Chain wear indicator tool for "screening"?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,763
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times
in
760 Posts
Chain wear indicator tool for "screening"?
There's probably a million threads on this very question, but I couldn't figure out how to search for it.
Short version: Is a chain wear tool a valid screening tool - does it err on the side of falsely indicating excessive wear (good for screening) or the opposite - tricking you into thinking the chain is OK when really it's worn (bad for screening)?
Long version: I totally understand that it is cheap and easy to measure chain wear using a steel ruler and the 1/16" elongation criterion. I can do that. But I also understand that it's best if the chain is under at least a little tension (i.e. hanging from a nail or manually stretched out.
I also understand that using a tool is dead simple but might not accurately measure real chain wear (I can't explain to you why but when i read explanations, it makes sense, so there).
Finally, I also think it's a hassle with poor lighting and only two hands to do a truly accurate measurement with a ruler while a chain is on the bike - pulling the chain in tension, holding the ruler precisely and sighting a 1/16 measurement. Not impossible mind you, but more of a hassle than just using the chain wear indicator tool ... again, while the chain is on the bike.
In my family of fairly active riders, I have about a dozen chains I need to keep track of, mostly on bikes but also a couple of spares I rotate in. I have a Park chain wear tool and a steel ruler. Yesterday I did a spot check of a couple of chains on the bikes with the Park tool and also the spare using the tool and a ruler (which has similar wear).
I did 2-3 checks on each of the chains I checked with the tool on the bikes. A couple of chains were totally "OK" with the tool at every test site. A couple were OK at two sites, but showed ".75%" wear on a third. In other words, those chains could have shown "OK" if I'd only checked once.
This is where the question comes in. If the indicator tool shows wear, I'm thinking then I'd take the chain off and do a ruler test to confirm. But, if the indicator tool doesn't show at least "75%" wear, I'll just lube up the chain and we're good to go.
What do you think?
Thanks.
Short version: Is a chain wear tool a valid screening tool - does it err on the side of falsely indicating excessive wear (good for screening) or the opposite - tricking you into thinking the chain is OK when really it's worn (bad for screening)?
Long version: I totally understand that it is cheap and easy to measure chain wear using a steel ruler and the 1/16" elongation criterion. I can do that. But I also understand that it's best if the chain is under at least a little tension (i.e. hanging from a nail or manually stretched out.
I also understand that using a tool is dead simple but might not accurately measure real chain wear (I can't explain to you why but when i read explanations, it makes sense, so there).
Finally, I also think it's a hassle with poor lighting and only two hands to do a truly accurate measurement with a ruler while a chain is on the bike - pulling the chain in tension, holding the ruler precisely and sighting a 1/16 measurement. Not impossible mind you, but more of a hassle than just using the chain wear indicator tool ... again, while the chain is on the bike.
In my family of fairly active riders, I have about a dozen chains I need to keep track of, mostly on bikes but also a couple of spares I rotate in. I have a Park chain wear tool and a steel ruler. Yesterday I did a spot check of a couple of chains on the bikes with the Park tool and also the spare using the tool and a ruler (which has similar wear).
I did 2-3 checks on each of the chains I checked with the tool on the bikes. A couple of chains were totally "OK" with the tool at every test site. A couple were OK at two sites, but showed ".75%" wear on a third. In other words, those chains could have shown "OK" if I'd only checked once.
This is where the question comes in. If the indicator tool shows wear, I'm thinking then I'd take the chain off and do a ruler test to confirm. But, if the indicator tool doesn't show at least "75%" wear, I'll just lube up the chain and we're good to go.
What do you think?
Thanks.
#2
Senior Member
I remove my chains to clean them. I check them then.
. I have a Rohloff chain gauge that I use until it shows a worn out chain. I then use the ruler method until the chain is actually gone. I bought the gauge before I knew that it is not accurate because it measure the rollers and the chain. Not the best way.
. I have a Rohloff chain gauge that I use until it shows a worn out chain. I then use the ruler method until the chain is actually gone. I bought the gauge before I knew that it is not accurate because it measure the rollers and the chain. Not the best way.
#3
The Improbable Bulk
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,379
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Sounds like a good plan to me.
I do find myself wondering why a chain would wear differently in different spots, but it could be a difference because of the manufacturing tolerances that allows one portion of the chain to be flagged as worn earlier than other parts of the chain in some cases. Or possibly that a pin or link is slightly softer than others (again related to variances in manufacturing process. It could also mean that at some point(s) lubrication ws not done uniformly.
In any case, if a chain checks good on one section, and fails on another, I would consider the chain "almost worn" for practical purposes.
Based on your findings, I plan to use my indicator on a chain. If it shows good, I will keep using the chain. If it shows as ready for replacement, I will check 1 more spot. If it shows worn, I will replace the chain. If it shows ok, I will assume it is borderline and ride on... With my history, I assume that I can misread a ruler far more easily than make a mistake with a gauge constructed specifically for the purpose.
Your risk and/or cost avoidance priorities and history of accurate or inaccurate measurements may lead you elsewhere for your decision process.
I do find myself wondering why a chain would wear differently in different spots, but it could be a difference because of the manufacturing tolerances that allows one portion of the chain to be flagged as worn earlier than other parts of the chain in some cases. Or possibly that a pin or link is slightly softer than others (again related to variances in manufacturing process. It could also mean that at some point(s) lubrication ws not done uniformly.
In any case, if a chain checks good on one section, and fails on another, I would consider the chain "almost worn" for practical purposes.
Based on your findings, I plan to use my indicator on a chain. If it shows good, I will keep using the chain. If it shows as ready for replacement, I will check 1 more spot. If it shows worn, I will replace the chain. If it shows ok, I will assume it is borderline and ride on... With my history, I assume that I can misread a ruler far more easily than make a mistake with a gauge constructed specifically for the purpose.
Your risk and/or cost avoidance priorities and history of accurate or inaccurate measurements may lead you elsewhere for your decision process.
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
#4
Banned
More accurate .. KMC makes a digital chain wear indicator How to minimize chain wear
seen here .. too KMC Digital Chain Checker : Fairwheel Bikes, Cycling Boutique
seen here .. too KMC Digital Chain Checker : Fairwheel Bikes, Cycling Boutique
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
I remove my chains to clean them. I check them then.
. I have a Rohloff chain gauge that I use until it shows a worn out chain. I then use the ruler method until the chain is actually gone. I bought the gauge before I knew that it is not accurate because it measure the rollers and the chain. Not the best way.
. I have a Rohloff chain gauge that I use until it shows a worn out chain. I then use the ruler method until the chain is actually gone. I bought the gauge before I knew that it is not accurate because it measure the rollers and the chain. Not the best way.
#6
Senior Member
Yes, but as OP is asking, that is a false positive, so it is safe. Also that is only true once the tool can be squeezed between the pins. As long as the second tab is not fitting between the pins, the measurement is accurate. In other words, until the tool is stretching the chain against all the internal parts, it is just as good as a ruler. Also once the chain is really way too long and the tool fits between the pins with no stretching, the tool is once again as good as a ruler. It is only when the tool is stretching the chain in order to hook it at both ends that is gives a false high reading. So you can just wait until the chain is long enough to be a little loose on the smaller, more conservative scale of the tool. Simple, huh?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: D'uh... I am a Cutter
Posts: 6,139
Bikes: '17 Access Old Turnpike Gravel bike, '14 Trek 1.1, '13 Cannondale CAAD 10, '98 CAD 2, R300
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1571 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
Sounds like a lot of work to save a dime. Of course the total amount of currency involved could be lesser or greater I guess... but ether way it can't be much.
Of course in my calculations I don't use specialty finished 11 speed chains or anything like that. My KMC chains purchased via Amazon aren't much more than about ten bucks. So if I repeatedly replace the chain about ten percent too early.... every decade it would amount to a whole new free $10 chain. Of course a less than perfect measurement/replacement procedure would more likely mean a five percent ether way error. Early replacements would cancel late replacements.... and little to nothing would change.
I don't know why cyclist fret so much about the disposable parts.
Of course in my calculations I don't use specialty finished 11 speed chains or anything like that. My KMC chains purchased via Amazon aren't much more than about ten bucks. So if I repeatedly replace the chain about ten percent too early.... every decade it would amount to a whole new free $10 chain. Of course a less than perfect measurement/replacement procedure would more likely mean a five percent ether way error. Early replacements would cancel late replacements.... and little to nothing would change.
I don't know why cyclist fret so much about the disposable parts.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 1,282
Bikes: two blacks, a blue and a white.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 445 Post(s)
Liked 847 Times
in
410 Posts
Sounds like a lot of work to save a dime. Of course the total amount of currency involved could be lesser or greater I guess... but ether way it can't be much.
Of course in my calculations I don't use specialty finished 11 speed chains or anything like that. My KMC chains purchased via Amazon aren't much more than about ten bucks. So if I repeatedly replace the chain about ten percent too early.... every decade it would amount to a whole new free $10 chain. Of course a less than perfect measurement/replacement procedure would more likely mean a five percent ether way error. Early replacements would cancel late replacements.... and little to nothing would change.
I don't know why cyclist fret so much about the disposable parts.
Of course in my calculations I don't use specialty finished 11 speed chains or anything like that. My KMC chains purchased via Amazon aren't much more than about ten bucks. So if I repeatedly replace the chain about ten percent too early.... every decade it would amount to a whole new free $10 chain. Of course a less than perfect measurement/replacement procedure would more likely mean a five percent ether way error. Early replacements would cancel late replacements.... and little to nothing would change.
I don't know why cyclist fret so much about the disposable parts.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,763
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times
in
760 Posts
Sounds like a lot of work to save a dime. Of course the total amount of currency involved could be lesser or greater I guess... but ether way it can't be much.
Of course in my calculations I don't use specialty finished 11 speed chains or anything like that. My KMC chains purchased via Amazon aren't much more than about ten bucks. So if I repeatedly replace the chain about ten percent too early.... every decade it would amount to a whole new free $10 chain. Of course a less than perfect measurement/replacement procedure would more likely mean a five percent ether way error. Early replacements would cancel late replacements.... and little to nothing would change.
I don't know why cyclist fret so much about the disposable parts.
Of course in my calculations I don't use specialty finished 11 speed chains or anything like that. My KMC chains purchased via Amazon aren't much more than about ten bucks. So if I repeatedly replace the chain about ten percent too early.... every decade it would amount to a whole new free $10 chain. Of course a less than perfect measurement/replacement procedure would more likely mean a five percent ether way error. Early replacements would cancel late replacements.... and little to nothing would change.
I don't know why cyclist fret so much about the disposable parts.
I'm simply asking - from someone who might know and explain - whether the tool gives a false positive or false negative. I'll leave it up to myself and others to decide whether to "fret" about the hassle of chain wear methods or chain replacement.
Myself? I don't sweat a few bucks here and there to save time and effort. But, I don't think it's so dumb that with about a dozen chains to keep track of, it's worthwhile to have a dead simple and quick screening tool as long as I know which way the potential inaccuracy goes.
Last edited by Camilo; 04-22-14 at 04:10 PM.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,585 Times
in
1,433 Posts
IMO, as you describe it, they're excellent for screening since they read false high.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Yep, my Park CC3 does tend to over report chain wear as the 0.75% tab will fit when the 12" ruler says 1/16" (0.5%) or less. As to checking the chain under tension, just use the ruler on the lower run of the chain while it's installed on the bike. The rear derailleur spring will keep it plenty tight enough for a good reading.
Last edited by HillRider; 04-22-14 at 06:40 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681
Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
There's probably a million threads on this very question, but I couldn't figure out how to search for it.
Short version: Is a chain wear tool a valid screening tool - does it err on the side of falsely indicating excessive wear (good for screening) or the opposite - tricking you into thinking the chain is OK when really it's worn (bad for screening)?
Long version: I totally understand that it is cheap and easy to measure chain wear using a steel ruler and the 1/16" elongation criterion. I can do that. But I also understand that it's best if the chain is under at least a little tension (i.e. hanging from a nail or manually stretched out.
I also understand that using a tool is dead simple but might not accurately measure real chain wear (I can't explain to you why but when i read explanations, it makes sense, so there).
Finally, I also think it's a hassle with poor lighting and only two hands to do a truly accurate measurement with a ruler while a chain is on the bike - pulling the chain in tension, holding the ruler precisely and sighting a 1/16 measurement. Not impossible mind you, but more of a hassle than just using the chain wear indicator tool ... again, while the chain is on the bike.
In my family of fairly active riders, I have about a dozen chains I need to keep track of, mostly on bikes but also a couple of spares I rotate in. I have a Park chain wear tool and a steel ruler. Yesterday I did a spot check of a couple of chains on the bikes with the Park tool and also the spare using the tool and a ruler (which has similar wear).
I did 2-3 checks on each of the chains I checked with the tool on the bikes. A couple of chains were totally "OK" with the tool at every test site. A couple were OK at two sites, but showed ".75%" wear on a third. In other words, those chains could have shown "OK" if I'd only checked once.
This is where the question comes in. If the indicator tool shows wear, I'm thinking then I'd take the chain off and do a ruler test to confirm. But, if the indicator tool doesn't show at least "75%" wear, I'll just lube up the chain and we're good to go.
What do you think?
Thanks.
Short version: Is a chain wear tool a valid screening tool - does it err on the side of falsely indicating excessive wear (good for screening) or the opposite - tricking you into thinking the chain is OK when really it's worn (bad for screening)?
Long version: I totally understand that it is cheap and easy to measure chain wear using a steel ruler and the 1/16" elongation criterion. I can do that. But I also understand that it's best if the chain is under at least a little tension (i.e. hanging from a nail or manually stretched out.
I also understand that using a tool is dead simple but might not accurately measure real chain wear (I can't explain to you why but when i read explanations, it makes sense, so there).
Finally, I also think it's a hassle with poor lighting and only two hands to do a truly accurate measurement with a ruler while a chain is on the bike - pulling the chain in tension, holding the ruler precisely and sighting a 1/16 measurement. Not impossible mind you, but more of a hassle than just using the chain wear indicator tool ... again, while the chain is on the bike.
In my family of fairly active riders, I have about a dozen chains I need to keep track of, mostly on bikes but also a couple of spares I rotate in. I have a Park chain wear tool and a steel ruler. Yesterday I did a spot check of a couple of chains on the bikes with the Park tool and also the spare using the tool and a ruler (which has similar wear).
I did 2-3 checks on each of the chains I checked with the tool on the bikes. A couple of chains were totally "OK" with the tool at every test site. A couple were OK at two sites, but showed ".75%" wear on a third. In other words, those chains could have shown "OK" if I'd only checked once.
This is where the question comes in. If the indicator tool shows wear, I'm thinking then I'd take the chain off and do a ruler test to confirm. But, if the indicator tool doesn't show at least "75%" wear, I'll just lube up the chain and we're good to go.
What do you think?
Thanks.
twelve replies and countless threads on this issue has wasted more people's time and money than i care to think about. i'm a little disappointed that what i otherwise consider to be clear thinking, well informed individuals on this forum are drinking the kool-aid on this issue. is suspect it's a genetic "a tool for everything" thing involved here.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
twelve replies and countless threads on this issue has wasted more people's time and money than i care to think about. i'm a little disappointed that what i otherwise consider to be clear thinking, well informed individuals on this forum are drinking the kool-aid on this issue. is suspect it's a genetic "a tool for everything" thing involved here.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: D'uh... I am a Cutter
Posts: 6,139
Bikes: '17 Access Old Turnpike Gravel bike, '14 Trek 1.1, '13 Cannondale CAAD 10, '98 CAD 2, R300
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1571 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
Fret: verb (used without object), fretted, fretting. to feel or express worry (like post about it on the Internet?), annoyance, discontent.
Yeah... I guess I was implying that most or at least many cyclists (not just you) fret the wear of what are disposable parts. But I didn't mean it as any form of insult or put down... I promise. Sorry if my wording wasn't as friendly sounding on your side as it was intended to be... from my side.
Yeah... I guess I was implying that most or at least many cyclists (not just you) fret the wear of what are disposable parts. But I didn't mean it as any form of insult or put down... I promise. Sorry if my wording wasn't as friendly sounding on your side as it was intended to be... from my side.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
IME, measuring a chain is a waste of time. until the drivetrain skips, it is alright as far as i am concerned. when the drivetrain skips, i start with the rear cog(s) first, then the chain, and then the chainring.
twelve replies and countless threads on this issue has wasted more people's time and money than i care to think about. i'm a little disappointed that what i otherwise consider to be clear thinking, well informed individuals on this forum are drinking the kool-aid on this issue. is suspect it's a genetic "a tool for everything" thing involved here.
twelve replies and countless threads on this issue has wasted more people's time and money than i care to think about. i'm a little disappointed that what i otherwise consider to be clear thinking, well informed individuals on this forum are drinking the kool-aid on this issue. is suspect it's a genetic "a tool for everything" thing involved here.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681
Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I read a post the other day about a guy who gets 20,000 miles (or was it km) out of a chain, cassette, and front rings, because he never changes them until he absolutely must, and then all together. The economics of this plan are indisputable. The only downside I can see is if you need to swap in a wheel with a different cassette that isn't worn in like the one that is part of the system. Then you have trouble.
to be honest i rarely have a chain or cog wear out, let alone a chainring, although i ride about 7000 miles a year spread evenly across six bikes (it could be because i live in a benign climate and wipe down and oil the drivetrain before each daily ride). but i've been buying new chainrings and chains at an alarming rate recently, mostly because i've decided to run higher gears. the noise generated by a new chainring and even slightely used chain annoys me so i oftentimes just get a new chain too. SRAM pc-1 chains are surprisingly inexpensive.
Last edited by hueyhoolihan; 04-22-14 at 09:05 PM.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,904
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,933 Times
in
1,213 Posts
The chain checker as a pre-screen is a good idea as long as you do it frequently enough. If, like me, you let it go another 500 miles at the end of the winter, not so good.
It's quick and easy, works well in a poorly lit garage, and I'm going to do that tonight!
It's quick and easy, works well in a poorly lit garage, and I'm going to do that tonight!
#19
Senior Member
IME, measuring a chain is a waste of time. until the drivetrain skips, it is alright as far as i am concerned. when the drivetrain skips, i start with the rear cog(s) first, then the chain, and then the chainring.
twelve replies and countless threads on this issue has wasted more people's time and money than i care to think about. i'm a little disappointed that what i otherwise consider to be clear thinking, well informed individuals on this forum are drinking the kool-aid on this issue. is suspect it's a genetic "a tool for everything" thing involved here.
twelve replies and countless threads on this issue has wasted more people's time and money than i care to think about. i'm a little disappointed that what i otherwise consider to be clear thinking, well informed individuals on this forum are drinking the kool-aid on this issue. is suspect it's a genetic "a tool for everything" thing involved here.
Or you can just never change the chain and cassette. That will last you easily ten years or so with normal miles, but you can never put a good wheel on your bike because it will skip.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
Actually I just realized there is another problem with the just keep using the chain, cassette and front rings all together until you absolutely have to change them out. If you ride mostly on two or three cogs as I do in pancake flat Houston, it is like having two differently worn cassettes mounted at the same time. If I were to let the chain, cassette (say the three most used cogs) and chain rings all wear in together significantly, then maybe took the bike to the mountains or had a really strong wind day, I would be in trouble. Using relatively new higher or lower cogs than the usual three would not work well with the worn chain. I guess there are reasons why folks frequently replace their chains, less so their cassettes and even more rarely their chain rings. Damn!
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,968
Bikes: '09 Trek 2.1 * '75 Sekine * 2010 Raleigh Talus 8.0 * '90 Giant Mtb * Raleigh M20 * Fuji Nevada mtb
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
More accurate .. KMC makes a digital chain wear indicator...seen here .. too KMC Digital Chain Checker : Fairwheel Bikes, Cycling Boutique
__________________
FB4K - Every October we wrench on donated bikes. Every December, a few thousand kids get bikes for Christmas. For many, it is their first bike, ever. Every bike, new and used, was donated, built, cleaned and repaired. Check us out on FaceBook: FB4K.
Disclaimer: 99% of what I know about cycling I learned on BF. That would make, ummm, 1% experience. And a lot of posts.
FB4K - Every October we wrench on donated bikes. Every December, a few thousand kids get bikes for Christmas. For many, it is their first bike, ever. Every bike, new and used, was donated, built, cleaned and repaired. Check us out on FaceBook: FB4K.
Disclaimer: 99% of what I know about cycling I learned on BF. That would make, ummm, 1% experience. And a lot of posts.
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,763
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times
in
760 Posts
Fret: verb (used without object), fretted, fretting. to feel or express worry (like post about it on the Internet?), annoyance, discontent.
Yeah... I guess I was implying that most or at least many cyclists (not just you) fret the wear of what are disposable parts. But I didn't mean it as any form of insult or put down... I promise. Sorry if my wording wasn't as friendly sounding on your side as it was intended to be... from my side.
Yeah... I guess I was implying that most or at least many cyclists (not just you) fret the wear of what are disposable parts. But I didn't mean it as any form of insult or put down... I promise. Sorry if my wording wasn't as friendly sounding on your side as it was intended to be... from my side.
They are indeed wear parts and the marginal difference in cost between being compulsive and just "reasonable" is negligible, to me.
So, really, I wasn't fretting - not worrying, not being discontented or annoyed. Just curious about the screening value of the tool - which I think it does have that value.
At my rate of riding in a mostly dry climate, only about 2,000 miles per year (short summer season, not a winter rider) divided between three main road bikes..... well, chain and cassette wear is just a non issue, except there's several more bikes in the family that I get "ready to go" every spring and any time I can save a minute it's worth it!
Thanks to all for the advice. Conclusion: it's a screening tool that gives false positives (indicating more wear than actually exists).
Last edited by Camilo; 04-23-14 at 12:22 PM.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: D'uh... I am a Cutter
Posts: 6,139
Bikes: '17 Access Old Turnpike Gravel bike, '14 Trek 1.1, '13 Cannondale CAAD 10, '98 CAD 2, R300
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1571 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
I can't imagine maintaining a family sized fleet of bicycles. Do you just wait for complaints or do you have scheduled inspections? I assume you have tools and do your own work.
#24
Really Old Senior Member
..........This is where the question comes in. If the indicator tool shows wear, I'm thinking then I'd take the chain off and do a ruler test to confirm. But, if the indicator tool doesn't show at least "75%" wear, I'll just lube up the chain and we're good to go.
What do you think?
Thanks.
What do you think?
Thanks.
I flip a few bikes on CL and have 2 of my own. A quick "yep, it's OK" gauge" I expect would be handy, instead of trying to read the ruler while holding a magnifying glass with one hand and keeping the pins aligned to the 0 & 12" mark with the other two.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,585 Times
in
1,433 Posts
......
This is where the question comes in. If the indicator tool shows wear, I'm thinking then I'd take the chain off and do a ruler test to confirm. But, if the indicator tool doesn't show at least "75%" wear, I'll just lube up the chain and we're good to go.
What do you think?
.
This is where the question comes in. If the indicator tool shows wear, I'm thinking then I'd take the chain off and do a ruler test to confirm. But, if the indicator tool doesn't show at least "75%" wear, I'll just lube up the chain and we're good to go.
What do you think?
.
Remember that measuring stretch isn't a precise measurement of the chain's condition, it's only an indirect indicator, so serious precision is meaningless.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.