Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

No longer inspecting frames for crash damage

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

No longer inspecting frames for crash damage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-19, 01:50 PM
  #126  
colnago62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times in 230 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
I don't think so.. ie. the burden of proof resides with the accuser/plaintiff. In your scenario, the accuser would be asked to provide evidence that he/she for example, didn't possibly damage their own frame after inspection (eg. after running thru a deep pothole or whatnot). This is somewhat reminiscent of the JRA threads and warranty claims for frame failures from 'just riding around".
I doubt that would even be an issue. I think you would find a judge or jury would connect the dots and come to the conclusion that there was damage that the shop missed. This is a civil case, the burden of proof is much lower. The Schwinn bike reflector case is an example of why it would probably not even go to court.
colnago62 is offline  
Old 06-23-19, 03:44 PM
  #127  
JohnJ80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,673

Bikes: N+1=5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 244 Times in 181 Posts
Originally Posted by colnago62
I doubt that would even be an issue. I think you would find a judge or jury would connect the dots and come to the conclusion that there was damage that the shop missed. This is a civil case, the burden of proof is much lower. The Schwinn bike reflector case is an example of why it would probably not even go to court.
Agree. Especially if some shop says that the frame is good, sends them on their way, the frame catastrophically fails and there is a serious injury.

I can’t possibly see that being a winner for the shop in court with a plaintiff (for example) sitting in a wheel chair and drooling and then watch the shop trying to defend their decision after some industry CF expert or bike expert testifies that damage that is catastrophic is often hidden inside the frame. Doubt that would ever get to court, the insurance company would have their checkbook out right away to settle and then cancel the shop’s policy.
JohnJ80 is offline  
Old 06-23-19, 04:01 PM
  #128  
JohnJ80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,673

Bikes: N+1=5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 244 Times in 181 Posts
Originally Posted by colnago62
I doubt that would even be an issue. I think you would find a judge or jury would connect the dots and come to the conclusion that there was damage that the shop missed. This is a civil case, the burden of proof is much lower. The Schwinn bike reflector case is an example of why it would probably not even go to court.
Agree. Especially if some shop says that the frame is good, sends them on their way, the frame catastrophically fails and there is a serious injury.

I can’t possibly see that being a winner for the shop in court with a plaintiff (for example) sitting in a wheel chair and drooling and then watch the shop trying to defend their decision after some industry CF expert or bike expert testifies that damage that is catastrophic is often hidden inside the frame. Doubt that would ever get to court, the insurance company would have their checkbook out right away to settle and then cancel the shop’s policy.
JohnJ80 is offline  
Old 06-24-19, 06:33 PM
  #129  
Kimmo
Senior Member
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times in 510 Posts
Still can't see why a shop can't inspect it, give it a hard time in front of the customer, and say that although more stringent methods are required to pronounce it good, you can't say it's bad after the tests the customer has seen.

Here you go mate, certified not definitely cactus. We don't promise it's good, but it has no obvious damage and you've seen what it survived without a creak.

I say common sense demands a happy medium between bending over for the lawyers and telling customers to go jump.

...

On another note, anyone seen this? ENVE have announced a no questions lifetime replacement policy for original owners of their parts, doesn't matter how the damage happened. And it's retroactive!

https://www.bikeradar.com/news/enve-...nt-protection/

Suddenly their gear is a whole lot better value.
Kimmo is offline  
Old 06-24-19, 06:50 PM
  #130  
JohnJ80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,673

Bikes: N+1=5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 244 Times in 181 Posts
Originally Posted by Kimmo
Still can't see why a shop can't inspect it, give it a hard time in front of the customer, and say that although more stringent methods are required to pronounce it good, you can't say it's bad after the tests the customer has seen.

Here you go mate, certified not definitely cactus. We don't promise it's good, but it has no obvious damage and you've seen what it survived without a creak.

I say common sense demands a happy medium between bending over for the lawyers and telling customers to go jump.
They can, but it’s beyond stupid to do so. Frankly, any shop that does so after understanding carbon fiber should have their advice be suspect.
...

On another note, anyone seen this? ENVE have announced a no questions lifetime replacement policy for original owners of their parts, doesn't matter how the damage happened. And it's retroactive!

https://www.bikeradar.com/news/enve-...nt-protection/

Suddenly their gear is a whole lot better value.
I’ve always like Enve’s stuff and I love their forks, but this makes me like them even more. Great move for consumers.
JohnJ80 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
novecho_delta
Mountain Biking
4
02-03-19 07:59 AM
EnzoRWD
Classic & Vintage
26
07-28-12 10:51 PM
cervelo4me
Southern California
4
03-26-11 04:21 PM
dasding
Bicycle Mechanics
17
10-22-10 10:44 AM
OldPilot
Road Cycling
93
12-19-09 09:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.