bike Are you confused about how you should fit a bike to your particular body dimensions? Have you been reading, found the terms Merxx or French Fit, and dont know what you need? Every style of riding is different- in how you fit the bike to you, and the sizing of the bike itself. Its more than just measuring your height, reach and inseam. With the help of Bike Fitting, youll be able to find the right fit for your frame size, style of riding, and your particular dimensions. Here ya go..the location for everything fit related.

Cranks: $100 for a lousy 2.5mm

Old 01-14-20, 07:53 AM
  #1  
Moishe
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Guilford, CT
Posts: 83

Bikes: Trek doughmain SLR6

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked 62 Times in 33 Posts
Cranks: $100 for a lousy 2.5mm

I never paid any attention to crank length until last week, when I bought a newly affordable Stages left Ultegra crank power meter for $350. I learned that my one-year-old Trek Domain has 175mm cranks, while my nine-year-old Roubaix, now my Zwift bike, has 172.5mm cranks. A few minor knee twinges in the past year, 4000 miles, on the 175mm cranks. Im 71 inches tall with a longer-than-average inseam of 34.5 inches; by height I should have shorter cranks, by leg length longer ones.

So here is my question: should I just install my new 175mm crank-meter and relax with a couple of Dogfish Head triple IPAs, or should I exchange it for a 172.5mm (or even 170mm) crank-meter, buy a matching right-side Ultegra crank for around $100, and THEN have the beers?
Moishe is offline  
Old 01-14-20, 09:21 AM
  #2  
ThermionicScott 
7-speed cultist
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 19,689

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers)

Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2590 Post(s)
Liked 472 Times in 341 Posts
Height and even leg length are not the final authority on what your crank length should be. Since our muscles are strongest at full extension, what is most important is that the saddle height is correct for the crank used, and this allows a range of crank lengths to work fine. I have a mix of 165mm and 170mm cranks on bikes. Use what feels best.

Have a delicious beer now.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Likes For ThermionicScott:
Old 01-14-20, 09:24 AM
  #3  
ridelikeaturtle
Senior Member
 
ridelikeaturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 809

Bikes: Bianchi Ti Megatube, M Alloy Pro, Sprint 76; Amp Research B4; Colnago Crystal; Klein Pulse; Litespeed Catalyst, Fondriest Squadra Corse

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 382 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 69 Posts
If something on any of the bikes I ride hurts me, I try to fix it. For $100, it's worth it to not be in pain.
ridelikeaturtle is offline  
Likes For ridelikeaturtle:
Old 01-14-20, 09:42 AM
  #4  
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 15,566

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2073 Post(s)
Liked 179 Times in 141 Posts
Going by your inseam, you could profitably spin 190 cranks. I have a 30" inseam and run 170 on most of my bike and 175 on our tandem. Can't even tell the difference, which makes total sense, since 5mm is about 3/16", nothing. Your overall height has nothing to do with crank length. I'm 5'6". Put on your new cranks. Check you saddle height with the heel-on-pedal method.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
Old 01-15-20, 09:50 AM
  #5  
Leisesturm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,214
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1457 Post(s)
Liked 110 Times in 82 Posts
No beers (forfeit!) if the o.p. dares to squander $100 for a 2.5mm change in crank length. The width of this 'I' is just about 1mm. The manufacturing tolerance of a crankset likely is around 1mm.
Leisesturm is offline  
Likes For Leisesturm:
Old 01-15-20, 11:02 AM
  #6  
jimincalif
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 2,189

Bikes: '96 Trek 850, '08 Specialized Roubaix Comp, '18 Niner RLT RDO

Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 537 Post(s)
Liked 63 Times in 41 Posts
"A few minor knee twinges" may or may not be related to the crank length, but interesting you say this occurs only on the longer cranks? I have read several things in the last few years that suggest "standard" OEM cranks might be too long for people. Here is one such article:

https://bicyclist.xyz/regulars/ask-t...ing-crankarms/

I did replace my wife's crank, dropping from 170 to 165 and she says it has helped her knees a lot. I'm 73-1/2" with slightly shorter legs than you, both my bikes (58/59cm frames) came with 175s, I've not had any issues.
jimincalif is offline  
Likes For jimincalif:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.