Times are a-changin
#26
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
Fewer gears, heavier brake systems, wider wheels, heavier frames.. it's a brave new world.
Likes For Sy Reene:
#27
Passista
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,596
Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 866 Post(s)
Liked 720 Times
in
395 Posts
All three of my bikes are running 1x drivetrains now. My Grail for instance, has a 42T chainring. I give up about 2 mph top speed, but gain plenty of granny gear.
Top line is 42T chainring matched to an Eagle 10-50 cassette. Bottom line is 34-50 front rings and 11-34 cassette.
Top line is 42T chainring matched to an Eagle 10-50 cassette. Bottom line is 34-50 front rings and 11-34 cassette.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,475
Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1233 Post(s)
Liked 318 Times
in
245 Posts
I've been seeing some of those 1x MTBs on MUPs. They are going 16 mph in HIGH gear. LOL. Hilarious. The crank is 30T or something equally USELESS.
While I can go 46 mph and 133 miles on a 73 lb tour bike, with my SA RD5w. LOL
They'll take my 1x IGH out of my cold dead hands. LOL
While I can go 46 mph and 133 miles on a 73 lb tour bike, with my SA RD5w. LOL
They'll take my 1x IGH out of my cold dead hands. LOL
#31
Senior Member
I've seen a few of those on Youtube (I don't know why they keep recommending them). On a bike like that, my ol' legs will be pedalling in a blur just to keep up with Granny and the grandkids out for a ride on the straight and level rail-trails we have around here.
#32
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,474 Times
in
4,181 Posts
As they say ------------ times they are a-changin. Not all that long ago everyone was arguing for 11 and 12 speed rear sprocket with two and 3 chain rings up front so they would have enough gears. On some bikes that would mean as many as 36 gears.
Now strangely enough 1x11 seem to be all the rage. Just one more than the old 10 speed bikes of yore.
Now strangely enough 1x11 seem to be all the rage. Just one more than the old 10 speed bikes of yore.
This isnt difficult to understand.
- when drivetrains were 5, 6, 7 cogs in back, having a triple up front helped with gear range while keeping jumps small. this helped for touring bikes, mtb, hybrids, etc.
- when drivetrains were 8 and 9 in back, this trend continued because it was still beneficial for touring, mtb, hybrids, etc.
- once compact cranksets and wider range cassettes were introduced, the need for triples on drop bar bikes was reduced, especially since more cogs in back were added which solved the small jumps issue.
- 1x has become more popular for MTB and CX for simplicity. Its a bear to switch left and right shifters as you make a turn and approach a short steep climb. 1x is simply easier to get to the right gear quicker.
- 1x has become more popular for some gravel riding because people are used to it from riding MTB, people use their gravel bike on singletrack, and because a certain drivetrain company has made poor performing mechanical front derailleurs.
- 2x is popuar for road because gear jumps are small and because there is no sudden shifting- you see whats coming up and have time to shift. Same applies for a lot of gravel riding.
As drivetrains moved to 10, 11, and 12 speed, 1x became more viable since wide range cassettes with manageable jumps could be made.
Stop posting incorrect info. People google things, find your ignorant threads, and dont know any better than to think your ignorance is a valid point on an issue.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#33
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,474 Times
in
4,181 Posts
I've been seeing some of those 1x MTBs on MUPs. They are going 16 mph in HIGH gear. LOL. Hilarious. The crank is 30T or something equally USELESS.
While I can go 46 mph and 133 miles on a 73 lb tour bike, with my SA RD5w. LOL
They'll take my 1x IGH out of my cold dead hands. LOL
While I can go 46 mph and 133 miles on a 73 lb tour bike, with my SA RD5w. LOL
They'll take my 1x IGH out of my cold dead hands. LOL
Likes For mstateglfr:
#34
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 118
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times
in
11 Posts
I've been seeing some of those 1x MTBs on MUPs. They are going 16 mph in HIGH gear. LOL. Hilarious. The crank is 30T or something equally USELESS.
While I can go 46 mph and 133 miles on a 73 lb tour bike, with my SA RD5w. LOL
They'll take my 1x IGH out of my cold dead hands. LOL
While I can go 46 mph and 133 miles on a 73 lb tour bike, with my SA RD5w. LOL
They'll take my 1x IGH out of my cold dead hands. LOL
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,614
Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Liked 780 Times
in
502 Posts
1957, My S-A AW3 , 3 speed, got a 3 cog cluster,& and a triple crankset... 3 cubed (3x3x3) is 27..
Now the R'off is 3 3 speeds - 2 redundant 2 nds, 7, x 2 (in low range) for IGH 14 speeds..
SRAM is Pushing and cashing in on this new one by obsession trend, closed several product lines to crank up the volume sold..
getting on that bandwagon is a choice..
...
Now the R'off is 3 3 speeds - 2 redundant 2 nds, 7, x 2 (in low range) for IGH 14 speeds..
SRAM is Pushing and cashing in on this new one by obsession trend, closed several product lines to crank up the volume sold..
getting on that bandwagon is a choice..
...
#36
Zip tie Karen
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,004
Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times
in
806 Posts
I'm not a fan of triples. I have one on my tourer, though. In normal life, I never use the granny. So a 36/48 or whatever I have makes pretty good sense. In special cases, like carrying gear up mountains, I do use the 24T granny ring. Plenty. But not for everyday riding.
On my other bikes, a double is generally fine. I'm a big fan of taking a compact double and swapping in a 46T outer ring. That gives quite a useful range with today's 11-34T cassettes. I don't worry about spinning out. If I'm descending a large hill, I'm more likely to want to trim speed than to increase. But I'm old(er) and wise(r).
On my other bikes, a double is generally fine. I'm a big fan of taking a compact double and swapping in a 46T outer ring. That gives quite a useful range with today's 11-34T cassettes. I don't worry about spinning out. If I'm descending a large hill, I'm more likely to want to trim speed than to increase. But I'm old(er) and wise(r).
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,221
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18403 Post(s)
Liked 15,495 Times
in
7,317 Posts
#38
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
It sure is nice that nobody has to run a gear system they don't like. Everyone's needs and desires are different, I don't understand why gearing "debates" often get so hot. Who cares what someone else likes. Anyway, a single 46 chain ring is best.
Likes For AlmostTrick:
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,475
Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1233 Post(s)
Liked 318 Times
in
245 Posts
PLUS you would gain 2 gears for up and down hills. It certainly helped me ride all over GTA.
You would gain a LOT actually. Wizzing out is no fun.
Last edited by GamblerGORD53; 08-24-20 at 10:02 AM.
#40
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,342
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6200 Post(s)
Liked 4,204 Times
in
2,358 Posts
Much as I dislike defending 1x systems, it’s exactly the same gap as the 11 to 13 shift in the double. Both are 5.2m in the meters development.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#41
Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Foothills of West Central Maine
Posts: 410
Bikes: 2007 Motobecane Fantom Cross Expert, 2020 Motobecane Omni Strada Pro Disc (700c gravel bike), 2021 Motobecane Elite Adventure with Bafang 500W rear hub drive
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 143 Times
in
94 Posts
Nine is the correct number of gears...
I'm liking my 2x9 cyclocross bike with road tires, 39/48 and 11-36. The shift of chainrings isn't nearly as dramatic as my gravel bike with 30/46 and ten speed 11-34. Somehow nine speeds seems like enough, and ten is too many. I have to look down a lot on the ten speed to see what gear I'm in. Not so on the nine speed (with gear position indicator). Maybe if the ten speed had indicators on the shifter it would seem better, but for me, nine is the best number of gears.
Was considering a road bike with 2x11 Shimano 105, but am put off by the number of gears and the 16 tooth chainring gap. I guess the gear position indicators were done away with to make room for hydraulic brake reservoir, but these 10 plus speed bikes would be much better with gear indicators on the shifter! Are you listening, Shimano, SRAM, etc?
Was considering a road bike with 2x11 Shimano 105, but am put off by the number of gears and the 16 tooth chainring gap. I guess the gear position indicators were done away with to make room for hydraulic brake reservoir, but these 10 plus speed bikes would be much better with gear indicators on the shifter! Are you listening, Shimano, SRAM, etc?
#42
n00b
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,397
Bikes: Surly Karate Monkey, Twin Six Standard Rando
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 428 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times
in
273 Posts
these discussions always give me a laugh. 38x16 on my gravel/urban bike and 34x20 on my mountain bike. I ride all the same stuff that everyone with huge gear ranges ride, but I don't worry about drivetrain technology changes. set and forget. I'm faster than some but slower than most. doesn't matter—I'm having fun and spending less money on maintenance and less time fussing with derailers.
#43
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,342
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6200 Post(s)
Liked 4,204 Times
in
2,358 Posts
I disagree. Gearing always seems to have been something that is difficult for manufacturers to understand. Back in the freewheel days, shops had cog boards which allowed the customer to build whatever gearing they wanted. Cassette technology seemed to take that idea to the next level with a much easier way to build gearing. However, someone in Shimano decided that wouldn’t work and stuck us with gears of their choosing.
Triples have never been about keeping the jumps small. Only people racing want small jumps between cogs so that they can fine tune the gearing for races. Tourist and mountain bike riders wanted wider ranges for climbing up hills in conditions that most road racers would never encounter. The problem was that manufacturers were afraid of pushing the range of their derailers and gearing. That could be carrying a load or riding up steep, loose trails. Suntour experimented with a 38 tooth cog on a freewheel for a while in the late 80s with 5 speed systems but Shimano never seemed interested and thus keep the largest cog on their cassettes limited to 34 teeth. Suntour also offered micro drive which allowed for a 20 tooth inner but, again, Shimano never was interested in going below 22 teeth on their cranks. We were stuck with 22/34 gearing or about a 17” gear for ages. The Suntour system would have resulted in a 14” gear.
What really make Shimano change their minds was SRAM and 29ers. The same 22/34 combination on a 29er results in a 19” gear which is way too high most mortals to climb much of anything.
Simple but also simplistic. People have pooh-poohed triples for decades. It’s most a macho thing. I’ve had triples for all those decades and never found them to be “sluggish” on shifts, especially after the advent of ramp and pin chainrings. Downshifts require a slightly different riding style...less pressure on the pedals during the shift...but having a wide range with a decent high and a decent low has always been worth the effort.
The range of 1x is limited in most cases. For touring, there are lots of situations where being able to climb a hill is a positive but that climb is usually followed by going down another hill. 1x is too limited to allow for a really good low and a really good high. You have to choose one or the other. Triples allow for both. Doubles do too but more on that later.
I will agree that Shimano has issues with their front derailers. Their springs are too weak most times and their expensive front derailers are too clever. All the bells and whistles that Shimano puts in their high end stuff don’t do what they think they do. SRAM’s front derailers are far superior to Shimano’s but Shimano’s low end stuff is excellent.
The problem with front derailers is the way that they work. If the companies turned them around and made them high normal, the derailer would work much better. In a high normal mode (Suntour made some of these back in the 80s as well), the cable drags the chain off the high gear to the low gear under slow speed, high torque situations...just like a high normal rear derailer does. Under the low normal mode, the spring needs to knock the chain off and it has to be very strong to do so...which is why SRAM’s front derailers work better. Shimano got RapidRise exactly backwards and really missed the boat.
Gear jumps within a range (rear shifts) can be small but a triple has the same small steps as well. The jumps between ranges are where the problems arise. The shift from the outer to the inner ring results in a large cadence change on the double. A middle ring makes for smaller jumps and a more progressive shifting system with smaller cadence changes.
If all you are worried about is “manageable jumps” then 1x is viable. But if you want wide range, 1x is less viable. And, if you want “manageable jumps”, 2x falls flat on that score as well.
I don’t agree with ryanbent nor am I agreeing with him here. I abandoned the idea of bicycles having “more gears” or the concept of “10 speed”, “12 speed”, or “27 speed” gearing long ago. The number of gears a bike has is marketing and it’s lazy marketing...as well as deceptive...at that. It’s a positive that bike companies have moved away for total number of gears to a range but, especially in the 2x case, they’ve done it in the worst possible way and the result is every bit as deceptive as “27 speed” gearing.
- when drivetrains were 5, 6, 7 cogs in back, having a triple up front helped with gear range while keeping jumps small. this helped for touring bikes, mtb, hybrids, etc.
- when drivetrains were 8 and 9 in back, this trend continued because it was still beneficial for touring, mtb, hybrids, etc.
- once compact cranksets and wider range cassettes were introduced, the need for triples on drop bar bikes was reduced, especially since more cogs in back were added which solved the small jumps issue.
- when drivetrains were 8 and 9 in back, this trend continued because it was still beneficial for touring, mtb, hybrids, etc.
- once compact cranksets and wider range cassettes were introduced, the need for triples on drop bar bikes was reduced, especially since more cogs in back were added which solved the small jumps issue.
What really make Shimano change their minds was SRAM and 29ers. The same 22/34 combination on a 29er results in a 19” gear which is way too high most mortals to climb much of anything.
- 1x has become more popular for MTB and CX for simplicity. Its a bear to switch left and right shifters as you make a turn and approach a short steep climb. 1x is simply easier to get to the right gear quicker.
- 1x has become more popular for some gravel riding because people are used to it from riding MTB, people use their gravel bike on singletrack, and because a certain drivetrain company has made poor performing mechanical front derailleurs.
- 1x has become more popular for some gravel riding because people are used to it from riding MTB, people use their gravel bike on singletrack, and because a certain drivetrain company has made poor performing mechanical front derailleurs.
The range of 1x is limited in most cases. For touring, there are lots of situations where being able to climb a hill is a positive but that climb is usually followed by going down another hill. 1x is too limited to allow for a really good low and a really good high. You have to choose one or the other. Triples allow for both. Doubles do too but more on that later.
I will agree that Shimano has issues with their front derailers. Their springs are too weak most times and their expensive front derailers are too clever. All the bells and whistles that Shimano puts in their high end stuff don’t do what they think they do. SRAM’s front derailers are far superior to Shimano’s but Shimano’s low end stuff is excellent.
The problem with front derailers is the way that they work. If the companies turned them around and made them high normal, the derailer would work much better. In a high normal mode (Suntour made some of these back in the 80s as well), the cable drags the chain off the high gear to the low gear under slow speed, high torque situations...just like a high normal rear derailer does. Under the low normal mode, the spring needs to knock the chain off and it has to be very strong to do so...which is why SRAM’s front derailers work better. Shimano got RapidRise exactly backwards and really missed the boat.
- 2x is popuar for road because gear jumps are small and because there is no sudden shifting- you see whats coming up and have time to shift. Same applies for a lot of gravel riding.
As drivetrains moved to 10, 11, and 12 speed, 1x became more viable since wide range cassettes with manageable jumps could be made.
Stop posting incorrect info. People google things, find your ignorant threads, and dont know any better than to think your ignorance is a valid point on an issue.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#44
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,474 Times
in
4,181 Posts
Of course you do.
People don't want small jumps in gearing on a triple? Of course they do. Having wide jump reduces the need for a triple, so if someone seeks out a triple, its because they want smaller jumps.
My touring/commute bike has a triple for this very reason- it gives me a wide range while also giving me small jumps.
What nobody would want is a 2x6 where the freewheel is 13-17-22-28-32-36. Instead, use a triple and the jumps are smaller, which is why I said that is appealing.
I'm not getting into your gesr inch rant about 17" not being low enough for most people. Thats as deleted as what I actually deleted from your post because its too subjective to get into with you.
Triples have never been about keeping the jumps small. Only people racing want small jumps between cogs so that they can fine tune the gearing for races. Tourist and mountain bike riders wanted wider ranges for climbing up hills in conditions that most road racers would never encounter. The problem was that manufacturers were afraid of pushing the range of their derailers and gearing. That could be carrying a load or riding up steep, loose trails. Suntour experimented with a 38 tooth cog on a freewheel for a while in the late 80s with 5 speed systems but Shimano never seemed interested and thus keep the largest cog on their cassettes limited to 34 teeth. Suntour also offered micro drive which allowed for a 20 tooth inner but, again, Shimano never was interested in going below 22 teeth on their cranks. We were stuck with 22/34 gearing or about a 17” gear for ages. The Suntour system would have resulted in a 14” gear.
What really make Shimano change their minds was SRAM and 29ers. The same 22/34 combination on a 29er results in a 19” gear which is way too high most mortals to climb much of anything.
What really make Shimano change their minds was SRAM and 29ers. The same 22/34 combination on a 29er results in a 19” gear which is way too high most mortals to climb much of anything.
My touring/commute bike has a triple for this very reason- it gives me a wide range while also giving me small jumps.
What nobody would want is a 2x6 where the freewheel is 13-17-22-28-32-36. Instead, use a triple and the jumps are smaller, which is why I said that is appealing.
I'm not getting into your gesr inch rant about 17" not being low enough for most people. Thats as deleted as what I actually deleted from your post because its too subjective to get into with you.
#45
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,507
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3657 Post(s)
Liked 5,394 Times
in
2,739 Posts
#46
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,342
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6200 Post(s)
Liked 4,204 Times
in
2,358 Posts
Oh, so disagreeing is only something you get to do? Silly me. Here I thought this was a discussion group.
The steps and the distance between them depend on where they are being used. The steps between gears on the back are exactly the same in a 3x, 2x, or 1x. Most people when they are discussing wanting even steps are talking about the rear cassette. If they wanted even steps in the front, they certainly wouldn’t be using a wide range 2x system. I do agree that I use a triple because it has smaller steps between the chainrings but that’s not usually part of the discussion when people are talking about having gears with smaller jumps.
I’m not sure if your list was supposed to be a link. It doesn’t work as one. All I get is my computer trying to make a phone call. Here’s a link using those gears with a old style mountain bike gearing in both a double and triple. Yes, there is a giant whole in the shifting pattern from the large ring to the inner ring on the double. But that same hole exists if you add 4 more gears. As a bonus, however, you only have to shift once on the back after shifting on the front to get to a reasonable gear instead of 2 to 3 times.
But I have to say that your 6 speed gearing isn’t all that bad for gearing. Modern gearing has concentrated on small steps between the higher gears. This might be good for racing but for the rest of us, we spend a lot more time in the middle range and/or using the lower range. Having gears that are closer together on the low end would be more beneficial than having large gaps at the low end.
Shimano has the MegaRange gearing in 7 speeds which displays the concentration on the high gearing. I would propose a sort of MegaRange in reverse. It would give the rider more choices in lower gears while ignoring the high range.
Your sentence needs a bit of editing. Let’s just say that for many years, the 17” low was standard on World Class race bikes ridden by World Class athletes. Joe Newbie or even Joe Weekend Warrior would find a lower gear a bit handy.
People don't want small jumps in gearing on a triple? Of course they do. Having wide jump reduces the need for a triple, so if someone seeks out a triple, its because they want smaller jumps.
My touring/commute bike has a triple for this very reason- it gives me a wide range while also giving me small jumps.
My touring/commute bike has a triple for this very reason- it gives me a wide range while also giving me small jumps.
What nobody would want is a 2x6 where the freewheel is 13-17-22-28-32-36. Instead, use a triple and the jumps are smaller, which is why I said that is appealing.
But I have to say that your 6 speed gearing isn’t all that bad for gearing. Modern gearing has concentrated on small steps between the higher gears. This might be good for racing but for the rest of us, we spend a lot more time in the middle range and/or using the lower range. Having gears that are closer together on the low end would be more beneficial than having large gaps at the low end.
Shimano has the MegaRange gearing in 7 speeds which displays the concentration on the high gearing. I would propose a sort of MegaRange in reverse. It would give the rider more choices in lower gears while ignoring the high range.
I'm not getting into your gesr inch rant about 17" not being low enough for most people. Thats as deleted as what I actually deleted from your post because its too subjective to get into with you.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#47
Senior Member
Well get ready for 13 speed in one or two with a radical new tuneable derailleur technology using curved indexing.
Campagnolo is pretty close to launching.
Campagnolo is pretty close to launching.
#48
Senior Member
I currently have a double up front, but my front brifter has broken and can't downshift. Realistically, Shanghai is so pancake flat that I'm not going to bother replacing it - I'm just going to remove the front derailleur and the shifter cable and run with just a single up front, since I rarely used the smaller front chainring even when the brifter was working properly anyway.