Anyone still using BioPace chainrings?
#26
Senior Member
I have a couple bikes that have them my 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert and Master and my 1986 Trek 560 . i took them off the 560 when i first got it but after riding the Ironman's i dont mind them i might put them back on the 560 someday.
I remember in the late 80's in the area's i rode in they were cool, i dont think it was til the middle 90's that they got a bad rap.
I remember in the late 80's in the area's i rode in they were cool, i dont think it was til the middle 90's that they got a bad rap.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,624
Bikes: iele Latina, Miele Suprema, Miele Uno LS, Miele Miele Beta, MMTB, Bianchi Model Unknown, Fiori Venezia, Fiori Napoli, VeloSport Adamas AX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1324 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
640 Posts
I have a couple bikes that have them my 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert and Master and my 1986 Trek 560 . i took them off the 560 when i first got it but after riding the Ironman's i dont mind them i might put them back on the 560 someday.
I remember in the late 80's in the area's i rode in they were cool, i dont think it was til the middle 90's that they got a bad rap.
I remember in the late 80's in the area's i rode in they were cool, i dont think it was til the middle 90's that they got a bad rap.
Cheers
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Denver
Posts: 58
Bikes: 1983 Team Fuji, 1983? Ross 290S, 1988 Trek 900, 1985 Raleigh Kodiak,
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I appreciate the honest offer to my mostly tongue in cheek comment and when it comes time to build that frame I will message you!
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,067
Bikes: 84 Pinarello Trevisio, 86 Guerciotti SLX, 96 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2010 Surly Cross Check, 88 Centurion Prestige, 73 Raleigh Sports, GT Force, Bridgestone MB4
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
56 Posts
I still have them on my Centurion. I have a new set as well for spare. I cannot really tell they are there. If not still using them, what would one replace them with on a late 80s Shimano 105/600 crank?
#31
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
I've had them on bikes and didn't notice a pronounced difference so they came back off. I sold the 48/38/28 steel set and don't miss them, but perhaps if I ever work myself up into needing a 52T big ring I'll put the 52/42 on something.
#32
Partially Sane.
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Sunny Sacramento.
Posts: 3,559
Bikes: Soma Saga, pre-disc
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 972 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 643 Times
in
468 Posts
Titanium. I just recently bought some old XT M730 cranks, mostly for the Ti chainrings & bolts. I'll be test riding today, still need to mount a bottle cage & pump.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,358
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2475 Post(s)
Liked 2,947 Times
in
1,673 Posts
Some people may remember that when Shimano introduced the chainrings, the U.S. bike magazines praised BioPace highly. However, articles began criticizing them starting about six months later, claiming that sprinters complained that they felt lumpy at high cadences.
My guess is that one sprinter complained to one or two Bicycling Magazine writers, and they ran with it.
BioPace was introduced early in the era of Shimano marketplace dominance. Once Shimano felt themselves to be in a position of sufficient strength, they told bike manufacturers that they could either (i) buy complete Shimano groups (no more cherry-picking of components) or (ii) take a hike. Another new rule: (i) accept BioPace chainrings on the cranksets in every Shimano group (no option for round rings) or (ii) see above.
Pushing around bike companies (and, effectively, bike dealers) that way might not have had a big effect on the acceptance of BioPace in the market, but it probably didn't help.
My guess is that one sprinter complained to one or two Bicycling Magazine writers, and they ran with it.
BioPace was introduced early in the era of Shimano marketplace dominance. Once Shimano felt themselves to be in a position of sufficient strength, they told bike manufacturers that they could either (i) buy complete Shimano groups (no more cherry-picking of components) or (ii) take a hike. Another new rule: (i) accept BioPace chainrings on the cranksets in every Shimano group (no option for round rings) or (ii) see above.
Pushing around bike companies (and, effectively, bike dealers) that way might not have had a big effect on the acceptance of BioPace in the market, but it probably didn't help.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,480
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 141 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
7 Posts
My right knee is sort of delicate due to using a kickwheel for pottery for a lot of years. Experience has shown me that biopace rings let me do longer days when touring day after day.
I really cant feel anything different between round and oval when just tooling around at home, it takes several days on a tour before the benefits start. So all of my bikes that see loaded tours get the biopace, sporty sprinters get the round.
It may be a Dumbos feather effect, but Ill still stick with the formula that does not leave me with a strained and swollen knee.
I really cant feel anything different between round and oval when just tooling around at home, it takes several days on a tour before the benefits start. So all of my bikes that see loaded tours get the biopace, sporty sprinters get the round.
It may be a Dumbos feather effect, but Ill still stick with the formula that does not leave me with a strained and swollen knee.
#35
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 131
Bikes: 2018 Salsa Marakesh / 2006 HooKooEKoo / 2005 CoMotion Nor'wester / 1987 Trek 520 and 560EX (1 ea.)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Thanx for all the input. I hadn't given much thought to the BioPace rings for ~20 years, back when they were very much not in fashion.
I rode the old bike with the BioPace yesterday and my regular road bike today, and I think I am kinda diggin' the BioPace rings. Leaving them on.
I rode the old bike with the BioPace yesterday and my regular road bike today, and I think I am kinda diggin' the BioPace rings. Leaving them on.
Likes For Knet:
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,968
Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1362 Post(s)
Liked 1,674 Times
in
827 Posts
My '83 Nishiki International has 'em...or had 'em. I swapped out the smaller gear to something smaller to help with the hills. Big ring is still oval. I don't notice it at all.
#37
verktyg
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,030
Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro
Mentioned: 207 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 1,237 Times
in
653 Posts
I put together this Flickr collection of Biopace and similar types of chainrings when I was researching them back in 2010:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/282672...57625130627294
https://www.flickr.com/photos/282672...7625130627294/
Sheldon Brown wrote a nice article on BB chainrings that covers a lot of the bases (click on link below):
Biopace Chainwheels
Here's a quote:
"The marketers of Biopace made a crucial error of judgment: too much information. In particular, they mentioned that the Biopace design was optimized for cadences of about 90 rpm and slower. Many readers interpreted this as an indication that Biopace chainrings would somehow interfere with pedaling faster than that. This perception caused a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy, and the Conventional Wisdom arose that Biopace was bad for high-performance cyclists for this reason. I [Sheldon] used to believe this myself, but I rode them anyway because I appreciated their other virtues."
I got back into riding again about 10 years ago after a number of years off the bike (plus a total hip replacement). I picked up a 1988 Colnago Technos frame. It was so weird looking to my retro grouch eyes that I decided to build it up as a frankenbike. That was during my Campy free zone era. I got a bunch of NOS Shimano Deore XT components dirt cheap on eBay including 2 triple Biopace cranks.
I have Biopace chainrings on a few other bikes:
I switched the chainrings (including some BP rings) on most of my 130 BCD Shimano cranks from 52T-42T to 48T or 49T-38T because I wanted lower gearing and I'll almost never need a 52T ring again.
After riding 38T small rings with 28T FWs for quite a few years, I noticed something when I got a 1988 Peugeot Biarritz with 52T-42T BP chain rings. While this is totally subjective, when climbing the pedal effort of the 42T BP ring is about the same as with a round 38T ring!
My bikes equipped with Shimano BP triples seem to climb easier too!
verktyg
Chas.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/282672...57625130627294
https://www.flickr.com/photos/282672...7625130627294/
Sheldon Brown wrote a nice article on BB chainrings that covers a lot of the bases (click on link below):
Biopace Chainwheels
Here's a quote:
"The marketers of Biopace made a crucial error of judgment: too much information. In particular, they mentioned that the Biopace design was optimized for cadences of about 90 rpm and slower. Many readers interpreted this as an indication that Biopace chainrings would somehow interfere with pedaling faster than that. This perception caused a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy, and the Conventional Wisdom arose that Biopace was bad for high-performance cyclists for this reason. I [Sheldon] used to believe this myself, but I rode them anyway because I appreciated their other virtues."
I got back into riding again about 10 years ago after a number of years off the bike (plus a total hip replacement). I picked up a 1988 Colnago Technos frame. It was so weird looking to my retro grouch eyes that I decided to build it up as a frankenbike. That was during my Campy free zone era. I got a bunch of NOS Shimano Deore XT components dirt cheap on eBay including 2 triple Biopace cranks.
I have Biopace chainrings on a few other bikes:
I switched the chainrings (including some BP rings) on most of my 130 BCD Shimano cranks from 52T-42T to 48T or 49T-38T because I wanted lower gearing and I'll almost never need a 52T ring again.
After riding 38T small rings with 28T FWs for quite a few years, I noticed something when I got a 1988 Peugeot Biarritz with 52T-42T BP chain rings. While this is totally subjective, when climbing the pedal effort of the 42T BP ring is about the same as with a round 38T ring!
My bikes equipped with Shimano BP triples seem to climb easier too!
verktyg
Chas.
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Last edited by verktyg; 05-22-16 at 05:53 PM.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Richmond VA area
Posts: 2,618
Bikes: '00 Koga Miyata Full Pro Oval Road bike.
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 475 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
I like Biopace as well. I wouldnt say I'd go out of my way to get it onto a bike, but I'm totally good with it being on bikes I've bought.
#40
Full Member
When I had my custom Veloce built in the mid '80s I spec'ed a Sugino AT crank with 48-44-26 Biopace chainrings. Still run the combo but the granny has been swapped to a round ring. Never noticed any substantial difference but they kinda took a bad rap in the 90's.
#42
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,402
Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present
Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1556 Post(s)
Liked 2,024 Times
in
989 Posts
After having a pleasant experience with a Biopace set on a just-purchased '89 Schwinn Tempo (I thought I had lost my keys on a test ride and was retracing my steps...er, spins), I sought them out a few years later when I was building my do-anything Nishiki build. First gen Biopace with the more pronounced deviations from round--a 52-42-28 setup. They are really smooth and often after riding round rings, pedaling the Nishiki (on 6500-era Ultegra triple cranks, no less) feels velvet-y. I make it work with an 11-34 rear cassette and it gives me no trouble.
Sporty bikes, as other(s) have said, get the round rings and the non-sporty Nishiki gets the funky stuff. Interestingly, I feel like I can hold a slightly lower cadence than I would with round rings without any extra strain, usually up inclines. The 28T ring does feel like pedaling a square, but it's a nice square that my knees don't hate. Biopace rings are always a cast-off at the few major used shops I frequent here in Seattle. They should just have an Oddballs With Merit section where that can go into. They can stick Rapid Rise Shimano rear derailleurs in there too, but not mine because an XTR example is on my bike and works a treat.
If you like the Biopace feel, rock it! If you like forgotten and/or esoteric stuff that works well (I do), then that will increase your draw to it.
Sporty bikes, as other(s) have said, get the round rings and the non-sporty Nishiki gets the funky stuff. Interestingly, I feel like I can hold a slightly lower cadence than I would with round rings without any extra strain, usually up inclines. The 28T ring does feel like pedaling a square, but it's a nice square that my knees don't hate. Biopace rings are always a cast-off at the few major used shops I frequent here in Seattle. They should just have an Oddballs With Merit section where that can go into. They can stick Rapid Rise Shimano rear derailleurs in there too, but not mine because an XTR example is on my bike and works a treat.
If you like the Biopace feel, rock it! If you like forgotten and/or esoteric stuff that works well (I do), then that will increase your draw to it.
#43
Death fork? Naaaah!!
Biopace fan; helps beat-up old knees get up hills.
Top
Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 150
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My wife's circa-1987 Lotus Excelle mixte touring/commuter has Shimano Biopace chainrings and my circa-1990 Specialized Hard Rock commuter has Sugino Bionic chainrings. I have no complaints, and as far as I know, neither does she.
Are there any real differences between genuine-Shimano BioPace vs. other non-circular chainrings such as my Sugino one?
Are there any real differences between genuine-Shimano BioPace vs. other non-circular chainrings such as my Sugino one?
#45
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
Per Sheldon's article, SR's "Ovaltech" and Sugino's "Cycloid" were designed similarly to BioPace. Other, more "performance-based" non-round rings tend to be oriented 90° off, so that the biggest part of the gear is when the cranks are horizontal.
#46
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 386
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I enjoy BioPace so much I run it on my fixed gear. Just make sure to tension the chain at the tight spot in the rotation and not the loose spot I receive no shortage of people wanting to lecture me on how I'm doing it wrong, how I'm going to throw a chain (hasn't happened in 5 years), but if I go, "Sheldon Brown did it" then all of a sudden it's okay
More than half of my bikes run it and I think it allows me to push a higher cadence and not bounce in my seat as much. Switching back and forth between a bike with round chainrings or with BioPace is uneventful, I could live with either setups. I do enjoy the novelty of BioPace so I don't replace it when I pick up a bike with it.
More than half of my bikes run it and I think it allows me to push a higher cadence and not bounce in my seat as much. Switching back and forth between a bike with round chainrings or with BioPace is uneventful, I could live with either setups. I do enjoy the novelty of BioPace so I don't replace it when I pick up a bike with it.
#47
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,495
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7341 Post(s)
Liked 2,441 Times
in
1,425 Posts
Hmm, I wonder if this would be a good application for our tandem. I doubt my wife and I are going to pedal more than 120 rpm together, but I could be wrong. We need higher high gears, though.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The First State.
Posts: 1,168
Bikes: Schwinn Continental, Schwinn Paramount, Schwinn High Plains, Schwinn World Sport, Trek 420, Trek 930,Trek 660, Novara X-R, Giant Iguana. Fuji Sagres mixte.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times
in
10 Posts
Do Biopace rings shift more smoothly? Reason I ask is that for some period of time Shimano offered round chainrings with a series of shortened teeth opposite each other on the chainring and marketed it as an aid to shifting. These were eventually replaced by ramps and pins. I'm wondering if the oblong BP chainring helps in the transition as the chain moves between chainrings.
#49
Death fork? Naaaah!!
Do Biopace rings shift more smoothly? Reason I ask is that for some period of time Shimano offered round chainrings with a series of shortened teeth opposite each other on the chainring and marketed it as an aid to shifting. These were eventually replaced by ramps and pins. I'm wondering if the oblong BP chainring helps in the transition as the chain moves between chainrings.
In fact, I think the reason they died is index front DRs. Granted, they weren't pinned and ramped, but every bike I have with Biopace launches the chain outboard of the big ring every 200th shift or so. I think if the shift occurs at just the right low spot with just the right power applied it'll overshoot the teeth of the big ring. And I haven't been able to get them to work well on my sole 10 speed brifter bike.
Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
#50
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 386
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Yes? I've never experienced anymore difficulty shifting my BioPace bikes compared to the ones with a normal setup. I've got a Nishiki Modulous that's BioPace and Shimano Light Action throughout. If my experience were determined by internet hearsay then that bike shouldn't work at all.