Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

When gravel becomes 29er territory

Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

When gravel becomes 29er territory

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-19, 10:24 PM
  #1  
Hondo Gravel
Life Feeds On Life
Thread Starter
 
Hondo Gravel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Hondo,Texas
Posts: 2,143

Bikes: Too many Motobecanes

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4409 Post(s)
Liked 4,521 Times in 3,023 Posts
When gravel becomes 29er territory

I love gravel grinding that is my favorite cycling discipline but some roads become 29er MTB with front suspension roads. Big Bend NP jeep roads are definitely MTB I’m not saying that can’t be done on a gravel grinder but IMO a MTB would be a far better option. There is a point when the road gets too rough for the gravel bike and the ride is miserable but smooth when opting for a front suspension MTB. Or just maybe I’m getting to old and can’t take it Any of you gravel grinders ever find a similar scenario?
Hondo Gravel is offline  
Old 03-05-19, 08:00 AM
  #2  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,474 Times in 4,181 Posts
Originally Posted by Hondo Gravel
Any of you gravel grinders ever find a similar scenario?
no.

Our gravel roads are just that- gravel roads. There are Level B roads here too, which are considered by the counties as minimum maintenance roads. They are typically just a bulldozed out 2 vehicle wide path so the ground is often times hardpack and subject to rains as to whether its smooth, bumpy, washed out, etc.
But none of that requires a front suspension MTB. A front suspension MTB could certainly be used, but its hardly required. A quality 40mm tire(or there about) has comfortably handled all gravel Ive come across in Iowa and 4 of the surrounding states.

I see more fatbikes on gravel around here than MTBs with front suspension.


We dont have the extreme roads that exist in TX, CO, WY, AZ, etc etc.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 03-05-19, 08:20 AM
  #3  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,546

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5223 Post(s)
Liked 3,579 Times in 2,341 Posts
past cpl years been exploring trails like this. started w 45mm gravel tires but then got a cheap "29er" w cheap spring front fork. gotta say, the suspension shows use & the extra width in the tires is a real pleasure. used to go 4wheeling on the powerlines on the cape w my Chevy Citation but it was waaaay better in my 4Runner












Last edited by rumrunn6; 03-06-19 at 02:31 PM.
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 03-05-19, 08:21 AM
  #4  
Bryan C. 
nothing to see here
 
Bryan C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Antioch, CA
Posts: 564
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 218 Post(s)
Liked 145 Times in 78 Posts
Only occasionally and almost always while descending a rough road. I've had a couple occasions where the ride up was just fine but coming down required heavy braking to keep myself at a manageable speed for the washboard, potholes, and rocks along the way.

Titus Canyon in Death Valley was probably the worst. A slow descent of over 1 hour on a rigid gravel bike. Between the hand cramps from braking hard and the numbing sensation of the constant jarring from the road it wasnt much fun at all. I could have easily cut that time in half on my FS MTB. But the climbing efficiency of the rigid frame bike on the way up was very much appreciated.
Bryan C. is offline  
Old 03-05-19, 09:26 AM
  #5  
trailangel
Senior Member
 
trailangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 4,848

Bikes: Schwinn Varsity

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1931 Post(s)
Liked 742 Times in 422 Posts
In So Ca we don't really have gravel roads....... just rocky, sandy fire roads. Go to is a MTB. I've seen some riders on gravel bikes with 650b wheels and drop bars, but it's not for me.
trailangel is offline  
Old 03-05-19, 09:44 AM
  #6  
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,386
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,687 Times in 2,510 Posts
We have some roads that the Pennsylvania DNCR says are only suitable for 4wd. Descending on those can be a little much on a full rigid bike. Football size gravel is one thing if you are going slow and it's not too close together, but downhill is a bit tougher. There is one 10 mile stretch fairly close to here where it is pretty bad and the further along you get, the more obvious that there is very little through traffic. People drive out far enough to get to where they want to hunt deer and stop, then turn around when they are done. I find it's really hard to take a representative picture of those roads.

My current design for a gravel/adventure bike looks a lot like a full rigid 29'er. Not sure how I feel about that really.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 03-05-19, 10:31 AM
  #7  
Spoonrobot 
Senior Member
 
Spoonrobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,063
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1216 Post(s)
Liked 183 Times in 116 Posts
I converted my drop-bar hardtail specifically for the north georgia mountain gravel/dirt roads. I found the ~20 minute descents more taxing than enjoyable on a regular 40mm tire gravel bike. There's generally large embedded rock, washboarding and enough loose gravel and directional changes that the speed difference ends up being significant. On the flatter, smoother gravel in the other parts of the state the bike obviously gives up some speed but it's still acceptably fast for all but aggressive racing. Also a blast on singletrack and works great for the hyrbird races here in the southeast that often have 20 miles of singletrack and 20 miles of gravel.

Spoonrobot is offline  
Old 03-05-19, 01:24 PM
  #8  
Caliper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 990

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 43 Posts
Originally Posted by Hondo Gravel
Any of you gravel grinders ever find a similar scenario?
Without riding on some sort of trail? Rarely. At least locally to me in MI, our paved roads are mostly within city limits or high speed roads with next to no paved shoulder for a bicycle. Most of the acreage of my county seems to be covered by dirt/gravel roads. The roads aren't necessarily smooth, but most of these roads are easily driven by any regular car, except possibly after a deep snowfall when at least snow tires may be needed (plowing is sparse on many dirt roads). There are some seasonal use roads or hunters access around the state rec areas where 4WD or an ATV would be needed, but generally the area is covered by standard residential lots between 1-20+ acres and the roads reflect that.

So for me, while I do enjoy my drop bar 29er and love the look of monster tires on drop bar bikes, I got a Warbird because it's the best bike for the largest amount of roads near me.
Caliper is offline  
Old 03-05-19, 03:52 PM
  #9  
rosefarts
With a mighty wind
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,583
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1086 Post(s)
Liked 858 Times in 487 Posts
Colorado here.

I think I'm in the ignorance is bliss category. The last full suspension bike I had was a Pro-Flex 855 in high school. The last bike I had with any suspension was a GT Xziang I had when I was about 20. It's been road ever since.

So last year when I got a gravel bike, I never considered it lacking in the suspension category. I thought the 38's were plush compared to my 23's.

I've taken it riding all over the trails at Pueblo Reservoir and the only sections I can't do on it are the same I can't do on a rigid 29er.

It's much faster most of the time. I will admit to not catching air on it.

​​​
rosefarts is offline  
Old 03-05-19, 04:28 PM
  #10  
tangerineowl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oz
Posts: 936

Bikes: Curve Grovel v2 ti

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 257 Post(s)
Liked 90 Times in 74 Posts
Had some 650b ThunderBurts on last weekend. I tend to ride quite a bit on paved roads until I get to the gravel/rough stuff, and back again.
Found some fairly smooth hiking trails in the hills, but also went down a couple of long quite rocky (fist sized and larger) sections in a valley.
I just rode down those slowly/braking, picking my way through the worst of the rocks. Don't mind doing that as I enjoy working on my lines/balance/clipless.
Same with going uphill. I kind of enjoy 'rockcrawling' up a steep gradient.
I'm in no hurry.
tangerineowl is offline  
Old 03-05-19, 07:58 PM
  #11  
Clem von Jones
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 660
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Liked 23 Times in 16 Posts
If your riding position is fairly upright, and your handlebars are high at about the same level as your saddle, then I agree a lot of bumpy feedback comes from the front wheel and is transmitted into your hands, arms, neck, shoulders, and back.. In that situation I'm sure a suspension fork is helpful in achieving greater comfort, but I've also found that if you keep the front end of the bicycle as low as possible by using a rigid fork with low fork crown height, and by using a frame with a short head tube, and by keeping the handlebars as low as possible, and by using 2.1" tires instead of say 40mm tires, that combination also reduces LOTS of riding fatigue. In this latter scenario your arms are kept on the bars with a light touch and they serve well for a front suspension. A low front end also helps with steep extended climbs, keeps more weight on the front tire which improves bike handling and prevents that zig-zag motion when climbing hills. This kind of setup where you keep the bars as low as possible also requires a shorter top tube, and shorter reach, so you generally size down one frame size or two. If you have a "too-small" bicycle it might be worth experimenting with a setup like this. I did and it has revolutionized my personal bike fit theory.

Last edited by Clem von Jones; 03-05-19 at 08:10 PM.
Clem von Jones is offline  
Old 03-05-19, 08:36 PM
  #12  
Spoonrobot 
Senior Member
 
Spoonrobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,063
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1216 Post(s)
Liked 183 Times in 116 Posts
Originally Posted by Clem von Jones
If your riding position is fairly upright, and your handlebars are high at about the same level as your saddle, then I agree a lot of bumpy feedback comes from the front wheel and is transmitted into your hands, arms, neck, shoulders, and back.. In that situation I'm sure a suspension fork is helpful in achieving greater comfort, but I've also found that if you keep the front end of the bicycle as low as possible by using a rigid fork with low fork crown height, and by using a frame with a short head tube, and by keeping the handlebars as low as possible, and by using 2.1" tires instead of say 40mm tires, that combination also reduces LOTS of riding fatigue. In this latter scenario your arms are kept on the bars with a light touch and they serve well for a front suspension. A low front end also helps with steep extended climbs, keeps more weight on the front tire which improves bike handling and prevents that zig-zag motion when climbing hills. This kind of setup where you keep the bars as low as possible also requires a shorter top tube, and shorter reach, so you generally size down one frame size or two. If you have a "too-small" bicycle it might be worth experimenting with a setup like this. I did and it has revolutionized my personal bike fit theory.
This post is a head-spinner. Pretty much everything you posted is wrong.
Spoonrobot is offline  
Old 03-05-19, 09:54 PM
  #13  
Happy Feet
Senior Member
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times in 707 Posts
Yeah.. I would think if those things improved handling or reduced fatigue they would be used in mountain bike design (opposite direction) and, in the end, every improvement for uphill riding discussed comes at a cost for downhill control. What that positioning does though is improve speed, and the balance between gravel speed and comfort is the divide being discussed.

I see it as a spectrum between full suspension and basically a road geometry bike with gravel tires. Seems like there are three ways to meet in the middle:

  • Tire size/volume
  • Hardtail with front suspension and/or sprung saddle
  • Stem and/or seat post suspension
I've been talking about this idea in the touring section for an off road bikepacking build and thinking about the pros and cons of front suspension. Having never used one before I just put a cheap low travel Suntour fork on my rigid mtb and can tell the difference when riding over rough ground. It smoothes out the harsh ride. At the same time it weighs a ton and I can feel a reduction in speed over the rigid fork. My thoughts have been to look for a low travel light xc fork but then I also started thinking about using a suspension stem instead (have also never used one before). A decent Redshift suspension stem would probably run less than a decent fork and could be used on an otherwise road geometry gravel bike to reduce vibration fatigue. Combined with a dropper seat post and sprung saddle there is a lot of room for variation without an undue weight penalty or reduction is fast riding posture.

Anyone using a suspension stem instead of a suspension fork and if so, what is the feedback?

Last edited by Happy Feet; 03-05-19 at 10:13 PM.
Happy Feet is offline  
Old 03-06-19, 07:13 AM
  #14  
Zaskar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 781
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 479 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times in 156 Posts
I agree. There are just roads/trails where a 2.1 on a FS 29 is going be faster - a LOT faster - and more comfortable. I've done rides with buddies on mixed rides - a few on gravel and a few on mtn bikes. As expected, the guys on the mtn bikes suffered on the slow grind to the top... and put minutes on the the gravel bikes on the decent. The big question is: What's the aggregate advantage or disadvantage. And it'll never be quantifiable - too many variables.
Zaskar is offline  
Old 03-11-19, 04:43 PM
  #15  
IronM
Full Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 201

Bikes: Fuji Transonic, Ridley Excalibur, Foundry Overland, Niner EMD

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Liked 24 Times in 16 Posts
They way I look at it, not one bike is perfect for all conditions. I'm happy with 90%. I find my gravel bike is great on mixed surface rides with country gravel & paved sections. In the mountains on forest service roads - lots of guys do ride 29'ers. I make due with my gravel bike - still good more 90%; just so of the rough descents are a problem for me. Some of that is technique - I have a buddy that can fly down this stuff on his gravel bike. I have no idea how he does it - it feels like I'm trying to hang on to a paint-shaker, its' really hard to see as I try not to hit anything too big. But he does destroy more wheels than I do!
IronM is offline  
Old 03-12-19, 09:07 AM
  #16  
chas58
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
Well, I pick tire and bike for the road conditions.

At near race pace, my speeds are
10mph - mountain biking
15mph - gravel grinding
20mph - road
25mph - track.

At 10mph average, drop bars are not going to do me any good - and a mountain bike is a clear choice. I do like to throw some single track in on my gravel rides. I swap out front tire/wheel based on the conditions.
28mm - road only
32mm - smooth gravel
40mm - typical gravel
50mm - some mountain bike like riding (ridged).

54mm Thunder burts are a ball, and make my bike feel like a ridged mountain bike with narrow handle bars. They will take much bigger hit than 40mm gravel tires - handy for rocky and rooty rides where I don't want to be quite so ginger in picking out my path...
chas58 is offline  
Old 03-12-19, 02:03 PM
  #17  
Clem von Jones
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 660
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Liked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Suspension forks and shocks have to be rebuilt every few years. I hate 'em. Use your tires, arms, and legs for suspension the way god intended.
Clem von Jones is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
firebird854
Road Cycling
10
06-26-19 02:56 PM
FlashBazbo
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
32
04-17-19 01:45 PM
Hondo Gravel
Texas
0
01-18-18 12:04 PM
cthenn
Northern California
16
04-09-17 12:05 AM
CanadianBiker32
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
4
10-07-14 01:47 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.