What gearing changes should I make to my Tarmac for better climbing in Maine?
#126
Senior Member
Seems like you haven't been following the thread. I consider myself to be a normal person, I don't race but do a lot of long distance and my preference is a top gear of around 100" narrow spacing around 70" and a low of around 30" or lower, which I can't achieve with any standard or compact road chainset.
If people ride a lot of steep and long hills they may want a lower low gear, but I would argue that has more to do with fitness than terrain. I'm not an especially strong climber and can get up anything with 30". Lower is easier obviously. Could be someone who likes to go really fast down big hills would want a top end bigger than 100".
If people ride a lot of steep and long hills they may want a lower low gear, but I would argue that has more to do with fitness than terrain. I'm not an especially strong climber and can get up anything with 30". Lower is easier obviously. Could be someone who likes to go really fast down big hills would want a top end bigger than 100".
#127
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
On the other hand, I've barely done a hundred miles a few times total, so I wouldn't slap you with that label either.
#128
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,646 Times
in
828 Posts
100 miles is the beginning of long-distance to me.
Standard gearing is too high for me. If people have less fitness than I do, they need lower gearing not more fitness. That's been my point the whole time. Standard road gearing is designed for people who are a lot stronger than I am, and even I am stronger than some people who need even lower gearing than that.
Standard gearing is too high for me. If people have less fitness than I do, they need lower gearing not more fitness. That's been my point the whole time. Standard road gearing is designed for people who are a lot stronger than I am, and even I am stronger than some people who need even lower gearing than that.
I agree. My Litespeed with 50-34 and 11-30 has a lot gearing territory I will never need. I can safely say it's the same for just about every person I know, ride with and observe. I know I live in the flats, but I take my bikes with me when I travel to the mountains. I don't take the Litespeed because I can't push 34-30 up steep grades or long stretches of more moderate grades. I prefer to be able to ride up steeper grades at about 20 gear inches. The best mine can do is about 26 gear inches if I go to an 11-34 cassette. I can't push that up mountains. Most riders I know can't. Bottom line is that this bikes gearing won't allow this reasonably fit person to climb mountains.
On the other end, the 50-11 at a 90 cadence finds me going 32. The average rider can't do that for long if at all. I can't. It's simply not useful territory for me.
With a 40-26 and 11-34. I can climb anything I would ever want to climb at under 20 gear inches. In 40-11 I am at 25 MPH at 90 RPM. If I spin it up to 110, I can eclipse 30. That will find me going downhill as fast as I ever want to. Gear spacing is small enough on the smaller cogs that I will be able to find a sweet spot in my group rides.
For ALL the things I and most riders I know do, a 40-26 and 11-34 is FAR more useful than modern compacts.
Likes For Paul Barnard:
#129
Jedi Master
Yes, my distances are pretty far outside the normal range. While we might not be fast, old guys can still be good at endurance. How about "low power output"?
#130
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
Gearing can effected by fitness. Gearing can also be effected by weight. Larger people need lower bears to keep their cadence at a speed that efficient. Gears are like saddles; you will probably have to replace them when you buy a new bike.
Likes For colnago62:
#131
Portland Fred
For up to moderate hills, a 46/36 or 46/34 mated with a cassette with a 27 or 28T max would probably be more useful for most people. Lots of overlap and plenty of low gear for stiff headwinds.
#132
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
In the spirit of every gearing discussion ever, 36x28 is good enough for me so it's all the low end anyone needs.
Likes For Bah Humbug:
#133
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,646 Times
in
828 Posts
Unless you have some serious hills, I'd imagine anything below a 34T is going to make the bottom ring seem ridiculous.
For up to moderate hills, a 46/36 or 46/34 mated with a cassette with a 27 or 28T max would probably be more useful for most people. Lots of overlap and plenty of low gear for stiff headwinds.
For up to moderate hills, a 46/36 or 46/34 mated with a cassette with a 27 or 28T max would probably be more useful for most people. Lots of overlap and plenty of low gear for stiff headwinds.
How much of your average ride would you say you are pushing more than 100 gear inches at 90 RPM? At what cadence do you begin to spin out?
#134
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
I agree. My Litespeed with 50-34 and 11-30 has a lot gearing territory I will never need. I can safely say it's the same for just about every person I know, ride with and observe. I know I live in the flats, but I take my bikes with me when I travel to the mountains. I don't take the Litespeed because I can't push 34-30 up steep grades or long stretches of more moderate grades. I prefer to be able to ride up steeper grades at about 20 gear inches. The best mine can do is about 26 gear inches if I go to an 11-34 cassette. I can't push that up mountains. Most riders I know can't. Bottom line is that this bikes gearing won't allow this reasonably fit person to climb mountains.
On the other end, the 50-11 at a 90 cadence finds me going 32. The average rider can't do that for long if at all. I can't. It's simply not useful territory for me.
With a 40-26 and 11-34. I can climb anything I would ever want to climb at under 20 gear inches. In 40-11 I am at 25 MPH at 90 RPM. If I spin it up to 110, I can eclipse 30. That will find me going downhill as fast as I ever want to. Gear spacing is small enough on the smaller cogs that I will be able to find a sweet spot in my group rides.
For ALL the things I and most riders I know do, a 40-26 and 11-34 is FAR more useful than modern compacts.
On the other end, the 50-11 at a 90 cadence finds me going 32. The average rider can't do that for long if at all. I can't. It's simply not useful territory for me.
With a 40-26 and 11-34. I can climb anything I would ever want to climb at under 20 gear inches. In 40-11 I am at 25 MPH at 90 RPM. If I spin it up to 110, I can eclipse 30. That will find me going downhill as fast as I ever want to. Gear spacing is small enough on the smaller cogs that I will be able to find a sweet spot in my group rides.
For ALL the things I and most riders I know do, a 40-26 and 11-34 is FAR more useful than modern compacts.
You'all got some steep hills on that Louisissippi Coast!
Likes For woodcraft:
#137
Portland Fred
But I also think having great selection where you do the lion's share of your riding is a good thing which is why I favor narrower cassettes when they make sense -- hardly ever using certain ring/cog combos or needing to change rings too often is a sign that there's probably a better cassette ring combo for you.
Just so happens on my ride today, I had a particularly steep section at 22% (Brynwood Drive for those who know PDX). On my 34/27 combo it was brutal -- a 26T would have been most welcome. But the combo is good for my riding in general, and our hills max out around 1K feet so even if you take a steep way up and have to use extra muscle, it's not that long before your legs get a chance to rest.
If we had serious mountain climbs with extended steep pitches, I'd want a wider cassette for certain and probably a smaller ring.
Likes For banerjek:
#138
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,646 Times
in
828 Posts
[QUOTE=banerjek;21402403]
My knees ache thinking about doing 22% hills in any gear. I'd tap out if I had to do it in 34-27. Looks like a wonderful place to ride from looking on Google Streetview. I am stuck in flat, featureless terrain with mostly straight roads.
I ride category one climbs every summer. I
Percentage wise, not so much -- and I think it's more important to have low end when you need it than high end when you want it.
But I also think having great selection where you do the lion's share of your riding is a good thing which is why I favor narrower cassettes when they make sense -- hardly ever using certain ring/cog combos or needing to change rings too often is a sign that there's probably a better cassette ring combo for you.
Just so happens on my ride today, I had a particularly steep section at 22% (Brynwood Drive for those who know PDX). On my 34/27 combo it was brutal -- a 26T would have been most welcome. But the combo is good for my riding in general, and our hills max out around 1K feet so even if you take a steep way up and have to use extra muscle, it's not that long before your legs get a chance to rest.
If we had serious mountain climbs with extended steep pitches, I'd want a wider cassette for certain and probably a smaller ring.
Percentage wise, not so much -- and I think it's more important to have low end when you need it than high end when you want it.
But I also think having great selection where you do the lion's share of your riding is a good thing which is why I favor narrower cassettes when they make sense -- hardly ever using certain ring/cog combos or needing to change rings too often is a sign that there's probably a better cassette ring combo for you.
Just so happens on my ride today, I had a particularly steep section at 22% (Brynwood Drive for those who know PDX). On my 34/27 combo it was brutal -- a 26T would have been most welcome. But the combo is good for my riding in general, and our hills max out around 1K feet so even if you take a steep way up and have to use extra muscle, it's not that long before your legs get a chance to rest.
If we had serious mountain climbs with extended steep pitches, I'd want a wider cassette for certain and probably a smaller ring.
My knees ache thinking about doing 22% hills in any gear. I'd tap out if I had to do it in 34-27. Looks like a wonderful place to ride from looking on Google Streetview. I am stuck in flat, featureless terrain with mostly straight roads.
Likes For Paul Barnard:
#139
Portland Fred
Although I don't use my top gears much in terms of total distance, I do use them multiple times on every single ride (including my commute which has 1000' of gain). Though that didn't happen by luck alone -- I specifically looked for a job that would have a great commute
Likes For banerjek:
#140
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,948
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3949 Post(s)
Liked 7,295 Times
in
2,946 Posts
Likes For tomato coupe:
#141
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
[QUOTE=Paul Barnard;21402410]
22% grades are tough, no mater what gears you have.
There's one on the other side of town, that I do 6-10 times a year. No matter what gear I use, it's never easy. I gear my bikes for the other 350 rides I do every year, instead of the one I do a handful of times.
There's one on the other side of town, that I do 6-10 times a year. No matter what gear I use, it's never easy. I gear my bikes for the other 350 rides I do every year, instead of the one I do a handful of times.
Likes For noodle soup:
#142
Portland Fred
It means it lacks the small things that would have made the ride great even if there was practically no elevation gain -- a great view, peeks at neat things, variations in terrain that change the optimal lines for the ride depending on what you want, and a million other things that make you discover new stuff no matter how many times you've ridden it. A good ride never gets old. Rather it gets better every time you do it.
This ride isn't horrible. There's zero traffic and it's forested residential. But it's really just a stunt with nothing else to recommend it.
There are plenty of steep grades that have many redeeming qualities beyond the pitch.
This ride isn't horrible. There's zero traffic and it's forested residential. But it's really just a stunt with nothing else to recommend it.
There are plenty of steep grades that have many redeeming qualities beyond the pitch.
Likes For banerjek:
#143
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,646 Times
in
828 Posts
[QUOTE=noodle soup;21402578]
How often do you use your big-little combo and under what circumstances?
How often do you use your big-little combo and under what circumstances?
Likes For noodle soup:
#145
Senior Member
[QUOTE=Paul Barnard;21403109]My top gear is 48/11. I spin it up to 38 on nearly every ride with a downhill that brings my speed up into the 40-54 mph range. Yesterday I rode the 44 mile round trip up to Estes Park, with only 2500 feet of climbing. A lot of the descent is so gradual that I only spin out the top gear briefly, but it gets lots of use when my speed is in the 30s.
Likes For DaveSSS:
#146
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
[QUOTE=DaveSSS;21403730]
FTR, I didn't ask that question.
My top gear is 48/11. I spin it up to 38 on nearly every ride with a downhill that brings my speed up into the 40-54 mph range. Yesterday I rode the 44 mile round trip up to Estes Park, with only 2500 feet of climbing. A lot of the descent is so gradual that I only spin out the top gear briefly, but it gets lots of use when my speed is in the 30s.
#147
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 53
Bikes: 2020 S-Works Roubaix, Infinity seat
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 25 Times
in
14 Posts
Make sure you do the calculation
As you may need to replace the rear derailleur. Fwiw, my lbs goes over the max regularly and without difficulty. You may not be able to do large large, but you don't want to cross chain anyway
I moved from flat sea level in Outer Banks NC to Boulder CO mountains and had to suck.a lot of air, even after I changed my cassette
:-)
https://www.mantel.com/blog/en/derai...mum-techcenter
I moved from flat sea level in Outer Banks NC to Boulder CO mountains and had to suck.a lot of air, even after I changed my cassette
:-)
https://www.mantel.com/blog/en/derai...mum-techcenter
Likes For bfaIllini:
#148
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Redmond, WA & Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 566
Bikes: 1999 Giant ATX MTB, 2002 Lemond Zurich, 2018 Fuji Transonic 2.3, 2019 Specialized Tarmac Disc Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
227 Posts
Hello, I recently moved to Maine from Illinois and there is a lot more elevation here. I was already advised to go with a smaller front ring in Illinois but I was ok with powering along at a slightly lower cadence, however one ride here has convinced me that I need to make a change. I have a 2016 Specialized Tarmac Sport (specs on bikeradar here) with a stock 52/36 up front and 11/28 in the rear. Suggestions?
My much older LeMond Zurich is a triple with 52/42/30 and a 12-25 cassette. I rarely ever used the 30 up front. Once climbed a short half mile hill in 30/25 that was at 14-15% grade. Biggest problem was keeping the front wheel down!
Likes For SpeedyBlueBiker:
#149
Portland Fred
As you may need to replace the rear derailleur. Fwiw, my lbs goes over the max regularly and without difficulty. You may not be able to do large large, but you don't want to cross chain anyway
I moved from flat sea level in Outer Banks NC to Boulder CO mountains and had to suck.a lot of air, even after I changed my cassette
I moved from flat sea level in Outer Banks NC to Boulder CO mountains and had to suck.a lot of air, even after I changed my cassette
While you often can do it, this sounds like a great way to increase your exposure to the sort of bad luck that can put your RD in your spokes.
Better to get the right tool for the job and ride with confidence IMO
#150
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
The pro peloton added cogs in the middle instead of the ends until reaching 12-13-14-15-16-17-19-21-23 9 cogs; after which some 10 sped Campagnolo riders still preferred adding an 18 for 12-13-14-15-16-17-18-19-21-23.