Why are average speed readings so different on group rides?
#26
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,634
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4733 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
Likes For rubiksoval:
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Because, as was pointed out to me by a racing type when I opined something similar, sometimes people who take the shortest line in corners win while someone close behind them is swinging wide. The guy swinging wide is going further and it *might* be enough to have a higher average speed. I'm skeptical that there's enough difference in path to make that happen, but not being a "racing type" myself I have to take their word for it.
#29
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,634
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4733 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
Because, as was pointed out to me by a racing type when I opined something similar, sometimes people who take the shortest line in corners win while someone close behind them is swinging wide. The guy swinging wide is going further and it *might* be enough to have a higher average speed. I'm skeptical that there's enough difference in path to make that happen, but not being a "racing type" myself I have to take their word for it.
Likes For Sy Reene:
#30
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
GPS sampling and interpolation error. Very common.
And apps can vary significantly in interpolation. When I've run Strava, Wahoo Fitness, Cyclemeter and others, all showed differences. Not enough to matter much to me, but enough to snag a new PR or miss it by a hair.
I usually record with Wahoo Fitness but occasionally run Strava simultaneously on the same or another phone. They'll be very close in overall speed, time and distance, and on most segments. But occasionally there will be significant discrepancies.
A few weeks ago Strava showed my time on the final sprint to be the fastest, and the ride-by feature on the website showed me in the lead. Far from accurate. I was middle of the pack. The difference was only a few yards, but that's enough to show the relative inaccuracy of GPS.
Another factor is the individual rider's approach to a segment. In groups often one or two riders will try for a new PR or KOM. Sometimes when they take off I'll follow. If I close the gap Strava will show my time as faster than theirs, even though I was behind. That's because technically my time was faster because I was closing the gap, even though I sprinted late.
Same with climbs. I'm not really any stronger than I was a couple of years ago but I've dropped 15 lbs so my climbing has improved a bit. I tend to lurk in the back of the pack on groups when I'm not familiar with some riders. I'll often pass a few folks along the climb and close the gap on the riders ahead. So occasionally Strava shows my time as significantly faster due to GPS sampling and interpolation error, when my speed was probably only 1/2 to 1 mph faster.
On Sunday morning's group ride Strava logs showed anywhere from 15.5 mph to 17.8 mph average over 33 miles, even though the group wasn't separated by much.
I used to run wired and wireless sensors to check against GPS data but haven't bothered for a few months. I'm mostly interested in my fitness trends, not so much in short segments along a ride.
And apps can vary significantly in interpolation. When I've run Strava, Wahoo Fitness, Cyclemeter and others, all showed differences. Not enough to matter much to me, but enough to snag a new PR or miss it by a hair.
I usually record with Wahoo Fitness but occasionally run Strava simultaneously on the same or another phone. They'll be very close in overall speed, time and distance, and on most segments. But occasionally there will be significant discrepancies.
A few weeks ago Strava showed my time on the final sprint to be the fastest, and the ride-by feature on the website showed me in the lead. Far from accurate. I was middle of the pack. The difference was only a few yards, but that's enough to show the relative inaccuracy of GPS.
Another factor is the individual rider's approach to a segment. In groups often one or two riders will try for a new PR or KOM. Sometimes when they take off I'll follow. If I close the gap Strava will show my time as faster than theirs, even though I was behind. That's because technically my time was faster because I was closing the gap, even though I sprinted late.
Same with climbs. I'm not really any stronger than I was a couple of years ago but I've dropped 15 lbs so my climbing has improved a bit. I tend to lurk in the back of the pack on groups when I'm not familiar with some riders. I'll often pass a few folks along the climb and close the gap on the riders ahead. So occasionally Strava shows my time as significantly faster due to GPS sampling and interpolation error, when my speed was probably only 1/2 to 1 mph faster.
On Sunday morning's group ride Strava logs showed anywhere from 15.5 mph to 17.8 mph average over 33 miles, even though the group wasn't separated by much.
I used to run wired and wireless sensors to check against GPS data but haven't bothered for a few months. I'm mostly interested in my fitness trends, not so much in short segments along a ride.
Likes For canklecat:
#33
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,634
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4733 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,035
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times
in
207 Posts
If he gets a flat on the climb, stops to change a wheel, then chases back on and loses the sprint, then yes, his average moving speed in his ride data will be faster than the winner (presuming the winner didn’t also have a mechanical during the race).
As pointed out above, though, the only true metric for average speed in a race is Official Race Distance (as determined by the organizers) divided by Official Race Time (as determined by race clock and timekeeping officials). And the highest average speed by this analysis is always the winner. No point showing up after the race and telling the officials “but my Elemnt Bolt says I was 0.2km/hr faster than the guy who crossed the line first!”
#35
mechanically sound
Agree. If I go 20 miles in an hour, I’ve averaged 20, but my computer always reads lower, so it is horribly inaccurate, and therefore worthless.
__________________
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
740 Posts
I have a car which I have compared my speedo to those roadside radar readouts. It's dead on. So, I think 40 mph is actually 40 mph. The other day I went out in the car and took my Garmin Edge 200 (about 4 years old). When the car was at 40 mph the Garmin was reading around 38.5 mph. Not exactly sure if this means anything.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: West Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,112
Bikes: '84 Peugeot PH10LE
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 397 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
39 Posts
Are they wireless or hard-wired units? If wireless they're "stepping" on each other and fouling up the readings.
Jon
Jon
#38
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,302
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 724 Times
in
371 Posts
More importantly, focusing just on average speed is counterproductive to actually getting faster.
Doing intervals will result in lower average speed than just going out and trying to ride consistently hard. But the former approach makes you faster, and a steady diet of the later leads to a quick plateau, and you being slower than you could be.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
Likes For merlinextraligh:
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,112
Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 987 Post(s)
Liked 584 Times
in
439 Posts
Did a group ride today. We pull into to our rest stop and I hear people sharing their average speeds, as we seemed to be pushing it quicker than usual, so folks got curious. One says 18.2, another 18.6, another 19.1.
Are these devices that keep track of such stuff that erratic, or can little things make for legit differences in speeds in a group ride? There was occasional surging, but we basically stayed together.
Not that it matters any, but I've experienced this a few times. Just wondered what's up with that. Folks say speed doesn't mean anything, and maybe this is another example of that.
Are these devices that keep track of such stuff that erratic, or can little things make for legit differences in speeds in a group ride? There was occasional surging, but we basically stayed together.
Not that it matters any, but I've experienced this a few times. Just wondered what's up with that. Folks say speed doesn't mean anything, and maybe this is another example of that.
Likes For eduskator:
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Worthless is an overstatement. The point, that bears repeating, particularly for newer riders is that average speed, for most purposes, is not a very useful metric.
More importantly, focusing just on average speed is counterproductive to actually getting faster.
Doing intervals will result in lower average speed than just going out and trying to ride consistently hard. But the former approach makes you faster, and a steady diet of the later leads to a quick plateau, and you being slower than you could be.
More importantly, focusing just on average speed is counterproductive to actually getting faster.
Doing intervals will result in lower average speed than just going out and trying to ride consistently hard. But the former approach makes you faster, and a steady diet of the later leads to a quick plateau, and you being slower than you could be.
#41
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,634
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4733 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
Though while riding as a group, it's speed that the group is using to set a pace and to stay together. It's also usually speed that sets the group levels for clubs. For a group to team to stay together and trading places at the lead, they're not basing this on cadence, HR or watts/kg, or are they?
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,035
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times
in
207 Posts
Though while riding as a group, it's speed that the group is using to set a pace and to stay together. It's also usually speed that sets the group levels for clubs. For a group to team to stay together and trading places at the lead, they're not basing this on cadence, HR or watts/kg, or are they?
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Though while riding as a group, it's speed that the group is using to set a pace and to stay together. It's also usually speed that sets the group levels for clubs. For a group to team to stay together and trading places at the lead, they're not basing this on cadence, HR or watts/kg, or are they?
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Though while riding as a group, it's speed that the group is using to set a pace and to stay together. It's also usually speed that sets the group levels for clubs. For a group to team to stay together and trading places at the lead, they're not basing this on cadence, HR or watts/kg, or are they?
And then there are the group rides where the average speed is determined by who shows up and the wind speed and direction. I'm thinking of my local Saturday morning world championship. The average speed of the entire ride might be 21, but if you can't hold a wheel at 28 you're probably going to get dropped.
Last edited by caloso; 10-30-19 at 03:12 PM.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
I've seen some AA going full tilt to a red light and then stopping rather than coasting. They don't want their average speed to drop.
I've seen others have Auto Pause set to 10mph, I have mine set to 3mph so it doesn't include if i'm walking the bike.
Finally i've sen the wrong tire size set.
I've seen others have Auto Pause set to 10mph, I have mine set to 3mph so it doesn't include if i'm walking the bike.
Finally i've sen the wrong tire size set.
What is this "walking the bike" that you speak of?
#46
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
#48
Globo Gym lifetime member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redmond, Oregon
Posts: 5,204
Bikes: Fast ones
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 410 Post(s)
Liked 614 Times
in
306 Posts
There can also be a difference between someone running an actual speed sensor mounted to the bike vs just using a GPS headunit for speed.
I'll address the average speed thing, which I wish would just die off already.
I plucked three solo rides from my data that show three different average speeds in increasing order. A newer rider might think 15.8 to be easy, 19.5 would be iffy and 22.2 to be out of their reach. The thing is, the normalized power data is almost identical for two of the rides (261W/260W), but the ride with the lowest NP (245W) was the hardest. I don't mean to toot my own horn, but a newer rider wouldn't have been able to keep up on any of these rides, especially the 15.8 mph average.
If someone rode the same route every day for a year they'd notice that on the same route with the same windspeed, a headwind on the wrong sections can pull 1-2 mph off of an average. Even the difference in air density due to temperature can knock 0.5 mph off of an average. When I get asked "what's your average?" when someone is considering riding with me I'll just say "I can go whatever speed you want. Let's ride."
I'll address the average speed thing, which I wish would just die off already.
I plucked three solo rides from my data that show three different average speeds in increasing order. A newer rider might think 15.8 to be easy, 19.5 would be iffy and 22.2 to be out of their reach. The thing is, the normalized power data is almost identical for two of the rides (261W/260W), but the ride with the lowest NP (245W) was the hardest. I don't mean to toot my own horn, but a newer rider wouldn't have been able to keep up on any of these rides, especially the 15.8 mph average.
If someone rode the same route every day for a year they'd notice that on the same route with the same windspeed, a headwind on the wrong sections can pull 1-2 mph off of an average. Even the difference in air density due to temperature can knock 0.5 mph off of an average. When I get asked "what's your average?" when someone is considering riding with me I'll just say "I can go whatever speed you want. Let's ride."
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
I've seen some AA going full tilt to a red light and then stopping rather than coasting. They don't want their average speed to drop.
I've seen others have Auto Pause set to 10mph, I have mine set to 3mph so it doesn't include if i'm walking the bike.
Finally i've sen the wrong tire size set.
I've seen others have Auto Pause set to 10mph, I have mine set to 3mph so it doesn't include if i'm walking the bike.
Finally i've sen the wrong tire size set.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Boston Roads
Posts: 975
Bikes: 2012 Canondale Synapse 105, 2017 REI Co-Op ADV 3.1
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 507 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
133 Posts
I'm assuming you're talking about GPS-based units. You can't really compare those with magnet-based wheel units.
Haven't seen anyone mention this, but do you know the GPS sampling rate and accuracy? Not everybody is going to be sampling at 1Hz. As an exaggerated example, think about going on a road with lots of switchbacks but taking a measurement every minute except every second. Your reported path will look very different.
Not everyone's computed positions will be close to one another - at every measurement your reported position will be within a circle with a ~4m radius (in the best case!), centered at your true position. Of course, it depends on how devices process the data, but simply speaking, at each measurement you accumulate and propagate the local error into your total distance. Also, what kinds of GPS units are people using? Smartphone, smartwatch, cycling computer? Are smartphones using any sort of cell-tower correction? GLONASS/other satellites? Different antennas in all these devices... see, lots of variables.
You should also compare vertical displacement (feet climbed) - I think you'll find that this is even more inconsistent on group rides. GPS is worse at altitude than lat/lon estimates.
Haven't seen anyone mention this, but do you know the GPS sampling rate and accuracy? Not everybody is going to be sampling at 1Hz. As an exaggerated example, think about going on a road with lots of switchbacks but taking a measurement every minute except every second. Your reported path will look very different.
Not everyone's computed positions will be close to one another - at every measurement your reported position will be within a circle with a ~4m radius (in the best case!), centered at your true position. Of course, it depends on how devices process the data, but simply speaking, at each measurement you accumulate and propagate the local error into your total distance. Also, what kinds of GPS units are people using? Smartphone, smartwatch, cycling computer? Are smartphones using any sort of cell-tower correction? GLONASS/other satellites? Different antennas in all these devices... see, lots of variables.
You should also compare vertical displacement (feet climbed) - I think you'll find that this is even more inconsistent on group rides. GPS is worse at altitude than lat/lon estimates.