Cycle Computer For Luddite
#1
For The Fun of It
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times
in
829 Posts
Cycle Computer For Luddite
I have used basic 8 function wired computers for several decades. I'd get about 5 years of service out of a 10 dollar computer and was happy with that. Lately the wired computers I have purchased have been defective right out of the box or have died after a year or so. With 3 bikes in the fleet, I am ready to try something different.
I am highly technologically challenged. I have done some reading on phone apps and have decided for several reasons that option is off the table. My search has led me to a Lezyne Macro Easy GPS. It's not wired. It's not dependent upon anything external of the base unit. It gives me the basic functions I want and can be moved from bike to bike very easily. Battery life is good for 8-10 of my typical rides.
Reviews are hard to come by on this unit. Conceptually it fits the bill. The price is about what I'd pay for 3 modern wired computers. Are any of you using this unit? Is there anything that competes with it in size, cost, function and simplicity?
I am highly technologically challenged. I have done some reading on phone apps and have decided for several reasons that option is off the table. My search has led me to a Lezyne Macro Easy GPS. It's not wired. It's not dependent upon anything external of the base unit. It gives me the basic functions I want and can be moved from bike to bike very easily. Battery life is good for 8-10 of my typical rides.
Reviews are hard to come by on this unit. Conceptually it fits the bill. The price is about what I'd pay for 3 modern wired computers. Are any of you using this unit? Is there anything that competes with it in size, cost, function and simplicity?
Last edited by Paul Barnard; 01-16-20 at 10:55 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
Stem Captain has a series of one function Cycle Computers for Luddites.
Before you ride you decide if you need the clock function, the temperature function, or the compass function. The one function inserts are easy to move from bike to bike.
Mapping function is provided by a folding piece of paper in your back pocket, available separately.
-mr. bill
Before you ride you decide if you need the clock function, the temperature function, or the compass function. The one function inserts are easy to move from bike to bike.
Mapping function is provided by a folding piece of paper in your back pocket, available separately.
-mr. bill
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 1,282
Bikes: two blacks, a blue and a white.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 445 Post(s)
Liked 847 Times
in
410 Posts
While I don't have a Lezyne computer, I do have a lot of their other products. Very happy customer, I find their designs well done and the quality quite high.
As a basic function computer, the Specialized Speedzone Wireless has been flawless. While I like to keep these things simple, the wireless connectivity really makes sense.
As a basic function computer, the Specialized Speedzone Wireless has been flawless. While I like to keep these things simple, the wireless connectivity really makes sense.
Likes For blacknbluebikes:
#4
Full Member
What features do you need? If you don't need cadence, I would seriously consider buying a GPS watch. I own a Garmin Forerunner 35. It gives me speed, distance, heart rate and step counter. Super simple to operate. My bike computer has been sitting in a drawer since I bought it. Price was $150. I wear it all the time and I'm a guy who never regularly wore a wristwatch.
If you want navigation, you can get even more sophisticated watches with mapping functions. They get expensive though.
If you want navigation, you can get even more sophisticated watches with mapping functions. They get expensive though.
#5
vespertine member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Land of Angora, Turkey
Posts: 2,476
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 687 Post(s)
Liked 220 Times
in
163 Posts
I've been liking the Bryton Rider 10. With over 10,000 miles on the thing, it still holds a charge and measures speed, distance, and elevation about as accurately as the expensive computers. It's ~$60, and compatible with cadence and heart rate sensors if you ever wanted to go that route. It's pretty simple to move between bikes.
Has anybody tried the Wahoo ELEMNT Mini? That looks like an interesting option as well, for ~$50 on Amazon.
Has anybody tried the Wahoo ELEMNT Mini? That looks like an interesting option as well, for ~$50 on Amazon.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
I've been liking the Bryton Rider 10. With over 10,000 miles on the thing, it still holds a charge and measures speed, distance, and elevation about as accurately as the expensive computers. It's ~$60, and compatible with cadence and heart rate sensors if you ever wanted to go that route. It's pretty simple to move between bikes.
Has anybody tried the Wahoo ELEMNT Mini? That looks like an interesting option as well, for ~$50 on Amazon.
Has anybody tried the Wahoo ELEMNT Mini? That looks like an interesting option as well, for ~$50 on Amazon.
And no mapping. (Or breadcrumbs.) Can't tell if that's important, or not.
Coincell battery (Versus rechargable), but good for a couple hundred hours though.
And no backlight. (Versus no backlight.)
But comes with one speed sensor. (Versus none.)
And no power, which for most people is fine, and was for me until PT wanted me to use power on the stand while I was recovering, so "upgraded" to an ELEMNT Bolt. (I haven't used power since I stopped doing the PT sessions on the stand.) Which doesn't require pairing, but is out of price range?
Two last finallies.
One, the low-end wireless bike computers and the low-end wired bike computers generally share the works great until they don't problem. I wouldn't expect a low-end wireless bike computer to last longer than a low-end wired bike computers.
Two, there's a whole subforum Electronics, Lighting, and Gadgets. Which not only has an Oxford comma, but might even have people there who have specific experience with the Lezyne Macro Easy GPS.
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 01-17-20 at 04:49 PM.
#8
Senior Member
You are not a Luddite if you have a bike computer. A Luddite wouldn't have bike computer. I might be considered a Luddite because I don't have a bike computer, nor do I use a GPS to find my way around. Paper maps are fine.
Likes For ironwood:
#9
For The Fun of It
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times
in
829 Posts
What features do you need? If you don't need cadence, I would seriously consider buying a GPS watch. I own a Garmin Forerunner 35. It gives me speed, distance, heart rate and step counter. Super simple to operate. My bike computer has been sitting in a drawer since I bought it. Price was $150. I wear it all the time and I'm a guy who never regularly wore a wristwatch.
If you want navigation, you can get even more sophisticated watches with mapping functions. They get expensive though.
If you want navigation, you can get even more sophisticated watches with mapping functions. They get expensive though.
Just need basic functions. Time, speed, trip distance, average speed, total distance, ride time. I really appreciate you ringing in, but I am not a watch kind of person at all.
#10
For The Fun of It
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times
in
829 Posts
I've been liking the Bryton Rider 10. With over 10,000 miles on the thing, it still holds a charge and measures speed, distance, and elevation about as accurately as the expensive computers. It's ~$60, and compatible with cadence and heart rate sensors if you ever wanted to go that route. It's pretty simple to move between bikes.
Has anybody tried the Wahoo ELEMNT Mini? That looks like an interesting option as well, for ~$50 on Amazon.
Has anybody tried the Wahoo ELEMNT Mini? That looks like an interesting option as well, for ~$50 on Amazon.
Funny (maybe creepy story) A few days ago I was getting my bike set up for a ride. I was in my living room. When I realized my computer had died, I may have rattled off some expletives about bicycle computers. We have an Alexa in our house. I rode sans computer. Later that evening I was surfing Facebook and lo and behold a bicycle computer ad showed up. I hadn't done any online bicycle part searching in weeks. The ad was for the Wahoo Mini.
Conceptually it checked all the boxes. My search for information led me to REI reviews. There are 74 reviews, 35 of which are 1 or 2. In reading the comments I opted out. That's what set me on the course that steered me to the Lezyne.
#11
Senior Member
I've been using a Cateye strada for the past few years. It's a basic GPS unit that I can switch from bike to bike, you just have to have a mount for each bike, sold separately. It does require you to use Cateye software to load rides to Strava, but it's an easy process once you do it once or twice. And it's rechargeable so you don't have to worry about batteries dying mid ride.
#12
For The Fun of It
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times
in
829 Posts
I have a crap memory, but for some reason or another I can review a map and retain most of what I see. If there is an area I think I might not remember, I take a pic with my phone so that I can pull it out and review it if needed. Not an issue if I am out of cell range (which is pretty easy to accomplish with T Mobile)
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
Without using a phone with the Wahoo ELEMNT Mini you'll get only the functions you want. You'll also get one speed sensor in the box.
(p.s. Most of the negative reviews about Wahoo ELEMNT Mini are pairing with phone problems. Since you don't care about phones, why care?)
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 01-17-20 at 01:37 PM.
#14
For The Fun of It
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times
in
829 Posts
Point well made and taken! I am without question technologically challenged and as a consequence tend to favor simplicity.
#15
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,990
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4947 Post(s)
Liked 8,090 Times
in
3,829 Posts
I recently bought a Wahoo Mini (couldn't pass it up at $50), and have added HR and cadence sensors. So far, it's been great. I use it for both rides and trainer sessions. Setup is super easy through the Wahoo app, and the amount of customization is remarkable for such a small and low-budget unit. I have mine set up to upload ride data to Strava at the end of the ride, and email a "live track" link to my wife at the start of the ride, both of which are also super easy to do through the Wahoo app. It's missing a couple of features of the bigger units (power meter and turn-by-turn directions being the biggest ones), but that's not a significant concern for me. I found a lot of excellent in-depth information about it by searching "wahoo mini review".
Last edited by Eric F; 01-17-20 at 05:21 PM.
#16
For The Fun of It
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times
in
829 Posts
I recently bought a Wahoo Mini (couldn't pass it up at $50), and have added HR and cadence sensors. So far, it's been great. I use it for both rides and trainer sessions. Setup is super easy through the Wahoo app, and the amount of customization is remarkable for such a small and low-budget unit. I have mine set up to upload ride data to Strava at the end of the ride, and email a "live track" link to my wife at the start of the ride, both of which are also super easy to do through the Wahoo app. It's missing a couple of features of the bigger units (power meter being the biggest one), but that's not a significant concern for me. I found a lot of excellent in-depth information about it by searching "wahoo mini review".
#17
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Check out the XOSS bike computers, especially the relatively less expensive G+. These offer an interesting compromise between the "dumb" bike computers for around $10-$25 that record basic info, other than GPS, but don't include any way to share data to our phones or computers for spreadsheets, or to Strava or other fitness apps; and the more full featured sub-$100 models from Lezyne, Bryton and others.
Just a word of caution: While the XOSS G+ seems pretty good (I bought two within the past couple of weeks, including one for half price when a one-hour flash sale appeared on Amazon), the app still needs work. I went ahead and bought two based on prompt replies from XOSS in response to customer questions and feedback on the private Facebook community for XOSS. The company seems anxious to improve the app and has made a few updates since late last year when the G+ was introduced as a lower price alternative to the XOSS Sprint launched a year or so ago after a successful kickstarter campaign. Consider it a work in progress.
And while the XOSS reliably records my rides and routes, it offers *no* navigation aids. None. No maps, compass, visual or audio prompts. That's not what it's for. It's just for recording a route, and basic relevant data such as speed determine from a sensor rather than GPS tracking, cadence, heart rate, etc. It has a barometer to estimate elevation apart from the usual map data added by Strava and other apps.
Folks who prefer navigation aids in the sub-$100 range should consider the Bryton Rider 15 and Lezyne Macro Easy. Those appear to be specifically aimed at folks who want navigation aids on the bike without resorting to their phones (or leaving the phones at home). But those aren't full featured fitness-oriented devices for hardcore roadies or fitness buffs. They record all the basic sensor info, but appear to be Bluetooth only, which leaves out my ANT+ sensors.
I was also considering the Bryton Rider 10 and 15 (very different models and features), Lezyne Macro Easy and a couple older model Lezynes for basic bike computer functions with the addition of GPS tracking and post-ride uploading to Strava.
But I wanted something that combined my favorite features of the Wahoo Fitness app for my older iPhone 4s and newer Android phone, along with better navigation:
Just a word of caution: While the XOSS G+ seems pretty good (I bought two within the past couple of weeks, including one for half price when a one-hour flash sale appeared on Amazon), the app still needs work. I went ahead and bought two based on prompt replies from XOSS in response to customer questions and feedback on the private Facebook community for XOSS. The company seems anxious to improve the app and has made a few updates since late last year when the G+ was introduced as a lower price alternative to the XOSS Sprint launched a year or so ago after a successful kickstarter campaign. Consider it a work in progress.
And while the XOSS reliably records my rides and routes, it offers *no* navigation aids. None. No maps, compass, visual or audio prompts. That's not what it's for. It's just for recording a route, and basic relevant data such as speed determine from a sensor rather than GPS tracking, cadence, heart rate, etc. It has a barometer to estimate elevation apart from the usual map data added by Strava and other apps.
Folks who prefer navigation aids in the sub-$100 range should consider the Bryton Rider 15 and Lezyne Macro Easy. Those appear to be specifically aimed at folks who want navigation aids on the bike without resorting to their phones (or leaving the phones at home). But those aren't full featured fitness-oriented devices for hardcore roadies or fitness buffs. They record all the basic sensor info, but appear to be Bluetooth only, which leaves out my ANT+ sensors.
I was also considering the Bryton Rider 10 and 15 (very different models and features), Lezyne Macro Easy and a couple older model Lezynes for basic bike computer functions with the addition of GPS tracking and post-ride uploading to Strava.
But I wanted something that combined my favorite features of the Wahoo Fitness app for my older iPhone 4s and newer Android phone, along with better navigation:
- Compatibility with Bluetooth and ANT+ sensors. I use both. My Android phone is Bluetooth only. I have an older 2011-2012 era Wahoo Bike Pack for my iPhone 4s, a kludge by today's standards but pretty clever for that era: a protective case that adds ANT+ capability, and includes a combo magnet type speed/cadence sensor. I bought it new/old stock a couple of years ago for $15 (about 10% of the original MSRP back in 2012), and with the exception of a fragile USB port and short battery life, it's been satisfactory. In fact it was such a good deal I just bought another NOS Wahoo Bike Pack for $10, just for the ANT+ speed/cadence sensor.
- More reliable GPS tracking. For folks who are serious about friendly competitions for KOMs, or snagging new PRs, minor GPS variations matter. A common gripe about Strava is losing GPS sync and losing part or all of a ride. For that reason I began running two or more fitness apps simultaneously, often on two phones (to Apple's credit, they still sorta support my old iPhone 4s and offered an iOS update last year to improve GPS reliability and fix a bug). While this is generally related to the phone device rather than the app, Strava seems more prone to sync errors than Wahoo Fitness and Cyclemeter. I suspect the difference is in how the app reconstructs the most likely route after a GPS sync error. Strava tends to draw straight lines between the point where sync was lost and reacquired, often resulting in improbable ventures across fences, through open fields and buildings, etc. Wahoo Fitness and Cyclemeter seem to reconstruct our most likely route with remarkable accuracy. My friends and I have experienced Strava GPS sync errors about once a month. With Wahoo Fitness and Cyclemeter it was once or twice a year. Again, the difference appears to be in how the apps interpolate available GPS data and reconstruct our most likely routes. And while Strava customer support often seems opaque and unresponsive, Cyclemeter is very customer oriented. Wahoo is somewhere between the two.
- And I wanted to save my phone battery, which often drained over the course of long day/night rides. Shifting ride recording to a lightweight computer on the handlebar/stem would eliminate the need to carry a heavy spare USB battery and cable to recharge my phone. The older iPhone 4s in particular never lasted a full 50 mile ride, and I'd sometimes lose an entire log if the battery drained around the 40 mile mark. So now I use the iPhone/Wahoo ANT+ case only on the indoor trainer.
#18
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Likes For livedarklions:
#19
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,990
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4947 Post(s)
Liked 8,090 Times
in
3,829 Posts
The Mini requires using Wahoo's sensors, which is a bummer for people who already have other manufacturer's sensors, but Wahoo's sensors will work with other computers if you decide to upgrade later. If you're diving in for the first time, there's no significant downside to this issue, as far as I can tell.
I highly suggest looking up the review videos on YouTube. They offer a lot of in-depth info, as well as pros and cons. For me, the cons weren't an issue considering where I'm coming from (getting back into it after being away for 15 years). At some point I can see myself upgrading to the Bolt, but I'm pretty pleased with the Mini for now.
Last edited by Eric F; 01-17-20 at 04:31 PM.
Likes For Eric F:
#20
Senior Member
Can you do math in your head? Memorize a gear chart? Mount a stopwatch on your 'bar. Count pedal revolutions. If you know pedal rpm and gearing you can calculate speed. Basically gear inches times 0.3 gives speed in mph at 100rpm, varies with exact tire size. This was how it was done before such a thing as a 'cycle computer' existed. I am a Luddite and proud of it and still do exactly this. A computer would look all wrong mounted on handlebar of a 1950 Bates.
GPS? I have seen riders crash into parked cars while involved in GPS.
GPS? I have seen riders crash into parked cars while involved in GPS.
Likes For 63rickert:
Likes For mr_bill:
#23
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,990
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4947 Post(s)
Liked 8,090 Times
in
3,829 Posts
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,883
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3240 Post(s)
Liked 2,086 Times
in
1,181 Posts
Speed isn’t so much inaccurate as laggy, as the computer waits for the unit to figure out it’s current and ever changing position. Distance accuracy can be off if the unit is tracking a very twisty course, such as single track in the woods. As well GPS units (all of them, cycling specific, watches, hiking) have issues in heavily wooded areas with a lot of leaf coverage do to the GPS satellite signal being weak and prone to path errors.
Speed sensors fix both these issues. Roadies doing paceline group rides benefit from a sensor to get a better and more timely speed readout which is useful to be able to maintain a steady pace. Riding roads that have gentle turns, not super twisty and the distance won’t be off by much as compared to a calibrated bike computer. My initial measurements showed my Garmin 810 was off by about a mile in 100 as compared to a Cateye computer, on the roads I rode which tend to straight. I use speed sensors for bikes I use on group rides and the bikes I take in the woods.
#25
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts