Equipment/Product Review (1984) Shimano Biopace / Non-Circular Chainrings
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central Florida, USA
Posts: 1,987
Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (9); Specialized (3); Kestrel (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Trek (2)
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 433 Post(s)
Liked 3,443 Times
in
994 Posts
Equipment/Product Review (1984) Shimano Biopace / Non-Circular Chainrings
This post contains two short articles.
The first is focused on Shimano Biopace.
The second is a brief review of other non-circular designs and the author's experience with Thetic, Bridgestone, and Durham,
The first is focused on Shimano Biopace.
The second is a brief review of other non-circular designs and the author's experience with Thetic, Bridgestone, and Durham,
__________________
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
Likes For SpeedofLite:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,433
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5887 Post(s)
Liked 3,469 Times
in
2,079 Posts
Chris Froome uses oval chainrings so it's not like this idea has completely gone out of style.
Likes For bikemig:
Likes For stardognine:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,107
Bikes: Trek 800 x 2, Schwinn Heavy Duti, Schwinn Traveler, Schwinn Le Tour Luxe, Schwinn Continental, Cannondale M400 and Lambert, Schwinn Super Sport
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 809 Post(s)
Liked 1,018 Times
in
664 Posts
This is an enjoyable read since we are looking at this decades later. It sure seems that Shimano put great effort into the design. I haven't tried Biopace, however, I had a bike only briefly that had a SunTour version of BioPace. I didn't get enough time on it to get a feel if it would be better for me. I also have chondromalisia, so I would, at some point like to try it out.
"Chris Froome uses oval chainrings so it's not like this idea has completely gone out of style." Is this perhaps why people have commented that he pedals like a washing machine? bikemig
I think athletes work to accommodate the equipment they use. Maybe BioPace is the domain of amateurs and tourists.
"Chris Froome uses oval chainrings so it's not like this idea has completely gone out of style." Is this perhaps why people have commented that he pedals like a washing machine? bikemig
I think athletes work to accommodate the equipment they use. Maybe BioPace is the domain of amateurs and tourists.
#5
Death fork? Naaaah!!
My experience concurs that they are easier on the knees.
Top
Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
Likes For top506:
#6
The Drive Side is Within
I think I’ve read this one before. For some reason I have always loved vintage magazine writing and advertising.
I like biopace on a road touring triple for the large and middle chainring, but being a 6’4” Clyde, the granny is going to be for mashing to some extent, and Biopace just saps my torque.
I recently switched out the inner for a circular chainring on my Trek 620 when replacing the BB ahead of a tour. My son rode it 160 miles and seemed to do great!
I like biopace on a road touring triple for the large and middle chainring, but being a 6’4” Clyde, the granny is going to be for mashing to some extent, and Biopace just saps my torque.
I recently switched out the inner for a circular chainring on my Trek 620 when replacing the BB ahead of a tour. My son rode it 160 miles and seemed to do great!
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089
Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times
in
723 Posts
SpeedofLite Thanks for posting this article! I'm a Biopace devotee.
You could have one of the "milder" flavors of Biopace, possibly Biopace II and Biopace HP. HP was "high performance" oriented toward people who liked to spin, and II was just a general mellowing-out as far as I have read.
I find that the most immediately noticeable difference for me occurs when switching back from Biopace to round rings. I end up coasting a click or two of the freehub at the top of each stroke!
Me too! I have joint hypermobility - everything dislocates - so my knees dislocate a little at the top of the stroke (painless in the moment, but quickly leading to overuse) if I use too high a cadence or if my cranks are too long. I needed to switch to 165 cranks to stop this happening with round rings. Retrofitting Biopace rings allowed me to keep using my 172.5 TA Zephyr and TopLine Speed Stick cranks which have sentimental value to me on their respective bikes. I really went all-in for nice cranks thinking I was a 172.5 man, but turning 31 was a doozy for my knees. Biopace saved my bike parts investment.
His chainrings are clocked such that the high gear is in the middle of the stroke, the opposite of Biopace. But he's an animal. I can't imagine my knees lasting five miles on a bike like that. This stuff is all so personal and quite possibly a lot of it is subjective! But I think there's real tangible benefit in them continuing to exist for people with joint problems.
I find that the most immediately noticeable difference for me occurs when switching back from Biopace to round rings. I end up coasting a click or two of the freehub at the top of each stroke!
Me too! I have joint hypermobility - everything dislocates - so my knees dislocate a little at the top of the stroke (painless in the moment, but quickly leading to overuse) if I use too high a cadence or if my cranks are too long. I needed to switch to 165 cranks to stop this happening with round rings. Retrofitting Biopace rings allowed me to keep using my 172.5 TA Zephyr and TopLine Speed Stick cranks which have sentimental value to me on their respective bikes. I really went all-in for nice cranks thinking I was a 172.5 man, but turning 31 was a doozy for my knees. Biopace saved my bike parts investment.
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Last edited by scarlson; 07-31-20 at 01:21 PM.
#9
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
I used a set of Biopace 52/42 chainrings on a 1993 Trek 5900 road bike most of 2019 and part of this year before disassembling that bike for an overhaul (still waiting for some parts). I liked 'em, although it required some adaptation.
I found Biopace worked best for me with shorter cranks (170mm, which was short for me) and slower cadence. Before 2019 I was a spinner, usually 90 rpm like clockwork, sometimes 100 rpm on climbs, 130+ rpm on fast downhills without coasting. But Biopace felt better to me with a slower cadence. I gradually adjusted by pushing harder gears around 75 rpm. Seemed to improve my stamina as well, so I rarely spin anymore even with my other bikes using conventional round chainrings.
The one quirk I experienced was trying those Biopace 52/42 rings with a 172.5mm crankset. Within a couple of weeks I had some knee twinges. Switching back to the 170 cranks resolved that problem. I usually prefer 172.5 and 175 cranks on my bikes with round chainrings.
I suspect that when some cyclists experience knee pain with Biopace, they may have encountered a similar quirk and didn't experiment with different crank lengths to see if it helped.
Some folks also report better results by reorienting the Biopace rings on the crank spider. The options are pretty limited. I tried that and it worked okay on the big ring but felt odd on the smaller ring. Probably because the big Biopace ring eccentric shape isn't as oblong as the smaller rings. Eventually I switched back to factory orientation and that felt fine to me.
Changing the orientation of the big Biopace ring can also lead to some chain drops on shifting because the chain catch doodad is on the chainring rather than on the crank. But I was able to minimize chain drops by carefully tweaking the front derailleur so it wasn't a big problem.
Newer style eccentric chainrings offer more variations in orientation, so those might work better for some folks.
I found Biopace worked best for me with shorter cranks (170mm, which was short for me) and slower cadence. Before 2019 I was a spinner, usually 90 rpm like clockwork, sometimes 100 rpm on climbs, 130+ rpm on fast downhills without coasting. But Biopace felt better to me with a slower cadence. I gradually adjusted by pushing harder gears around 75 rpm. Seemed to improve my stamina as well, so I rarely spin anymore even with my other bikes using conventional round chainrings.
The one quirk I experienced was trying those Biopace 52/42 rings with a 172.5mm crankset. Within a couple of weeks I had some knee twinges. Switching back to the 170 cranks resolved that problem. I usually prefer 172.5 and 175 cranks on my bikes with round chainrings.
I suspect that when some cyclists experience knee pain with Biopace, they may have encountered a similar quirk and didn't experiment with different crank lengths to see if it helped.
Some folks also report better results by reorienting the Biopace rings on the crank spider. The options are pretty limited. I tried that and it worked okay on the big ring but felt odd on the smaller ring. Probably because the big Biopace ring eccentric shape isn't as oblong as the smaller rings. Eventually I switched back to factory orientation and that felt fine to me.
Changing the orientation of the big Biopace ring can also lead to some chain drops on shifting because the chain catch doodad is on the chainring rather than on the crank. But I was able to minimize chain drops by carefully tweaking the front derailleur so it wasn't a big problem.
Newer style eccentric chainrings offer more variations in orientation, so those might work better for some folks.