Drop Bar width?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Drop Bar width?
It seems the way drop bar widths are measured is not consistent? Sometimes it is hard to figure out how wide the actual bar will be. Apparently there is width at the hoods, width at the actual drops which may be quite different if the drops are angled out.....
I wonder what size drop bar a 5’8” dude (17” , 43.5cm shoulder width) should use? I am reading some who suggest as wide as 46cm. Not sure if this is measured at hoods or the width of the entire bar, angled drops included?
I wonder what size drop bar a 5’8” dude (17” , 43.5cm shoulder width) should use? I am reading some who suggest as wide as 46cm. Not sure if this is measured at hoods or the width of the entire bar, angled drops included?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Good question, I've assumed width was outside to outside and purchased them that way, but most of the internet searches show center-to-center measurements. At the hoods or ramp area. It probably depends on the specifications page that you're looking at.
It's generally supposed to be your shoulder measurements plus a hair more, a couple of centimeters. Some people, myself included, prefer narrower drop bars and my road bike in fact has 42 cm, outside measurement. I associate wider with a more relaxed posture and narrower with more aggressive and aerodynamic.
It's generally supposed to be your shoulder measurements plus a hair more, a couple of centimeters. Some people, myself included, prefer narrower drop bars and my road bike in fact has 42 cm, outside measurement. I associate wider with a more relaxed posture and narrower with more aggressive and aerodynamic.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Good question, I've assumed width was outside to outside and purchased them that way, but most of the internet searches show center-to-center measurements. At the hoods or ramp area. It probably depends on the specifications page that you're looking at.
It's generally supposed to be your shoulder measurements plus a hair more, a couple of centimeters. Some people, myself included, prefer narrower drop bars and my road bike in fact has 42 cm, outside measurement. I associate wider with a more relaxed posture and narrower with more aggressive and aerodynamic.
It's generally supposed to be your shoulder measurements plus a hair more, a couple of centimeters. Some people, myself included, prefer narrower drop bars and my road bike in fact has 42 cm, outside measurement. I associate wider with a more relaxed posture and narrower with more aggressive and aerodynamic.
I am converting a Cyclocross/Hybrid to more of a Gravel/Road bike. I ride paved roads covered with sand and gravel, also some fairly rough gravel roads. I have 700 x 40C WTB Nanos on my bike now. I might be able to get a little wider tire in the forks. I am using Stan’s NOTUBES Grail rims.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
if flared/angled drop bars are measured from the drops or the hoods?
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks for the reply. Maybe I should not be trying to buy bike parts on Amazon? They seem to offer only a modicum of information on the parts they sell, which may be the issue.
#6
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
Most of the time, I see bars measured center-to-center at the ends. If there is flare to the drops, the customer should understand that the bars will be narrower at the hoods.
Likes For ThermionicScott:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 2,397
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1104 Post(s)
Liked 1,824 Times
in
878 Posts
https://www.specialized.com/us/en/ho...flare/p/155205
Likes For nomadmax:
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
9
These are the ones I have been looking at: They say they are measured at the initial bends, not the hoods or center to center at the ends, whatever that means? Apparently hands can reach across the bend in the bar, adding stability.
https://www.modernbike.com/ritchey-c...6cm-31.8-black
That's my experience as well but I do know of at least one exception; the Specialized Hover Flare bars @ 12 degrees. They measure at the hoods; the flared drops are even wider. Ironically they don't list the C to C measurement at the drops for comparison to the hood C to C measurement.
https://www.specialized.com/us/en/ho...flare/p/155205
https://www.specialized.com/us/en/ho...flare/p/155205
https://www.modernbike.com/ritchey-c...6cm-31.8-black
Last edited by McMitchell; 09-22-19 at 08:45 AM.
#9
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
These are the ones I have been looking at: They say they are measured at the initial bends, not the hoods or center to center at the ends, whatever that means? Apparently hands can reach across the bend in the bar, adding stability.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-Wr...&feature=share
https://www.modernbike.com/ritchey-c...6cm-31.8-black
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-Wr...&feature=share
https://www.modernbike.com/ritchey-c...6cm-31.8-black
Interesting idea to reach down with the fingertips to the drops while on the ramps... I could see it adding some stability, but then you also don't have a firm grip on the top or bottom part of the bar.
Likes For ThermionicScott:
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
It just occurred to me the expected use might determine where a manufacturer chooses to measure the bars. The old-school handlebars I ride were designed when people spent a lot of their time in the drops, so it would make sense to compare them based on the width at the ends. Newer handlebars are designed for people who primarily ride on the hoods, hence the shallower drops and shorter reach. And the width at the ends may never be a factor for them.
Interesting idea to reach down with the fingertips to the drops while on the ramps... I could see it adding some stability, but then you also don't have a firm grip on the top or bottom part of the bar.
Interesting idea to reach down with the fingertips to the drops while on the ramps... I could see it adding some stability, but then you also don't have a firm grip on the top or bottom part of the bar.
#11
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
I think the idea behind shallow drops has more to do with a desire for a less “radical/aero” position. Certainly one might cover the smaller distance in less time. We might think of these bars as offering a greater variety of less radical hand positions (inside the hoods, on hoods, in drops, hands covering the drops. It might also be easier to reach a bar end shifter or even a more typical MTB shifter.
Likes For ThermionicScott:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
I think we're on the same track, just expressing it differently. With compact drops, the various hand positions are closer together, so if you primarily ride on the hoods, going to the drops doesn't drastically change your position. And vice versa, if you primarily ride in the drops, going to the upper positions doesn't have you sitting way up all of a sudden. It works for a lot of people whether they want to be riding low/aero or upright.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I think we're on the same track, just expressing it differently. With compact drops, the various hand positions are closer together, so if you primarily ride on the hoods, going to the drops doesn't drastically change your position. And vice versa, if you primarily ride in the drops, going to the upper positions doesn't have you sitting way up all of a sudden. It works for a lot of people whether they want to be riding low/aero or upright.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,891
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4790 Post(s)
Liked 3,917 Times
in
2,548 Posts
I've never thought about how the old "rule" plays with the new drops that are angled out. That rule was that the ends of the drops should match the width of the balls of your shoulders. in other words, the bare bars with no plugs should fit exactly over the shoulder balls. I heard this many times in my racing days 40 years ago. That puts the rider at a place with enough width for deep breathing and bike control but narrow enough to be decently areo and enable one to be able to slid between riders. If you wanted more control, 2 cm wider. I raced a 39 cm bar; having skinny shoulders.
In recent years I have gone wider on my fix gears, 42 on most and probably 44 on my two road climbing setups. (That's out of the saddle climbing in typically way too high a gear. Then spinning sometimes crazy RPM and trying to control the bike coming down.)
I"m another who loves having the hoods directly over the drops. I do however prefer a generous bend at the tops, not the almost square that is popular now so one can rest their forearms on the tops. I bang my forarms against the square corners riding out of the saddle climbing and sprinting across intersections. I now have a couple of bikes set up with pista bars with the very generous bends and love them.
Ben
In recent years I have gone wider on my fix gears, 42 on most and probably 44 on my two road climbing setups. (That's out of the saddle climbing in typically way too high a gear. Then spinning sometimes crazy RPM and trying to control the bike coming down.)
I"m another who loves having the hoods directly over the drops. I do however prefer a generous bend at the tops, not the almost square that is popular now so one can rest their forearms on the tops. I bang my forarms against the square corners riding out of the saddle climbing and sprinting across intersections. I now have a couple of bikes set up with pista bars with the very generous bends and love them.
Ben