Ti-Raleigh Team 753 40th anniversary replica review
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Colleyville, Texas
Posts: 89
Bikes: 1988 Gitane Team Replica, 2022 Trek Top Fuel 9.8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times
in
35 Posts
Ti-Raleigh Team 753 40th anniversary replica review
Raleigh is reliving the glory days of its 1980 Tour de France win with a remake of the iconic Team 753 bike, but how does it actually ride? We've been tightening up its toe straps to find out
It's a little pricey, but I like the effort. This doesn't make up for discontinuing the Grand Vitesse though.
I thought this part was really interesting
The biggest issue with remaking the Team 753 is that Reynolds doesn’t make the original heat-treated steel tubeset anymore. The Nottingham bike brand and Birmingham tube worked together to recreate period-correct plumbing which was then silver brazed into Allotec lugs by Maxway in Taiwan - one of the few remaining 753-certified builders.
Last edited by capt_velo; 09-15-20 at 02:50 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,031
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4509 Post(s)
Liked 6,374 Times
in
3,666 Posts
Plenty here to like regardless of its shortcomings, perceived or otherwise.
We should embrace any and all efforts by any company that continues to keep the flame going, most of them are happy to abandon most of it.
My hats off to Raleigh for sticking with us.
Spendy, yes, no I didn't get one, thought long and hard about it, biggest one is too small, still should have.
Actually lucky my advanced link didn't work, I'd probably have one of the frames sitting here otherwise.
We should embrace any and all efforts by any company that continues to keep the flame going, most of them are happy to abandon most of it.
My hats off to Raleigh for sticking with us.
Spendy, yes, no I didn't get one, thought long and hard about it, biggest one is too small, still should have.
Actually lucky my advanced link didn't work, I'd probably have one of the frames sitting here otherwise.
Likes For merziac:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North, Ga.
Posts: 2,401
Bikes: 3Rensho-Aerodynamics, Bernard Hinault Look - 1986 tour winner, Guerciotti, Various Klein's & Panasonic's
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 375 Times
in
162 Posts
I am really just not a fan of retro or reproduction bikes.
They usually have none of the redeeming qualities that made the original bike cool in the first place.
This one is no exception.
They usually have none of the redeeming qualities that made the original bike cool in the first place.
This one is no exception.
#4
Senior Member
Happy to see the bike but the reviewer? What was he thinking? Of course it has cloth tape. Of course it has toe straps. Saying those things make the bike less desirable is like reviewing a car built to specs from the 50’s and then complaining about having to use the choke and the clutch.
Likes For Mr. Spadoni:
#5
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,510
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2420 Post(s)
Liked 4,381 Times
in
2,090 Posts
I was about to say - it may not be the original, but it appeared to be a very worthy KOF (and potentially a better deal for some than an original SBDU frameset), until I took a good hard look at the main triangle.
These photos are from two different sources. And you know what I see? A sloping top tube. Ever so slight, but it's there.
I can't for the life of me understand why they took something so nearly perfect and ruined it this way. The non-aero brakes and downtube shifters are proof enough that this replica was intended to have no concessions to modernity if it could avoid it...so why ruin the one critical thing that us retrogrouches look for in a replica like this?
-Kurt
These photos are from two different sources. And you know what I see? A sloping top tube. Ever so slight, but it's there.
I can't for the life of me understand why they took something so nearly perfect and ruined it this way. The non-aero brakes and downtube shifters are proof enough that this replica was intended to have no concessions to modernity if it could avoid it...so why ruin the one critical thing that us retrogrouches look for in a replica like this?
-Kurt
Last edited by cudak888; 09-15-20 at 06:51 PM.
Likes For cudak888:
#6
framebuilder
And you know what I see? A sloping top tube. Ever so slight, but it's there. I can't for the life of me understand why they took something so nearly perfect and ruined it this way. The non-aero brakes and downtube shifters are proof enough that this replica was intended to have no concessions to modernity if it could avoid it...so why ruin the one critical thing that us retrogrouches look for in a replica like this?-Kurt
For the market it is intended (somebody old enough to have wanted one 40 years ago), a slightly sloping tube is most likely an advantage. It raises the top of the head tube a slight amount so the handlebars can be just a little bit higher without looking as goofy. Those in their 60's and 70's aren't as lean and flexible as they were in 1980 and will most likely prefer higher handlebars. A slightly sloping top tube is a trick some of my older frame building class students use when designing their frames. Using lugs with steeper angles than their design makes it easier for them to fit and braze their frame.
Likes For Doug Fattic:
Likes For P!N20:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,031
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4509 Post(s)
Liked 6,374 Times
in
3,666 Posts
I was about to say - it may not be the original, but it appeared to be a very worthy KOF (and potentially a better deal for some than an original SBDU frameset), until I took a good hard look at the main triangle.
These photos are from two different sources. And you know what I see? A sloping top tube. Ever so slight, but it's there.
I can't for the life of me understand why they took something so nearly perfect and ruined it this way. The non-aero brakes and downtube shifters are proof enough that this replica was intended to have no concessions to modernity if it could avoid it...so why ruin the one critical thing that us retrogrouches look for in a replica like this?
-Kurt
These photos are from two different sources. And you know what I see? A sloping top tube. Ever so slight, but it's there.
I can't for the life of me understand why they took something so nearly perfect and ruined it this way. The non-aero brakes and downtube shifters are proof enough that this replica was intended to have no concessions to modernity if it could avoid it...so why ruin the one critical thing that us retrogrouches look for in a replica like this?
-Kurt
There is a factory video where they address it some.
Looks like it was done to minimize the range they wanted to do, sloping the TT would let them say "oh a 61 will be ok if you need a 62-63" and still accommodate 59-60 as well.
#9
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,510
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2420 Post(s)
Liked 4,381 Times
in
2,090 Posts
If comfort is a priority, they failed by being too accurate to the original in regards to components.
If accuracy is a priority, they failed by sloping that top tube.
About the only folks they aren't going to tick off are those who're going to buy one and leave it in the box with the silly idea that it's an "investment."
-Kurt
#10
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,510
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2420 Post(s)
Liked 4,381 Times
in
2,090 Posts
They've gone through all the effort of making a bike limited to 250 units, and even dusted Reynolds 753 out of the closet to do it. The least they could have done was not violate one of the principle rules of C&V in making a lugged steel frameset that's aspiring to be a fairly hardcore replica.
Now I'm curious if the 2014/15 replica is sloped or not. If anything, the brifters and bar tape - though by no means period accurate - make a lot more sense for the target market Doug is speaking of. Head angle on this 54(?)cm example looks a bit slack though - a concession for toe overlap? Who knows - can't find a photo of a larger one from this particular reissue series.
-Kurt
Last edited by cudak888; 09-15-20 at 07:47 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,031
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4509 Post(s)
Liked 6,374 Times
in
3,666 Posts
A slick corporate video isn't going to convince me that they're putting glitter over a crap decision.
They've gone through all the effort of making a bike limited to 250 units, and even dusted Reynolds 753 out of the closet to do it.
The least they could have done was not violate one of the principle rules of C&V in making a lugged steel frameset that's aspiring to be a fairly hardcore replica. Sheesh.
-Kurt
They've gone through all the effort of making a bike limited to 250 units, and even dusted Reynolds 753 out of the closet to do it.
The least they could have done was not violate one of the principle rules of C&V in making a lugged steel frameset that's aspiring to be a fairly hardcore replica. Sheesh.
-Kurt
Same BS goes for the dropouts that are slab steak thick ugly to conform to "safety standards" since all before and since have maimed and killed so many.
There certainly is too much wrong here but at least they tried, more than you can say for many of the rest.
Guess I'm just sentimental, or just mental at least.
Likes For merziac:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 166
Bikes: 1970's Piasentin Super Vitus 971, 1979 Carlton Professional, 2005 Trek 5000, 2011 Niner EMD, 2018 Argon 18 XRoad, 1990 Diamondback Master TG Centurion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Liked 73 Times
in
55 Posts
Looks great! A nice modern update on a classic bicycle. Raleigh has done a good job on this and I'm sure they'll quickly sell all 250 copies.
Likes For NatusEstInSuht:
#13
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,510
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2420 Post(s)
Liked 4,381 Times
in
2,090 Posts
I'm not justifying it or drinking the kool-aid, just saying they tried to gloss over it, I wholeheartedly agree with you and like I said am glad my link didn't work since I may have momentarily lost my mind when they launched.
Same BS goes for the dropouts that are slab steak thick ugly to conform to "safety standards" since all before and since have maimed and killed so many.
There certainly is too much wrong here but at least they tried, more than you can say for many of the rest.
Guess I'm just sentimental, or just mental at least.
Same BS goes for the dropouts that are slab steak thick ugly to conform to "safety standards" since all before and since have maimed and killed so many.
There certainly is too much wrong here but at least they tried, more than you can say for many of the rest.
Guess I'm just sentimental, or just mental at least.
They did try, but all things considered, it really leaves me shaking my head. It just feels as if they went to 99% with this replica and then told the top tube to take a hike.
-Kurt
P.S.: I don't mind thick dropouts, even if they're thicker than the standard 1010 fare - I think it's a knee-jerk reaction against how thin drops tend to suggest "stamped and cheap bike boom" for anything after the mid-1960s.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,512
Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 789 Post(s)
Liked 1,739 Times
in
630 Posts
I was about to say - it may not be the original, but it appeared to be a very worthy KOF (and potentially a better deal for some than an original SBDU frameset), until I took a good hard look at the main triangle.
These photos are from two different sources. And you know what I see? A sloping top tube. Ever so slight, but it's there.
I can't for the life of me understand why they took something so nearly perfect and ruined it this way. The non-aero brakes and downtube shifters are proof enough that this replica was intended to have no concessions to modernity if it could avoid it...so why ruin the one critical thing that us retrogrouches look for in a replica like this?
-Kurt
These photos are from two different sources. And you know what I see? A sloping top tube. Ever so slight, but it's there.
I can't for the life of me understand why they took something so nearly perfect and ruined it this way. The non-aero brakes and downtube shifters are proof enough that this replica was intended to have no concessions to modernity if it could avoid it...so why ruin the one critical thing that us retrogrouches look for in a replica like this?
-Kurt
#15
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,510
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2420 Post(s)
Liked 4,381 Times
in
2,090 Posts
In comparison to a '75 Pro Mk.IV and a '78 Pro Mk.V (both with 23C's - the V has tubulars), it's not far off:
I bet there are much tighter SBDUs out there.
-Kurt
Last edited by cudak888; 09-15-20 at 08:41 PM.
Likes For cudak888:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Humboldt County, CA
Posts: 832
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 430 Times
in
286 Posts
I find it even more offensive that the writer assumes that his readers all wear camelbaks, since they'd crash and die if they tried to use a water bottle.
--Shannon
--Shannon
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,031
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4509 Post(s)
Liked 6,374 Times
in
3,666 Posts
No worries . And I almost did something about that "buy now" button too. I've wanted something very red, very yellow, and very Raleigh for a while now. Those oddball French 531 frames that worked their way here are quite enticing too - I don't need an SBDU, and I don't think I should be cranking on vintage 753.
They did try, but all things considered, it really leaves me shaking my head. It just feels as if they went to 99% with this replica and then told the top tube to take a hike.
-Kurt
P.S.: I don't mind thick dropouts, even if they're thicker than the standard 1010 fare - I think it's a knee-jerk reaction against how thin drops tend to suggest "stamped and cheap bike boom" for anything after the mid-1960s.
They did try, but all things considered, it really leaves me shaking my head. It just feels as if they went to 99% with this replica and then told the top tube to take a hike.
-Kurt
P.S.: I don't mind thick dropouts, even if they're thicker than the standard 1010 fare - I think it's a knee-jerk reaction against how thin drops tend to suggest "stamped and cheap bike boom" for anything after the mid-1960s.
#18
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times
in
4,181 Posts
Tough crowd. Or tough minor peanut gallery, I guess.
Sloping top tube that is a couple degrees. Oh well.
Flat crown instead of sloping. Oh well.
Larger dropouts due to legal compliance. Oh well.
Maybe these things add up to not wanting to buy the bike because it isnt close enough to the original.
It also has a 2x10 drivetrain as well as 130mm dropouts, so it clearly isn't an exact replica.
It'd be neat if the US version of Raleigh did anything cool like this over the last few years. Instead, they just seem to recycle the same half neat designs and let them run their course until selling out the stock.
Sloping top tube that is a couple degrees. Oh well.
Flat crown instead of sloping. Oh well.
Larger dropouts due to legal compliance. Oh well.
Maybe these things add up to not wanting to buy the bike because it isnt close enough to the original.
It also has a 2x10 drivetrain as well as 130mm dropouts, so it clearly isn't an exact replica.
It'd be neat if the US version of Raleigh did anything cool like this over the last few years. Instead, they just seem to recycle the same half neat designs and let them run their course until selling out the stock.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,031
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4509 Post(s)
Liked 6,374 Times
in
3,666 Posts
Tough crowd. Or tough minor peanut gallery, I guess.
Sloping top tube that is a couple degrees. Oh well.
Flat crown instead of sloping. Oh well.
Larger dropouts due to legal compliance. Oh well.
Maybe these things add up to not wanting to buy the bike because it isnt close enough to the original.
It also has a 2x10 drivetrain as well as 130mm dropouts, so it clearly isn't an exact replica.
It'd be neat if the US version of Raleigh did anything cool like this over the last few years. Instead, they just seem to recycle the same half neat designs and let them run their course until selling out the stock.
Sloping top tube that is a couple degrees. Oh well.
Flat crown instead of sloping. Oh well.
Larger dropouts due to legal compliance. Oh well.
Maybe these things add up to not wanting to buy the bike because it isnt close enough to the original.
It also has a 2x10 drivetrain as well as 130mm dropouts, so it clearly isn't an exact replica.
It'd be neat if the US version of Raleigh did anything cool like this over the last few years. Instead, they just seem to recycle the same half neat designs and let them run their course until selling out the stock.
Like I said, I'm glad they went here as many won't but am glad I didn't lose my mind when it came out.
#20
Senior Member
"Period correct plumbing" ??? later referred to as cro mo. Like they are really going to create a new alloy just for this bike. Why not just admit they used 725, which is basically identical to 753 in physical properties.
The terrible set up in the first picture of the review didn't exactly give me confidence. It wouldn't have been that hard to find someone familiar enough with vintage race bikes to correctly route cables, position levers, level the seat, and choose the right size frame.
The terrible set up in the first picture of the review didn't exactly give me confidence. It wouldn't have been that hard to find someone familiar enough with vintage race bikes to correctly route cables, position levers, level the seat, and choose the right size frame.
#21
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,823 Times
in
1,709 Posts
$3222.42 for that? Lol.
These retro-flashback rigs are a joke. For that kind of money, I am not impressed with a spec sheet which includes "Retro style 50/39T chainset" or "Classic aero post". Sounds like they outfitted this with the same wonky Frankenbike gruppo cues from Bianchi's grossly-overpriced L'Eroica tribute bike. I wonder who the target audience is, honestly.
I know there are a lot of fans here, I'm just not one of them. The component spec is my biggest gripe regarding any of these modern retro bikes, but as Kurt noted, the sloping top tube is a no-go as well. Meh.
DD
These retro-flashback rigs are a joke. For that kind of money, I am not impressed with a spec sheet which includes "Retro style 50/39T chainset" or "Classic aero post". Sounds like they outfitted this with the same wonky Frankenbike gruppo cues from Bianchi's grossly-overpriced L'Eroica tribute bike. I wonder who the target audience is, honestly.
I know there are a lot of fans here, I'm just not one of them. The component spec is my biggest gripe regarding any of these modern retro bikes, but as Kurt noted, the sloping top tube is a no-go as well. Meh.
DD
Likes For Drillium Dude:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wurundjeri Country
Posts: 2,467
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1078 Post(s)
Liked 1,895 Times
in
930 Posts
$3222.42 for that? Lol.
These retro-flashback rigs are a joke. For that kind of money, I am not impressed with a spec sheet which includes "Retro style 50/39T chainset" or "Classic aero post". Sounds like they outfitted this with the same wonky Frankenbike gruppo cues from Bianchi's grossly-overpriced L'Eroica tribute bike. I wonder who the target audience is, honestly.
I know there are a lot of fans here, I'm just not one of them. The component spec is my biggest gripe regarding any of these modern retro bikes, but as Kurt noted, the sloping top tube is a no-go as well. Meh.
DD
These retro-flashback rigs are a joke. For that kind of money, I am not impressed with a spec sheet which includes "Retro style 50/39T chainset" or "Classic aero post". Sounds like they outfitted this with the same wonky Frankenbike gruppo cues from Bianchi's grossly-overpriced L'Eroica tribute bike. I wonder who the target audience is, honestly.
I know there are a lot of fans here, I'm just not one of them. The component spec is my biggest gripe regarding any of these modern retro bikes, but as Kurt noted, the sloping top tube is a no-go as well. Meh.
DD
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 852
Bikes: 1903 24 spd Sunbeam, 1927 Humber, 3 1930 Raleighs, 2 1940s Sunbeams, 2 1940s Raleighs, Rudge, 1950s Robin Hood, 1958 Claud Butler, 2 1973 Colnago Supers, Eddie Merckx, 2 1980 Holdsworth, EG Bates funny TT bike, another 6 or so 1990s bikes
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Liked 332 Times
in
185 Posts
Break my balls
They ship the 753 tubing to Taiwan and get some poor bastard on 5 bucks an hour to make it coz instead of making a decent profit they want to make an obscene profit. It won't work.
Interesting they go the Full Cleveland on dress code for the CEOs in the promo to enhance the retro look. LOL, back in the day even the factory foreman wore a suit.
I never liked the Milk Race livery but I wouldn't have thought a horizontal top tube was going to break the bank.
Who under 50 wants a poor replica of a 1980s steel bike. If someone wants light steel there are plenty of new 853 Reynolds bikes for less that don't falsely claim to be retro.
Interesting they go the Full Cleveland on dress code for the CEOs in the promo to enhance the retro look. LOL, back in the day even the factory foreman wore a suit.
I never liked the Milk Race livery but I wouldn't have thought a horizontal top tube was going to break the bank.
Who under 50 wants a poor replica of a 1980s steel bike. If someone wants light steel there are plenty of new 853 Reynolds bikes for less that don't falsely claim to be retro.
#24
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,823 Times
in
1,709 Posts
An honest comparison of old against new (frame/fork only):
DD
DD
Likes For Drillium Dude: