Is amateur racing legit?
#27
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times
in
560 Posts
Bicycle races are incredibly expensive to put on, and they do not generate the participation numbers that running or triathlon events do. That's why you often don't get a t-shirt. I really wish that USAC had not stopped requiring all clubs to put on events, because there are a lot of people who have no clue how much work and cost is required to put on a race.
And you can look up USAC's finances online. They aren't rolling in it. A lot of the money that goes to USAC from racing fees goes to insurance coverage of racers. USAC pays out a lot to insure riders who are injured in crashes. Masters and Juniors nationals cover the costs of pro and elite nationals. (Pro Nationals loses money every year.)
And you can look up USAC's finances online. They aren't rolling in it. A lot of the money that goes to USAC from racing fees goes to insurance coverage of racers. USAC pays out a lot to insure riders who are injured in crashes. Masters and Juniors nationals cover the costs of pro and elite nationals. (Pro Nationals loses money every year.)
We ran into some legality issues and felt like there wasn't 100% support at the national level for us to do that so we modified it. We put out a public statement to all teams in Illinois that we expected them to put on or be listed as a supporting club on a permit within the year. We also hosted a webinar series that covered the meat and potatoes of how to actually put on a race. Finding venues, navigating the demands from the municipalities, etc. We ran through budgets/expenses for small races like mine as well as large races like the Glencoe Grand Prix (RIP).
We had a disappointing turnout but 1 step at a time. There is a national LA group at USA C that is trying to figure out what to do with clubs in the future.
Also - Indeed on the USA C finances and payouts for insurance. There was a racer who died during a race in St Louis last fall. There is a large settlement that is expected to come from that. DBH said he officially believes there will be a huge increase in insurance premiums for this next year (to the tune of millions).
A lot of the money that they operate with comes from the Foundation and from the USOC. Both of those organizations are focused on track performance. that can make things difficult.
...and yes - nationals for the US is a money losing endeavor.
As for not testing masters - I understand the logic but it's still cheating. There are national and world competitions at the Master's level. Until that changes it needs to be policed and tested. There will never be enough money in this sport to allow testing to become an actual deterrent but IMO that doesn't mean we shouldn't try.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
#28
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times
in
560 Posts
great quote I saw on FB link to an article about UCI equalizing payouts from an ex-Pro women's racer friend - can't find it again quickly but was basically like - I like it but where on earth does anyone expect the teams or promoters to get the money from? The riders will be expected to continue to bring their own sponsors to the team and then be paid their "salary" back from that sponsorship like they do on many teams now.
It's a stupid, stupid, stupid, broken system. if you aren't in it already then GTFO while you can.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
#29
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times
in
560 Posts
While talking about doping though it's always fun to hear the other side too - if you're racing domestic pro/elite then you know of or have heard of Brandon Feehery. I got to watch him grow up racing around here and still spent way too much time with the whole Feehery family (whom I love deeply so that's tongue in cheek). His mother is on the board with me and went with me to Colorado. She was like, "Do you know how many times Brandon has been tested? It's ridiculous. You can't complain because then you look like you're hiding something, but it's such a colossal waste of money."
The results we know of have pretty much validated that. The concern isn't really with the domestic pros (although there are plenty who do dope), but with the masters. They have the need, desire, and the money to make it happen.
On the pro bit I have never known a pro who didn't already know who was and who wasn't doping. Still shocked about the day I sat at a UCI race talking to a friend who ended up winning that day (TT) as he watched the rest of the racers finish up. "He's doping....He is too.....He's clean....Oh he just smokes weed so I'm fine with that. He's clean.....He's clean too......that guy is a joke - soooo dirty".
The results we know of have pretty much validated that. The concern isn't really with the domestic pros (although there are plenty who do dope), but with the masters. They have the need, desire, and the money to make it happen.
On the pro bit I have never known a pro who didn't already know who was and who wasn't doping. Still shocked about the day I sat at a UCI race talking to a friend who ended up winning that day (TT) as he watched the rest of the racers finish up. "He's doping....He is too.....He's clean....Oh he just smokes weed so I'm fine with that. He's clean.....He's clean too......that guy is a joke - soooo dirty".
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
#30
out walking the earth
As for not testing masters - I understand the logic but it's still cheating. There are national and world competitions at the Master's level. Until that changes it needs to be policed and tested. There will never be enough money in this sport to allow testing to become an actual deterrent but IMO that doesn't mean we shouldn't try.
I hear you, but I still have a strong anarchist streak. A few years back when the whole ride clean thing started folks got really jacked up and beat their chests that things were changing. In both NYC and NJ a very big deal was made of it. In reality a handful of tests were done. Roughly 100,000 bikes crossed starting lines in the area that season. Based on the number of folks they caught I figure roughly 97% of the riders were doping.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
On the boycott bit - I call that the great “Masters Bluff”. We had a couple of local teams imply the same thing. I believe they skipped the first year. Then they came back.
I have always seen it like this: I was putting on 3/5’s of our Illinois cup series - if they wanted to be the “best masters racer in Illinois” they had to show up. There aren’t enough actual races left to boycott - they’re only screwing themselves by missing one of the handful of races left on the calendar.
.....and finally and most importantly- racing a bicycle is an self-absorbed ego driven endeavor. They couldn’t stand NOT racing. As soon as the races happened they forgot there wasn’t a payout. Precedent set.
In reality there here is always a vocal minority of masters racers that get upset about no payouts. They are usually the ones that were winning those payouts. The rest of the field never cared (they didn’t win them anyway). So if you pull the payouts and the “top” guys don’t show then it gives the rest of the field a chance to win - which they love. Those top guys end up either coming back immediately (because they hate the idea that whatshisname won) or they become a footnote to amateur racing and we all move on.
Seriously there are no ends to the positives of eliminating them.
Oooooo.... and if they totally disappeared then you can move that time slot into having/adding a masters women’s race!
One problem is that our BAR series points multipliers are tied directly to payout, so if you want races worth the most points, you have to put out the appropriate payout. Something that has to be addressed, but it's not an issue in mtn. biking or cyclocross, so not sure why it has to be one for road racing, either.
Think I'll speak up again this year.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Rather, it's about winning at home in front of the "home crowd" of racers and the occasional spouse or child. I've even heard guys lament not winning a Wed. night race versus a weekend race because all of the local crowd are standing around watching.
People want to "win" group rides, too. There's always something on the line, even if it's just pride and a good parking lot story.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
The time commitment being competitive in a p/1/2 field requires is much higher than the other categories. The fastest riders in the p/1/2 field might only be working part time so they can focus on making cycling the center of their universe. You get a mixture of actual pros and amateurs trying to go pro. That prize money comes in handy for both.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
So I don't honestly think that the "pursuit of the pro life" is a legitimate reason for prize money in p/1/2 races. Especially with the massive demise of the pros racing in the U.S. anyway. Every PRT crit I watched had half a dozen or less "pros" in it. It's crazy.
#37
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
there's plenty of posts on ****** from actual doctors who are finally practicing but swimming in oceans of debt as well. Life is hard.
#38
Senior Member
I can't understand why they pay anyone, 1/2 categories included.
I've spent maybe 30-50 grand on bike racing over the past few years. Bikes, bike parts, lots of gas, lots of entry fees, double the calories of a sedentary person,
I've spent well over 100 grand in time at my current pay rate. Maybe 200.
I've won 3 crits (cat 4, cat 4, cat 2/3), a circuit race (cat 3/4), a road race (cat 3), and a couple track nights (cat 4).
That amounts to me paying $30,000 for each win. Why oh why would anyone except the very top guys who win all the time care about a few hundred bucks payout? I got 3rd one time after a 60 mile break was caught by 5 guys. They gave me an envelope with $10 in it. If they gave me $500 it wouldn't outweigh being caught 10 minutes from the line, and that was cat 4.
#39
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times
in
560 Posts
This isn't a participation sport. The point of a bike race is to win.
I can't understand why they pay anyone, 1/2 categories included.
I've spent maybe 30-50 grand on bike racing over the past few years. Bikes, bike parts, lots of gas, lots of entry fees, double the calories of a sedentary person,
I've spent well over 100 grand in time at my current pay rate. Maybe 200.
I've won 3 crits (cat 4, cat 4, cat 2/3), a circuit race (cat 3/4), a road race (cat 3), and a couple track nights (cat 4).
That amounts to me paying $30,000 for each win. Why oh why would anyone except the very top guys who win all the time care about a few hundred bucks payout? I got 3rd one time after a 60 mile break was caught by 5 guys. They gave me an envelope with $10 in it. If they gave me $500 it wouldn't outweigh being caught 10 minutes from the line, and that was cat 4.
I can't understand why they pay anyone, 1/2 categories included.
I've spent maybe 30-50 grand on bike racing over the past few years. Bikes, bike parts, lots of gas, lots of entry fees, double the calories of a sedentary person,
I've spent well over 100 grand in time at my current pay rate. Maybe 200.
I've won 3 crits (cat 4, cat 4, cat 2/3), a circuit race (cat 3/4), a road race (cat 3), and a couple track nights (cat 4).
That amounts to me paying $30,000 for each win. Why oh why would anyone except the very top guys who win all the time care about a few hundred bucks payout? I got 3rd one time after a 60 mile break was caught by 5 guys. They gave me an envelope with $10 in it. If they gave me $500 it wouldn't outweigh being caught 10 minutes from the line, and that was cat 4.
It is is truly ridiculous when looked at and actually thought about.
I always made it a personal rule to make the lowest pay out at least was more than the entry price. Even then payouts were always my largest expense for a race (second to cops).
It is comon for a run of the mill crit to have $3k in payouts and only be paying $20-$30 for 3rd and only paying the top 3. For a race with overall expenditures and inputs being in the $7k total range... it’s not sustainable. This is with $30-$40 reg feels too.
Top thia off with trying to gwt someone new interrested in trying a race. “Yup that’s $25 to race for 25 minutes as a cat 5. Oh and you need a $15 1-day license as well. So $50 please and don’t come crying to me when you get pulled on the 3rd lap because you had no idea how fast it was and weren’t even remotely prepared. Thanks for the $50, get off my course and don’t let the door hit you in the ass.” - this just is ridiculous. Something has to change and the payouts is the thing that makes the most sense.
That said something like 58% of our licenses racers in Illinois are male and masters racers. I’ve watched CEO’s of $100M+ companies argue with each other after a race about their payout splits within the team. Ego. Self absorption. That is this sport to a T.
To the few who who are young and actually trying to make a go of it: I apologize. I wish we could figure this stuff out.
#40
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,568 Times
in
973 Posts
This isn't a participation sport. The point of a bike race is to win.
I can't understand why they pay anyone, 1/2 categories included.
I've spent maybe 30-50 grand on bike racing over the past few years. Bikes, bike parts, lots of gas, lots of entry fees, double the calories of a sedentary person,
I've spent well over 100 grand in time at my current pay rate. Maybe 200.
I've won 3 crits (cat 4, cat 4, cat 2/3), a circuit race (cat 3/4), a road race (cat 3), and a couple track nights (cat 4).
That amounts to me paying $30,000 for each win. Why oh why would anyone except the very top guys who win all the time care about a few hundred bucks payout? I got 3rd one time after a 60 mile break was caught by 5 guys. They gave me an envelope with $10 in it. If they gave me $500 it wouldn't outweigh being caught 10 minutes from the line, and that was cat 4.
I can't understand why they pay anyone, 1/2 categories included.
I've spent maybe 30-50 grand on bike racing over the past few years. Bikes, bike parts, lots of gas, lots of entry fees, double the calories of a sedentary person,
I've spent well over 100 grand in time at my current pay rate. Maybe 200.
I've won 3 crits (cat 4, cat 4, cat 2/3), a circuit race (cat 3/4), a road race (cat 3), and a couple track nights (cat 4).
That amounts to me paying $30,000 for each win. Why oh why would anyone except the very top guys who win all the time care about a few hundred bucks payout? I got 3rd one time after a 60 mile break was caught by 5 guys. They gave me an envelope with $10 in it. If they gave me $500 it wouldn't outweigh being caught 10 minutes from the line, and that was cat 4.
Where do you think we’re advocating participation trophies? Nobody here is.
Also, those figures are outrageous. It’s $3k for an amazing race rig setup with all the kit you need and maybe $1k per year to do most any racing till your heart explodes.
Not sure what’s up with the hyperbole going on here.
Just say what you mean, you think the money is pointless.
I don’t think it is. It’s a fun incentive in lots of amateur sports and clubs. God forbid anyone have some fun.
#41
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
As much as he's overstating, you're understating.
#42
Senior Member
Uhm, that’s the entire point of the prize. Goes to winners, not losers. This isn’t Ironman where everyone gets a medal for finishing.
Where do you think we’re advocating participation trophies? Nobody here is.
Also, those figures are outrageous. It’s $3k for an amazing race rig setup with all the kit you need and maybe $1k per year to do most any racing till your heart explodes.
Not sure what’s up with the hyperbole going on here.
Just say what you mean, you think the money is pointless.
I don’t think it is. It’s a fun incentive in lots of amateur sports and clubs. God forbid anyone have some fun.
Tires, chains, repairs, components, cables, tubes, power meter, wheels: $1000
$45 per race x 60 races: $2700
160 miles per race at 28 mpg x $4 / gallon x 60 races: $1370
Wear and tear, lets say same as gas, $1370
7500 calories x 52 weeks x $4/1000 cal = $1560
kits: $600
Total: $10,600 per year
11 hours per week x 52 weeks at free time being worth $50 /hour = $28,600
6 wins per 5 years -- (10,600 + 28,600)*5/6 = $36,667 per win
#44
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times
in
560 Posts
When I started PSIMET I polled every rider I knew and then every racer I knew. I asked them how much they spent on cycling in the previous year. Everything. Kit, travel, hotels, parts, tires, entry fees, etc.
I found that almost everyone answered between $3k-$30k annually.
I asked because at the time I was keeping really specific personal financial records and I had seen that one year I spent close to $15k and was floored.
People don’t actually realize what they’re spending.
Regardless at the end end of the day - the payouts set up a system that is untenable. Everyone is free to disagree but if those disagreeing are only approaching the issue as a payout winner and never as a promoter or organizer or volunteer then you’ll have to excuse me if I sit in the corner and roll my eyes. We all have valid points of view and experience but I kind of feel like a climate change scientist talking to deniers.
I found that almost everyone answered between $3k-$30k annually.
I asked because at the time I was keeping really specific personal financial records and I had seen that one year I spent close to $15k and was floored.
People don’t actually realize what they’re spending.
Regardless at the end end of the day - the payouts set up a system that is untenable. Everyone is free to disagree but if those disagreeing are only approaching the issue as a payout winner and never as a promoter or organizer or volunteer then you’ll have to excuse me if I sit in the corner and roll my eyes. We all have valid points of view and experience but I kind of feel like a climate change scientist talking to deniers.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
When someone with both X and Y chromosomes can win women's worlds not cheating, then "cheating" is less of an issue to me than fairness (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/not-f...075054632.html ). We have TUEs, junior gears covered in pages of posts elsewhere (and locked threads) that deal with fairness. As cheating and not fairness was in the OP....
IMO: Most cheating in amateurs (this thread topic) comes in the restricted classes - women and masters. I am aware of several, and only in those groups.
There is little cheating in the open elite amateurs. And very little, on those thinking of moving to pro, although some juniors in Europe have been busted (parents fault).
The reason is not being a pro is a choice for many peak age males, and not being pro almost by definition put them out of the top 20%, and if they chose not to be pro, there is little reason to cheat. While masters and women in the top % of their class, while not pros, have that similar focus to pros. My guess on the physiology of it, is they are trying to be the best in their restricted class. Peak age males who are not pros are doing it for fun, and before cheating, they would choose to just go pro. Then they might cheat, but that is off topic for this thread.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
Is “young guy” racing more significant? Does it matter more? Young amateur men is the most “important” demographic in bike racing? Or perhaps young men & women are the ones whose fields are important? I mean, here in the States we’re talking about amateur racers with essentially zero hope of turning pro, right? I’m just curious as to how you define in your mind whose races matter.
#askingforafriend
I think this concept of zero hope of being pro does not really fit this group. Young guys (male Cat 1 juniors, now not juniors) in that group, "chance" of being pro is more a choice than hope.
#47
out walking the earth
and even those people aren't really pro, or likely to be
when you look at the landscape of NY cycling over the past few decades who went to the world stage pro level
Mike McCarthy
Hincapie
Evie Stevens
there's a guy who lives in 'upstate ny' named Norton I think who rode for a domestic pro team.
Marc Gullickson was a hardcore cross rider, but basically got spanked when it came to world stage stuff
There are a host of masters in NYC who raced on pro teams in the 90s, but none of them really made anything of it in Europe. A few got caught for doping. Merlito Heredita won that late season PA Pro/1 UCI race (it's now the doylestown crit, instead of being a huge RR) which was a big deal until he got popped in the after race drug test for EPO. He's married to a racer that Psimet knows. Still hangs the winning poster in his shop, and most of NYC acts like the cheating never happened.
There was guy in the NY area who ended up on Chipotle because he knew the sponsor, and the contingency for the money was that he got put on the team. But he didn't start a single race with them. The following season he got on the champ-systems team which was basically created so a bunch of rider and older guys could live the dream of having a pro team. But they were a domestic crit squad (they might have gotten to race Philly) and while they might have had the budget one year to pay the guy who the series, but I forget. I knew the 'owners' and it basically broke up their friendship, cost a ton of money, and they had to deal with major prima donna issues once they started trying to recruit riders who could actually get anything done in those races. And again, those riders were racing domestic crits because they couldn't make it elsewhere. When you look at the number of guys who are racing the domestic crit circuit vs choosing another form of racing they could make it at, the number is very few.
Last edited by gsteinb; 10-18-18 at 04:57 AM.
#48
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times
in
560 Posts
Ooooo. Now I want to know. Guessing I might know but want to know. If it’s who I think she always says he’s a boyfriend. Never met him though.
Love race gossip that isnt tired out Chicago gossip.
Hopefully you guys read our buddy Event Services latest book. Just another tale about a bunch of people trying to make it happen. He came by the shop and was on the podcast. It was fun but we spent a lot of time reflecting on how desperate it all seems.
I have ave a coffee shop customer/regular who now refers to me as “mr negativity”. 🙄
Love race gossip that isnt tired out Chicago gossip.
Hopefully you guys read our buddy Event Services latest book. Just another tale about a bunch of people trying to make it happen. He came by the shop and was on the podcast. It was fun but we spent a lot of time reflecting on how desperate it all seems.
I have ave a coffee shop customer/regular who now refers to me as “mr negativity”. 🙄
#49
out walking the earth
ooooo. Now i want to know. Guessing i might know but want to know. If it’s who i think she always says he’s a boyfriend. Never met him though.
Love race gossip that isnt tired out chicago gossip.
Hopefully you guys read our buddy event services latest book. Just another tale about a bunch of people trying to make it happen. He came by the shop and was on the podcast. It was fun but we spent a lot of time reflecting on how desperate it all seems.
I have ave a coffee shop customer/regular who now refers to me as “mr negativity”. 🙄
Love race gossip that isnt tired out chicago gossip.
Hopefully you guys read our buddy event services latest book. Just another tale about a bunch of people trying to make it happen. He came by the shop and was on the podcast. It was fun but we spent a lot of time reflecting on how desperate it all seems.
I have ave a coffee shop customer/regular who now refers to me as “mr negativity”. 🙄
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,551
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4194 Post(s)
Liked 2,911 Times
in
1,780 Posts
They did test at Masters Nationals. They had monitors following racers after almost every event, and I know several people who had to pee in a cup.
Sometimes, I wonder why bother with the Masters. Sure, they're the worst offenders, but does it really matter. It's masters racing.
Sometimes, I wonder why bother with the Masters. Sure, they're the worst offenders, but does it really matter. It's masters racing.