Carbolite 103, what is wrong with this type of frame?
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Niagara Region, Canada
Posts: 1,455
Bikes: 1970s Alex Singer, 1960s Peugeot PX 10, 1960s Bertin C37, 1973 Carre Bertin C 37, 1972 Carlton Kermesse, 1981 Peugeot PX 14 Super Competition
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 346 Post(s)
Liked 266 Times
in
157 Posts
SH27-
Carbolite 103 frames can be very good indeed. I wrote about this on a Peugeot PB 12 I restored and can be found here: https://peugeotcoursepb12.wordpress.com/tag/carbolite/
Carbolite 103 frames can be very good indeed. I wrote about this on a Peugeot PB 12 I restored and can be found here: https://peugeotcoursepb12.wordpress.com/tag/carbolite/
Likes For bertinjim:
#28
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,328
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,832 Times
in
2,229 Posts
I had a lugless Carbolite103 framed bike in size 58. 1984 PH10LE if memory serves.
Can't speak to frame weights. I think the lugless frames were made with metric tubing and a 'new' joining process.
It was a good allround ride, but pushed to limits under a 200# rider.
I put some tubular wheels on it for some rides and compared to the much heavier 27" wheels, it was a pleasure to ride - quick and well mannered.
Can't speak to frame weights. I think the lugless frames were made with metric tubing and a 'new' joining process.
It was a good allround ride, but pushed to limits under a 200# rider.
I put some tubular wheels on it for some rides and compared to the much heavier 27" wheels, it was a pleasure to ride - quick and well mannered.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Last edited by Wildwood; 06-14-19 at 10:11 PM.
#29
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,193
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,295 Times
in
865 Posts
Carbolite tubing was first introduced on Peugeot's lower-level racing-style bikes having brazed lugs.
It was a significantly lighter tubing than their previous high-tensile tubing as used on their U08 through U010 frames, and as such they no longer spot-welded the cable stops onto the now-thinner tubing but brazed on new barrel-shaped cable stops instead.
Later on they used Carbolite tubing for making their unique lugless frames, which were lighter yet by virtue of their losing the lugs.
My first-year 1979 Carbolite U09 carries the Super Sport moniker of that one year, and sort of lives up to it. It is a great-riding bike imo, with far more-sporting geometry than any previous U0-series bikes. I think of it as "a Super Course with 1-degree steeper angles", again it is an altogether different animal than any that came before it.
It was a significantly lighter tubing than their previous high-tensile tubing as used on their U08 through U010 frames, and as such they no longer spot-welded the cable stops onto the now-thinner tubing but brazed on new barrel-shaped cable stops instead.
Later on they used Carbolite tubing for making their unique lugless frames, which were lighter yet by virtue of their losing the lugs.
My first-year 1979 Carbolite U09 carries the Super Sport moniker of that one year, and sort of lives up to it. It is a great-riding bike imo, with far more-sporting geometry than any previous U0-series bikes. I think of it as "a Super Course with 1-degree steeper angles", again it is an altogether different animal than any that came before it.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
Carbolite tubing was first introduced on Peugeot's lower-level racing-style bikes having brazed lugs.
It was a significantly lighter tubing than their previous high-tensile tubing as used on their U08 through U010 frames, and as such they no longer spot-welded the cable stops onto the now-thinner tubing but brazed on new barrel-shaped cable stops instead.
Later on they used Carbolite tubing for making their unique lugless frames, which were lighter yet by virtue of their losing the lugs.
My first-year 1979 Carbolite U09 carries the Super Sport moniker of that one year, and sort of lives up to it. It is a great-riding bike imo, with far more-sporting geometry than any previous U0-series bikes. I think of it as "a Super Course with 1-degree steeper angles", again it is an altogether different animal than any that came before it.
It was a significantly lighter tubing than their previous high-tensile tubing as used on their U08 through U010 frames, and as such they no longer spot-welded the cable stops onto the now-thinner tubing but brazed on new barrel-shaped cable stops instead.
Later on they used Carbolite tubing for making their unique lugless frames, which were lighter yet by virtue of their losing the lugs.
My first-year 1979 Carbolite U09 carries the Super Sport moniker of that one year, and sort of lives up to it. It is a great-riding bike imo, with far more-sporting geometry than any previous U0-series bikes. I think of it as "a Super Course with 1-degree steeper angles", again it is an altogether different animal than any that came before it.
I did think--and perhaps incorrectly--that the frame geometry was pretty much the same on the UO 8, 9, and 10s. I'm fairly certain that they all had pretty similar long wheelbases (42 inches if my memory serves me correctly) and I thought they all had relatively slack angles. Once set up, these bikes all make fine C&V touring bikes.
#31
Newbie
Last weekend I finished 600km brevet with my Carbolite 103 -tubed PH8M bike, no bad feeligs towards the frame. 22.5h ride time and 34.5 hours from start to finish, so it was not even close being the slowest bike in the bunch. Sure, it's bit more heavy than the bikes made out of fancier tubes, but ride quality is good, if not great. Gravel or rainy sections were not scary because there's lots of room to run 35mm tires with full fenders, too.
For 39 year old low-end frame, I could not ask for more.
For 39 year old low-end frame, I could not ask for more.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,448
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 874 Post(s)
Liked 2,287 Times
in
1,278 Posts
I had a lugless Carbolite103 framed bike in size 58. 1984 PH10LE if memory serves.
Can't speak to frame weights. I think the lugless frames were made with metric tubing and a 'new' joining process.
It was a good allround ride, but pushed to limits under a 200# rider.
I put some tubular wheels on it for some rides and compared to the much heavier 27" wheels, it was a pleasure to ride - quick and well mannered.
Can't speak to frame weights. I think the lugless frames were made with metric tubing and a 'new' joining process.
It was a good allround ride, but pushed to limits under a 200# rider.
I put some tubular wheels on it for some rides and compared to the much heavier 27" wheels, it was a pleasure to ride - quick and well mannered.
Last edited by Kabuki12; 06-15-19 at 07:13 AM.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
Last weekend I finished 600km brevet with my Carbolite 103 -tubed PH8M bike, no bad feeligs towards the frame. 22.5h ride time and 34.5 hours from start to finish, so it was not even close being the slowest bike in the bunch. Sure, it's bit more heavy than the bikes made out of fancier tubes, but ride quality is good, if not great. Gravel or rainy sections were not scary because there's lots of room to run 35mm tires with full fenders, too.
For 39 year old low-end frame, I could not ask for more.
For 39 year old low-end frame, I could not ask for more.
Nice ride,
#34
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
I'm sure I have ridden some of these on test rides back in my bike mechanic days. Nothing particularly remarkable, but they were low-end bikes and the component selection probably created a cognitive bias on my part.
my understanding is these were internally lugged, not really lugless. I always figured that they were not made by hand, and figured there must have been engineers involved. I would really like to know more about the process. They were very clean, I'm sure the brazing filler was internal and they were hearth brazed somehow. I would also like to see one cut apart.
My only reservation about them is that it would have been pretty easy for a production line person to ignore a bad braze. But I have never seen a broken one. And you can see that the mitering is perfect.
my understanding is these were internally lugged, not really lugless. I always figured that they were not made by hand, and figured there must have been engineers involved. I would really like to know more about the process. They were very clean, I'm sure the brazing filler was internal and they were hearth brazed somehow. I would also like to see one cut apart.
My only reservation about them is that it would have been pretty easy for a production line person to ignore a bad braze. But I have never seen a broken one. And you can see that the mitering is perfect.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
I'm sure I have ridden some of these on test rides back in my bike mechanic days. Nothing particularly remarkable, but they were low-end bikes and the component selection probably created a cognitive bias on my part.
my understanding is these were internally lugged, not really lugless. I always figured that they were not made by hand, and figured there must have been engineers involved. I would really like to know more about the process. They were very clean, I'm sure the brazing filler was internal and they were hearth brazed somehow. I would also like to see one cut apart.
My only reservation about them is that it would have been pretty easy for a production line person to ignore a bad braze. But I have never seen a broken one. And you can see that the mitering is perfect.
my understanding is these were internally lugged, not really lugless. I always figured that they were not made by hand, and figured there must have been engineers involved. I would really like to know more about the process. They were very clean, I'm sure the brazing filler was internal and they were hearth brazed somehow. I would also like to see one cut apart.
My only reservation about them is that it would have been pretty easy for a production line person to ignore a bad braze. But I have never seen a broken one. And you can see that the mitering is perfect.
#36
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,328
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,832 Times
in
2,229 Posts
I also have one of these PH10LE bikes.According to the brochure they are HLE type tubing, not sure if it is the same as Carbolite.I picked it up original and complete for $80 in my size (25"). I have not messed with it yet . From what I have learned , the tubing is very light and internally brazed. That is why it is lugless. I look forward to building this bike(my first Peugeot). I plan to get rid of the worn out HelioMatic hub and set it up with a conventional FW.I will also run a set of Gentleman 700c rims instead of the 27" that came with it. Mine is black and I believe a 1984. Joe
Here's an old pic. Maybe I can find a better one to show tube joins. All original (less tires/tubes), even silver ribbon tape.
Ridden only a few times, minor fall in driveway caused original owner to 'hang it in the rafters'. About 20 years later, it came to me free.
PH10LE - frame was smallest comfortable fit for me @ 58cm.
here's a clearer pic of lugless tube joins.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Last edited by Wildwood; 06-15-19 at 09:39 AM.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,800
Bikes: Lots of English 3-speeds, a couple of old road bikes, 3 mountain bikes, 1 hybrid, and a couple of mash-ups
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 887 Post(s)
Liked 335 Times
in
225 Posts
I'm sure I have ridden some of these on test rides back in my bike mechanic days. Nothing particularly remarkable, but they were low-end bikes and the component selection probably created a cognitive bias on my part.
my understanding is these were internally lugged, not really lugless. I always figured that they were not made by hand, and figured there must have been engineers involved. I would really like to know more about the process. They were very clean, I'm sure the brazing filler was internal and they were hearth brazed somehow. I would also like to see one cut apart.
My only reservation about them is that it would have been pretty easy for a production line person to ignore a bad braze. But I have never seen a broken one. And you can see that the mitering is perfect.
my understanding is these were internally lugged, not really lugless. I always figured that they were not made by hand, and figured there must have been engineers involved. I would really like to know more about the process. They were very clean, I'm sure the brazing filler was internal and they were hearth brazed somehow. I would also like to see one cut apart.
My only reservation about them is that it would have been pretty easy for a production line person to ignore a bad braze. But I have never seen a broken one. And you can see that the mitering is perfect.
#38
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,193
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,295 Times
in
865 Posts
I didn't know that the carbolite tubing used on the UO 9 and later bikes was different than the hi tensile steel used on the UO 8s and 9s. I really liked the UO 9s and 10s and wish I could find one in my size.
I did think--and perhaps incorrectly--that the frame geometry was pretty much the same on the UO 8, 9, and 10s. I'm fairly certain that they all had pretty similar long wheelbases (42 inches if my memory serves me correctly) and I thought they all had relatively slack angles. Once set up, these bikes all make fine C&V touring bikes.
I did think--and perhaps incorrectly--that the frame geometry was pretty much the same on the UO 8, 9, and 10s. I'm fairly certain that they all had pretty similar long wheelbases (42 inches if my memory serves me correctly) and I thought they all had relatively slack angles. Once set up, these bikes all make fine C&V touring bikes.
I know more about these bike's geometry, which was the same over the years until 1979. That year, the frame angles changed completely, a steeper seattube angle, shorter chainstays and a more-relaxed headtube angle took the place of their traditional geometry on their price-point UO-series bikes. Suddenly these bikes lent themselves more toward spirited riding.
HLE again was some sort of high-tensile steel, translated I believe to "high elastic limit".
The lugless frame construction extended well up into Peugeot's extensive mid-priced lineup, with some of these frames sporting Reynolds tubing at least up to the level of enhanced "Chromoly-M" or 501.
Surprisingly, these "tre-tubi" lugless framesets could be about as light as an earlier, lugged PX10 frame based on the weight of these two complete bikes that I have weighed!
#39
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
I always loved the pearl color on these, they even had it on the lower end models.
#40
Ellensburg, WA
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 3,755
Bikes: See my signature
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 313 Post(s)
Liked 458 Times
in
160 Posts
Perhaps mine is a year or two earlier - HLE followed Carbolite103 in the model years. Not sure how long HLE lasted before a conversion to other tubing, maybe 2yrs?. There must have been a debate about Metric vs English tubing at this point.
Here's an old pic. Maybe I can find a better one to show tube joins. All original (less tires/tubes), even silver ribbon tape.
Ridden only a few times, minor fall in driveway caused original owner to 'hang it in the rafters'. About 20 years later, it came to me free.
PH10LE - frame was smallest comfortable fit for me @ 58cm.
here's a clearer pic of lugless tube joins.
Here's an old pic. Maybe I can find a better one to show tube joins. All original (less tires/tubes), even silver ribbon tape.
Ridden only a few times, minor fall in driveway caused original owner to 'hang it in the rafters'. About 20 years later, it came to me free.
PH10LE - frame was smallest comfortable fit for me @ 58cm.
here's a clearer pic of lugless tube joins.
__________________
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1968 Peugeot PL8; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, mid-80's Bianchi Veloce, 1984 or 85 Vitus 979
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1968 Peugeot PL8; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, mid-80's Bianchi Veloce, 1984 or 85 Vitus 979
Likes For scozim:
#41
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,328
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,832 Times
in
2,229 Posts
Well that looks familiar. This is the 1984 I got from my brother free last fall. It's now my yard sale bike. Comfortable, stable ride. Far from fast, but also far from slow. A few adjustments are needed but, overall, I really liked the shakedown ride into town this past week.
Can you confirm the metric tubing? I put that info in a post and not sure now.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,321
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 767 Post(s)
Liked 1,898 Times
in
889 Posts
Some handsome machines in this thread.
So, is it safe to claim that Peugeot was the undisputed king of the low end? I like the look of these Carbolite and HLE framed bikes, but I've never ridden one. I do have a '71 UO8, and prefer it to a Raleigh GP, Hi-ten Schwinn Le Tour, Fuji Special Road Racer, and every other bike I've had in the same basic class. The low end Pug seems to get an awful lot of praise here. Mine rides much better than I expected it to when I got it. If it ever fails, I'll snatch up another Peugeot to replace it.
So, is it safe to claim that Peugeot was the undisputed king of the low end? I like the look of these Carbolite and HLE framed bikes, but I've never ridden one. I do have a '71 UO8, and prefer it to a Raleigh GP, Hi-ten Schwinn Le Tour, Fuji Special Road Racer, and every other bike I've had in the same basic class. The low end Pug seems to get an awful lot of praise here. Mine rides much better than I expected it to when I got it. If it ever fails, I'll snatch up another Peugeot to replace it.
#43
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Greenville, SC / Asheville, NC
Posts: 290
Bikes: '74 Raleigh Professional, '73 Raleigh Grand Prix, '84 Nishiki Medalist, '85 Gazelle Champion Mondial AB, '81 Peugeot Course, '79 Univega Gran Rally, '85 Torpado Super Strada
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
I had a Peugeot with 103 for a while, sold it a few months ago because it was too small. It was heavy, too heavy in my opinion. Around 27lbs fully built with mostly original components.
But, other than being too small the ride was fine. If you’re not climbing a bunch of hills, the weight really doesn’t matter that much. Mine certainly wasn’t as lively feeling as my Reynolds 531 bikes, but not dead feeling either.
But, other than being too small the ride was fine. If you’re not climbing a bunch of hills, the weight really doesn’t matter that much. Mine certainly wasn’t as lively feeling as my Reynolds 531 bikes, but not dead feeling either.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: West Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,112
Bikes: '84 Peugeot PH10LE
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 397 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
39 Posts
I too, don't understand the antipathy towards the Carbolite 103 frame, or for that matter, the Helicomatic drive system. My only velo is an '84 PH10LE that I bought new. It has both, Carbolite 103 frame AND the Helicomatic drive system. Every thing looks and functions as well as it did on day one. It handles well and rides smoothly and accelerates with ease. Maybe some who poo-poo the Carbolite frame and/or the Helicomatic system have no personal, first-hand experience with either and just like to regurgitate what they've heard. I wouldn't trade my DT friction shifting for Di2. I wouldn't trade my PH10 for ANY new bike, either. It ain't broke--don't need to be ''fixed".
Jon
Jon
#45
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,193
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,295 Times
in
865 Posts
I too, don't understand the antipathy towards the Carbolite 103 frame, or for that matter, the Helicomatic drive system. My only velo is an '84 PH10LE that I bought new. It has both, Carbolite 103 frame AND the Helicomatic drive system. Every thing looks and functions as well as it did on day one. It handles well and rides smoothly and accelerates with ease. Maybe some who poo-poo the Carbolite frame and/or the Helicomatic system have no personal, first-hand experience with either and just like to regurgitate what they've heard. I wouldn't trade my DT friction shifting for Di2. I wouldn't trade my PH10 for ANY new bike, either. It ain't broke--don't need to be ''fixed".
Jon
Jon
Even after trying both the original Sedisport chain and a couple of modern chains, the chain "skating" problem remained annoying and even dangerous while riding in a tight group on climbs when someone was behind me. I had one very experienced rider nearly fall off of her bike when I hit "neutral" and the bike slowed suddenly, luckily she veered to the side and thus didn't have to un-clip suddenly.
I changed it to a standard freewheel hub early last year with no looking back!
I remember also rebuilding my Trek 720's rear wheel back around 1990 when I decided that a Shimano 7s freehub would just be 100% better, not to mention that on one ride the lockring bearing cone on the Helicomatic freewheel loosened while I was 25 miles from home up in the Santa Monica Mountains. I found a thick nail and a rock to re-secure it, but it helped convince me to let go of the Helicomatic.
The Helicomatic freewheel hub and the Panaracer TT Radial tires were both incredibly poor component choices for a top-of-line touring bike in an era when much better parts were available. But some combination of lower cost and/or marketing value apparently swayed Trek's decision-making for the worse.
Last edited by dddd; 06-16-19 at 12:28 AM.
#46
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
That's not safe to say at all. The European brands were more expensive than better Japanese bikes at this time in history. That's why they pretty much disappeared from the U.S. The low end Japanese bikes were still using lugs, I'm guessing these Peugeots were a hard sell when there was so much pro-lug propaganda out there in the literature that people were looking at before they bought. Peugeot still had name recognition from the early '70s bike boom. They were one of the manufacturers that really stepped up production and profited from the demand, and that stuck with them for over a decade. I would say that by the early '80s, that had started to fade.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,321
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 767 Post(s)
Liked 1,898 Times
in
889 Posts
That's not safe to say at all. The European brands were more expensive than better Japanese bikes at this time in history. That's why they pretty much disappeared from the U.S. The low end Japanese bikes were still using lugs, I'm guessing these Peugeots were a hard sell when there was so much pro-lug propaganda out there in the literature that people were looking at before they bought. Peugeot still had name recognition from the early '70s bike boom. They were one of the manufacturers that really stepped up production and profited from the demand, and that stuck with them for over a decade. I would say that by the early '80s, that had started to fade.
I was really referring more to ride qualities/preferences among current bike geeks, not so much market dominance in the time they were made. No doubt the products coming from Japan were excellent quality, good riders, and good sellers.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Nice old thread! I have a question about experience with Carbolite. Scooper said waybackwhen, that this alloy or its most likely industry equivalents that the strength (both UTS and YS) should be less than 4130 or 531, yet the flexibility (ride quality) is pretty good. The tube walls should be a little thin, and therefore if so the durability of the frames should be kind of short.
UO-8 and similar frames have a rep as easily bent, if not prone to breakage. Does Carbolite have a reputation for fragility?
UO-8 and similar frames have a rep as easily bent, if not prone to breakage. Does Carbolite have a reputation for fragility?
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,904
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
I suspect those lowly Carbolite frames were considerably stronger than the UP-8s of Peugeot's history. I had a Reynolds 501 Peugeot of the same era - nicer tubing but I believe the same internal lugs. That, despite the ordinary looks, was a good frame and a good ride. I"m guessing the Carbolite frames are a stiffer and heavier version of that good ride and probably far and away better than the "classic" UO-8 ride.
Edit: OK I answered a 5 yo post. My bad. I'll stick to what I said.
Ben
Last edited by 79pmooney; 06-16-19 at 10:47 AM.
#50
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,193
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,295 Times
in
865 Posts
That history includes decades and many thousands of UO-8s, probably Peugeot's all-time biggest selling bike. Beneficiary of the early '70s bike boom. I know there are those who revere UO-8s but they are nothing special. That tubing is heavy and not strong. Yes, classic lugs, but lugs that are nothing special to look at, just a cheap, fast way to join tubes. My first 10 speed was a '67 UO-8. Became a single speed 4 years later, fix gear in '76 and died a car-door death in '82. Did many winters and many crashes. I got quite used to the concept that after each crash (many of these crashes just sliding out on snow and ice; events that wouldn't trouble a stronger frame), the frame had a new "alignment" and rode differently. Wasn't worth the trouble to actually align it. Next time I looked at it funny, it wold take a new alignment.
I suspect those lowly Carbolite frames were considerably stronger than the UP-8s of Peugeot's history. I had a Reynolds 501 Peugeot of the same era - nicer tubing but I believe the same internal lugs. That, despite the ordinary looks, was a good frame and a good ride. I"m guessing the Carbolite frames are a stiffer and heavier version of that good ride and probably far and away better than the "classic" UO-8 ride.
Edit: OK I answered a 5 yo post. My bad. I'll stick to what I said.
Ben
I suspect those lowly Carbolite frames were considerably stronger than the UP-8s of Peugeot's history. I had a Reynolds 501 Peugeot of the same era - nicer tubing but I believe the same internal lugs. That, despite the ordinary looks, was a good frame and a good ride. I"m guessing the Carbolite frames are a stiffer and heavier version of that good ride and probably far and away better than the "classic" UO-8 ride.
Edit: OK I answered a 5 yo post. My bad. I'll stick to what I said.
Ben
Now we have to consider that most of the riders of these new-fangled, skinny-tire ten-speeds had previously owned heavier, durable, mostly American bikes with wider wheels and tires, but the Raleigh tens-speeds of that era showed themselves to be more durable than the Pugs under these same riders.
It is to Raleigh's credit that I am a serious rider all these years later, since I remember friends from my early-teen years who stopped riding after their flashier, fancy-pants U08 (relative to my Raleigh, at least as I remember it) failed to survive a curb-crossing.
My Raleigh Record survived years of hard use up to and beyond the day I entered my first road race, and then survived some further use by my father after I had (with his help) moved up to a larger Super Course MkII that I later toured on, sold, and bought a much-revised 1979 Super Course that sadly was stolen from an NC State bike rack during my first year of ownership.
Peugeot's vast experience with their proprietary tubings and manufacturing methods likely resulted in each successive version of their entry-level bikes being better than the prior one, both in terms of performance and durability. I haven't damaged any of these bikes myself so this is pure speculation on my part, but they were accumulating experience with the American market end users, and no doubt put that knowledge to good use.
I've seen an early-eighties Nishiki Riviera survive a solid impact into an open car door with only minimal effect on fork alignment while the front wheel was fully taco'd, so at least by this time some of the Japanese bike frames/forks were being made to very high strength standards.
Last edited by dddd; 06-16-19 at 12:17 PM.