replacing crankset on Trek FX bike
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
replacing crankset on Trek FX bike
Hi Folks,
I have a Trek FX 7.4 bicycle. I think it's about 3 years old. It's a nice bike and has an 8-speed shimano rear cassette. I'd like to upgrade the current triple crankset and bottom bracket for this bike.
When shopping for a new crankset and bottom bracket, do I have to worry about finding an 8-speed compatible crankset or will most Shimano mountain bike cranksets work with my 8-speed cassette and derailleurs?
Thanks!
I have a Trek FX 7.4 bicycle. I think it's about 3 years old. It's a nice bike and has an 8-speed shimano rear cassette. I'd like to upgrade the current triple crankset and bottom bracket for this bike.
When shopping for a new crankset and bottom bracket, do I have to worry about finding an 8-speed compatible crankset or will most Shimano mountain bike cranksets work with my 8-speed cassette and derailleurs?
Thanks!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,100
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4212 Post(s)
Liked 3,883 Times
in
2,318 Posts
Crankset upgrades don't provide much actual change of performance beyond the psychological (ring size not changed).
But- The ring c-c dimension is different between the 8,9,10 speed systems. There is some fudge and overlap as well as tolerance variations. So sometimes the miss match will work to a degree, sometimes not so much so. Andy.
But- The ring c-c dimension is different between the 8,9,10 speed systems. There is some fudge and overlap as well as tolerance variations. So sometimes the miss match will work to a degree, sometimes not so much so. Andy.
#3
Really Old Senior Member
The 7.4 FX's I see are 9 speed??
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Oops - it is a Trek 7.2FX and it has an 8 speed drive train. I think I found some compatible 8 speed triple crank sets. Currently it has a road crankset with a 28/38/48 set of rings. I think I would prefer a more compact mountain bike set (pretty hilly where i ride and i am using it for commuting so i haul my work laptop and other items to/from the office). I think I found some 7/8 speed compatible shimano crank sets online. Thanks!
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
While doable, there's really marginal benefits to your suggestion.
Lightly loaded, hills, not mountains, a 28T small at the front should let you deal with almost anything.
If you're still struggling in your lowest gear, another cassette with a bigger biggest, would give you the same benefit at probably lower cost/effort.
Lightly loaded, hills, not mountains, a 28T small at the front should let you deal with almost anything.
If you're still struggling in your lowest gear, another cassette with a bigger biggest, would give you the same benefit at probably lower cost/effort.
#6
Zip tie Karen
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,004
Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times
in
806 Posts
No, you wouldn't. I'd run your crankset on a touring bike, for loaded touring. But I'd pair it with at least a 32T largest cassette cog, and maybe a Deore-level rear derailleur. What is the 8-speed cassette range? Maybe go to a slightly wider range, depending on your rear derailleur capacity? It's likely that your gearing is fine. How is your conditioning?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Your crank has riveted rings so you can't change the current 28T granny ring for a smaller one and it has a square taper bottom bracket so any more "modern" crank will require a new bottom bracket too.
Your best bet is to find an older square taper Shimano, Suguino or SR 7/8-speed triple crank with a 110 mm/74 mm bolt circle. It will take down to a 24T granny ring. It may require a different length bottom bracket too.
Your best bet is to find an older square taper Shimano, Suguino or SR 7/8-speed triple crank with a 110 mm/74 mm bolt circle. It will take down to a 24T granny ring. It may require a different length bottom bracket too.
#8
Banned
So..whats wrong with whats on there? you would not wear out all 3 chainrings in 3 years..
any how, 110bcd 34 t are common as spares from aftermarket sources, likewise 74bcd, from 24t upward..
any how, 110bcd 34 t are common as spares from aftermarket sources, likewise 74bcd, from 24t upward..
Last edited by fietsbob; 06-22-16 at 07:47 AM.
#9
Senior Member
No, you wouldn't. I'd run your crankset on a touring bike, for loaded touring. But I'd pair it with at least a 32T largest cassette cog, and maybe a Deore-level rear derailleur. What is the 8-speed cassette range? Maybe go to a slightly wider range, depending on your rear derailleur capacity? It's likely that your gearing is fine. How is your conditioning?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
I agree that would be a better choice but all of the current MTB cranks I know of are 9/10-speed format and require an external bearing (Hollowtech II or similar) bottom bracket. They would also be best used with a 9 or 10-speed chain. This is going to be a relatively expensive conversion, particularly if the OP can't install the components himself.
#11
Senior Member
Nothing special but good enough, Shimano, 8 speed compatible and square taper for $41: https://www.universalcycles.com/shop...3&category=380
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: City of Brotherly Love
Posts: 1,562
Bikes: Raleigh Companion, Nashbar Touring, Novara DiVano, Trek FX 7.1, Giant Upland
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
28/38/48 was a common combination when paired with 7-speed freewheels with a small cog of 14 teeth*. With a move towards cassettes with 11 tooth cogs, 22/32/44 made more sense.
* I know 13t cogs were available but 14 was much more common.
* I know 13t cogs were available but 14 was much more common.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Hi folks
I found a shimano crank set with the same compatibility for the square factory bottom bracket. It's an 8 speed MTB set with a 22 tooth chain ring.
I like the small/short gears for hauling stuff around the hills around here (New Hampshire). I am getting back into cycling after a 5 year absence. Trying to ride to work regularly.
Thanks for all of the replies.
I found a shimano crank set with the same compatibility for the square factory bottom bracket. It's an 8 speed MTB set with a 22 tooth chain ring.
I like the small/short gears for hauling stuff around the hills around here (New Hampshire). I am getting back into cycling after a 5 year absence. Trying to ride to work regularly.
Thanks for all of the replies.