Are Cycling Sunglasses necessary?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Staten Island NY
Posts: 63
Bikes: 2016 Cannondale Quick Speed 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Are Cycling Sunglasses necessary?
If I have a good pair of polarized sunglasses that look good and feel comfortable when I ride, is there a need to buy glasses labeled as cycling sunglasses? Do cycling sunglasses offer anything a good pair of regular sunglasses for not? Most of the cycling sunglasses I have seen look cheap and few are polarized. Using a pair of Bolle now
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Westchester County, NY
Posts: 1,299
Bikes: Giant TCR SL3 and Trek 1.5
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
When you get right down to it, there's no real reason to buy any clothing or accessory like sunglasses that's specifically labeled for cycling. The litmus should be whether a specific product performs the desired function. If it does, buy it.
It's hard to get away from certain cycling specific items, such as bibs, standard cycling shorts, etc. But you don't have to wear jerseys when riding, don't have to buy a particular brand, etc. When you can save money, save it and use that money for things where the right product is more important.
It's hard to get away from certain cycling specific items, such as bibs, standard cycling shorts, etc. But you don't have to wear jerseys when riding, don't have to buy a particular brand, etc. When you can save money, save it and use that money for things where the right product is more important.
#3
Banned
the curved shape fits under bike hats worn under you helmet better, but it can be safety glasses too,
the corners of regular glasses can get the glasses pressed down on your nose.. by hats
the corners of regular glasses can get the glasses pressed down on your nose.. by hats
#4
Padawan
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 838
Bikes: Orbea Mitis Dama, Bridgestone Sirius, Cranbrook Cruiser, Cheap Mountain Bike
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
When you get right down to it, there's no real reason to buy any clothing or accessory like sunglasses that's specifically labeled for cycling. The litmus should be whether a specific product performs the desired function. If it does, buy it.
It's hard to get away from certain cycling specific items, such as bibs, standard cycling shorts, etc. But you don't have to wear jerseys when riding, don't have to buy a particular brand, etc. When you can save money, save it and use that money for things where the right product is more important.
It's hard to get away from certain cycling specific items, such as bibs, standard cycling shorts, etc. But you don't have to wear jerseys when riding, don't have to buy a particular brand, etc. When you can save money, save it and use that money for things where the right product is more important.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Medway, MA
Posts: 2,727
Bikes: 2011 Lynskey Sportive, 1988 Cannondale SM400
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Other "sports glasses" or even safety glasses can work fine- they need to block the wind, provide protection from flying objects, and have UV protection (unless they are clear for night riding). If you want cycling specific shades, then get them. I wear a pair of Maui Jim sunglasses when I ride. They have my prescription in them, are polarized and have full UV protection, keep the wind and foreign objects out of my eyes, and I think they look good too. But, they are not cycling specific. Otherwise, I couldn't use them for kayaking and other activities...
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Westchester County, NY
Posts: 1,299
Bikes: Giant TCR SL3 and Trek 1.5
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Tops are by far the easiest way for both men and women to save money. I do have some cycling jerseys, but rarely wear them. Most all of my riding is in Russell athletic shirts I got from Target years ago. Shorts can be tricky because sizing and fit can vary between brands and you'll notice the lack of a comfortable fit in your shorts.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,909
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
For a little perspective: once the vast majority of the roads raced on were paced, a lot of racing cyclists didn't wear glasses at all until rather recently. Look at the pre-helmet photos. After goggles were no longer needed for dirt roads, racers rode with no eye covering.
Yes, poor on the UV. Tiring, But the bike can be ridden just fine. I did all my racing with wire rim glass glasses, ala Laurent Fignon though I was before his time. (Glass is a pretty good UV block, unlike the untreated plastic lenses.) And now I wear prescription glasses and sunglasses, but not cycling specific. In fact, I wear glasses that have nearly rectangular and high outside corners so my helmet mirror is in a very good place, out of the way but completely in focus. (And I wear my helmet straps outside my helmet. Those glasses cost me enough that I don't want them being tossed off every time my helmet gets jarred. (Or I forget and just pull my helmet off.)
Ben
Yes, poor on the UV. Tiring, But the bike can be ridden just fine. I did all my racing with wire rim glass glasses, ala Laurent Fignon though I was before his time. (Glass is a pretty good UV block, unlike the untreated plastic lenses.) And now I wear prescription glasses and sunglasses, but not cycling specific. In fact, I wear glasses that have nearly rectangular and high outside corners so my helmet mirror is in a very good place, out of the way but completely in focus. (And I wear my helmet straps outside my helmet. Those glasses cost me enough that I don't want them being tossed off every time my helmet gets jarred. (Or I forget and just pull my helmet off.)
Ben
#8
~>~
#9
Padawan
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 838
Bikes: Orbea Mitis Dama, Bridgestone Sirius, Cranbrook Cruiser, Cheap Mountain Bike
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Polarized lenses can make some computer displays difficult to read.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Washington DC Metro Area
Posts: 1,218
Bikes: Breezer Uptown 8, Jamis Renegade Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have cycling sunglasses, but only because the ones I had before would slip off my face when I sweated. Funny how those 90+ F riding days seem so long ago.
If my old sunglasses stayed securely on my face regardless of sweat, I'd be wearing those instead.
If my old sunglasses stayed securely on my face regardless of sweat, I'd be wearing those instead.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NoVA
Posts: 1,421
Bikes: Specialized Allez Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The top of my cycling glasses is higher than my normal glasses. That allows me to see better when riding in the drop or drop-like. With the other glasses, I have to bend my neck a bit more and that's something I can't do very long.
#14
Custom User Title
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times
in
14 Posts
Are cycling glasses necessary? No, but as others have said they are nice. They're shaped in a way that prevents wind in the eyes and they stay snug to your head so they don't fall off.
Where do you put your stuff if you don't have a cycling jersey on?
Tops are by far the easiest way for both men and women to save money. I do have some cycling jerseys, but rarely wear them. Most all of my riding is in Russell athletic shirts I got from Target years ago. Shorts can be tricky because sizing and fit can vary between brands and you'll notice the lack of a comfortable fit in your shorts.
#16
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,180 Times
in
1,470 Posts
If you ride slow and short, you may not need them. With increased speeds and distance, the more important they become.
#17
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
No, cycling sunglasses are not necessary.
I've been cycling seriously for 25 years and have covered a lot of distance and have rarely worn sunglasses of any sort.
Sometimes I think they might be nice, but my prescription means that if I got some, they would be hugely expensive. So I don't bother.
I've been cycling seriously for 25 years and have covered a lot of distance and have rarely worn sunglasses of any sort.
Sometimes I think they might be nice, but my prescription means that if I got some, they would be hugely expensive. So I don't bother.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,824
Bikes: 1996 Trek 970 ZX Single Track 2x11
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 614 Post(s)
Liked 566 Times
in
430 Posts
Have had the Oakley "M" frame wrap-arounds for years, with the polarized lenses. Keeps nearly all the blowing dust and air away from the eyes, has fairly good seal at the eyebrows (to keep the light out), and the polarized lenses are wonderful. Wouldn't want any other type of sunglasses for outdoors use where wind/dust is involved, actually, short of going to full goggles or mountaineer-style.
Can't imagine what having a "cycling" label on them would change, assuming those factors get met.
#19
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,641
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4739 Post(s)
Liked 1,533 Times
in
1,004 Posts
I think the key question is whether whatever glasses you want to wear are impact resistant/safety. ie.. glass lensed glasses probably aren't a great idea.
#20
Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've never owned a pair of "cycling" sunglasses in my life. I like ANSI certified safety glasses and have a few different pair in different tints. All are polycarbonate lenses with UVA/B protection. I've got clear, yellow, dark amber and dark smoke for various conditions. No Oakley or Tifosi here. I've got Remington, Dewalt, and Stanley.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Otay Mesa in South San Diego
Posts: 133
Bikes: Worksman Port o trike, Cozy cargo trike; both electric.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 588
Bikes: Gary Fisher Hi-Fi Deluxe, Giant Stance, Cannondale Synapse, Diamondback 8sp IGH, 1989 Merckx
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I use "Remington" shooting glasses:
(https://www.amazon.com/Remington-Shoo...0_SR160%2C160_
They are cheap and fit well.
Joe
(https://www.amazon.com/Remington-Shoo...0_SR160%2C160_
They are cheap and fit well.
Joe
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,719
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 258 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've never owned a pair of "cycling" sunglasses in my life. I like ANSI certified safety glasses and have a few different pair in different tints. All are polycarbonate lenses with UVA/B protection. I've got clear, yellow, dark amber and dark smoke for various conditions. No Oakley or Tifosi here. I've got Remington, Dewalt, and Stanley.
Last edited by ltxi; 10-16-15 at 07:56 PM.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 854
Bikes: All 80s Schwinns: 88Prologue, 88Circuit, 88Ontare, 88KOM, 86SS, 88Tempo, 88V'ger, 80V'ger, 88LeTour, 82LTLuxeMixte, 87 Cimarron, 86H.Sierra, 92Paramount9c
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 188 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
To the OP... "necessary" is probably a poor choice of words. Probably 90% of cyclists don't wear cycling sunglasses so how could they be necessary?
Last edited by T Stew; 10-16-15 at 07:12 PM.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,719
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 258 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The Oakley's meant for cycling have a straight stem, whatever that means. So their cycling ones are actually different - it is not just a label. If I recall when I was shopping for glasses my Oakleys or maybe it was the other pair I was looking at were available with the straight stem for cycling but I wasn't into bike yet at that point and I just went with the normal version. I got the Racing Jacket and love em. Aside from the super cheap bin of terrible looking frames at the eye doctor, the Oakleys were really no more expensive than most of the other frames (most of them being >$200 and much more than the Oakleys actually). So the tables are turned when we are talking prescription glasses. And my health insurance paid a good chunk of them since they are prescription, and my tax free health savings account paid the rest.
To the OP... "necessary" is probably a poor choice of words. Probably 90% of cyclists don't wear cycling sunglasses so how could they be necessary?
To the OP... "necessary" is probably a poor choice of words. Probably 90% of cyclists don't wear cycling sunglasses so how could they be necessary?