Frame Size
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 226
Bikes: 1991 Diamondback Apex, 2015 Trek Verve 3, 2020 Specialized Diverge
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
58 Posts
Frame Size
I am shopping for a new bike. The online fitting tables suggest 56 cm frame for me. I am 5’ 10” 32” inseam.
I am sure this is just a starting point and 54 or 58 might be better for certain situations.
What would make me choose a larger or smaller frame that normally recommended for my size?
I am sure this is just a starting point and 54 or 58 might be better for certain situations.
What would make me choose a larger or smaller frame that normally recommended for my size?
#3
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,985
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,808 Times
in
3,316 Posts
Experience.
Knowing how you felt on a particular size frame for several thousand miles and then trying other size frames to see what that does for you.
Larger frame might keep you more upright or allow you to get more stretched out.
Smaller frame will generally let you get more drop from saddle to bars and with longer stem just as stretched out as the larger frame. You probably can't get as upright with out the stem being ridiculously angled up.
After riding excessively large frames (64, 60, 59cm) for over 45 years, I'm on a 56 cm Tarmac since this March. Very comfortable right out of the shop. The only thing I changed was putting short cranks on it. I'm 5' 11" with 34.5" legs.
Knowing how you felt on a particular size frame for several thousand miles and then trying other size frames to see what that does for you.
Larger frame might keep you more upright or allow you to get more stretched out.
Smaller frame will generally let you get more drop from saddle to bars and with longer stem just as stretched out as the larger frame. You probably can't get as upright with out the stem being ridiculously angled up.
After riding excessively large frames (64, 60, 59cm) for over 45 years, I'm on a 56 cm Tarmac since this March. Very comfortable right out of the shop. The only thing I changed was putting short cranks on it. I'm 5' 11" with 34.5" legs.
Last edited by Iride01; 08-16-20 at 09:16 AM.
#4
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 226
Bikes: 1991 Diamondback Apex, 2015 Trek Verve 3, 2020 Specialized Diverge
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
58 Posts
Seems like starting with standard size is best for me until I have more experience.
#5
Full Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Oakland CA
Posts: 274
Bikes: 1984 Gitane TdF, 1986 Look Équipe, 1983 Colnago Super
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Liked 137 Times
in
80 Posts
I am also 5'10", and my inseam is 33". 56cm bikes seem a bit large to me, I prefer the nimble feel (in my opinion) of the 54 or 55cm bikes. The decision is also related to the type of roads and riding you plan to do. This all is a matter of opinion, but short quick turns and rides, smaller bike; longer rides, bigger bike. Try different sizes if you can.
When people state the frame size, you really need to find out how they measured it. Generally, the seat tube length is easy to adjust - just raise the seat up or down. The top tube length is more difficult - you can alter stem lengths, slide the seat fore and aft, and/or change the reach on the handlebars.
When people state the frame size, you really need to find out how they measured it. Generally, the seat tube length is easy to adjust - just raise the seat up or down. The top tube length is more difficult - you can alter stem lengths, slide the seat fore and aft, and/or change the reach on the handlebars.
#6
I like speed
I am also 5'10", and my inseam is 33". 56cm bikes seem a bit large to me, I prefer the nimble feel (in my opinion) of the 54 or 55cm bikes. The decision is also related to the type of roads and riding you plan to do. This all is a matter of opinion, but short quick turns and rides, smaller bike; longer rides, bigger bike. Try different sizes if you can.
When people state the frame size, you really need to find out how they measured it. Generally, the seat tube length is easy to adjust - just raise the seat up or down. The top tube length is more difficult - you can alter stem lengths, slide the seat fore and aft, and/or change the reach on the handlebars.
When people state the frame size, you really need to find out how they measured it. Generally, the seat tube length is easy to adjust - just raise the seat up or down. The top tube length is more difficult - you can alter stem lengths, slide the seat fore and aft, and/or change the reach on the handlebars.
I'm also 5'10" with a 33" inseam and prefer 53/54cm bikes. 56 cm bikes felt a little stretched out for me but I also prefer to run about 8.5 - 9 cm of saddle to handlebar drop. Similar to cyclic eric's comment, make sure to check out the geometry and compare reach/stack along with the top tube for the bikes you're looking at.
#7
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 226
Bikes: 1991 Diamondback Apex, 2015 Trek Verve 3, 2020 Specialized Diverge
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
58 Posts
It seems sizing varies from one bike company to another. Specialized and Trek guide me toward 56 cm. But Ridley towards 53.5.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,094
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 1,290 Times
in
743 Posts
I am shopping for a new bike. The online fitting tables suggest 56 cm frame for me. I am 5’ 10” 32” inseam.
I am sure this is just a starting point and 54 or 58 might be better for certain situations.
What would make me choose a larger or smaller frame that normally recommended for my size?
I am sure this is just a starting point and 54 or 58 might be better for certain situations.
What would make me choose a larger or smaller frame that normally recommended for my size?
Your needs may be different, and as someone else pointed out, a smaller fame can be more nimble. Wheel size makes a difference too. The 56 LHT with 700 wheels is less nimble than the 56 with 26 inch wheels. I went with the 26 inch wheels. If you want to run more drop, a smaller frame can work.
When comparing frames, look also at the effective top tube length. There will be differences between frames "of the same size."
Likes For phughes:
#9
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,985
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,808 Times
in
3,316 Posts
Ridley might be just measuring to the intersection of the top tube with the seat tube as we did back in the days when most all bikes had a horizontal top tube.
Sizing varies even among different models from the same manufacturer. Don't assume because a 56 cm Émonda SLR 7 is recomended for your size, that a 56 cm in another model Trek is correct for you.
Likes For Iride01:
#10
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 226
Bikes: 1991 Diamondback Apex, 2015 Trek Verve 3, 2020 Specialized Diverge
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
58 Posts
I think stability and ride comfort will be more important to me than nimbleness.
#11
Senior Member
Greg Lemond says you should ride a 53 cm frame. Go ride a few. If it’s too small you’ll feel cramped, if it’s too large it will hurt. Most people ride a frame that’s too large then complain. You should feel one with the bike.
Likes For AlanO:
#13
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 226
Bikes: 1991 Diamondback Apex, 2015 Trek Verve 3, 2020 Specialized Diverge
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
58 Posts
I am leaning toward the 56 cm frame at the moment since less drop from seat to handle bars appeals to me.
But it would seem this would also depend on the bike geometry. Looking at endurance and gravel bikes that already have more relaxed geometries and longer wheel base maybe a smaller frame would work. I wonder if a 54 cm frame on a Roubaix might fit similarly to a 56 cm frame on a Tarmac.
But it would seem this would also depend on the bike geometry. Looking at endurance and gravel bikes that already have more relaxed geometries and longer wheel base maybe a smaller frame would work. I wonder if a 54 cm frame on a Roubaix might fit similarly to a 56 cm frame on a Tarmac.
#14
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,985
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,808 Times
in
3,316 Posts
When you look at drop from saddle to bars from one model to the next, don't just look at stack height in the geometry specs. Many bike come with a lot of spacers under the stem that if not removed will leave a bike marketed as a "Race" fit just as relaxed as a bike marketed toward something else.
Trying them on is the best way to figure it out and having the experience to look for stuff like that. But also, maybe make certain you don't buy such an expensive bike that you can't afford another if this turns out to not quite be the one.
Trying them on is the best way to figure it out and having the experience to look for stuff like that. But also, maybe make certain you don't buy such an expensive bike that you can't afford another if this turns out to not quite be the one.
Last edited by Iride01; 08-21-20 at 10:07 AM.
Likes For Iride01:
#15
I like speed
I am leaning toward the 56 cm frame at the moment since less drop from seat to handle bars appeals to me.
But it would seem this would also depend on the bike geometry. Looking at endurance and gravel bikes that already have more relaxed geometries and longer wheel base maybe a smaller frame would work. I wonder if a 54 cm frame on a Roubaix might fit similarly to a 56 cm frame on a Tarmac.
But it would seem this would also depend on the bike geometry. Looking at endurance and gravel bikes that already have more relaxed geometries and longer wheel base maybe a smaller frame would work. I wonder if a 54 cm frame on a Roubaix might fit similarly to a 56 cm frame on a Tarmac.
Like another poster noted, most bikes come with quite a few spacers underneath the stem to dial in fit. Generally endurance frames have the handlebars closer and higher due to reduced reach and increased stack over a "race fit" frame.
Likes For oris:
#16
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 226
Bikes: 1991 Diamondback Apex, 2015 Trek Verve 3, 2020 Specialized Diverge
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
58 Posts
That is what I would like to do. The issue is that local shops are not doing test rides. You can buy a bike. Ride it and return it if you do not like it. I am considering doing this, but I would really prefer to ride one right after another for a better comparison.
My existing bike works fine for the way I am riding now. I will probably just wait until things get back to normal.
My existing bike works fine for the way I am riding now. I will probably just wait until things get back to normal.
#17
Member
The question is not correct. Each frame has its own geometry. Geometry of pure race and endurance bike is different. So often You can be fitted well on 56cm endurance frame or 54cm race frame. Now let me share my personal experience. My hight is 172cm. When I visited LBS to buy bike shop owner loooked at me and told: “You need 54cm. If You are going to participate in races buy 52cm.”
#18
Member
The question is not correct. Each frame has its own geometry. Geometry of pure race and endurance bike is different. So often You can be fitted well on 56cm endurance frame or 54cm race frame. Now let me share my personal experience. My hight is 172cm. When I visited LBS to buy bike shop owner looked at me and told: “You need 54cm. If You are going to participate in races buy 52cm.”
#19
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,528
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Personal proportions vary. Frame designs vary. One thing remains constant - saddles and bars can go up and down. So buy a frame by the effective top tube (ETT) length, not by the nominal frame size. Competitive Cyclist's calculator will give ETT.
https://www.competitivecyclist.com/S...ulatorBike.jsp
https://www.competitivecyclist.com/S...ulatorBike.jsp
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#20
Newbie
I wouldn't buy a bike without throwing a leg over it. I'm 5' 11'' with a 32" inseam. A previously-owned Bottecchia 57cm road bike felt a bit compact. In a pinch I recently borrowed a buddy's 15 y.o. 54cm Sirrus and it felt really small. My current 2016 Scott hybrid is an XL. Other than the standover height being a bit higher than I'd prefer, the frame is a good fit.
Likes For overthebars:
#21
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 226
Bikes: 1991 Diamondback Apex, 2015 Trek Verve 3, 2020 Specialized Diverge
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
58 Posts
I have decided to wait to buy a bike until bike shops open for test rides. Perhaps more experienced riders would be able to know how the bike would fit based on geometry but at my experience level I think I need to try it out. Even then I probably won’t really know until I get some miles under my belt.
Considering the possibility of getting a used bike to ride for a while and get some experience on a particular size and geometry to get a basis for comparison.
I have a hybrid and MTB. The MTB has an aggressive fit. Maybe a bit small for me. Riding them is giving me some perspective of what I am looking for. But I would really like to get some experience on a drop bar bike.
Considering the possibility of getting a used bike to ride for a while and get some experience on a particular size and geometry to get a basis for comparison.
I have a hybrid and MTB. The MTB has an aggressive fit. Maybe a bit small for me. Riding them is giving me some perspective of what I am looking for. But I would really like to get some experience on a drop bar bike.
#22
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,528
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
I have decided to wait to buy a bike until bike shops open for test rides. Perhaps more experienced riders would be able to know how the bike would fit based on geometry but at my experience level I think I need to try it out. Even then I probably won’t really know until I get some miles under my belt.
Considering the possibility of getting a used bike to ride for a while and get some experience on a particular size and geometry to get a basis for comparison.
I have a hybrid and MTB. The MTB has an aggressive fit. Maybe a bit small for me. Riding them is giving me some perspective of what I am looking for. But I would really like to get some experience on a drop bar bike.
Considering the possibility of getting a used bike to ride for a while and get some experience on a particular size and geometry to get a basis for comparison.
I have a hybrid and MTB. The MTB has an aggressive fit. Maybe a bit small for me. Riding them is giving me some perspective of what I am looking for. But I would really like to get some experience on a drop bar bike.
I think using their trainer with an employee to help me with fit was a much better experience than taking the bike out on the road. It's much easier to focus down on fit issues on a trainer instead of being totally wowed by the new fast bike experience on the road. Which of course I totally had after the purchase.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Likes For Carbonfiberboy: