Wide rim / narrow tire trend, but for MTB?
#1
Wat.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 53
Bikes: Marinoni Pista (650c), Gunnar Crosshairs, Yakota Twin Peaks Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wide rim / narrow tire trend, but for MTB?
I'm familiar with the ETRTO chart on what tires are recommended for rims, but I'm curious if anyone has experience moving outside this for larger rims with narrower tires.
Now road cycling is quite happy outside of this, with upwards of 18mm internal width rims and 23c tires (1.3x tire to rim). The idea being a reduced "lightbulb" effect, lower air pressure comfort, traction, etc. What I'm curious about is why we aren't seeing similar trends in some mountain/cyclocross/commuter rims.
I'm building a 650b porteur style commuter/touring/grocery mule bike and plan to run anywhere between 650x35-42b tires on this bike. I'm looking at DT Swiss rims, the XM 401 rim with a 22.5mm internal width. The XM 401 is "recommended" for 1.9"-2.4" (48-61mm) tires. I want to know if I can pop a 650x35b tire on it (1.55x tire to rim) and get the same benefits seen on narrower rim/tire combinations.
Anyone with any experience on this matter?
Now road cycling is quite happy outside of this, with upwards of 18mm internal width rims and 23c tires (1.3x tire to rim). The idea being a reduced "lightbulb" effect, lower air pressure comfort, traction, etc. What I'm curious about is why we aren't seeing similar trends in some mountain/cyclocross/commuter rims.
I'm building a 650b porteur style commuter/touring/grocery mule bike and plan to run anywhere between 650x35-42b tires on this bike. I'm looking at DT Swiss rims, the XM 401 rim with a 22.5mm internal width. The XM 401 is "recommended" for 1.9"-2.4" (48-61mm) tires. I want to know if I can pop a 650x35b tire on it (1.55x tire to rim) and get the same benefits seen on narrower rim/tire combinations.
Anyone with any experience on this matter?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,585 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Narrow tires on wide rims assume an inverted U profile, vs. the traditional Omega or "lightbulb". Some say this increases steering precision, and maybe it does, but it worsens radial compliance and increases road friction, and worsens the ride. It may be fine on glass smooth roads, but riders on poorer roads probably won't become fans.
Since mtn bike trails aren't exactly lie glass smooth roads, I don't expect this trend to catch on there, but, after decades in the bike world, I know enough to never say never.
Also two other point to consider. Mtn bikes already have been going beyond the ERTRO guidlines but it's to the wide tire on narrow rim side, probably because they handle low pressure better in DH and the like. Also consider that the guidelines aren't arbitrary edicts. They've based on 100 years of tire and rim experience and evolution. Trends narrower or wider will come and go, but it will always come back to the guidline ratios.
Since mtn bike trails aren't exactly lie glass smooth roads, I don't expect this trend to catch on there, but, after decades in the bike world, I know enough to never say never.
Also two other point to consider. Mtn bikes already have been going beyond the ERTRO guidlines but it's to the wide tire on narrow rim side, probably because they handle low pressure better in DH and the like. Also consider that the guidelines aren't arbitrary edicts. They've based on 100 years of tire and rim experience and evolution. Trends narrower or wider will come and go, but it will always come back to the guidline ratios.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131
Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
37 Posts
There has actually been a trend in mountain-biking toward wider rims. On another bike I've a set of 35mm-wide Salsa Gordo rims with 2.2" tires mounted on them. Not sure about hitting the 1.55 ratio the OP mentions. They are wide rims though.
Rims on fat-tire bikes are sometimes 100mm wide, and that's where you maybe would find the highest ratio of rim width to tire width.
#4
Wat.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 53
Bikes: Marinoni Pista (650c), Gunnar Crosshairs, Yakota Twin Peaks Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sheldon Brown notes "A general guideline is that the tire width should be between 1.45/2.0 x the inner rim width."
My question here is probably more relevant to commuter/touring setups riding mostly on pavement and sometimes gravel/dirt roads. Many touring bikes come with 35-40c tires, but mounted on rims with the same 17mm internal width as road bikes running 23c tires. Why not use wider rims for these uses?
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,585 Times
in
1,433 Posts
My question here is probably more relevant to commuter/touring setups riding mostly on pavement and sometimes gravel/dirt roads. Many touring bikes come with 35-40c tires, but mounted on rims with the same 17mm internal width as road bikes running 23c tires. Why not use wider rims for these uses?
I've posted on this a number of times, and the general rule is that tires narrower than ideal have the side walls straighter and more vertical, so they then to be a bit stiffer. Wide tires on narrow rims lack lateral stability, especially at low pressure and can wallow in turns. But those are only rough guidelines, and other factors lie the tire's construction can have greater affects.
My personal rule is ride what you think work best for you, then apply the guideline as a reference tool if you have performance issues. For my part, I commute on 1.9" tires on comparatively narrow mtn rims. They're fine at full pressure, and serve me well on poor roads, especially at night when I can't see as well. However, they're not without issue, and have twice put me on pavement in turns, because a slow leak in the front tire went unnoticed.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.