Anyone here who is 5'10.5 and rides a 60cm?
#101
Old Fart
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bumpkinsville
Posts: 3,348
Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
What you ride, because it is what you have had since you were a teen and didn't know any better is one thing. What you should buy given a full selection is quite another. What sense does it make to buy a brand new bike in the wrong size just because you could kinda-sorta make it work when the right size is equally available? Nada!
I'd much rather be like CliffordK, and be able to be happy with a range of sizes, than to be some fuss-budget who thinks he needs a custom frame, because everything has to be just so, down to the millimeter.
#102
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18380 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
What you ride, because it is what you have had since you were a teen and didn't know any better is one thing. What you should buy given a full selection is quite another. What sense does it make to buy a brand new bike in the wrong size just because you could kinda-sorta make it work when the right size is equally available? Nada!
It's often more about what your body becomes used to/acclimates to, than what some book says is "proper". Those of us who grew-up on ill-sized bikes (Who even knew that bikes came in sizes?!) are lucky, as we learned to adapt and be flexible*. [*= More in a mental sense, although the literal meaning is appropriate too]
I'd much rather be like CliffordK, and be able to be happy with a range of sizes, than to be some fuss-budget who thinks he needs a custom frame, because everything has to be just so, down to the millimeter.
I'd much rather be like CliffordK, and be able to be happy with a range of sizes, than to be some fuss-budget who thinks he needs a custom frame, because everything has to be just so, down to the millimeter.
Once you get on the bike, you have basically 3 contact points. Your pedals, your seat, and the handlebars (plus different positions on the bars).
How you arrive at those contact points is pretty much irrelevant (although you may get different flex characteristics depending on how close bearing are and length of seatposts and stems).
If the seat tube angle was the same, then moving the top tube up or down wouldn't affect the fit. However, the larger frames often have slightly different angles than the small ones. But, some of that can be altered with the saddle adjustment and post setback.
I sit on the top tube (5'10, 60cm) at traffic lights, and find it comfortable to do so.
I will say that I admit that I get some pants rub when pedalling standing with the 60cm frame. One gets used to the frame being there, but perhaps there is a slight power loss. Less pants rub with a smaller frame.
#103
Old Fart
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bumpkinsville
Posts: 3,348
Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I'm the exact opposite of you in that regard @CliffordK - I'm 5'10" also, but I prefer smaller bikes- I consider 54 to be my size- but I like to think that I can ride anything from a 52 to a 58. And it's always fun to experiment with bikes of different sizes. You never really know until you try....and I mean, long enough for your body to adapt- not just some 20 mile test-ride.
#104
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
I'm the exact opposite of you in that regard @CliffordK - I'm 5'10" also, but I prefer smaller bikes- I consider 54 to be my size- but I like to think that I can ride anything from a 52 to a 58. And it's always fun to experiment with bikes of different sizes. You never really know until you try....and I mean, long enough for your body to adapt- not just some 20 mile test-ride.
#105
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
Well, I'll admit, after 30 years mostly on one bike. I built up a "new" bike with a little more handlebar drop last winter. It did take some time to get used to, at least for longer rides. Perhaps the back is getting old
Once you get on the bike, you have basically 3 contact points. Your pedals, your seat, and the handlebars (plus different positions on the bars).
How you arrive at those contact points is pretty much irrelevant (although you may get different flex characteristics depending on how close bearing are and length of seatposts and stems).
If the seat tube angle was the same, then moving the top tube up or down wouldn't affect the fit. However, the larger frames often have slightly different angles than the small ones. But, some of that can be altered with the saddle adjustment and post setback.
I sit on the top tube (5'10, 60cm) at traffic lights, and find it comfortable to do so.
I will say that I admit that I get some pants rub when pedalling standing with the 60cm frame. One gets used to the frame being there, but perhaps there is a slight power loss. Less pants rub with a smaller frame.
Once you get on the bike, you have basically 3 contact points. Your pedals, your seat, and the handlebars (plus different positions on the bars).
How you arrive at those contact points is pretty much irrelevant (although you may get different flex characteristics depending on how close bearing are and length of seatposts and stems).
If the seat tube angle was the same, then moving the top tube up or down wouldn't affect the fit. However, the larger frames often have slightly different angles than the small ones. But, some of that can be altered with the saddle adjustment and post setback.
I sit on the top tube (5'10, 60cm) at traffic lights, and find it comfortable to do so.
I will say that I admit that I get some pants rub when pedalling standing with the 60cm frame. One gets used to the frame being there, but perhaps there is a slight power loss. Less pants rub with a smaller frame.
I'm the exact opposite of you in that regard @CliffordK - I'm 5'10" also, but I prefer smaller bikes- I consider 54 to be my size- but I like to think that I can ride anything from a 52 to a 58. And it's always fun to experiment with bikes of different sizes. You never really know until you try....and I mean, long enough for your body to adapt- not just some 20 mile test-ride.
#106
Old Fart
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bumpkinsville
Posts: 3,348
Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
How do you know if it's "the wrong size" unless you've tried it and found it not to work? I'm very comfortable on a 54- but what would be so terrible about buyiong a used 58 for say $300 on CL and experimenting with it? I might find, that after a month of riding, that I indeed hate it; and then I could flip it; or I might find that a change of fity and position is actually refreshing. I'd hate to think that I went through life having not at least tried riding anything but a 54.
#107
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
[QUOTE=Stucky;18139632]How do you know if it's "the wrong size" unless you've tried it and found it not to work? I'm very comfortable on a 54- but what would be so terrible about buyiong a used 58 for say $300 on CL and experimenting with it? I might find, that after a month of riding, that I indeed hate it; and then I could flip it; or I might find that a change of fity and position is actually refreshing. I'd hate to think that I went through life having not at least tried riding anything but a 54.[/QUOTE]
That would be horrible, wouldn't it?
Do you apply this very sensible philosophy to clothing too? I mean do you buy pants and shoes, etc. a couple of sizes too large and too small just so you can say you tried them out? Are they easy to "flip" when you find out that you are still the same size you have always been?
Perhaps you have never heard the joke about the guy who goes in to buy a suit, but the store is out of his size...and the next sizes both up and down, too. So the salesman puts him in a suit that is two sizes too big for him. When he complains about the sleeves being too long, the salesman explains that he has to bend his elbows to get the right fit. When he shows the salesman the shoulders are too wide, he is told to hunch his shoulders to take up the slack. Same with bending his knees to get the pants legs right and bending over at the waist to keep the pants from falling down.
So he pays for the suit and is walking down the street when two old ladies see him coming toward them, hobbling and swaying back and forth.
One says to the other, "Oh Penelope, what a shame, look at that poor old crippled man."
"Yes, Hiledgarde," says Penelope, "but look how fine his suit fits."
So that is what your approach to bike fit reminds me of.
That would be horrible, wouldn't it?
Do you apply this very sensible philosophy to clothing too? I mean do you buy pants and shoes, etc. a couple of sizes too large and too small just so you can say you tried them out? Are they easy to "flip" when you find out that you are still the same size you have always been?
Perhaps you have never heard the joke about the guy who goes in to buy a suit, but the store is out of his size...and the next sizes both up and down, too. So the salesman puts him in a suit that is two sizes too big for him. When he complains about the sleeves being too long, the salesman explains that he has to bend his elbows to get the right fit. When he shows the salesman the shoulders are too wide, he is told to hunch his shoulders to take up the slack. Same with bending his knees to get the pants legs right and bending over at the waist to keep the pants from falling down.
So he pays for the suit and is walking down the street when two old ladies see him coming toward them, hobbling and swaying back and forth.
One says to the other, "Oh Penelope, what a shame, look at that poor old crippled man."
"Yes, Hiledgarde," says Penelope, "but look how fine his suit fits."
So that is what your approach to bike fit reminds me of.
#108
Old Fart
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bumpkinsville
Posts: 3,348
Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Do you apply this very sensible philosophy to clothing too? I mean do you buy pants and shoes, etc. a couple of sizes too large and too small just so you can say you tried them out? Are they easy to "flip" when you find out that you are still the same size you have always been?
Perhaps you have never heard the joke about the guy who goes in to buy a suit, but the store is out of his size...and the next sizes both up and down, too. So the salesman puts him in a suit that is two sizes too big for him. When he complains about the sleeves being too long, the salesman explains that he has to bend his elbows to get the right fit. When he shows the salesman the shoulders are too wide, he is told to hunch his shoulders to take up the slack. Same with bending his knees to get the pants legs right and bending over at the waist to keep the pants from falling down.
So he pays for the suit and is walking down the street when two old ladies see him coming toward them, hobbling and swaying back and forth.
One says to the other, "Oh Penelope, what a shame, look at that poor old crippled man."
"Yes, Hiledgarde," says Penelope, "but look how fine his suit fits."
So that is what your approach to bike fit reminds me of.
It would be terrible to have gone through life riding just one size, and then maybe when you're 65 to hop on a bike that is a different size, and to say "Ya know? This feels good! Wow! Why hadn't i tried this sooner?!". All I'm saying, is that with something as subjective as bike sizing; and something which is so dependent upon personal preference and other variables, what is so bad about at least experimenting with the unknown?
I doubt very much that I'll ever stray from a 54- as I hate being too stretched-out (I've even ridden 54's which felt too big for me); and anything smaller would likely be too small- but the thing is, how do I know unless I try? Especially considering all of the different styles and geometries of all the bikes out there. On a level top-tube C&V bike, I could probably go bigger and be O-K- maybe I'd like that; maybe not- but I'm willing to try. At the very least, I'd learn WHY it doesn't work for me; on the other hand, I might discover something amazing; or, it just might seem nice to have a change, as long as it works.
If you're going to go out and buy an expensive new bike, by all means, make sure it's the perfect size that you can live with for the next 15 years- but since there are plenty of used bikes in the world that can be had cheaply, why not look at their existence as an opportunity to experiment and try different things? The results might surprise you; or they might confirm that your current size is perfection.
I'd bet that most riders do go through an experimentation period before settling on "their size". The fact that so many guys who are the same body size ride so many different sized bikes, would bear that out.
You know your shoe size, but I'll bet you've tried a half size up and down on occasion......
Last edited by Stucky; 09-05-15 at 11:15 AM.
#110
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The New World
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm the exact opposite of you in that regard @CliffordK - I'm 5'10" also, but I prefer smaller bikes- I consider 54 to be my size- but I like to think that I can ride anything from a 52 to a 58. And it's always fun to experiment with bikes of different sizes. You never really know until you try....and I mean, long enough for your body to adapt- not just some 20 mile test-ride.
#111
Senior Member
[QUOTE=rpenmanparker;18139964]The problem with your analogy is that a suit has very little adjustability to fit different sizes of people (a belt) while a bike can be adjusted quite a bit. I can easily fit a 52-56cm frame with nothing more than a stem swap and some saddle adjustments. I could probably go a bit further in each direction after swapping the handlebars to my preferred size. Those extreme sizes might look odd but they'd fit very similarly to my ideal 53-54cm frame size in the end.
#112
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
[QUOTE=joejack951;18141494]
The problem with your analogy is that a suit has very little adjustability to fit different sizes of people (a belt) while a bike can be adjusted quite a bit. I can easily fit a 52-56cm frame with nothing more than a stem swap and some saddle adjustments. I could probably go a bit further in each direction after swapping the handlebars to my preferred size. Those extreme sizes might look odd but they'd fit very similarly to my ideal 53-54cm frame size in the end.
It wasn't an analogy. It was a joke.
Look, you have the smarts, experience and information to pick a bike that fits perfectly accordng to your own concept of what that is. (Which is the final test of correct fit.). You can choose to ride whatever you like. OP doesn't have all that working for him. We are not talking about what someone can hop onto and get away with if they are fleeing a volcanic eruption. We are talking about best fit for a lifetime of riding. You can ride whatever you want. But don't tell a noob who doesn't know any better that it doesn't matter. It isn't right.
The problem with your analogy is that a suit has very little adjustability to fit different sizes of people (a belt) while a bike can be adjusted quite a bit. I can easily fit a 52-56cm frame with nothing more than a stem swap and some saddle adjustments. I could probably go a bit further in each direction after swapping the handlebars to my preferred size. Those extreme sizes might look odd but they'd fit very similarly to my ideal 53-54cm frame size in the end.
Look, you have the smarts, experience and information to pick a bike that fits perfectly accordng to your own concept of what that is. (Which is the final test of correct fit.). You can choose to ride whatever you like. OP doesn't have all that working for him. We are not talking about what someone can hop onto and get away with if they are fleeing a volcanic eruption. We are talking about best fit for a lifetime of riding. You can ride whatever you want. But don't tell a noob who doesn't know any better that it doesn't matter. It isn't right.
#113
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 92
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
LOL! Ah, but bicycle fit can be very subjective.
I'd bet that most riders do go through an experimentation period before settling on "their size". The fact that so many guys who are the same body size ride so many different sized bikes, would bear that out.
You know your shoe size, but I'll bet you've tried a half size up and down on occasion......
I'd bet that most riders do go through an experimentation period before settling on "their size". The fact that so many guys who are the same body size ride so many different sized bikes, would bear that out.
You know your shoe size, but I'll bet you've tried a half size up and down on occasion......
I'm sure we've all had at least one poorly sized frame. Fortunately mine was years ago as a kid and thankfully my neighbor, an experienced cyclist and former national team member in his home country who was teaching me to ride, took me and my new too big bike right back to the shop and made them exchange it. In this case, it was a 59 c-t for a smaller 56 c-t with a 56.5 tt. I still ride a 56.5 tt. (Interestingly enough, even on today's fit calculators, 56.5 is smack in the middle of optimal for my measurements.) IMHO, there's little need to 'experiment' with frame sizes from 54-60 within a single riding discipline; in this case, performance oriented recreational road riding. Time and $$$ are better spent working with a fitter/club coach/experienced and well regarded friend or mentor to make the adjustments (including riding technique) over time to work into a better, more effective and efficient riding position on a properly sized frame. Buying and selling and buying different sized frames beyond one's optimum sizing is a waste of time and resources. Changing sizing abruptly causes injuries.
Last edited by puddinlegs; 09-06-15 at 09:21 AM.
#114
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
LOL! Ah, but bicycle fit can be very subjective. There are plenty of other guys just on this forum, who are the same body size as myself, and yet ride 56's or 58's- and I think one or two who even ride a 52 or 53. And even @CliffordK with his 60cm! That's quite a range, in't it? But I guess those sizes work for what those riders are trying to accomplish- to give them the position they want; the comfort they want, etc.
It would be terrible to have gone through life riding just one size, and then maybe when you're 65 to hop on a bike that is a different size, and to say "Ya know? This feels good! Wow! Why hadn't i tried this sooner?!". All I'm saying, is that with something as subjective as bike sizing; and something which is so dependent upon personal preference and other variables, what is so bad about at least experimenting with the unknown?
I doubt very much that I'll ever stray from a 54- as I hate being too stretched-out (I've even ridden 54's which felt too big for me); and anything smaller would likely be too small- but the thing is, how do I know unless I try? Especially considering all of the different styles and geometries of all the bikes out there. On a level top-tube C&V bike, I could probably go bigger and be O-K- maybe I'd like that; maybe not- but I'm willing to try. At the very least, I'd learn WHY it doesn't work for me; on the other hand, I might discover something amazing; or, it just might seem nice to have a change, as long as it works.
If you're going to go out and buy an expensive new bike, by all means, make sure it's the perfect size that you can live with for the next 15 years- but since there are plenty of used bikes in the world that can be had cheaply, why not look at their existence as an opportunity to experiment and try different things? The results might surprise you; or they might confirm that your current size is perfection.
I'd bet that most riders do go through an experimentation period before settling on "their size". The fact that so many guys who are the same body size ride so many different sized bikes, would bear that out.
You know your shoe size, but I'll bet you've tried a half size up and down on occasion......
It would be terrible to have gone through life riding just one size, and then maybe when you're 65 to hop on a bike that is a different size, and to say "Ya know? This feels good! Wow! Why hadn't i tried this sooner?!". All I'm saying, is that with something as subjective as bike sizing; and something which is so dependent upon personal preference and other variables, what is so bad about at least experimenting with the unknown?
I doubt very much that I'll ever stray from a 54- as I hate being too stretched-out (I've even ridden 54's which felt too big for me); and anything smaller would likely be too small- but the thing is, how do I know unless I try? Especially considering all of the different styles and geometries of all the bikes out there. On a level top-tube C&V bike, I could probably go bigger and be O-K- maybe I'd like that; maybe not- but I'm willing to try. At the very least, I'd learn WHY it doesn't work for me; on the other hand, I might discover something amazing; or, it just might seem nice to have a change, as long as it works.
If you're going to go out and buy an expensive new bike, by all means, make sure it's the perfect size that you can live with for the next 15 years- but since there are plenty of used bikes in the world that can be had cheaply, why not look at their existence as an opportunity to experiment and try different things? The results might surprise you; or they might confirm that your current size is perfection.
I'd bet that most riders do go through an experimentation period before settling on "their size". The fact that so many guys who are the same body size ride so many different sized bikes, would bear that out.
You know your shoe size, but I'll bet you've tried a half size up and down on occasion......
#115
Senior Member
I'm 6'5 and ride a 60cm Caad10, the fit is spot on so I'd have to think the bike is way to big for someone 7in shorter?
#117
Old Fart
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bumpkinsville
Posts: 3,348
Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
You just changed the subject again. We were talking about buying and riding different size bikes for the satisfaction of doing different things. Also the ability to ride lots of different sizes without much imact on the riding experience. And the bizarre notion of buying and selling different size bikes just so you can say you have. Now you are talking about test riding different sizes before you buy. Who would argue against that? Make up your mind what you are talking about.
How do you know if it's "the wrong size" unless you've tried it and found it not to work? I'm very comfortable on a 54- but what would be so terrible about buyiong a used 58 for say $300 on CL and experimenting with it? I might find, that after a month of riding, that I indeed hate it; and then I could flip it; or I might find that a change of fity and position is actually refreshing. I'd hate to think that I went through life having not at least tried riding anything but a 54.
#118
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
740 Posts
Do you apply this very sensible philosophy to clothing too? I mean do you buy pants and shoes, etc. a couple of sizes too large and too small just so you can say you tried them out? Are they easy to "flip" when you find out that you are still the same size you have always been?
#119
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
That's not test riding before buying. That is test riding after buying. Also the size you get on obay or CL could have little relationship to the same nominal size in a different brand you finally buy as a keeper. By all means knock yourself out and have your fun. But my point is you may enjoy "fooling around" with different size bikes, but it is no kind of plan on which to base advice for a noob looking to buy their right size.
#120
Old Fart
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bumpkinsville
Posts: 3,348
Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
That's not test riding before buying. That is test riding after buying. Also the size you get on obay or CL could have little relationship to the same nominal size in a different brand you finally buy as a keeper. By all means knock yourself out and have your fun. But my point is you may enjoy "fooling around" with different size bikes, but it is no kind of plan on which to base advice for a noob looking to buy their right size.
And this is not even taking into account the wide variations in the actual dimensions of bikes of even the same size from different manufacturers! Gimme a 54 Lemond with their long top tubes, and I guarantee you, even though it's "my size" I'd feel too stretched out. Gimme a traditional frame with a short top tube and put on a shorter stem, and I guarantee you I could be perfectly happy with a 58.
I can't understand why you think it so horrible to try out different bikes, and to to see how they feel and how your body adapts.... Or even to have bikes of different sizes, so as to be able to have a change from time to time (You watch, some time in the future, some prominent cyclist will say just that, and it will become a trend- to have bikes of different sizes to switch-off to...)
IIRC from other posts, you are some kind of engineer- so I can see how this might be anathema to your thinking- since you were trained to work with precision and exacting tolerances......but bodies are quiote different than machines.
#121
Newbie
For me as long you can still straddle the bike.. it fits..
I’m 5’-10 1/2” and for me.. advantage for having a 33 1/2” inseam.. I’m able to clear top tubes up to 60cm frame size..that’s why my bike collection range from a size 53cm to a 59cm
#122
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times
in
338 Posts
Did you specifically search for threads about being 5’10.5 and riding 60cm frames so you could tell people about it and this was the only one? Cos I don’t reckon the OP is still in a quandary about this decision after 8 years
#123
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,064
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22606 Post(s)
Liked 8,929 Times
in
4,161 Posts
But thanks for sharing. Nice looking bikes.
#124
Ride more, eat less
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Philla PA, Hoboken NJ, Brooklyn NY
Posts: 2,075
Bikes: Too many but never enough.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 715 Post(s)
Liked 737 Times
in
453 Posts
I'm 5'10", 34" inseam. I used to ride/race in a 56cm (Ibis Ti) or 54cm (Merlin) with 120mm stem, back in the 90's.
I've been riding a 58cm (Litespeed Ultimate) with 100mm stem since 2004.
Still my favorite, short chainstays, sharp handling, good snap response.
Now I go back & forth between 58 (Tuscany) & 59cm (Vortex), depending on my flexibility & distance of specific ride.
Larger frame allows me to be more comfortable at slower speed, no sprinting for the finish line,
more stable, less twitchy handling, allow better "hands-free" to take off the windbreaker while moving.
For carbon frames, I ride a 58cm.
TT frames also 58cm.
As I get older, I prefer longer wheelbase, longer top tube,
straight or slight upward stem/handlebar position,
shallower drops in the handlebar.
It's all about your personal preference.
I've been riding a 58cm (Litespeed Ultimate) with 100mm stem since 2004.
Still my favorite, short chainstays, sharp handling, good snap response.
Now I go back & forth between 58 (Tuscany) & 59cm (Vortex), depending on my flexibility & distance of specific ride.
Larger frame allows me to be more comfortable at slower speed, no sprinting for the finish line,
more stable, less twitchy handling, allow better "hands-free" to take off the windbreaker while moving.
For carbon frames, I ride a 58cm.
TT frames also 58cm.
As I get older, I prefer longer wheelbase, longer top tube,
straight or slight upward stem/handlebar position,
shallower drops in the handlebar.
It's all about your personal preference.
#125
bocobiking
I was 6'1", but at 76 apparently I'm now only 5'10". I've always been most comfortable on a 63cm bike with a short (57.5cm) top tube. That hasn't changed, not sure why. But the short bikes people ride now always amaze me.