Balancing Your Wheels
#51
Constant tinkerer
Someone should do a double-blind study on this so we can link that thread and never have to discuss it again.
I'm not saying one way or the other is the truth, but these are always exclusively armchair discussions.
I'm not saying one way or the other is the truth, but these are always exclusively armchair discussions.
#52
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Richfield, WI
Posts: 720
Bikes: Trek Domane SL7 Disc, Cannondale F29
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 388 Post(s)
Liked 324 Times
in
185 Posts
Yeah, let's get back to the really important topics discussed on these forums so we aren't wasting our time.
Likes For PoorInRichfield:
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
This is at the moment, with not-the-lightest wheels and a porky cassette. Includes bottle cages, front and rear blinkies, computer mount, bell, power meter, and of course, pedals.
Riding weight adds 17oz saddle bag with tire (tubular), pump, levers, pliers, 3 allen wrenches, chain tool, valve extension, valve cores, quicklinks, patch kit, zip ties, tape, knife, paper & pencil, needle & thread, bandages, boot, etc., and usually one water bottle.
Riding weight adds 17oz saddle bag with tire (tubular), pump, levers, pliers, 3 allen wrenches, chain tool, valve extension, valve cores, quicklinks, patch kit, zip ties, tape, knife, paper & pencil, needle & thread, bandages, boot, etc., and usually one water bottle.
Likes For woodcraft:
#54
Senior Member
Geez Louise, I carry spare water and food on my touring bike that weighs as much as these bikes, sheesh.
No wonder you're concerned about balanced wheels, I just calmly hustle down hills at 70kand worry about other stuff.
No wonder you're concerned about balanced wheels, I just calmly hustle down hills at 70kand worry about other stuff.
#55
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Richfield, WI
Posts: 720
Bikes: Trek Domane SL7 Disc, Cannondale F29
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 388 Post(s)
Liked 324 Times
in
185 Posts
We worry about grams to compensate for our puny leg muscles Yeah, ones perspective on this topic will certainly be swayed by the type of riding you do. I'm a roadie and prefer to ride as fast as sanely possible and have a bike that is light as sanely possible. None of this discussion probably makes any sense to a fat-tire bike rider or a touring bike rider.
#56
Senior Member
Wheel balancing makes more sense on cars than on road bikes for two reasons.
Automotive suspension is able to oscillate at a fairly large amplitude at fairly low frequencies. When a car is travelling rapidly, the rotation of the wheel can reach these frequencies, causing the suspension to be driven in resonance.
A road bike is comparatively very rigid, and the rider's body is very heavily damped, so you simply don't see the same sorts of frequency overlaps and resonances. If they exist at all, they are very small in magnitude.
Automotive wheels are very wide relative to their height, so the imbalance can be lateral in addition to radial. This causes the oscillation to directly manifest as steering wobble, which is obviously very bad.
This really doesn't apply to road bike wheels, because they are very narrow relative to their height.
Wheel balancing on bicycles is something that a lot of people believe in, but cannot ever seem to quantify or measure the purported efficiency gains of. Oftentimes it's "proven" that it makes a huge difference because it wobbles a bicycle in the stand, but this is a completely different dynamical system with completely different constraints than how people actually use bicycles. I ride my bicycles on the ground, I don't send them airborne on their own to pedal themselves through the troposphere.
I've clocked 57mph on my road bike with its imbalanced wheels before and it was rock solid.
Automotive suspension is able to oscillate at a fairly large amplitude at fairly low frequencies. When a car is travelling rapidly, the rotation of the wheel can reach these frequencies, causing the suspension to be driven in resonance.
A road bike is comparatively very rigid, and the rider's body is very heavily damped, so you simply don't see the same sorts of frequency overlaps and resonances. If they exist at all, they are very small in magnitude.
Automotive wheels are very wide relative to their height, so the imbalance can be lateral in addition to radial. This causes the oscillation to directly manifest as steering wobble, which is obviously very bad.
This really doesn't apply to road bike wheels, because they are very narrow relative to their height.
Wheel balancing on bicycles is something that a lot of people believe in, but cannot ever seem to quantify or measure the purported efficiency gains of. Oftentimes it's "proven" that it makes a huge difference because it wobbles a bicycle in the stand, but this is a completely different dynamical system with completely different constraints than how people actually use bicycles. I ride my bicycles on the ground, I don't send them airborne on their own to pedal themselves through the troposphere.
Yeah, ones perspective on this topic will certainly be swayed by the type of riding you do. I'm a roadie and prefer to ride as fast as sanely possible and have a bike that is light as sanely possible. None of this discussion probably makes any sense to a fat-tire bike rider or a touring bike rider.
Last edited by HTupolev; 05-18-20 at 03:10 PM.
Likes For HTupolev:
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
We worry about grams to compensate for our puny leg muscles Yeah, ones perspective on this topic will certainly be swayed by the type of riding you do. I'm a roadie and prefer to ride as fast as sanely possible and have a bike that is light as sanely possible. None of this discussion probably makes any sense to a fat-tire bike rider or a touring bike rider.
Oh, I don't know...
BITD, I kept my touring weight to 20lbs including bags and racks. Made a huge difference in the feeling of riding a bike as opposed to being a pack animal.
#58
Senior Member
My take on it is this: there's undoubtedly an effect of imbalance. The spin tests on the stand demonstrate that thanks to the bike on the stand being relatively unconstrained compared to when the bike is being pinned between asphalt and a human being. My guess is that the effects of road vibration from riding over uneven paving surfaces, the natural bounciness of the body due to pedaling motions, etc. are simply of such greater magnitude that the forces due to the wheel imbalance get lost in the noise. If there's any extra flex in the tire or tube that gets turned into heat through the action of the imbalance forces trying to bounce the bike but being pinned in between the rider and the street, then that would represent a power loss (same as suspension losses). Question is: what's the magnitude? Sounds like this could be the most marginal of gains.
But hey, I'd venture to say that it's probably going to be more of an effect than that argument a few weeks ago about power lost due to using a patched inner tube.
#59
Senior Member
We worry about grams to compensate for our puny leg muscles Yeah, ones perspective on this topic will certainly be swayed by the type of riding you do. I'm a roadie and prefer to ride as fast as sanely possible and have a bike that is light as sanely possible. None of this discussion probably makes any sense to a fat-tire bike rider or a touring bike rider.
But really, on all my bikes, Ive never felt anything not kosher with my wheels at whatever speed I can get up to, whether its now or 30 years ago.
I even did a bit of paved circuit racing on motorcycles, and have ridden up to somewhere over 160mph, so do have experience of riding fast on two wheels and being hyper aware of anything that would feel weird wheel wise. Sure, Ive experienced speed wobbles on bicycles a few times, and tank slappers on motorcycles, but nothing ever associated with bicycle wheels exhibiting any weirdness balance wise at speed.
But yes, when I'm riding my expeditiony type bike through different countries with a whackload of extra crap cuz I have to, my chicken legs use a 44/32/22 and a 11-34 to schlepp that damn 70-80-90lb bike along, especially in mountains and especially in countries where there are stupidly steep hills.
#60
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Richfield, WI
Posts: 720
Bikes: Trek Domane SL7 Disc, Cannondale F29
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 388 Post(s)
Liked 324 Times
in
185 Posts
I think a similar analogy to wheel balancing, that would also be considered a marginal gain at best, would be freewheel resistance.
I had my bike up-side-down the other day and spun both my front and rear wheel. The biggest difference between the two wheels obviously being that the rear wheel is subject to resistance by the freewheel where as the front is not. While I did not measure to make sure I spun both wheels with exactly equal force, the front wheel seemed to spin forever where as the rear slowed down noticeably fast. Now if I flip the bike over and ride it down the road, can I "feel" that there's resistance in the rear wheel caused by the freehub pawls? I cannot. Is energy being lost when coasting due to the freewheel. There is. Is it enough resistance to matter on one ride? Not likely. How about 1,000 rides? Well if I had a dollar for every wasted watt...
An unbalanced wheel is wasting energy. If it wasn't, they wouldn't bother balancing things like flywheels. One can get a massively heavy wheel to rotate with very little effort... if it's balanced. Most of the wheel balance deniers focus on not being able to feel an unbalanced wheel, which isn't really the point. The issue is that an unbalanced wheel is wasting energy... not only once the wheel is rotating but in just getting the wheel to rotate in the first place. Sure, there isn't enough force being generated for a 175 lbs rider to be able to feel it when sitting on the bike, but none-the-less, there is a loss of energy and the force certainly can be noticed when spinning an unbalanced wheel when not sitting on the bike. If I can reduce this loss for effort and little cost in conjunction with other small gains, that is what marginal gains is all about.
I had my bike up-side-down the other day and spun both my front and rear wheel. The biggest difference between the two wheels obviously being that the rear wheel is subject to resistance by the freewheel where as the front is not. While I did not measure to make sure I spun both wheels with exactly equal force, the front wheel seemed to spin forever where as the rear slowed down noticeably fast. Now if I flip the bike over and ride it down the road, can I "feel" that there's resistance in the rear wheel caused by the freehub pawls? I cannot. Is energy being lost when coasting due to the freewheel. There is. Is it enough resistance to matter on one ride? Not likely. How about 1,000 rides? Well if I had a dollar for every wasted watt...
An unbalanced wheel is wasting energy. If it wasn't, they wouldn't bother balancing things like flywheels. One can get a massively heavy wheel to rotate with very little effort... if it's balanced. Most of the wheel balance deniers focus on not being able to feel an unbalanced wheel, which isn't really the point. The issue is that an unbalanced wheel is wasting energy... not only once the wheel is rotating but in just getting the wheel to rotate in the first place. Sure, there isn't enough force being generated for a 175 lbs rider to be able to feel it when sitting on the bike, but none-the-less, there is a loss of energy and the force certainly can be noticed when spinning an unbalanced wheel when not sitting on the bike. If I can reduce this loss for effort and little cost in conjunction with other small gains, that is what marginal gains is all about.
#61
Senior Member
I balance mine if it's bad. At sporting good stores you can get matchbook weights. There a little bigger then a paper match and very flexible. You can cut them with scissors to get the right weight. I tape them to the tire sidewall or to the rim.
#62
Constant tinkerer
An unbalanced wheel is wasting energy. If it wasn't, they wouldn't bother balancing things like flywheels. One can get a massively heavy wheel to rotate with very little effort... if it's balanced. Most of the wheel balance deniers focus on not being able to feel an unbalanced wheel, which isn't really the point. The issue is that an unbalanced wheel is wasting energy... not only once the wheel is rotating but in just getting the wheel to rotate in the first place. Sure, there isn't enough force being generated for a 175 lbs rider to be able to feel it when sitting on the bike, but none-the-less, there is a loss of energy and the force certainly can be noticed when spinning an unbalanced wheel when not sitting on the bike. If I can reduce this loss for effort and little cost in conjunction with other small gains, that is what marginal gains is all about.
This "wasting energy" question could be answered by a roll-down test (rider on bike, not just in a stand) or with a power meter around a flat track. Is the difference measurable? Is it statistically significant? If not, then it does not matter. You could even compare your data to the energy lost by carrying those extra grams up every hill!
If this is what "marginal gains" is all about, then consider me skeptical of the entire category. Unless some of them are proven with data and analysis.
#63
Senior Member
An unbalanced wheel is wasting energy. If it wasn't, they wouldn't bother balancing things like flywheels.
One can get a massively heavy wheel to rotate with very little effort... if it's balanced. Most of the wheel balance deniers focus on not being able to feel an unbalanced wheel, which isn't really the point. The issue is that an unbalanced wheel is wasting energy... not only once the wheel is rotating but in just getting the wheel to rotate in the first place. Sure, there isn't enough force being generated for a 175 lbs rider to be able to feel it when sitting on the bike, but none-the-less, there is a loss of energy and the force certainly can be noticed when spinning an unbalanced wheel when not sitting on the bike. If I can reduce this loss for effort and little cost in conjunction with other small gains, that is what marginal gains is all about.
Where it can have an effect is if the lack of rotational smoothness is causing other elements of the system to interact unsmoothly with each other. That's why there's the emphasis on detectable things throughout the bike+rider system; if the wheel is moving stably relative to the ground and the frame is moving stably relative to the wheel, it's hard to imagine where any losses would be coming from.
A wheel imbalance should theoretically cause a slight oscillation in the loading at the wheel, which could cause a vertical oscillation in the system, but the expected magnitude of this effect is extremely tiny.
#64
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
612 Posts
Adding weight is a marginal hindrance.
I use strips of lead flashing, glued on w/ contact cement or spray adhesive, & covered w/ electrical tape.
You can use just tape initially.
Tennis shops sell adhesive lead strips for weighting racquets, but you need ~10g for a wheel & the tennis stuff is pretty thin.
My feeling is that if it reduces chance of pants-filling speed wobble, it's worth considering, and with the added 20g, the bike is still barely over 15 lbs.
I have a big roll of the stuff, & will send a piece for postage.
You can use just tape initially.
Tennis shops sell adhesive lead strips for weighting racquets, but you need ~10g for a wheel & the tennis stuff is pretty thin.
My feeling is that if it reduces chance of pants-filling speed wobble, it's worth considering, and with the added 20g, the bike is still barely over 15 lbs.
I have a big roll of the stuff, & will send a piece for postage.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Likes For Homebrew01:
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
I did a test- put a wheel in the truing stand, and spun it using very moderate force, timing until stopped.
Results:
Not balanced- 9 minutes, 9 minutes, 8 1/2 minutes.
Balanced w/ 10g- 7 1/2 minutes, 7 minutes, 7 minutes.
Weight added to heavy side- 11 minutes.
The unbalanced runs were about 5 minutes full revolutions, and the rest pendulum swings.
Maybe unbalanced wheels are better??
Results:
Not balanced- 9 minutes, 9 minutes, 8 1/2 minutes.
Balanced w/ 10g- 7 1/2 minutes, 7 minutes, 7 minutes.
Weight added to heavy side- 11 minutes.
The unbalanced runs were about 5 minutes full revolutions, and the rest pendulum swings.
Maybe unbalanced wheels are better??
Likes For woodcraft:
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504
Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times
in
30 Posts
At this rate, won't be long before bike shops start selling straight jackets...
...for the person wheel balancing for:
1. wheel magnet for speedometer
2. wheel reflector
3. "rad" rim tape
4. stem
5. seam
6. stem nut
7. stem cap
8. runny sealant
9. patch on tube
10. overlapping tire liner
11. wear indicator dot
12. replacement non-matching spoke
13. replacement non-matching nipple
14. missing rim ding material
15. hole left by a nail
...and on and on.
=8-|
...for the person wheel balancing for:
1. wheel magnet for speedometer
2. wheel reflector
3. "rad" rim tape
4. stem
5. seam
6. stem nut
7. stem cap
8. runny sealant
9. patch on tube
10. overlapping tire liner
11. wear indicator dot
12. replacement non-matching spoke
13. replacement non-matching nipple
14. missing rim ding material
15. hole left by a nail
...and on and on.
=8-|
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...
Disclaimer:
1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:
Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
5000+ wheels built since 1984...
Disclaimer:
1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:
Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
#68
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Richfield, WI
Posts: 720
Bikes: Trek Domane SL7 Disc, Cannondale F29
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 388 Post(s)
Liked 324 Times
in
185 Posts
My useless guess answer would be "no", only because I can't seem to find any info suggesting they do. However, if I was going to be screamin' down the Pyrenees at insane speeds in a pro peloton, I'd want my wheels as straight and balanced as possible to avoid speed shakes and any other disruption from pending doom! I might be surprised though... I'd assume that if maintaining bikes is your living, perhaps you'd be a bit more extreme about bike maintenance than the average Joe.
#69
Senior Member
Amen brother. I developed eosinophilic asthma 2 year ago and haven't been on my bikes since, but I did manage to find 28 pounds that I lost years ago. The only people who need worry about marginal gains are making a living riding a 6.8 kilo bike and are at less than 5% body fat.
#70
Senior Member
At this rate, won't be long before bike shops start selling straight jackets...
...for the person wheel balancing for:
1. wheel magnet for speedometer
2. wheel reflector
3. "rad" rim tape
4. stem
5. seam
6. stem nut
7. stem cap
8. runny sealant
9. patch on tube
10. overlapping tire liner
11. wear indicator dot
12. replacement non-matching spoke
13. replacement non-matching nipple
14. missing rim ding material
15. hole left by a nail
...and on and on.
=8-|
...for the person wheel balancing for:
1. wheel magnet for speedometer
2. wheel reflector
3. "rad" rim tape
4. stem
5. seam
6. stem nut
7. stem cap
8. runny sealant
9. patch on tube
10. overlapping tire liner
11. wear indicator dot
12. replacement non-matching spoke
13. replacement non-matching nipple
14. missing rim ding material
15. hole left by a nail
...and on and on.
=8-|
Last edited by davidad; 05-19-20 at 11:00 AM. Reason: spellink
#71
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,529
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3665 Post(s)
Liked 5,412 Times
in
2,750 Posts
It's always interesting when some fringe aspect of the bike hobby surfaces. Folks enjoy all sorts of different stuff. Awhile back there was a poster who was enthusiastic about "detailing" his bike, like teens do with their cars. I think it hurt his feelings when there wasn't much positive feedback.
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,480
Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 319 Times
in
246 Posts
At this rate, won't be long before bike shops start selling straight jackets...
...for the person wheel balancing for:
1. wheel magnet for speedometer
2. wheel reflector
3. "rad" rim tape
4. stem
5. seam
6. stem nut
7. stem cap
8. runny sealant
9. patch on tube
10. overlapping tire liner
11. wear indicator dot
12. replacement non-matching spoke
13. replacement non-matching nipple
14. missing rim ding material
15. hole left by a nail
...and on and on.
=8-|
...for the person wheel balancing for:
1. wheel magnet for speedometer
2. wheel reflector
3. "rad" rim tape
4. stem
5. seam
6. stem nut
7. stem cap
8. runny sealant
9. patch on tube
10. overlapping tire liner
11. wear indicator dot
12. replacement non-matching spoke
13. replacement non-matching nipple
14. missing rim ding material
15. hole left by a nail
...and on and on.
=8-|
You think the bike jumping around is imaginary and magically goes away just because your bum is holding it down?? LOL
Last edited by GamblerGORD53; 05-19-20 at 09:48 PM.
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
You could apply the "can't feel it so it doesn't matter" argument to latex tubes.
Most folks won't notice a difference vs butyl ones, but those who measure these things say that it is substantial.
Most folks won't notice a difference vs butyl ones, but those who measure these things say that it is substantial.
#74
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
Where it would really matter would be in the time trials, especially individual. The splits are so close that any possible advantage would be employed. Maybe it will be used some day, but it is hard to imagine that none of the pro teams haven’t tested it out.
John
#75
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,480
Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 319 Times
in
246 Posts
And speaking of other imaginaries.... When I used to do centuries on a defailleur bike, along quiet stretches I could feel the chain flutter from crooked chain line. It did rather bug me. Didn't matter if it was with the 50T or 39T.