View Poll Results: Who causes more problems on the road?
Motorists
64
84.21%
Cyclists
12
15.79%
Voters: 76. You may not vote on this poll
Who causes more problems? News Poll
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NW
Posts: 881
Bikes: Trek 4500
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Who causes more problems? News Poll
KATU News in Portland, Oregon held a poll asking "Who causes more problems on the road, motorists, or cyclists?" and receiving a lot of responses:
https://www.katu.com/news/8769412.html
https://www.katu.com/news/8769412.html
#2
Rider in the Storm
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 736
Bikes: LeMond Zurich, KHS Fiero (Fixed), Centurion Ironman Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Stupid question. Yeah, 99% of the local populace all driving monstrous vehicles around town and those few, tiny little bicycles cause the most problems on the road...freakin' dumbasses!
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NW
Posts: 881
Bikes: Trek 4500
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
yep if "problem" = minor inconvenience, then I think bikers by far cause more "problems" just by delaying a driver 5 seconds to slow down and go around. But if "problem" = injuries, deaths, $$$ in property damage, environmental and health issues, crippling personal debt, etc... then yeah it's a landslide by the motorists.
#4
No Talent Assclown
Yeah, that pretty much sums it up.
__________________
Fällt der Pfarrer in den Mist, lacht der Bauer bis er pisst.
Fällt der Pfarrer in den Mist, lacht der Bauer bis er pisst.
#5
Rider in the Storm
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 736
Bikes: LeMond Zurich, KHS Fiero (Fixed), Centurion Ironman Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ha, too funny, I just read the comments and lo, it's the same old drivel ad nauseum...
Permits, darn it! Permits and the bicycle "problem" is solved for good! Until then, well, those cyclists will suffer the wrath.
"When bicyclists have to get a permit/license to operate a bicycle on Portland streets, have to get liability insurance and are subject to laws, fines, rules of the road and liability for accidents caused by them, that is when I will have more sympathy for them."
Here's a beauty about the EXTENSIVE damage a bicycle could cause:
"I think cyclists should be required to have insurance. A bicycle could do $5000 worth of damage to a new car very easily."
Oh, and the Nazis:
"Bicycle Nazis can kiss my Hummers behind."
Bicycles are both unsafe and a bit scary too:
"Many bike riders use roads that are unsafe for cyclists. These roads are narrow with very little shoulders to ride on. Common sense would only tell one that for their own safety, choose a safer road. It is especially bad this time of year when the roads are also used by farm equipment. Many cyclists do not stay in behind the white line. Instead they seem to ride the line???
As a driver it is a scary situation when you come upon a cyclist that is out in the road."
I guess even in a bike lane cyclists anger this person because they apparently ride too close to the line and somehow FORCE people to do stupid stuff...I wonder, how far away from the line is sufficient? Maybe there should be two lines - one for the edge and one next to it for where the rider should be? Stupid twit.
"I am sick of the cyclists here! If they are in the cycle lane, they are right on the very edge of the white line and this always causes the cars to swerve out and around them. This causes other oncoming cars to have to either slow or swerve as well. THIS SITUATION IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS AND IS ALSO KNOWN AS 'IMPEDING TRAFFIC FLOW'.
I AM SICK TO DEATH OF CYCLISTS THINKING THAT THEY HAVE THE RIGHT OF WAY OR EVEN EQUAL RIGHTS ON OUR ROADS. THE DAY THEY CAN BE IN TRAFFIC OR AROUND TRAFFIC AND ACCELERATE WITH TRAFFIC AND RIDE AT THE POSTED SPEED LIMIT, AND NOT 'IMPEDE THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC' IS THE DAY THEY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED EQUAL...AND NOT UNTIL THAT TIME. "
For this guy, bigger is better so watch out! Maybe he needs to pull his stick out?
"If you want to ride your bike on the same road with cars be prepared to learn some physics - the big stick wins."
Anyway, I've already addressed the morons here: https://www.bikeforums.net/showpost.p...1&postcount=51
Permits, darn it! Permits and the bicycle "problem" is solved for good! Until then, well, those cyclists will suffer the wrath.
"When bicyclists have to get a permit/license to operate a bicycle on Portland streets, have to get liability insurance and are subject to laws, fines, rules of the road and liability for accidents caused by them, that is when I will have more sympathy for them."
Here's a beauty about the EXTENSIVE damage a bicycle could cause:
"I think cyclists should be required to have insurance. A bicycle could do $5000 worth of damage to a new car very easily."
Oh, and the Nazis:
"Bicycle Nazis can kiss my Hummers behind."
Bicycles are both unsafe and a bit scary too:
"Many bike riders use roads that are unsafe for cyclists. These roads are narrow with very little shoulders to ride on. Common sense would only tell one that for their own safety, choose a safer road. It is especially bad this time of year when the roads are also used by farm equipment. Many cyclists do not stay in behind the white line. Instead they seem to ride the line???
As a driver it is a scary situation when you come upon a cyclist that is out in the road."
I guess even in a bike lane cyclists anger this person because they apparently ride too close to the line and somehow FORCE people to do stupid stuff...I wonder, how far away from the line is sufficient? Maybe there should be two lines - one for the edge and one next to it for where the rider should be? Stupid twit.
"I am sick of the cyclists here! If they are in the cycle lane, they are right on the very edge of the white line and this always causes the cars to swerve out and around them. This causes other oncoming cars to have to either slow or swerve as well. THIS SITUATION IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS AND IS ALSO KNOWN AS 'IMPEDING TRAFFIC FLOW'.
I AM SICK TO DEATH OF CYCLISTS THINKING THAT THEY HAVE THE RIGHT OF WAY OR EVEN EQUAL RIGHTS ON OUR ROADS. THE DAY THEY CAN BE IN TRAFFIC OR AROUND TRAFFIC AND ACCELERATE WITH TRAFFIC AND RIDE AT THE POSTED SPEED LIMIT, AND NOT 'IMPEDE THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC' IS THE DAY THEY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED EQUAL...AND NOT UNTIL THAT TIME. "
For this guy, bigger is better so watch out! Maybe he needs to pull his stick out?
"If you want to ride your bike on the same road with cars be prepared to learn some physics - the big stick wins."
Anyway, I've already addressed the morons here: https://www.bikeforums.net/showpost.p...1&postcount=51
#6
Rider in the Storm
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 736
Bikes: LeMond Zurich, KHS Fiero (Fixed), Centurion Ironman Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
yep if "problem" = minor inconvenience, then I think bikers by far cause more "problems" just by delaying a driver 5 seconds to slow down and go around. But if "problem" = injuries, deaths, $$$ in property damage, environmental and health issues, crippling personal debt, etc... then yeah it's a landslide by the motorists.
#8
Urban Biker
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 731
Bikes: Trek 720 hybrid; 2007 Specialized Tricross Comp
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,508
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#11
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ogopogo's shoreline
Posts: 4,082
Bikes: LHT, Kona Smoke
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
One of the main reasons that cyclist "get in motorists' way" is so that they can avoid motor vehicles going ZERO miles an hour, parked on the side of the street.
fluckin' selfish pr!cks
fluckin' selfish pr!cks
#12
No Talent Assclown
I have not once seen a cyclist impede the flow of traffic, ever. I see several a day whether I'm driving or biking. It has never been even an inconvenience for me to allow for extra space on a two lane road or change lanes on a four lane road. If I saw a driver act in aggression toward a cyclist who was following the rules, even though it's "not my business" and I were driving as well, I would probably exchange words with the driver.
__________________
Fällt der Pfarrer in den Mist, lacht der Bauer bis er pisst.
Fällt der Pfarrer in den Mist, lacht der Bauer bis er pisst.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Posts: 13,696
Bikes: who cares?
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
the sad thing is that the Portland Police actually use 'data' like this as an excuse to go out and bust more bicyclists....
#14
Rider in the Storm
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 736
Bikes: LeMond Zurich, KHS Fiero (Fixed), Centurion Ironman Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Good science I tell ya.
#15
hill hater
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: norton ohio 5.5 miles from center road tow path trail head
Posts: 2,127
Bikes: cannondale t400 1987 model and a raleigh gran prix from 1973
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bleh same drivel dif day in portland. This is what the 20 post about various driver nastyness over there? Maybe ill have to take a trip down there and have a little fun in my old time challenge road shoes and a key on a stick ....
#17
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
And here we sit essentially educating one another... challenging one another about issues and taking to debate on the finer points of the law.
Meanwhile 45,000 motorists die each year because of some sort of violations... and then motorists point the fingers at us... while being blind to their own issues. Sigh.
I myself carry cards with the laws pertaining to cyclists printed on them... anyone willing to listen, gets a card.
This is why I have argued time after tiime the best thing cycling advocacy can do is push for higher standards for drivers' licensing, and public service announcements regarding public use of the road.
It's not about telling "them" about "us," it IS about educating a vastly misinformed public, period.
Here is something amusing you can do... the next time you are in some public place, where free conversations are taking place... wedding reception, work... at the water cooler, party, it doesn't matter, but you should not be known as a cyclist... bring up the subject of cyclists on the road, and just listen to the opinions. Start by perhaps talking about the price of gas... then move the conversation to what drivers think about bikes. You will get an earfull. Mostly poor opinion or folks telling you what they think the laws are... (and they are generally wrong.) Just listen.
If this is a group of folks you know well... take the time to clue them in... otherwise, just remember what you heard. It will be quite surprising.
For a long time at my office I had posted the laws regarding cyclists use of the road on the outside of my cube. It really surprised me how many people came by and said "I didn't know that... " and the conversations would start from there.
Driver's ed is just enough to get folks out on the road... along the way the tidbits of info get twisted into misconceptions that become "law" in drivers' minds.
Yeah, there are a lot of misconceptions out there... and we often suffer for this lack of knowledge.
#18
Senior Member
BINGO!
And here we sit essentially educating one another... challenging one another about issues and taking to debate on the finer points of the law.
Meanwhile 45,000 motorists die each year because of some sort of violations... and then motorists point the fingers at us... while being blind to their own issues. Sigh.
I myself carry cards with the laws pertaining to cyclists printed on them... anyone willing to listen, gets a card.
This is why I have argued time after tiime the best thing cycling advocacy can do is push for higher standards for drivers' licensing, and public service announcements regarding public use of the road.
It's not about telling "them" about "us," it IS about educating a vastly misinformed public, period.
Here is something amusing you can do... the next time you are in some public place, where free conversations are taking place... wedding reception, work... at the water cooler, party, it doesn't matter, but you should not be known as a cyclist... bring up the subject of cyclists on the road, and just listen to the opinions. Start by perhaps talking about the price of gas... then move the conversation to what drivers think about bikes. You will get an earfull. Mostly poor opinion or folks telling you what they think the laws are... (and they are generally wrong.) Just listen.
If this is a group of folks you know well... take the time to clue them in... otherwise, just remember what you heard. It will be quite surprising.
For a long time at my office I had posted the laws regarding cyclists use of the road on the outside of my cube. It really surprised me how many people came by and said "I didn't know that... " and the conversations would start from there.
Driver's ed is just enough to get folks out on the road... along the way the tidbits of info get twisted into misconceptions that become "law" in drivers' minds.
Yeah, there are a lot of misconceptions out there... and we often suffer for this lack of knowledge.
And here we sit essentially educating one another... challenging one another about issues and taking to debate on the finer points of the law.
Meanwhile 45,000 motorists die each year because of some sort of violations... and then motorists point the fingers at us... while being blind to their own issues. Sigh.
I myself carry cards with the laws pertaining to cyclists printed on them... anyone willing to listen, gets a card.
This is why I have argued time after tiime the best thing cycling advocacy can do is push for higher standards for drivers' licensing, and public service announcements regarding public use of the road.
It's not about telling "them" about "us," it IS about educating a vastly misinformed public, period.
Here is something amusing you can do... the next time you are in some public place, where free conversations are taking place... wedding reception, work... at the water cooler, party, it doesn't matter, but you should not be known as a cyclist... bring up the subject of cyclists on the road, and just listen to the opinions. Start by perhaps talking about the price of gas... then move the conversation to what drivers think about bikes. You will get an earfull. Mostly poor opinion or folks telling you what they think the laws are... (and they are generally wrong.) Just listen.
If this is a group of folks you know well... take the time to clue them in... otherwise, just remember what you heard. It will be quite surprising.
For a long time at my office I had posted the laws regarding cyclists use of the road on the outside of my cube. It really surprised me how many people came by and said "I didn't know that... " and the conversations would start from there.
Driver's ed is just enough to get folks out on the road... along the way the tidbits of info get twisted into misconceptions that become "law" in drivers' minds.
Yeah, there are a lot of misconceptions out there... and we often suffer for this lack of knowledge.
Gene, I agree that much of the problem comes from the public's lack of knowledge of the laws, but I believe that a large majority of motorists just detest cyclists, period, and even if they know the law, think the law is wrong believe that bicyclists should have no right to be on the road. These people continue to honk, buzz , swear , yell "get on the sidewalk", at cyclists because they don't care what the law is. They are cowards and at the moment they encounter a cyclist, they are in a 5000 pound car and will bully the cyclist.
Theres no arguing with these "bicycle bigots", their attitude is "God gave me a Hummer to crush you and your little bike".
Just ride accordingly. I bicycle with the attitude that I'm a paranoid until a driver shows me he's not trying to kill me.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
#19
hill hater
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: norton ohio 5.5 miles from center road tow path trail head
Posts: 2,127
Bikes: cannondale t400 1987 model and a raleigh gran prix from 1973
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Heh true i remember a number of times some cop telling me to get on the side walk. My response the law states i can ride on the road and infact the law forbids any one above the age of 12 to ride bikes on the side walk.
#20
Ride the Road
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 4,059
Bikes: Surly Cross-Check; hard tail MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
You gotta love the way Portland bike lanes encourage motorists to respect our right to use the road:
Originally Posted by Tanya from Portland
If there is no bike lanes than don't ride your bikes. . . . So if no bike lanes get off the road.
#21
tired
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,651
Bikes: Breezer Uptown 8, U frame
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
She's a minority opinion. The predominant opinion of motorists who have issues with cyclists is that there should not be any bike lanes at all because we're not licensed, registered, paying gasoline taxes, etc. Most anti-bike motorists around here feel we have no right to the road in any fashion.
__________________
"Real wars of words are harder to win. They require thought, insight, precision, articulation, knowledge, and experience. They require the humility to admit when you are wrong. They recognize that the dialectic is not about making us look at you, but about us all looking together for the truth."
"Real wars of words are harder to win. They require thought, insight, precision, articulation, knowledge, and experience. They require the humility to admit when you are wrong. They recognize that the dialectic is not about making us look at you, but about us all looking together for the truth."
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 714
Bikes: Jamis Nova
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You think drivers are delayed more by cyclists than by other drivers? What about that twice a day thing called rush hour?
#23
Thread Killer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Marfan Syndrome-Clyde-DFW, TX
Posts: 1,845
Bikes: Fuji Touring Xtracycle, Merlin Road, Bacchetta Giro 26 (Sold), Challenge Hurricane, Cruzbike Sofrider
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You have two lanes of traffic compressed into one just like if a car had broken down in the right lane.
Most times on most roads cyclists maybe cause a few seconds. The times people remember though are where they cause alot longer delay or are doing stupid stuff. It is unfortunate that there are so many cyclists that ride like crap around where I live. Law abiding predictable ones are an extreme minority of cyclists. The opposite is true mostly for motorists although they treat stop signs like yield signs too.
#24
Rider in the Storm
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 736
Bikes: LeMond Zurich, KHS Fiero (Fixed), Centurion Ironman Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
But that's what is so funny, nobody can seem to admit that! Let's use our imagination here. Imagine driving to work in the morning. Got it? How long did the trip take? OK, now imagine driving to work with all the bicycles that you would normally see, but absolutely no other cars or trucks on the road - none. Now, how long would the trip take? Did the bikes really slow you down, or was it really all the other cars?
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 714
Bikes: Jamis Nova
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
And during rush hour on a four lane road when they cars are packed like sardines going 40mph a cyclist taking the lane slows them down because every car must accomidate that cyclist they can't just move over and pass.
You have two lanes of traffic compressed into one just like if a car had broken down in the right lane.
You have two lanes of traffic compressed into one just like if a car had broken down in the right lane.
Even if that was completely true, and I wont argue it now, you honestly believe those delays from the cyclists you describe are MORE than the delays from other cars? As you said yourself, cars break down and take up those lanes, which is not uncommon, and delay traffic badly as well.
Dunno man, I see some streets that are backed up for miles and miles and it isnt because a cyclist is taking up one of the lanes, I bet some of those streets have never even seen a single cyclist during rush hour. Usually the freeways are just as clogged, and I can guarantee that isnt from cyclists taking up the lane like a broke down car.