Captain's Crankarm length
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Captain's Crankarm length
Is there any reason that the length of my crank arms, as captain of a tandem, should be longer than the crank arms I'm comfortable with on my single bikes? I can't imagine there would be. But a local dealer for one of the leading tandem builders tells me that all tandems the builder makes come with 175mm crank arms for the captain, regardless of the size of the tandem. That sounds crazy. What am I missing?
#2
Full Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: WI
Posts: 262
Bikes: 2010 Bob Brown Cycles tandem, 2019 Co-Mo Carrera tandem, 1980 Richardson tandem, 2014 Cervelo R3, 2018 Specialized Roubaix, 1985 Bianchi Campione, 1983 Trek 720, 2020 Trek Fuel EX8, 2021 Salsa Mukluk
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
70 Posts
I like a 175mm crank arm length on all of my bikes, but I'm also 6'2" tall with a 35" inseam. I would think that shorter riders wouldn't like that kind of length regardless of what kind of a bike it may be.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
You certainly shouldn't use a length that you are not comfortable with.
Two reasons for the captains to be longer than the stoker is that they are often taller and also a more experienced cyclist.
Being more experienced they often prefer a higher cadence than the stoker. The extra length in the crank helps to slow them down and reduce the cadence discrepancy.
Two reasons for the captains to be longer than the stoker is that they are often taller and also a more experienced cyclist.
Being more experienced they often prefer a higher cadence than the stoker. The extra length in the crank helps to slow them down and reduce the cadence discrepancy.
#4
Senior Member
Our tandem has 172.5mm cranks in the front and 165mm cranks in the rear... because that's what we use on all our single bikes.
#5
Senior Member
We were able to specify both front and rear crank arm lengths at no extra charge on our da Vinci Joint Venture. They have nine crank lengths from 150mm to 200mm and with 2.5mm increments from 165-175mm. Additionally there are two different sets of lengths for their adult/child triple-hole cranks. Choices are good to have! You can purchase their cranks without buying a bike.
Last edited by Joint Venture; 05-13-19 at 12:41 PM.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,989
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2493 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
522 Posts
The extra length is not intended to "slow the Captain down". They are already used to whatever cadence they adopt. The shorter length on the Stoker crank otoh may help them keep up.
Last edited by Leisesturm; 05-20-19 at 10:59 AM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,989
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2493 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
522 Posts
At 6'2" it is very possible that you could, in fact, use even longer cranks! But that would require extensive re-design of your entire bicycle. The current craze for extremely short cranks flies in the face of everything that is known about bio-mechanical efficiency.
#8
Full Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: WI
Posts: 262
Bikes: 2010 Bob Brown Cycles tandem, 2019 Co-Mo Carrera tandem, 1980 Richardson tandem, 2014 Cervelo R3, 2018 Specialized Roubaix, 1985 Bianchi Campione, 1983 Trek 720, 2020 Trek Fuel EX8, 2021 Salsa Mukluk
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
70 Posts
Yeah, I agree! I've never tried anything longer, but I've always been quite content with the 175mm cranks. I was actually taller than 6'2" at one time, too, but that's another geezer back story for another time.......LOL. My leg length has remained the same, though.
#9
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,527
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3885 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Yeah, that's crazy, but that's how it is. On our tandem, both our crank lengths now = 5.5 X inseam in inches. Mine is 31", so 175s work. Stoker's is 27", so we finally got 151mm custom cranks for her. She used to use the stock 170s, which were actually fine, but she likes the shorter ones better. Though I have the feeling that she has less power on the steep stuff, she can spin faster on the flats and easy climbs.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#10
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,498
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7345 Post(s)
Liked 2,452 Times
in
1,430 Posts
What short crank trend? The trend I notice is longer cranks on single bikes. I don't like it. I prefer short cranks.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.