Brooks Saddle Question
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Brooks Saddle Question
So I ended up spilling on my RB when clipping out the other day and it ripped a big chunk out of my stock saddle. Since I am looking at replacing it, I have been thinking about biting the bullet and picking a Brooks saddle. As I have looked at the different models I am stuck between the tide and true B-17 or going with the C-17 or 15 Cambien model. I was wondering if anyone has any experience with the new combine line of seats and can offer an opinion.
#2
Chases Dogs for Sport
Yes. I've put over 20,000 miles on a C17. From the first day, it rides like a well broken-in B17 -- plus, it's weather proof. You never have to worry about rain. For me, it's the most comfortable saddle for any distance.
#3
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,633
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4731 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
I ride a C13 Cambium Carved, but they now come in widths -- so basically can be a carbon railed version of a C15 or C17 I think. I like it, but only a couple hundred miles on it so far. FWIW came from a fizik antares vsx
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the information. My current seat is Prologo Kappa 2 and its 147mm wide, the C15 is 140mm and the C17 I believe is 162, do you think going up would be better then going down in size? Im thinking up especially since I am Clyde. The prologo worked fine but I would be a bit nervous going any smaller... Thoughts?
#5
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thanks for the information. My current seat is Prologo Kappa 2 and its 147mm wide, the C15 is 140mm and the C17 I believe is 162, do you think going up would be better then going down in size? Im thinking up especially since I am Clyde. The prologo worked fine but I would be a bit nervous going any smaller... Thoughts?
At 173 pounds, I go with the C13 wide on my road bike and C17 on my gravel bike. Of course, there's more to fitting the saddle than rider weight.
Last edited by FlashBazbo; 01-30-17 at 02:06 PM.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Flash, I will check them out... I am going to try and measure my sit bones and see what they come out at, not sure If that will work. thanks for the input. Wow, looking at the price, they are really proud of them...lol
Last edited by Sldrvr; 01-30-17 at 02:08 PM.
#7
smelling the roses
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tixkokob, Yucatán, México
Posts: 15,320
Bikes: 79 Trek 930, 80 Trek 414, 84 Schwinn Letour Luxe (coupled), 92 Schwinn Paramount PDG 5
Mentioned: 104 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7081 Post(s)
Liked 901 Times
in
612 Posts
I have a C17 and a C15, and like them both. I also have a Team Pro leather saddle that I think will ultimately surpass them both. Keep in mind that the C17 is significantly narrower than the B17, which is significantly too wide for my personal comfort.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 1,667
Bikes: Trek Emonda SL6 .... Miyata One Thousand
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 29 Times
in
22 Posts
Brooks C17 Cambium Carved (the one with the slot/cut-out).... 100% waterproof, designed for long distance/touring, plus you get a 10 year guarantee if you register the serial number on the Brooks website .... comfy straight out of the box
if you want leather.... Gilles Berthoud Aravis... the Rolls Royce of leather saddles but not cheap .... the Aravis has titanium rails
I own them both
if you want leather.... Gilles Berthoud Aravis... the Rolls Royce of leather saddles but not cheap .... the Aravis has titanium rails
I own them both
#9
Big Boned Biker
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 478
Bikes: Raleigh Detour 4.5, Trek Crossrip Elite '14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've ridden them both, and prefer the b17. After it is broken in, it is just a little more comfortable.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,667
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,981 Times
in
1,775 Posts
Well, I find a brand new Brooks Swallow to be more comfortable than the C15 Cambium I have. The swallow I totally forget is there while I'm always aware of the Cambium. I'm also having good luck with the Gyes saddles. I don't know if they will last as long as a Brooks but they are a good bit cheaper and seem well made. I feel like the Gyes are a bit "springier" out of the box than the Brooks.
For comparison of the profiles
The Brooks Cambium C15:
The Brooks Swallow:
The Gyes GS-06:
For comparison of the profiles
The Brooks Cambium C15:
The Brooks Swallow:
The Gyes GS-06:
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: SGV So Cal
Posts: 883
Bikes: 80's Schwinn High Plains, Motobecane Ti Cyclocross
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 108 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times
in
21 Posts
9000 mi on a B-17 Imperial. wouldn't trade it for anything else.
The Imperial has the cutout, is maybe a bit narrower, so kind of an intermediate between the B-17 and a Swallow?
also pre-punched for lacing and comes with the laces.
The Brooks do have short rails so you may have to find a long setback seatpost depending on your, and the bikes geometry.
The Imperial has the cutout, is maybe a bit narrower, so kind of an intermediate between the B-17 and a Swallow?
also pre-punched for lacing and comes with the laces.
The Brooks do have short rails so you may have to find a long setback seatpost depending on your, and the bikes geometry.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
I've only ridden the Brooks Pro and Swift - 100K+ miles. I can't comment on the other, but I'd stick with their leather. Expect 3Kmiles to break in :-)
Last edited by Doge; 01-30-17 at 10:52 PM.
#13
Full Member
Short version: I have both. They're both great, but I'll put Cambiums on all my non-touring bikes in the future.
Longer explanation: The B17 has a wonderful heritage and looks the part. It needs breaking in (> 700 miles on mine and still not there), but it really not that bad, even before.
The Cambium is comfortable right away, it's significantly lighter, and it's waterproof, which is nice for commuters in Seattle. It's vegan, too, if that matters to you. I've noticed a bit of wear on the nubby fabric top in a few places, but nothing that seems critical.
I think the Cambium wins for near-term practicality, and it seems like it will outlast many non-leather saddles. I imagine my B17 will outlast it by 2-3x, though.
Longer explanation: The B17 has a wonderful heritage and looks the part. It needs breaking in (> 700 miles on mine and still not there), but it really not that bad, even before.
The Cambium is comfortable right away, it's significantly lighter, and it's waterproof, which is nice for commuters in Seattle. It's vegan, too, if that matters to you. I've noticed a bit of wear on the nubby fabric top in a few places, but nothing that seems critical.
I think the Cambium wins for near-term practicality, and it seems like it will outlast many non-leather saddles. I imagine my B17 will outlast it by 2-3x, though.
#14
Full Member
This! I forgot about that. I had an odd-sized frame and couldn't get the B17 far enough back without a setback seatpost. The Cambium rails slid back farther.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,667
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,981 Times
in
1,775 Posts
Good point. The Swallow version has the longest rails of the Brooks saddles (as a norm) and then the look alike Gyes saddles have longer, more normal rails. I need a lot of setback with my saddles for my fit so this is an important consideration for me.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 3,417
Bikes: 1984 Miyata 310, 1986 Schwinn Sierra, 2011 Jamis Quest, 1980 Peugeot TH8 Tandem, 1992 Performance Parabola, 1987 Ross Mt. Hood, 1988 Schwinn LeTour, 1988 Trek 400T, 1981 Fuji S12-S LTD, 197? FW Evans
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 529 Post(s)
Liked 1,000 Times
in
513 Posts
I was very close to buying a C17, but a lot of reviews complained about the color fading and they didn't like how the textured surface gripped their bike shorts. so I bought another B17. I already had two, so I figured I would go with a sure thing. The first one took some breaking in. The second one seemed to be good, right out of the box. I will try the third one once the weather warms up.
#18
Senior Member
I have only had Brooks Pro and Swift. Could never get comfortable on the Swift and bought a new Pro so have them on two bike. Very comfortable and I have found initial brealin to be just a few hundred miles. B17 would be too wide for my road bike.
#19
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,633
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4731 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
I was very close to buying a C17, but a lot of reviews complained about the color fading and they didn't like how the textured surface gripped their bike shorts. so I bought another B17. I already had two, so I figured I would go with a sure thing. The first one took some breaking in. The second one seemed to be good, right out of the box. I will try the third one once the weather warms up.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lewisburg, TN
Posts: 1,356
Bikes: Mikkelsen custom steel, Santa Cruz Chameleon SS, old trek trainer bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
You went the same way I did last year. I snagged a C13 carved for pretty cheap, but didn't get to ride it a ton last year before the snow started falling. Liked it for the miles I put on it though. This year I will decide for certain if it is for me. Looks awesome, got the grey. Goes really well with my Lynskey R140!
#23
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,633
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4731 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
Good choice; I like mine. Now that they have width options (they didn't a year ago; it was originally only available in the narrow option), what width did you get?
It does look nice with a Ti frame fwiw.
It does look nice with a Ti frame fwiw.
#25
Full Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 201
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Have the Team Pro and a C17. Bought the C17 hoping for a lighter Team Pro, but the Team Pro is definitely a better seat for comfort on long hauls. The C17 is pretty good all of the time, though starts to wear on me at about the 40 mile mark. The Team Pro is comfortable all the time. Either way I needed a wider seat (wide sit bones) and they both work well for that.