Bike computer accuracy - magnet placement on spoke
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Magnetic reed switches can have maximum operating frequencies in hundreds of times per second, which on a bike wheel would be hundreds of miles per hour. So I think that having the magnet at the rim will make no difference whatsoever with respect to the magnet going by too fast for the sensor to read. If anything, I'd expect better performance at the rim because the faster attenuation of the magnetic field would mean less debouncing issues.
Reed switches have several advantages over hall effect switches, less power draw, cheaper, simpler, unaffected by electrostatic shock. The hall effect might last forever, but are more sensitive to current in wires, ESD and so on. Since a reed switch can last for billions of cycles, that's not really a problem. Convert a billion turns of the wheel into miles, and you'll see what I mean.
I think that the orientation of the magnet is a bigger concern than its position.
Reed switches have several advantages over hall effect switches, less power draw, cheaper, simpler, unaffected by electrostatic shock. The hall effect might last forever, but are more sensitive to current in wires, ESD and so on. Since a reed switch can last for billions of cycles, that's not really a problem. Convert a billion turns of the wheel into miles, and you'll see what I mean.
I think that the orientation of the magnet is a bigger concern than its position.
#27
Senior Member
Wheel magnets are plenty accurate, no need to worry about where they are placed. I always had accurate mileage when I used them. I now use rotation sensors and they are just as accurate, especially when combined with a GPS head unit. It can calculate wheel size based on GPS miles/revolutions, and just take it from there. I switch my sensor and head unit from a 700c road bike to a 26" MTB and I get the same miles on either, and the same MPH, both based on the rotations, not the GPS, without doing anything. And these miles equal the miles my old magnet system would report. I had them running together for a while just to be sure and it never varied by more than .1 over a 50 mile ride.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
High end ones might use a hall effect transistor, that would be the smart way to do it. Much more reliable than an inductive loop since a hall effect switch is extremely fast and will give you essentially an on/off switch no matter how slow the magnet is moving (or even if it's stopped altogether). Hall effect transistors are pretty cheap.
It's possible that newer comps have already switched to hall effects, I wouldn't know, my computer is a number of years old at this point.
It's possible that newer comps have already switched to hall effects, I wouldn't know, my computer is a number of years old at this point.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,375 Times
in
1,580 Posts
Don't know of any current bike speedometers that use a Hall effect sensor, but Avocet made some that did back in the '80s. I still have one of theirs which uses a little ring mounted on the spokes at the hub instead of the single magnet used by the reed-switch models. One advantage of the Avocet approach was that it got multiple readings per wheel revolution and therefore a bit faster response at slow speeds.
These old Avocets do go through batteries quickly... mine last about a year. Maybe that's why there was an assumption that it used hall cells?
Steve in Peoria
#30
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
I never thought about the sensor tech in an avocet, but a hall would just require a single magnet just like a reed switch. I used my avocet for years, the ring eventually got to be too much of a pain and I stopped using it. I hope I threw it out, but it might be in a junk box somewhere.
GPS speed is good enough for me, I know it's unreliable, but close enough. Don't the new ones use an accelerometer?
GPS speed is good enough for me, I know it's unreliable, but close enough. Don't the new ones use an accelerometer?
#32
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,985
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,808 Times
in
3,316 Posts
Yes, of course RPM is constant. But like some one mentioned - it is important that you give the magnet enough time to "pull" the sensing switch in the pickup unit.
Believe it or not, when i used to get fierce while riding rollers, i could get pickup sending units to "fail" or skip when riding at speeds near 50 mph. This was mostly because the unit was simply nearing being worn out. But it is proof that there was actual "mechanical" activity in older cat-eye and avocet units.
............
Believe it or not, when i used to get fierce while riding rollers, i could get pickup sending units to "fail" or skip when riding at speeds near 50 mph. This was mostly because the unit was simply nearing being worn out. But it is proof that there was actual "mechanical" activity in older cat-eye and avocet units.
............
It's a hypothesis, and a very reasonable one. Another might be that the wheel under such loads it experiences at that speed deflects and deforms more at the outer diameters. So maybe not so much the time of engagement between the magnetic flux and the reed switches, but maybe more that the magnet for that revolution was further away from the sensor.
But who knows. I'm not going to go out and test it. But likely there are other possible reasons too.
#33
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Jobst Brandt designed that Avocet computer. He claimed it was more accurate than the kind with the single magnet. He said the ring created a sine wave, and the computer counted the number of times voltage went to zero. I don't know enough to say he's right or wrong, but it sounds reasonable to me.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#34
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
that's interesting that he designed it. The difference in accuracy is questionable in my mind. And the disadvantages of the design from a mechanical viewpoint outweigh them.
#35
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Maybe those are the reasons the design didn't stick around. Brandt reported that at high speeds, the one-magnet design would give spurious spikes, which is why you see people claiming speeds of over 50 mph. I don't know if he's right, but even if he is, it happens rarely enough that it's not a big problem.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#36
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
only time I've been over 50 on a bike was with his computer. I'm pretty sure it was correct, long steep straight stretch on a mountain.
I don't see how more data makes things better on a cheap computer. But I'm pretty sure it went away because it was a lot more expensive than a magnet. At least in manufacturing terms.
I don't see how more data makes things better on a cheap computer. But I'm pretty sure it went away because it was a lot more expensive than a magnet. At least in manufacturing terms.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: 961' 42.28° N, 83.78° W (A2)
Posts: 2,344
Bikes: Mongoose Selous, Trek DS
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 941 Post(s)
Liked 319 Times
in
189 Posts
only time I've been over 50 on a bike was with his computer. I'm pretty sure it was correct, long steep straight stretch on a mountain.
I don't see how more data makes things better on a cheap computer. But I'm pretty sure it went away because it was a lot more expensive than a magnet. At least in manufacturing terms.
I don't see how more data makes things better on a cheap computer. But I'm pretty sure it went away because it was a lot more expensive than a magnet. At least in manufacturing terms.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,375 Times
in
1,580 Posts
Regarding the subject of why Avocet didn't survive in the market, I've got some thoughts.....
I like the old Avocet computers, partly for nostalgia and partly because I like the way that the pickup and magnet are unobtrusive. Call me shallow, but I find the pickups on conventional "magnet & reed switch" computers to be less pleasant visually. Here are some examples of my bikes with Avocets, and one with a Cateye.....
Olmo
Raleigh Team
Raleigh International
Hetchins with Cateye Mity, using a reed switch pickup
But.... (and there's always a "but")... I would say that the Avocet computers had some tech problems that contributed to their failure in the market.....
1. poor electrical connections at the pickup.
It looks like they used some cheap Molex stamped, tinned, connector sockets to connect to tinned wire at the sensor. As a guy who both spent years fixing aircraft electronics, and then later a career as an electrical engineer, I would say that connectors are a major source of problems on vehicles. I've had my share of troubles with the connectors on these Avocets, and just last year fixed a problem on the International by just soldering the wires to the sensor pins and got rid of the connectors. Problem solved!
2. poor electrical connections at the computer bracket.
It looks like they used the same family of cheap Molex contacts, but used the pins at the mounting bracket. In fact, it's fairly clever. Unfortunately, those pins weren't built for all of the mate/de-mate cycles that are typical for computers. The plating wore off quickly, resulting in the typical corrosion that degrades the signal strength.
3. poor housing design... on the model 30, at least
The top and bottom of the housing snapped together, creating a compression fit of the circuit board, LCD (liquid crystal display), and the "zebra strip" that connected the board to the display. After some period of time, the plastic housing relaxed a bit, reducing the compression and causing the display to loose contrast or causing digits to fade away entirely. A rubber band around the top of the housing takes care of this, however. Later designs used ultrasonic welding of the two halves of the housing, which appears to have fixed the problem.
4. poor battery life.
The battery lasts about a year. Compared to other computers, such as the Cateye Mity's that I've got on other bikes (about a 7 year battery life), this is pretty poor. It would be interesting to know the reason for the poor battery life. Was it using bipolar circuitry instead of CMOS? Is it related to the sensor technology?
5. The gap between the magnet ring and sensor has to be kept fairly small.
6. Fitting the magnet ring to the hub wasn't as trivial as sticking a magnet to a spoke.
I recall that there was large ring with 4 tabs that was 52mm in diameter that was used to clip onto high flange hubs (this is what I have on my International). For my bikes with small flange hubs, there is a smaller ring (48mm) with 3 tabs that is used. It works well with my 36 hole hubs. Not sure if it works with 32 or 28 hole hubs, since you can't divide 32 or 28 by 3. I think that was when you used the eyes on the ring, and you zip-tie'd the magnet ring to the spokes. Yeah... not a very easy way to attach the ring to the hub.
These are just the problems that I've experienced with the Avocets. Like a lot of quirky technologies, I've found fixes to most of the problems, and have just gotten used to the rest. Clearly, I don't represent the average bike computer purchaser from the 80's and 90's.
Steve in Peoria
I like the old Avocet computers, partly for nostalgia and partly because I like the way that the pickup and magnet are unobtrusive. Call me shallow, but I find the pickups on conventional "magnet & reed switch" computers to be less pleasant visually. Here are some examples of my bikes with Avocets, and one with a Cateye.....
Olmo
Raleigh Team
Raleigh International
Hetchins with Cateye Mity, using a reed switch pickup
But.... (and there's always a "but")... I would say that the Avocet computers had some tech problems that contributed to their failure in the market.....
1. poor electrical connections at the pickup.
It looks like they used some cheap Molex stamped, tinned, connector sockets to connect to tinned wire at the sensor. As a guy who both spent years fixing aircraft electronics, and then later a career as an electrical engineer, I would say that connectors are a major source of problems on vehicles. I've had my share of troubles with the connectors on these Avocets, and just last year fixed a problem on the International by just soldering the wires to the sensor pins and got rid of the connectors. Problem solved!
2. poor electrical connections at the computer bracket.
It looks like they used the same family of cheap Molex contacts, but used the pins at the mounting bracket. In fact, it's fairly clever. Unfortunately, those pins weren't built for all of the mate/de-mate cycles that are typical for computers. The plating wore off quickly, resulting in the typical corrosion that degrades the signal strength.
3. poor housing design... on the model 30, at least
The top and bottom of the housing snapped together, creating a compression fit of the circuit board, LCD (liquid crystal display), and the "zebra strip" that connected the board to the display. After some period of time, the plastic housing relaxed a bit, reducing the compression and causing the display to loose contrast or causing digits to fade away entirely. A rubber band around the top of the housing takes care of this, however. Later designs used ultrasonic welding of the two halves of the housing, which appears to have fixed the problem.
4. poor battery life.
The battery lasts about a year. Compared to other computers, such as the Cateye Mity's that I've got on other bikes (about a 7 year battery life), this is pretty poor. It would be interesting to know the reason for the poor battery life. Was it using bipolar circuitry instead of CMOS? Is it related to the sensor technology?
5. The gap between the magnet ring and sensor has to be kept fairly small.
6. Fitting the magnet ring to the hub wasn't as trivial as sticking a magnet to a spoke.
I recall that there was large ring with 4 tabs that was 52mm in diameter that was used to clip onto high flange hubs (this is what I have on my International). For my bikes with small flange hubs, there is a smaller ring (48mm) with 3 tabs that is used. It works well with my 36 hole hubs. Not sure if it works with 32 or 28 hole hubs, since you can't divide 32 or 28 by 3. I think that was when you used the eyes on the ring, and you zip-tie'd the magnet ring to the spokes. Yeah... not a very easy way to attach the ring to the hub.
These are just the problems that I've experienced with the Avocets. Like a lot of quirky technologies, I've found fixes to most of the problems, and have just gotten used to the rest. Clearly, I don't represent the average bike computer purchaser from the 80's and 90's.
Steve in Peoria
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,549
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,581 Times
in
2,342 Posts
if you go fast enough you can achieve a time warp
#40
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
I had an earlier version of the avocet, I want to say I bought it in '85? The ring was much bigger, probably more than 3" in diameter. Pretty sure I got rid of it even though it still worked.
actually was faster than that. Then I realized that if something happened, the results would not be good and sat up.
actually was faster than that. Then I realized that if something happened, the results would not be good and sat up.