Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Need a second set of eyes in this chainline.

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Need a second set of eyes in this chainline.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-19, 01:29 PM
  #1  
deux jambes
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
deux jambes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 1,326
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 535 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 196 Posts
Need a second set of eyes in this chainline.

6 speed ultra, triple crank. Chain is not installed as shown in the pics, but rather resting on third rear cog teeth & middle chainring with the crank pulled taught.

Looks like it should work, but I’m not an experienced judge of such things. Wondering if anyone sees it differently?


deux jambes is offline  
Old 09-02-19, 01:33 PM
  #2  
dddd
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,194

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,296 Times in 866 Posts
The only good way to eyeball chainline is to sight along the surface of one of the sprockets, which can easily translate that location front to rear within 1mm. It helps greatly if the sprockets are clean, and if there is a well-lit background (or use a flashlight).

Very worthwhile checking the chainline imo.
dddd is offline  
Old 09-02-19, 01:43 PM
  #3  
deux jambes
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
deux jambes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 1,326
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 535 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 196 Posts
Originally Posted by dddd
The only good way to eyeball chainline is to sight along the surface of one of the sprockets, which can easily translate that location front to rear within 1mm. It helps greatly if the sprockets are clean, and if there is a well-lit background (or use a flashlight).

Very worthwhile checking the chainline imo.

Sort of like so?

deux jambes is offline  
Likes For deux jambes:
Old 09-02-19, 01:52 PM
  #4  
Salamandrine 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,280

Bikes: 78 Masi Criterium, 68 PX10, 2016 Mercian King of Mercia, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr

Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2317 Post(s)
Liked 597 Times in 430 Posts
Why not measure? Get your middle ring the right distance from the center of the seat tube, and go from there.

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/chainline.html

Is that rear triangle spaced 126 or 120? If the latter, why bother with ultra 6?
Salamandrine is offline  
Likes For Salamandrine:
Old 09-02-19, 01:52 PM
  #5  
Hobbiano 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Baton Rouge La
Posts: 1,214
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 230 Posts
Same as above. I type slow.
I think if you measure from the center line of the middle chainring to the center line of the frame , it should be about 45 mm, for starters. Or 45 mm to half way between the chainrings on a double. The middle of the freewheel should also fall 45 mm from the center line of the frame - a little trickier to measure. Sheldon talks about it here: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/chainline.html
Hobbiano is offline  
Old 09-02-19, 01:59 PM
  #6  
Hobbiano 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Baton Rouge La
Posts: 1,214
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 230 Posts
For what it's worth, on most of my bikes, the little chainring is a lot closer to the chain stay than your's and the small cog on the freewheel is a lot closer to the dropout as well.
Hobbiano is offline  
Old 09-02-19, 02:09 PM
  #7  
dddd
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,194

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,296 Times in 866 Posts
Originally Posted by Hobbiano
For what it's worth, on most of my bikes, the little chainring is a lot closer to the chain stay than your's and the small cog on the freewheel is a lot closer to the dropout as well.
Same here, and this is how I like to see it, so that the chain won't cross so sharply as I use the range of the freewheel with the big chainring.
Also I like to shorten the driveside rear axle extension as much as possible.

The small ring I use as only an occasional bail-out, so it's ok if only the large cogs run smoothly when using the small chainring.

Can't see too much with those photos, I would need to move my head side to side a little to get a good sight line off the side of one of the sprockets.
dddd is offline  
Old 09-02-19, 02:41 PM
  #8  
Moe Zhoost
Half way there
 
Moe Zhoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,957

Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 986 Post(s)
Liked 880 Times in 527 Posts
Originally Posted by Salamandrine
Why not measure? Get your middle ring the right distance from the center of the seat tube, and go from there.

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/chainline.html
Measurements are easy and quickly answer your question.

By my eye on your pic, it looks fine.
Moe Zhoost is offline  
Old 09-02-19, 07:11 PM
  #9  
deux jambes
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
deux jambes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 1,326
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 535 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 196 Posts
Originally Posted by Salamandrine
Why not measure? Get your middle ring the right distance from the center of the seat tube, and go from there.

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/chainline.html

Is that rear triangle spaced 126 or 120? If the latter, why bother with ultra 6?
Thank you. I remember finding that article in the past, but it didn’t cross my mind when I actually needed it. It is quite helpful and I’ve taken the measurements.

Now that you’ve asked about the spacing, and the freewheel, I realize I may have been mistaken about it being an Ultra. It is a New Winner, and I was under the assumption that they were all compact spaced. But if an entry in Velobase is correct then it appears there may be a standard spaced NW 6 as well. I’m unsure how to tell either way.

The rear stays are splayed 120 mm though it accepts this 127 mm rear hub without much wrestling. I’m using the freewheel because it came with the wheel when purchased and happens to have gearing I think will work well for me.
deux jambes is offline  
Old 09-02-19, 07:18 PM
  #10  
deux jambes
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
deux jambes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 1,326
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 535 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 196 Posts
Originally Posted by Hobbiano
Same as above. I type slow.
I think if you measure from the center line of the middle chainring to the center line of the frame , it should be about 45 mm, for starters. Or 45 mm to half way between the chainrings on a double. The middle of the freewheel should also fall 45 mm from the center line of the frame - a little trickier to measure. Sheldon talks about it here: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/chainline.html
Thank you. I’ve taken measurements. The middle ring at center,, is 44.9 mm from the center of the seat tube. Little ring is ~6 mm from the chainstay at its closest while the small cog in back is 9.4 mm from the inside of the dropout.
deux jambes is offline  
Old 09-02-19, 07:27 PM
  #11  
deux jambes
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
deux jambes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 1,326
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 535 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 196 Posts
Originally Posted by dddd
Same here, and this is how I like to see it, so that the chain won't cross so sharply as I use the range of the freewheel with the big chainring.
Also I like to shorten the driveside rear axle extension as much as possible.

The small ring I use as only an occasional bail-out, so it's ok if only the large cogs run smoothly when using the small chainring.

Can't see too much with those photos, I would need to move my head side to side a little to get a good sight line off the side of one of the sprockets.
I don’t foresee using the small ring very often myself. It’s there for a bailout too, so am happy if it only runs smoothly with the large cogs too.

I took measurements per SB’s instructions as linked above. I’ve got a difference of just over 3 mm. Crankset seems right we’re it needs to be with the middle ring 44.9 mm from center of the seat tube. The rear is coming up short however at 41.6 mm

Is 3.3 mm too much? Seems to me like it would be.
deux jambes is offline  
Old 09-02-19, 07:34 PM
  #12  
deux jambes
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
deux jambes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 1,326
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 535 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 196 Posts
Originally Posted by Moe Zhoost
Measurements are easy and quickly answer your question.

By my eye on your pic, it looks fine.
Thank you. This is yet another learning experience!

Measured according ti Sheldon’s instructions I’ve got a front ring distance of 44.9 to center of seat tube. Seems close enough. The rear however is 3.3 mm short of being in line with the front. Middle cog is 41.6 mm. Would you say that’s too much of a difference?
deux jambes is offline  
Old 09-02-19, 07:37 PM
  #13  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1857 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
The point of chainline is that front chainline and rear chainline should match numerically when the frame is aligned correctly. You need to measure to get the distance from the middle of the cassette or cogset to the centerline of the main triangle of the frame. This assumes the rear dropouts are the correct distance apart and are equidistant from the center of the main triangle. Lennard Zinn goes through all of it in "Zinn and the Art of Road Bike Maintenance." I have 5th edition (or fourth?). I can't say it isn't in any of the other editions.

Have you ridden the bike very much? Any problems with chain dragging or shifting?
Road Fan is offline  
Old 09-02-19, 07:47 PM
  #14  
deux jambes
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
deux jambes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 1,326
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 535 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 196 Posts
Originally Posted by Road Fan
The point of chainline is that front chainline and rear chainline should match numerically when the frame is aligned correctly. You need to measure to get the distance from the middle of the cassette or cogset to the centerline of the main triangle of the frame. This assumes the rear dropouts are the correct distance apart and are equidistant from the center of the main triangle. Lennard Zinn goes through all of it in "Zinn and the Art of Road Bike Maintenance." I have 5th edition (or fourth?). I can't say it isn't in any of the other editions.

Have you ridden the bike very much? Any problems with chain dragging or shifting?
Front measures 44.9 mm
Rear is 41.6

I've never ridden the bike. I bought is as a frame and fork. It’s almost built, that is until discovering the 3.3 mm discrepancy in the chainline. Looks like I’ve hit an obstacle.
deux jambes is offline  
Likes For deux jambes:
Old 09-02-19, 07:50 PM
  #15  
clubman 
Phyllo-buster
 
clubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,847

Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic

Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2298 Post(s)
Liked 2,054 Times in 1,254 Posts
Originally Posted by moe zhoost
by my eye on your pic, it looks fine.
+1
clubman is offline  
Old 09-02-19, 08:09 PM
  #16  
Hobbiano 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Baton Rouge La
Posts: 1,214
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 230 Posts
Why not just add a spacer or two to the left side of the axle and remove the same from the right side? Wouldn't that improve the chain line and after re-dishing the wheel result in less dish and a stronger wheel?
Hobbiano is offline  
Old 09-02-19, 08:13 PM
  #17  
Hobbiano 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Baton Rouge La
Posts: 1,214
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 230 Posts
On the other hand, I rarely check this on my bikes and have not had any problems.
Hobbiano is offline  
Old 09-02-19, 08:13 PM
  #18  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1857 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by deux jambes
Front measures 44.9 mm
Rear is 41.6

I've never ridden the bike. I bought is as a frame and fork. It’s almost built, that is until discovering the 3.3 mm discrepancy in the chainline. Looks like I’ve hit an obstacle.

See if you can adjust or move around the axle spacers to move the cassette 3 mm closer to the drive side dropout. That should improve the chainline alignment to pretty darn close to correct. Then dish the rim toward the non-drive side by the same 3 mm. You'll also need to adjust the travel limits on the rear derailleur. You can also just try riding it and see what goes right and what goes wrong. But you don't want the chain to get thrown into the spokes - could break the frame, wheel, and derailleur if nothing goes right.
Road Fan is offline  
Likes For Road Fan:
Old 09-02-19, 08:22 PM
  #19  
Salamandrine 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,280

Bikes: 78 Masi Criterium, 68 PX10, 2016 Mercian King of Mercia, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr

Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2317 Post(s)
Liked 597 Times in 430 Posts
Originally Posted by deux jambes
Thank you. I remember finding that article in the past, but it didn’t cross my mind when I actually needed it. It is quite helpful and I’ve taken the measurements.

Now that you’ve asked about the spacing, and the freewheel, I realize I may have been mistaken about it being an Ultra. It is a New Winner, and I was under the assumption that they were all compact spaced. But if an entry in Velobase is correct then it appears there may be a standard spaced NW 6 as well. I’m unsure how to tell either way.

The rear stays are splayed 120 mm though it accepts this 127 mm rear hub without much wrestling. I’m using the freewheel because it came with the wheel when purchased and happens to have gearing I think will work well for me.
OK, you're fine for the crank and BB spacing then. You actually do have room to take it in a mm or two if you wanted to bias it towards being correct in the two big rings. Fine as is though.

RE the rear spacing, yeah, you can just cram in a 126 (nominal) hub in there, but you shouldn't. It may be bending the drive side chainstay more than the other side, which exacerbates chainline weirdness. More importantly, the dropouts are being forced out of alignment and this can lead to broken axles. I strongly recommend respacing properly using Sheldon's directions if you want to use 126 mm hubs in there. Follow this up by realigning the dropouts and derailleur hanger. This may sound OCD but it's very important. Stringing works OK for alignment if you don't have a tool, but use fishing line, not rough twine.

My eyeballs are telling me that looks like an ultra 6 freewheel. I'm sure there's measurements out there if you want to verify. Nothing wrong with Ultra 6, but it will make more sense if the hub is converted to 5spd/120 and the wheel is redished. You could fit a 7 speed in there now. IOW, you have room in there for another cog that's kinda being wasted.

Last edited by Salamandrine; 09-02-19 at 08:47 PM.
Salamandrine is offline  
Likes For Salamandrine:
Old 09-03-19, 09:52 AM
  #20  
deux jambes
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
deux jambes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 1,326
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 535 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 196 Posts
Originally Posted by clubman
+1
Thats what I thought too. But after measuring as suggested here, turns out it’s off by just over 3 mm.

I’m glad I posted, as I was really close to putting the rest of the bike together. Maybe it would have functioned fine but I’d rather have it spot on, removing all doubt, and possible risk of dumping the chain or worse.

I’m going to go ahead with respacing, and redishing the rear rear wheel.


Originally Posted by Hobbiano
Why not just add a spacer or two to the left side of the axle and remove the same from the right side? Wouldn't that improve the chain line and after re-dishing the wheel result in less dish and a stronger wheel?
Seems that should work right? Thing is, this hub has one keyed washer on the left, and no spacer. The right has one keyed washer, and a single 13 mm spacer. So working with the right side only seems most practical in this case.
deux jambes is offline  
Old 09-03-19, 09:57 AM
  #21  
deux jambes
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
deux jambes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 1,326
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 535 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 196 Posts
Originally Posted by Road Fan
..,You can also just try riding it and see what goes right and what goes wrong. But you don't want the chain to get thrown into the spokes - could break the frame, wheel, and derailleur if nothing goes right.
Impatience, tempted this route for a moment. Think I’ll take the more initially challenging approach and respace/redish.

Hub has a single 13 mm spacer on the right side, none on the left. If I can’t get to the LBS today, I may try shaving 3 mm from that spacer.
deux jambes is offline  
Old 09-03-19, 10:01 AM
  #22  
deux jambes
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
deux jambes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 1,326
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 535 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 196 Posts
Originally Posted by Salamandrine
OK, you're fine for the crank and BB spacing then. You actually do have room to take it in a mm or two if you wanted to bias it towards being correct in the two big rings. Fine as is though.

RE the rear spacing, yeah, you can just cram in a 126 (nominal) hub in there, but you shouldn't. It may be bending the drive side chainstay more than the other side, which exacerbates chainline weirdness. More importantly, the dropouts are being forced out of alignment and this can lead to broken axles. I strongly recommend respacing properly using Sheldon's directions if you want to use 126 mm hubs in there. Follow this up by realigning the dropouts and derailleur hanger. This may sound OCD but it's very important. Stringing works OK for alignment if you don't have a tool, but use fishing line, not rough twine.

My eyeballs are telling me that looks like an ultra 6 freewheel. I'm sure there's measurements out there if you want to verify. Nothing wrong with Ultra 6, but it will make more sense if the hub is converted to 5spd/120 and the wheel is redished. You could fit a 7 speed in there now. IOW, you have room in there for another cog that's kinda being wasted.

Thanks again for chiming in. Yep, I’m gonna go ahead, and make it right. Resolve for 120 mm. Redish. And align dropouts.
deux jambes is offline  
Old 09-03-19, 01:11 PM
  #23  
Hobbiano 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Baton Rouge La
Posts: 1,214
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 230 Posts
Originally Posted by deux jambes
Impatience, tempted this route for a moment. Think I’ll take the more initially challenging approach and respace/redish.

Hub has a single 13 mm spacer on the right side, none on the left. If I can’t get to the LBS today, I may try shaving 3 mm from that spacer.
Well that sounds like a plan. But if by shaving 3 mm off you mean filing or otherwise modifying your existing spacer, you run the risk of not getting the two faces perfectly parallel, which would have the same effect as slightly misaligned drop outs, as far as stressing the axle or misaligning the bearing surfaces. Better to find another spacer of the thickness you need. Also, if you're going from 126 to 120, or whatever, spacing make sure the drop out clears the small cog and chain. And you may need a shorter axle, or maybe not.
Hobbiano is offline  
Old 09-03-19, 03:17 PM
  #24  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1857 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by deux jambes
Impatience, tempted this route for a moment. Think I’ll take the more initially challenging approach and respace/redish.

Hub has a single 13 mm spacer on the right side, none on the left. If I can’t get to the LBS today, I may try shaving 3 mm from that spacer.
Well, you need to keep the Over Locknut distance the same before you move spacers as after.

Normally, a hub has more than just that buffer part at the ends of an axle. If that's really all there is before you have the faces of the cone, the wheel was not re-assembled professionally at some point in its long history. There is usually a thin locknut at the outer face of each cone (to lock in the bearing setting on each side), some kind of thin buffer washer facing to the dropout (which may be threaded and serve as an additional locknut), and more makers-up-of-dead-space between them ... to make up dead space and to establish the distance from the hub body to the dropout at each side. there should be no loose parts when it's all adjusted and tightened. You should take the opportunity to measure the over locknut distance (OLD). Based on your discription previously, I think it's probably OLD =126 mm or 128 mm. Most frames that are not indexed are less than 130 mm, and very little is left in the wild that is 120, or was 120 and has not been cold-set to 126 mm or 128 mm.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 09-03-19, 04:09 PM
  #25  
Salamandrine 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,280

Bikes: 78 Masi Criterium, 68 PX10, 2016 Mercian King of Mercia, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr

Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2317 Post(s)
Liked 597 Times in 430 Posts
Originally Posted by Hobbiano
Well that sounds like a plan. But if by shaving 3 mm off you mean filing or otherwise modifying your existing spacer, you run the risk of not getting the two faces perfectly parallel, which would have the same effect as slightly misaligned drop outs, as far as stressing the axle or misaligning the bearing surfaces. Better to find another spacer of the thickness you need. Also, if you're going from 126 to 120, or whatever, spacing make sure the drop out clears the small cog and chain. And you may need a shorter axle, or maybe not.
Yeah, all that. Just get a correct spacer from the LBS or online.

Perhaps it would be helpful to go over the procedure for converting 6 speed hubs to 5 speed. This kind of thing used to be done all the time, though usually it was the other way, converting 5 to 6. Most of the shops I worked in had dedicated campy drawers with axles and spacers just for this purpose. Definitely verify the current OLD before doing any of this. Also verify that if there is 6mm less axle that you still have space for that ultra 6 freewheel. Looks like it, but as always, measure twice, cut once. Sometimes three times is good.

Anyhow:

There is no swapping spacers from side to side. ALL changes happen on the drive side.

Leave the NDS cone and locknut alone and on the axle.

Take off the drive side spacer. Swap it out for a smaller 5 speed one. The new spacer should be 6mm smaller, not 3mm smaller. As NOS Campy spacers are probably unobtanium, you'll probably need a 3 and a 4mm.

Cut 6mm off the axle with a hacksaw. File and deburr. Put the locknut back on and adjust the hub. Redish the wheel. Theoretically, the rim will shift over 3mm to the NDS.

Hopefully I've remembered this correctly. I've done it many dozens of times I'm sure, but it's been decades.
Salamandrine is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.