question about narrow wide chainring
#1
surly old man
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 3,392
Bikes: IRO Mark V, Karate Monkey half fat, Trek 620 IGH, Cannondale 26/24 MTB, Amp Research B3, and more.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times
in
18 Posts
question about narrow wide chainring
Not sure to ask this here or in the mtb forum.
I am contemplating buying a cheap crankset set up for my fixed gear snow bike. The crank I am thinking of comes with a narrow wide chainring (every other tooth is wide so that the chain does not slap around and jump off a set up without a front derailleur). The chain ring has an even number of teeth and so is meant to pair with even-numbered teeth cogs in back. Otherwise it will get out of cycle and get a wide tooth jammed into the alternate narrow chain gap. I currently have a cog on the rear with an odd number of teeth.
So, here is the question: Will the wide teeth of the chainring fit in both the narrow and wide gaps of a single-speed chain? Will it work? Any downside otherwise?
Thanks,
Jim
I am contemplating buying a cheap crankset set up for my fixed gear snow bike. The crank I am thinking of comes with a narrow wide chainring (every other tooth is wide so that the chain does not slap around and jump off a set up without a front derailleur). The chain ring has an even number of teeth and so is meant to pair with even-numbered teeth cogs in back. Otherwise it will get out of cycle and get a wide tooth jammed into the alternate narrow chain gap. I currently have a cog on the rear with an odd number of teeth.
So, here is the question: Will the wide teeth of the chainring fit in both the narrow and wide gaps of a single-speed chain? Will it work? Any downside otherwise?
Thanks,
Jim
__________________
Cross Check Nexus7, IRO Mark V, Trek 620 Nexus7, Karate Monkey half fat, IRO Model 19 fixed, Amp Research B3, Surly 1x1 half fat fixed, and more...
--------------------------
SB forever
Cross Check Nexus7, IRO Mark V, Trek 620 Nexus7, Karate Monkey half fat, IRO Model 19 fixed, Amp Research B3, Surly 1x1 half fat fixed, and more...
--------------------------
SB forever
#3
surly old man
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 3,392
Bikes: IRO Mark V, Karate Monkey half fat, Trek 620 IGH, Cannondale 26/24 MTB, Amp Research B3, and more.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times
in
18 Posts
That is my hope. But has anyone actually tried it?
Jim
Jim
__________________
Cross Check Nexus7, IRO Mark V, Trek 620 Nexus7, Karate Monkey half fat, IRO Model 19 fixed, Amp Research B3, Surly 1x1 half fat fixed, and more...
--------------------------
SB forever
Cross Check Nexus7, IRO Mark V, Trek 620 Nexus7, Karate Monkey half fat, IRO Model 19 fixed, Amp Research B3, Surly 1x1 half fat fixed, and more...
--------------------------
SB forever
#4
Veteran Racer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,760
Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1337 Post(s)
Liked 765 Times
in
432 Posts
No, haven't tried it, but mathematically it should work. A narrow-wide chainring is designed to work with a 3/32" chain, and the wide teeth will be wider than the narrow teeth by about twice the thickness of the inner chain plates, which is less than the 1/32" difference between a 3/32" chain and a 1/8" chain.
#5
surly old man
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 3,392
Bikes: IRO Mark V, Karate Monkey half fat, Trek 620 IGH, Cannondale 26/24 MTB, Amp Research B3, and more.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times
in
18 Posts
That sounds pretty convincing to me. Thanks. Jim
__________________
Cross Check Nexus7, IRO Mark V, Trek 620 Nexus7, Karate Monkey half fat, IRO Model 19 fixed, Amp Research B3, Surly 1x1 half fat fixed, and more...
--------------------------
SB forever
Cross Check Nexus7, IRO Mark V, Trek 620 Nexus7, Karate Monkey half fat, IRO Model 19 fixed, Amp Research B3, Surly 1x1 half fat fixed, and more...
--------------------------
SB forever
#6
Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 303
Bikes: Raleigh Competition GS, Freschi Supreme, Miyata 1000, Trek 520, Marin Pine Mountain, Specialized RockCombo, Soma Smoothie, Surly Cross-Check
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Liked 267 Times
in
105 Posts
I'm super curious now because I was thinking about purchasing a narrow/wide for my 1x9 commuter setup.
Edit: Found some info on the MTB forum...
"The only way a chain can become out of sync is if the chain is lifted off the chainring and was placed 1 tooth away. It doesn't matter how many teeth are on the cog."
"The only issue I'm aware of with narrow-wide rings is that they don't play nice with half-links."
Last edited by squarenoise; 12-22-21 at 04:55 PM. Reason: more info
Likes For squarenoise:
#8
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,538
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4359 Post(s)
Liked 3,998 Times
in
2,668 Posts
Not to hijack your question but my 1x9 hybrid is a 38x11-32. Not great for hills should have gone with a 34+ but in the end it is not a hill bike it is a round town "beater" bike
#9
surly old man
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 3,392
Bikes: IRO Mark V, Karate Monkey half fat, Trek 620 IGH, Cannondale 26/24 MTB, Amp Research B3, and more.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times
in
18 Posts
Geez. You are right. I am a bit embarrassed to say that I ws repeating something I had read somewhere but had not bothered to pause and think it through. Thanks for pointing it out. Jim
__________________
Cross Check Nexus7, IRO Mark V, Trek 620 Nexus7, Karate Monkey half fat, IRO Model 19 fixed, Amp Research B3, Surly 1x1 half fat fixed, and more...
--------------------------
SB forever
Cross Check Nexus7, IRO Mark V, Trek 620 Nexus7, Karate Monkey half fat, IRO Model 19 fixed, Amp Research B3, Surly 1x1 half fat fixed, and more...
--------------------------
SB forever
#10
Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 303
Bikes: Raleigh Competition GS, Freschi Supreme, Miyata 1000, Trek 520, Marin Pine Mountain, Specialized RockCombo, Soma Smoothie, Surly Cross-Check
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Liked 267 Times
in
105 Posts
It's definitely a brain teaser and I had my doubts as to what the right answer was, haha!
#11
Quidam Bike Super Hero
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Stone Mountain, GA (Metro Atlanta, East)
Posts: 1,135
Bikes: 1995 Trek 800 Sport, aka, "CamelTrek"
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
282 Posts
Thanks Veganbikes and Squarenoise
My current commuter runs 22/32/42 with 11-32 on a Trek 800 Sport. That gets me 18-99 gear inches. A setup of 40 and 11-50 would capture most of that but exceed my derailleur (45 tooth). To please my CFO, I think I will eventually go with 36 up front and expand the cassette to 11-46 when it wears out.
The interim would give me 29-85 gear inches. I'm mostly ok with losing the rarely used 99 g.i. My operational range is mostly 24-84 gear inches with occasional dips to 20. An eventual 36x11-46 would give me 20-85.
Potentially stupid question: Is there a significant difference in effort to pedal 22x21 (27 g.i.) and 32x32 (26 g.i.)?
My current commuter runs 22/32/42 with 11-32 on a Trek 800 Sport. That gets me 18-99 gear inches. A setup of 40 and 11-50 would capture most of that but exceed my derailleur (45 tooth). To please my CFO, I think I will eventually go with 36 up front and expand the cassette to 11-46 when it wears out.
The interim would give me 29-85 gear inches. I'm mostly ok with losing the rarely used 99 g.i. My operational range is mostly 24-84 gear inches with occasional dips to 20. An eventual 36x11-46 would give me 20-85.
Potentially stupid question: Is there a significant difference in effort to pedal 22x21 (27 g.i.) and 32x32 (26 g.i.)?
Last edited by Digger Goreman; 12-25-21 at 04:56 PM.
Likes For Digger Goreman:
#12
Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 303
Bikes: Raleigh Competition GS, Freschi Supreme, Miyata 1000, Trek 520, Marin Pine Mountain, Specialized RockCombo, Soma Smoothie, Surly Cross-Check
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Liked 267 Times
in
105 Posts
Likes For squarenoise:
#13
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
#14
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
another hijack -sorry
I'm wondering if a narrow wide chainring will help for my issue,
I recently brought a cheep aluminium folding bike for a bike/train touring trip, (Dahoon v8)
i was anticipating selling it on my return, but I've actually somewhat fallen for it, but there are two big failures in the design,
1. The break and gear cables routes are ridiculous- I've sorted that,
2. the chain comes of the front chain ring occasionally when on he biggest rear sprocket, not because of chain jump, but because the chain angle is too much.
Will a narrow wide chainring solve this? or does it just solve chain jump on rough terrain?
I've tried changing the spacing on the rear wheel, but then it comes off on the smallest rear sprocket - it seems the change angle range between biggest and smallest spoken is to much for the chain ring.
any thoughts appreciated
I recently brought a cheep aluminium folding bike for a bike/train touring trip, (Dahoon v8)
i was anticipating selling it on my return, but I've actually somewhat fallen for it, but there are two big failures in the design,
1. The break and gear cables routes are ridiculous- I've sorted that,
2. the chain comes of the front chain ring occasionally when on he biggest rear sprocket, not because of chain jump, but because the chain angle is too much.
Will a narrow wide chainring solve this? or does it just solve chain jump on rough terrain?
I've tried changing the spacing on the rear wheel, but then it comes off on the smallest rear sprocket - it seems the change angle range between biggest and smallest spoken is to much for the chain ring.
any thoughts appreciated
#15
Veteran Racer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,760
Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1337 Post(s)
Liked 765 Times
in
432 Posts
I'm wondering if a narrow wide chainring will help for my issue,
I recently brought a cheep aluminium folding bike for a bike/train touring trip, (Dahoon v8)
i was anticipating selling it on my return, but I've actually somewhat fallen for it, but there are two big failures in the design,
1. The break and gear cables routes are ridiculous- I've sorted that,
2. the chain comes of the front chain ring occasionally when on he biggest rear sprocket, not because of chain jump, but because the chain angle is too much.
Will a narrow wide chainring solve this? or does it just solve chain jump on rough terrain?
I've tried changing the spacing on the rear wheel, but then it comes off on the smallest rear sprocket - it seems the change angle range between biggest and smallest spoken is to much for the chain ring.
any thoughts appreciated
I recently brought a cheep aluminium folding bike for a bike/train touring trip, (Dahoon v8)
i was anticipating selling it on my return, but I've actually somewhat fallen for it, but there are two big failures in the design,
1. The break and gear cables routes are ridiculous- I've sorted that,
2. the chain comes of the front chain ring occasionally when on he biggest rear sprocket, not because of chain jump, but because the chain angle is too much.
Will a narrow wide chainring solve this? or does it just solve chain jump on rough terrain?
I've tried changing the spacing on the rear wheel, but then it comes off on the smallest rear sprocket - it seems the change angle range between biggest and smallest spoken is to much for the chain ring.
any thoughts appreciated
#16
Full Member
I'm wondering if a narrow wide chainring will help for my issue,
I recently brought a cheep aluminium folding bike for a bike/train touring trip, (Dahoon v8)
i was anticipating selling it on my return, but I've actually somewhat fallen for it, but there are two big failures in the design,
1. The break and gear cables routes are ridiculous- I've sorted that,
2. the chain comes of the front chain ring occasionally when on he biggest rear sprocket, not because of chain jump, but because the chain angle is too much.
Will a narrow wide chainring solve this? or does it just solve chain jump on rough terrain?
I've tried changing the spacing on the rear wheel, but then it comes off on the smallest rear sprocket - it seems the change angle range between biggest and smallest spoken is to much for the chain ring.
any thoughts appreciated
I recently brought a cheep aluminium folding bike for a bike/train touring trip, (Dahoon v8)
i was anticipating selling it on my return, but I've actually somewhat fallen for it, but there are two big failures in the design,
1. The break and gear cables routes are ridiculous- I've sorted that,
2. the chain comes of the front chain ring occasionally when on he biggest rear sprocket, not because of chain jump, but because the chain angle is too much.
Will a narrow wide chainring solve this? or does it just solve chain jump on rough terrain?
I've tried changing the spacing on the rear wheel, but then it comes off on the smallest rear sprocket - it seems the change angle range between biggest and smallest spoken is to much for the chain ring.
any thoughts appreciated
#17
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
usually a folding bike has a 50+ tooth front sprocket to keep the gearing reasonable with the small wheels. I've been out of the folding bike store for a couple years now but I am not aware of any narrow wide chainrings in that size range. May exist though! I would also recommend a 10+ speed chain to prevent drops, cut as short as you can get away with to take out the chain slack. Clutch derailleur may be a good upgrade if you are running 8+ speed as well.
Likes For BK268:
#18
Sometimes on pedals
Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Also: In single-speed and fixed setups a narrow-wide chainring has no special value if the chainline is already straight (as it should be) and chain tension adjusted (as it should be).
But, what if one already has a narrow-wide chainring in a fixed bike? I guess it works just fine.
It could be good if the chainring and rear sprocket of a single-speed or a fixed gear bike had a hunting gear ratio.
That would be certain if the chainring had a prime number of teeth.