Cat trike, Velotechnik, or Performer?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 111
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Cat trike, Velotechnik, or Performer?
I have a friend who recently decided he would go with a recumbent due to back issues - he is 40 years old.
There is a Cat trike dealer in the area and took the the villager for a spin and liked it. It retails for $2500ish but he says it will be about $2800 out the door and it's not a folder which isn't absolutely necessary but would be nice. He said he also was interested in the 550.
The same dealer carries Velotechnik though he didn't have any on the floor - the Gekka model interested him and it costs about the same.
I came across the Performer brand and the prices are several hundred dollars less but he would have to drive 450 miles to the dealer.
Can you give any advice such as quality of the above manufacturers, any drawbacks to folders, is back wheel size important and any other things that might help?
Thanks in advance!
There is a Cat trike dealer in the area and took the the villager for a spin and liked it. It retails for $2500ish but he says it will be about $2800 out the door and it's not a folder which isn't absolutely necessary but would be nice. He said he also was interested in the 550.
The same dealer carries Velotechnik though he didn't have any on the floor - the Gekka model interested him and it costs about the same.
I came across the Performer brand and the prices are several hundred dollars less but he would have to drive 450 miles to the dealer.
Can you give any advice such as quality of the above manufacturers, any drawbacks to folders, is back wheel size important and any other things that might help?
Thanks in advance!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sin City, Nevada
Posts: 2,885
Bikes: Catrike 700, Greenspeed GTO trike, , Linear LWB recumbent, Haluzak Horizon SWB recumbent, Balance 450 MTB, Cannondale SM800 Beast of the East
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 523 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 228 Times
in
180 Posts
Both Catrike and HPV are long time brands with lots of satisfied owners (including me). Folding trikes tend to be heavier and more expensive than similar non-folders. Trikes with a bigger rear wheel have higher gear ranges at both ends than 20" drive wheel models. Trikes with higher seats are less stable than trikes with lower seats if you ride them under similar conditions.
I looked at the prices for the HPV and he must have looked at the HPV Gekko 26 sports model which has an MSRP of $1999. I can't find the specifications for the sports model trike so don't know what HPV did to make the price so much cheaper than the Gekko folding model with an MSRP of $3,640. It must be their "entry level" trike.
The Catrike Villager has an MSRP of $2550. It has 20" wheels all around so the gear range is (Gear Inch Range 15.4-87.1). Seat height is 12.5". The Catrike 5.5.9 is a very different trike. It costs a lot more - MSRP $3150 Gear range is the same as for the Catrike Expedition 20.7-117.6 gear inches. Seat height is 11 inches. I folds.
I looked at the prices for the HPV and he must have looked at the HPV Gekko 26 sports model which has an MSRP of $1999. I can't find the specifications for the sports model trike so don't know what HPV did to make the price so much cheaper than the Gekko folding model with an MSRP of $3,640. It must be their "entry level" trike.
The Catrike Villager has an MSRP of $2550. It has 20" wheels all around so the gear range is (Gear Inch Range 15.4-87.1). Seat height is 12.5". The Catrike 5.5.9 is a very different trike. It costs a lot more - MSRP $3150 Gear range is the same as for the Catrike Expedition 20.7-117.6 gear inches. Seat height is 11 inches. I folds.
#3
Banned
Cat trike is a Florida company , HP Velotechnik is German
doing much riding other than out of your garage, hauling a recumbent trike needs a trailer on the car..
gearing can be change by the selling shop.
doing much riding other than out of your garage, hauling a recumbent trike needs a trailer on the car..
gearing can be change by the selling shop.
#4
LBKA (formerly punkncat)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jawja
Posts: 4,299
Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2208 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times
in
686 Posts
I owned two nearly identical Catrike Road of the older rigid type. They were great bikes, very stable, and fairly dependable all in all. My only complaints had to do with the front derailleur they were using at the time.
I would expect to want and need dealer support for setup and such. Maint. help is nice with these as well. I would go with the closer place.
Performer is a semi knock off Chinese maker and wouldn't choose to support buying it over Catrike (or the others) if this is intended to be a long time purchase.
I would expect to want and need dealer support for setup and such. Maint. help is nice with these as well. I would go with the closer place.
Performer is a semi knock off Chinese maker and wouldn't choose to support buying it over Catrike (or the others) if this is intended to be a long time purchase.
#5
Senior Member
Last year my wife and I bought an ICE Adventure for her and a Catrike Trail for me, both are folders. When folded both trikes fit in the back of our 2018 Focus hatchback. With the rear sear folded down of course.
Well, just because you can do something doesn't mean you will---putting the trikes in the car was a royal pain in the ass. So we bought a 2019 Ford Explorer and the trikes just roll right in; no folding, no fighting, no sweat.
Well, just because you can do something doesn't mean you will---putting the trikes in the car was a royal pain in the ass. So we bought a 2019 Ford Explorer and the trikes just roll right in; no folding, no fighting, no sweat.
#7
Zircon Encrusted Tweezers
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: high ground
Posts: 1,346
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 260 Post(s)
Liked 128 Times
in
82 Posts
I have a friend who recently decided he would go with a recumbent due to back issues - he is 40 years old.
There is a Cat trike dealer in the area and took the the villager for a spin and liked it. It retails for $2500ish but he says it will be about $2800 out the door and it's not a folder which isn't absolutely necessary but would be nice. He said he also was interested in the 550.
The same dealer carries Velotechnik though he didn't have any on the floor - the Gekka model interested him and it costs about the same.
I came across the Performer brand and the prices are several hundred dollars less but he would have to drive 450 miles to the dealer.
Can you give any advice such as quality of the above manufacturers, any drawbacks to folders, is back wheel size important and any other things that might help?
Thanks in advance!
There is a Cat trike dealer in the area and took the the villager for a spin and liked it. It retails for $2500ish but he says it will be about $2800 out the door and it's not a folder which isn't absolutely necessary but would be nice. He said he also was interested in the 550.
The same dealer carries Velotechnik though he didn't have any on the floor - the Gekka model interested him and it costs about the same.
I came across the Performer brand and the prices are several hundred dollars less but he would have to drive 450 miles to the dealer.
Can you give any advice such as quality of the above manufacturers, any drawbacks to folders, is back wheel size important and any other things that might help?
Thanks in advance!
#8
Senior Member
Yes. These days, most shops only stock trikes so it's easy for someone interested in 'bents to not even realize that 2-wheelers exist. Trikes have their place; but at 64 and with no physical handicaps to prevent me from riding my recumbent bikes, the trike mostly stays in the garage.
#9
Zircon Encrusted Tweezers
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: high ground
Posts: 1,346
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 260 Post(s)
Liked 128 Times
in
82 Posts
This is off base. Performer is in Taiwan, and has a lot of unique designs. They are constantly innovating (maybe too much, as their product line seems to always be in some sort of flux).
I have owned many different recumbents from many different manufacturers, including Catrike, and I have a Performer in the garage right now. I'd put Performer's products right up there with some of the better companies.
What Performer product have you owned?
I have owned many different recumbents from many different manufacturers, including Catrike, and I have a Performer in the garage right now. I'd put Performer's products right up there with some of the better companies.
What Performer product have you owned?
#10
LBKA (formerly punkncat)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jawja
Posts: 4,299
Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2208 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times
in
686 Posts
I didn't. Looked at a couple of them extensively because the price was so attractive.
Some folks that I (we) met riding our Catrikes later were owners of Performers and had significant issues out of them with parts, drivetrain, boom, frame crack...it was a mess.
I will admit that there is much to be read about how Taiwan makes good frames. The ones they had weren't it.
Aside- Made in USA, as an American, will always trump any foreign product if there is a real choice to be made on quality. I like to keep money at home where I can.
Some folks that I (we) met riding our Catrikes later were owners of Performers and had significant issues out of them with parts, drivetrain, boom, frame crack...it was a mess.
I will admit that there is much to be read about how Taiwan makes good frames. The ones they had weren't it.
Aside- Made in USA, as an American, will always trump any foreign product if there is a real choice to be made on quality. I like to keep money at home where I can.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 111
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I agree
Steamer
"Why is your friend not considering 2-wheels? Much faster."
I agree with you and he has a two wheeler but has back issues and feels more comfortable on the recumbent.
"Why is your friend not considering 2-wheels? Much faster."
I agree with you and he has a two wheeler but has back issues and feels more comfortable on the recumbent.
#12
Zircon Encrusted Tweezers
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: high ground
Posts: 1,346
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 260 Post(s)
Liked 128 Times
in
82 Posts
Steamer
"Why is your friend not considering 2-wheels? Much faster."
I agree with you and he has a two wheeler but has back issues and feels more comfortable on the recumbent.
"Why is your friend not considering 2-wheels? Much faster."
I agree with you and he has a two wheeler but has back issues and feels more comfortable on the recumbent.
#13
Senior Member
Steamer
"Why is your friend not considering 2-wheels? Much faster."
I agree with you and he has a two wheeler but has back issues and feels more comfortable on the recumbent.
"Why is your friend not considering 2-wheels? Much faster."
I agree with you and he has a two wheeler but has back issues and feels more comfortable on the recumbent.
#15
Zircon Encrusted Tweezers
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: high ground
Posts: 1,346
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 260 Post(s)
Liked 128 Times
in
82 Posts
So , is there any reason your friend isn't considering a recumbent bike (2 wheels)? Recumbent trikes are fine, but there are lots of people that prefer the ride of a recumbent bike. He should consider both. Both are good for bad backs, but there is a lot more performance potential in a recumbent bike.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 111
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Good question
So , is there any reason your friend isn't considering a recumbent bike (2 wheels)? Recumbent trikes are fine, but there are lots of people that prefer the ride of a recumbent bike. He should consider both. Both are good for bad backs, but there is a lot more performance potential in a recumbent bike.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Delaware Sea Shore
Posts: 531
Bikes: There is always room for one more.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 184 Post(s)
Liked 388 Times
in
225 Posts
Also, if cost is a factor, two-wheeled recumbents are (usually) less expensive than a trike of the same quality.
__________________
Don
Don
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,992
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2494 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
522 Posts
With all due respect, I see nothing in the o.p. that indicated that there was a need for speed on the part of the friend. You read the same posts I do on BROL and it is clear that the majority of recumbent riders are just fine with being slow. Not that your question isn't valid, recumbent bikes are cheaper, have way less footprint, and are all around easier to store, transport, etc., but the recumbent riding position is unnatural to most people and the very models most interesting from a performance standpoint (faster) even less intuitive to ride well. I knew that just by looking at recumbents. All my initial research was on trikes, but when it came time to put $$$ down, at the last second I went for bikes. I'm not entirely certain I made the right decision.
#19
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: CT
Posts: 45
Bikes: Performer X-Low, Catrike Trail, Windcheetah Club Sport, HPV Grasshopper, FAW+ Velomobile (under construction)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 40 Times
in
17 Posts
If he liked the Catrike Villager, but wants a folder, look at the Catrike Trail. I folded mine after every ride for 2 years and stored it in the back of my car. Nice and easy to fold. And much easier to store while folded.
HP Veloteknik and Catrike both have good reputations and lots of satisfied customers. You can't go wrong with either brand. Performer doesn't have the best reputation on their trikes, but I think I've only seen positive things about their bikes.
HP Veloteknik and Catrike both have good reputations and lots of satisfied customers. You can't go wrong with either brand. Performer doesn't have the best reputation on their trikes, but I think I've only seen positive things about their bikes.
#20
Senior Member
If he wants a trike, he wants a trike. But apparently he didn't even know that 2-wheeled recumbents existed; and you can't make an informed decision without becoming informed. Trikes are fine for what they are; but recumbent bikes are lighter, less complicated, less expensive, easier to transport, easier to store, and go down the road with less energy used. That last point you can call "faster" or "more efficient," but they're different sides to the same coin. In my opinion, trikes should be considered mostly if there's a balance issue or when falling just cannot be tolerated, which were not reasons that were given up front. (All bike riders will fall, it's just a matter of time.) Otherwise they're just not worth the downsides. That said, I have one as a valued part of my n+1 collection.
#21
Zircon Encrusted Tweezers
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: high ground
Posts: 1,346
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 260 Post(s)
Liked 128 Times
in
82 Posts
With all due respect, I see nothing in the o.p. that indicated that there was a need for speed on the part of the friend. You read the same posts I do on BROL and it is clear that the majority of recumbent riders are just fine with being slow. Not that your question isn't valid, recumbent bikes are cheaper, have way less footprint, and are all around easier to store, transport, etc., but the recumbent riding position is unnatural to most people and the very models most interesting from a performance standpoint (faster) even less intuitive to ride well. I knew that just by looking at recumbents. All my initial research was on trikes, but when it came time to put $$$ down, at the last second I went for bikes. I'm not entirely certain I made the right decision.
#22
Senior Member
In my opinion, trikes should be considered mostly if there's a balance issue or when falling just cannot be tolerated, which were not reasons that were given up front. (All bike riders will fall, it's just a matter of time.) Otherwise they're just not worth the downsides.