Problem with knee to pedal
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Problem with knee to pedal
My current bike is a 61 cm Fuji Roubaix. It fits me well except for one parameter, ie my knees are about 4 cm in front of the pedal center in the 3/9 o’clock pedaling position. This is with the seat adjusted all the way to the rear. I don’t have a feel for how important this parameter is but I want to buy a new carbon frame bike and want to make sure it fits perfectly.
In looking at new bike geometries, it appears no one parameter affects where your knee is going to be but it seems to me that the critical distance is the TOP TUBE LENGTH minus the REACH. In my bike it is 183.4 mm. If that is correct, I need my new bike to have that measurement to be ~223 mm. I assumed this would be done by reducing the seat tube angle. (My current bike has a 72.5 degree seat tube angle). I have looked at a lot of new bike geometries and have not found anything near that.
My local bike shop was not a lot of help. They said I could:
1. Buy a new angled seat tube to get the seat farther to the rear but they did not recommend this. Did not say why.
2. Buy a custom frame.
3. Maybe move to a larger size such as 63 or 65 cm.
I can not afford a custom frame and when I look at larger sizes, I get a little more distance such as maybe 6 mm more but that’s a long ways from the 40 mm I need. Does anyone see something I have missed or have any ideas? Thanx in advance.
In looking at new bike geometries, it appears no one parameter affects where your knee is going to be but it seems to me that the critical distance is the TOP TUBE LENGTH minus the REACH. In my bike it is 183.4 mm. If that is correct, I need my new bike to have that measurement to be ~223 mm. I assumed this would be done by reducing the seat tube angle. (My current bike has a 72.5 degree seat tube angle). I have looked at a lot of new bike geometries and have not found anything near that.
My local bike shop was not a lot of help. They said I could:
1. Buy a new angled seat tube to get the seat farther to the rear but they did not recommend this. Did not say why.
2. Buy a custom frame.
3. Maybe move to a larger size such as 63 or 65 cm.
I can not afford a custom frame and when I look at larger sizes, I get a little more distance such as maybe 6 mm more but that’s a long ways from the 40 mm I need. Does anyone see something I have missed or have any ideas? Thanx in advance.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: D'uh... I am a Cutter
Posts: 6,139
Bikes: '17 Access Old Turnpike Gravel bike, '14 Trek 1.1, '13 Cannondale CAAD 10, '98 CAD 2, R300
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1571 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
One might never complete a task if one has decided not to stop until it is perfect: completing the project well is made impossible by striving to complete it perfectly.
Ride the bikes at the bicycle shops. Go by how they feel... not by how they measure.
#3
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Round Rock
Posts: 145
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
I don't have any specific recommendations for you, except that maybe you should check out the two articles below that discuss the Knee-Over-Pedal "standard" :
The Myth of K.O.P.S.
https://www.stevehoggbikefitting.com...or-road-bikes/
The Myth of K.O.P.S.
https://www.stevehoggbikefitting.com...or-road-bikes/
#4
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,328
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,836 Times
in
2,229 Posts
Getting your knee directly over pedal has never been a gold standard.
It IS a good starting point.
It is likely a goal of most custom builders to get a good overall fit and knee close to being directly over pedal. But riding style has a lot to do with it. Moving forward on the saddle during aggressive riding will certainly move the knee forward and that shouldn't be an issue.
would also agree with @Dave Cutter that riding and feeling the right frame size is better than debating measurements.
If your LBS is unhelpful or cannot fit you, please don't buy from them. A good bike shop will make your enjoyment easier. A poor one = wastes you time & $$$.
It IS a good starting point.
It is likely a goal of most custom builders to get a good overall fit and knee close to being directly over pedal. But riding style has a lot to do with it. Moving forward on the saddle during aggressive riding will certainly move the knee forward and that shouldn't be an issue.
would also agree with @Dave Cutter that riding and feeling the right frame size is better than debating measurements.
If your LBS is unhelpful or cannot fit you, please don't buy from them. A good bike shop will make your enjoyment easier. A poor one = wastes you time & $$$.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,992
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2495 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
522 Posts
There is truth in all of the posts preceding mine but I am putting it out there that... it is possible, in this instance, that the o.p. has mismeasured the critical dimension. It sounds very wrong to me that a 72.5 seat tube angle could be so off as to result in a 4 cm (~2"?) ahead of KOPS. Re-reading I notice that nowhere in the o.p. is the o.p.'s height or inseam provided. I think its relevant. Seat may be too low for one thing. FWIW.
H
H
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks to all who responded with the great replies. But you, Leisesturm hit the nail on the head. My height is 6' and my cycling inseam is 91.5 cm. My seat height is set low as it was set just for the thigh to calf angle at full extension. It never occurred to me that raising the seat would draw the knees back (DUH!) Of course raising the seat will straight my leg too much at full extension but that is probably because my bike is too big at 61 cm. (I bought it from an individual and have never been thru a proper fitting). The proper size for me according to the height charts is 58 cm. I think buying a 58 and getting a proper fitting will solve the problem. Thanks again.
#7
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,534
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Thanks to all who responded with the great replies. But you, Leisesturm hit the nail on the head. My height is 6' and my cycling inseam is 91.5 cm. My seat height is set low as it was set just for the thigh to calf angle at full extension. It never occurred to me that raising the seat would draw the knees back (DUH!) Of course raising the seat will straight my leg too much at full extension but that is probably because my bike is too big at 61 cm. (I bought it from an individual and have never been thru a proper fitting). The proper size for me according to the height charts is 58 cm. I think buying a 58 and getting a proper fitting will solve the problem. Thanks again.
Once you have that set, put your hands on the hoods and with your back straight, bend your elbows until your forearms are horizontal. Your elbows should be a little in front of your knees at 3 o'clock, no overlap, and the gap less than 2". If that's not true, adjust your stem length to get it closer. You may not need a new bike at all.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#8
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,328
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,836 Times
in
2,229 Posts
you have long legs for a 6' person, a 61cm frame should fit; but i understand the trend toward smaller frames.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
What is your crank length? Lots of debate about crank lengths, but if you have long legs... you could probably use at least a 175, or maybe a 180. That will also move the pedals forward just slightly
There are lots of adjustments possible. For example not all seatposts have the same setback.
There are lots of adjustments possible. For example not all seatposts have the same setback.
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This morning I did the saddle height setting procedure you sent me and it raised my saddle about 4 cm which is a lot. I then took a ride and it felt different, as it should, but I had more power and went faster. Thanks a bunch.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 1,662
Bikes: 1980 Koga-Miyata Gentsluxe-S, 1998 Eddy Merckx Corsa 01, 1983 Tommasini Racing, 2012 Gulf Western CAAD10, 1980 Univega Gran Premio
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 600 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
11 Posts
It sounds like you're on the right track, but if you decide to go ahead and get a new bike, get a fitting done before you buy your new bike. You'll either find that you really can adjust your current bike just so, and no need for spending further $$, or you know what size and geometry you should be looking for.
#13
Banned
my knees are about 4 cm in front of the pedal center in the 3/9 o’clock pedaling position.
*it may not be something off the shelf.. a "Brand"
(Velo News writer) Lennard Zinn in Colorado specializes in tall peoples custom bikes..
...
#14
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 225
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
Once you have that set, put your hands on the hoods and with your back straight, bend your elbows until your forearms are horizontal. Your elbows should be a little in front of your knees at 3 o'clock, no overlap, and the gap less than 2". If that's not true, adjust your stem length to get it closer. You may not need a new bike at all.[/QUOTE]
Is this another one of those "starting point" rules, or is it more definitive? I checked my fit, and found somewhat of an overlap (assuming I'm doing it correctly, and that you're referring to the vertical plane -- see photo). I arrived at this reach by going as long as I can with the reach while still being able to pedal at "full power." (If I increase the reach just a cm, or 2, my power drops at least 20%. I assume this is due to my ridiculously short torso-to-leg ratio.) Or, could that mean my saddle position isn't quite right?SANY0762.jpg
Is this another one of those "starting point" rules, or is it more definitive? I checked my fit, and found somewhat of an overlap (assuming I'm doing it correctly, and that you're referring to the vertical plane -- see photo). I arrived at this reach by going as long as I can with the reach while still being able to pedal at "full power." (If I increase the reach just a cm, or 2, my power drops at least 20%. I assume this is due to my ridiculously short torso-to-leg ratio.) Or, could that mean my saddle position isn't quite right?SANY0762.jpg
Last edited by pakossa; 12-09-16 at 07:56 PM. Reason: addition
#15
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,534
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Is this another one of those "starting point" rules, or is it more definitive? I checked my fit, and found somewhat of an overlap (assuming I'm doing it correctly, and that you're referring to the vertical plane -- see photo). I arrived at this reach by going as long as I can with the reach while still being able to pedal at "full power." (If I increase the reach just a cm, or 2, my power drops at least 20%. I assume this is due to my ridiculously short torso-to-leg ratio.) Or, could that mean my saddle position isn't quite right?Attachment 545437
Re saddle position: Only you can tell if you feel balanced on the bike. I don't think it's possible to see that from a photo.
In general, you want it to look like this in terms of pedaling, fit, and balance:
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Last edited by Carbonfiberboy; 12-11-16 at 12:22 AM.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
Once you have that set, put your hands on the hoods and with your back straight, bend your elbows until your forearms are horizontal. Your elbows should be a little in front of your knees at 3 o'clock, no overlap, and the gap less than 2". If that's not true, adjust your stem length to get it closer. You may not need a new bike at all.
Is this another one of those "starting point" rules, or is it more definitive? I checked my fit, and found somewhat of an overlap (assuming I'm doing it correctly, and that you're referring to the vertical plane -- see photo). I arrived at this reach by going as long as I can with the reach while still being able to pedal at "full power." (If I increase the reach just a cm, or 2, my power drops at least 20%. I assume this is due to my ridiculously short torso-to-leg ratio.) Or, could that mean my saddle position isn't quite right?Attachment 545437
Is this another one of those "starting point" rules, or is it more definitive? I checked my fit, and found somewhat of an overlap (assuming I'm doing it correctly, and that you're referring to the vertical plane -- see photo). I arrived at this reach by going as long as I can with the reach while still being able to pedal at "full power." (If I increase the reach just a cm, or 2, my power drops at least 20%. I assume this is due to my ridiculously short torso-to-leg ratio.) Or, could that mean my saddle position isn't quite right?Attachment 545437
Looks seriously too small.
Bike fit for dummies:
Get pedal in correct position: BEHIND ball of foot. Often this is cleats slammed all the way back.
Get saddle height in correct position: while pedalling in a slightly bigger gear than needed pedal up a hill. The pedal stroke needs to feel circular rather than up and down and there should be no "snapping"/sudden acceleration of the knee. Keep lowering it until it feels awkward then raise again until it starts snapping.
Get saddle setback right: you should not feel like you are using your quads or hamstrings more than the other.
If you feel your hamstrings then move the saddle forward. If you feel your quads then move the saddle back.
When reaching for the bars you should not feel pressure through your back or neck.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In general, you want it to look like this in terms of pedaling, fit, and balance:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z04uoO7U_SA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z04uoO7U_SA
#18
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 225
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
Note that your upper arms do not make a 90° angle with your torso. (SNIP)
Yes, but isn't that 90-degree rule when your arms are in the normal riding position (slightly bent), rather than with the forearms horizontal like that?
Yes, but isn't that 90-degree rule when your arms are in the normal riding position (slightly bent), rather than with the forearms horizontal like that?
#19
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,534
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
IME and oddly enough, it works for all seated positions if fit, posture, and reach are correct. Check it in a mirror and/or watch the model in the video I posted. You may see slight variations, but close enough.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bristol, R. I.
Posts: 4,340
Bikes: Specialized Secteur, old Peugeot
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 663 Post(s)
Liked 496 Times
in
299 Posts
This observation I think is correct. I once did an accurate scale drawing of a bike with a stick figure of my own proportions. Oddly, I found that the appearance on the bike, generally looked the same wherever the stick figure gripped the bars.