M530 or M520??
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
M530 or M520??
So, going to purchase my first set of clipless pedals for my road bike, and have narrowed it down to the Shimano M530 or 520, was originally going to get the R540 but after some reading decided to go for the MTB pedals as they seem to be a little more user friendly for a clipless noob!
Can anyone recommend which one would be better and if anyone has used both sets, how different did they feel? will be getting these as shoes https://www.decathlon.co.uk/100-moun...d_8386858.html to start with.
Thanks
Can anyone recommend which one would be better and if anyone has used both sets, how different did they feel? will be getting these as shoes https://www.decathlon.co.uk/100-moun...d_8386858.html to start with.
Thanks
#2
dirtroadcycling.ca
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Charlottetown, PE
Posts: 99
Bikes: 2016 Giant Revolt, 1985 Miyata Two Ten, 1987 Steve Bauer Chinook, 2005 Giant Rainier
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a pair of 520's and also other pedals similar to the 530's (but not Shimano). I prefer the 530 style. Like the larger surface area for two reasons: 1) I find them easier to clip into...and it is possible to pedal a bit even if you miss clipping in right away with pulling away from a stop. 2) if I break a cleat, it is still possible to pedal to some degree on the large pedal surface of the 530 style; more difficult to do so on the 520's just because the surface area is so small.
#3
Senior Member
I've got the 520's on two of my road bikes. I like them because they are cheap ($25) and reliable. I have used clipless for many years so the small size platform is fine for me. You will have to decide if the small platform matters to you.
#4
In the wind
I've used m520 and m424 but for a spd pedal on a road bike I find I like the a520 best of all. I have the a530 on one bike and don't really like it much.
The pricing vs the m530 makes no sense to me, however, and I guess if I was buying at list price the m530 looks like a pretty good deal.
The pricing vs the m530 makes no sense to me, however, and I guess if I was buying at list price the m530 looks like a pretty good deal.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 712
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 283 Post(s)
Liked 262 Times
in
164 Posts
520’s will clip in either side, easier to clip in after waiting at a stoplight. 530’s can kind of work with non-cleat shoes for a quick ride. Pick your poison, i have both. If i know I’ll always have cleats on I prefer the 520’s. Either work pretty good.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,550
Bikes: Wilier Izoard XP (Record);Cinelli Xperience (Force);Specialized Allez (Rival);Bianchi Via Nirone 7 (Centaur); Colnago AC-R Disc;Colnago V1r Limited Edition;De Rosa King 3 Limited(Force 22);DeRosa Merak(Red):Pinarello Dogma 65.1 Hydro(Di2)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times
in
145 Posts
I use the 530 for some bikes for when I want to ride with regular shoes. All my other bikes, I use the SPD-A600, I like that it is lighter than the M520 ( I used to have them). The dual side entry of the 520 was not really an issue.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 6,201
Bikes: ...a few.
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2010 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
234 Posts
Weight is not really an issue with my commuter bikes, which both have the M530's. I like it, also,that I can use street shoes...well, sort of use them, at least for short trips.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
I can ride with normal shoes on 520s or 530s for short distances so not an issue for either case, otherwise go a530 if you plan on doing that quite a bit. The m530 effectively has less free float feeling when used with mtb shoes with an aggressive sole as the cage interacts with the lugs to fee more connected. Not necessary or needed on a road bike IME with stiff enough shoes for a road bike.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 184 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times
in
31 Posts
M530 or M520
So, going to purchase my first set of clipless pedals for my road bike, and have narrowed it down to the Shimano M530 or 520, was originally going to get the R540 but after some reading decided to go for the MTB pedals as they seem to be a little more user friendly for a clipless noob!
Can anyone recommend which one would be better and if anyone has used both sets, how different did they feel? will be getting these as shoes https://www.decathlon.co.uk/100-moun...d_8386858.html to start with.
Thanks
Can anyone recommend which one would be better and if anyone has used both sets, how different did they feel? will be getting these as shoes https://www.decathlon.co.uk/100-moun...d_8386858.html to start with.
Thanks
#10
aka Phil Jungels
I've got 530s on one bike, and 324s on another. Personally, I like the 324s better.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,952
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 871 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times
in
436 Posts
I use M530s on my road bike with SH-56 cleats (switched when I couldn't get my right foot used to the rotation... probably could go back to the stock SH-51s now but not worth the bother). I started commuting with that setup before getting my first SPD shoes. Even though they are not ideal with regular shoes, I did multiple 16-mile rides and didn't have my feet slip off. Nashbar has the M530s for $28, which is a pretty good price if you have other stuff you want to buy to get free shipping, or if you wait for a no-minimum free shipping sale.
#12
Member
So, going to purchase my first set of clipless pedals for my road bike, and have narrowed it down to the Shimano M530 or 520, was originally going to get the R540 but after some reading decided to go for the MTB pedals as they seem to be a little more user friendly for a clipless noob!
Can anyone recommend which one would be better and if anyone has used both sets, how different did they feel? will be getting these as shoes https://www.decathlon.co.uk/100-moun...d_8386858.html to start with.
Thanks
Can anyone recommend which one would be better and if anyone has used both sets, how different did they feel? will be getting these as shoes https://www.decathlon.co.uk/100-moun...d_8386858.html to start with.
Thanks
#13
Full Member
Thread Starter
Don't think REI ship to I' but I'm still undecided at the moment as I have now found some shoes which are both SPD and SPD SL compatible, not sure whether to get the M520 and then get the R540 further down the line once I have got use to clipless pedals. Is there any benefit going from the M520 to the R540?
#14
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,182
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 889 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times
in
534 Posts
Don't think REI ship to I' but I'm still undecided at the moment as I have now found some shoes which are both SPD and SPD SL compatible, not sure whether to get the M520 and then get the R540 further down the line once I have got use to clipless pedals. Is there any benefit going from the M520 to the R540?
The 2-bolt SPD pedal lets you use the whole range of MTB and Touring / sport shoes, that you can actually walk in when you're not on the bike. Some of them can even pass for 'regular' shoes. I have a pair of the Pearl Izumi 'Fuel' shoes that look and feel like a pair of chunky, neon colored trainers. On the other end of the spectrum are the MTB/CX race shoes that are pretty much road racing shoes with treads on the bottom.
Finally; I wouldn't pick out the shoes with an eye towards 'upgrading' the pedals; The pedals will last far longer than the shoes. I have a pair of Shimano M-535 pedals that are 20+ years old, and i'm on my 3rd pair of shoes.
#15
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,342
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6200 Post(s)
Liked 4,202 Times
in
2,358 Posts
I've not used the M530 since the smaller M520 has been adequate for my needs and it is lighter.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#16
Full Member
Thread Starter
The main advantage (to 99% of us) of SPD-SL/LOOK pedals is that you can wear light and stiff road/ race style shoes. These shoes also don't have much, if any tread on them, so it's easier to walk on one of the big plastic 'delta' cleats than the little metal SPD cleat, especially on hard surfaces. You don't want to walk in them any farther than absolutely neccesary
The 2-bolt SPD pedal lets you use the whole range of MTB and Touring / sport shoes, that you can actually walk in when you're not on the bike. Some of them can even pass for 'regular' shoes. I have a pair of the Pearl Izumi 'Fuel' shoes that look and feel like a pair of chunky, neon colored trainers. On the other end of the spectrum are the MTB/CX race shoes that are pretty much road racing shoes with treads on the bottom.
Finally; I wouldn't pick out the shoes with an eye towards 'upgrading' the pedals; The pedals will last far longer than the shoes. I have a pair of Shimano M-535 pedals that are 20+ years old, and i'm on my 3rd pair of shoes.
The 2-bolt SPD pedal lets you use the whole range of MTB and Touring / sport shoes, that you can actually walk in when you're not on the bike. Some of them can even pass for 'regular' shoes. I have a pair of the Pearl Izumi 'Fuel' shoes that look and feel like a pair of chunky, neon colored trainers. On the other end of the spectrum are the MTB/CX race shoes that are pretty much road racing shoes with treads on the bottom.
Finally; I wouldn't pick out the shoes with an eye towards 'upgrading' the pedals; The pedals will last far longer than the shoes. I have a pair of Shimano M-535 pedals that are 20+ years old, and i'm on my 3rd pair of shoes.
I tried on some shoes at the weekend, and saw a couple of pairs that I liked, these https://www.decathlon.co.uk/500-road...d_8487283.html and these https://www.decathlon.co.uk/900-carb...d_8390039.html the first pair were the ones that are compatible with SPD and SPD SL, hence the reasoning for edging towards them as I could get the M520 to get use to clipping in and then getting the R540 if I liked it!
I can get first pair of shoes and a set of M520 and R540 for the price of the second pair of shoes and a set of R540 pedals.
#17
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,182
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 889 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times
in
534 Posts
Thanks for info.
I tried on some shoes at the weekend, and saw a couple of pairs that I liked, these https://www.decathlon.co.uk/500-road...d_8487283.html and these https://www.decathlon.co.uk/900-carb...d_8390039.html the first pair were the ones that are compatible with SPD and SPD SL, hence the reasoning for edging towards them as I could get the M520 to get use to clipping in and then getting the R540 if I liked it!
I can get first pair of shoes and a set of M520 and R540 for the price of the second pair of shoes and a set of R540 pedals.
I tried on some shoes at the weekend, and saw a couple of pairs that I liked, these https://www.decathlon.co.uk/500-road...d_8487283.html and these https://www.decathlon.co.uk/900-carb...d_8390039.html the first pair were the ones that are compatible with SPD and SPD SL, hence the reasoning for edging towards them as I could get the M520 to get use to clipping in and then getting the R540 if I liked it!
I can get first pair of shoes and a set of M520 and R540 for the price of the second pair of shoes and a set of R540 pedals.
The learning curve isn't really much different for the two styles, other than the 2-sided aspect of some SPD pedals. If you like the road shoes, go straight to the SPD-SL / LOOK pedals.