FD chain rub
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
FD chain rub
I converted an early-90s bike from 7-speed to 8-speed with new wheels (going from 126mm to 130mm), new 8-speed cassette, and new Claris brifters (which look sharp now that they've gone to under the bar tape routing). The bike was originally all RX100 except that a long time ago someone swapped in a wide-range 7-speed cassette and an 8-speed STX RC rear derailleur to go along with it. As I expected, rear shifting is working just fine. However, the front derailleur (RX100) will rub the chain in either big chainring/smallest cog or little chainring/largest cog, depending how I adjust it. I have backed out both limit screws as far as they want to go.
I'm not sure if this is happening because the range of angles the chain has to sweep is larger with 8-speed than with 7-speed or because the range of cable pull of the indexed brifters is smaller than it was with the friction downtube (I think it was friction up front and indexed in the back). In hindsight I should have made sure it would work with 8-speed with the downtube shifter still there but oh well.
Anyway, about to start a session of adjusting FD height, angle, etc in the hope that I can get it to work. I have two specific questions:
1. Is there any reason to *expect* this setup not to work up front and
2. Assuming I can't get it to work, should I next try a different FD or should I try going from a 7/8 speed chain to 9-speed or thinner chain.
I'm not sure if this is happening because the range of angles the chain has to sweep is larger with 8-speed than with 7-speed or because the range of cable pull of the indexed brifters is smaller than it was with the friction downtube (I think it was friction up front and indexed in the back). In hindsight I should have made sure it would work with 8-speed with the downtube shifter still there but oh well.
Anyway, about to start a session of adjusting FD height, angle, etc in the hope that I can get it to work. I have two specific questions:
1. Is there any reason to *expect* this setup not to work up front and
2. Assuming I can't get it to work, should I next try a different FD or should I try going from a 7/8 speed chain to 9-speed or thinner chain.
Last edited by coffeecherrypie; 11-15-20 at 10:49 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,052
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4193 Post(s)
Liked 3,837 Times
in
2,295 Posts
1- The system will work as it will. Given the tolerance range some chain rub might or might not remain in some crossing combos. Refresh our memories and tell us if the Claris shifters have trim features. If not then the chance of rub is far greater then if the shifters can trim the cage position.
2- A 9 speed chain will only lessen the amount of possible rub by half the width difference (between it and an 8 speed chain, that's about .2mm at most of clearance gain). If the rub is greater that this width half difference then the 9 speed chain will likely rub some too. Note that as the chain get's narrower the tendency to ride on top of the middle/small ring's teeth when down shifting (and not settle into the teeth's valleys fully) grows.
One aspect to understand is the ring to ring distance is reduced for 9, 10 and more speed cranksets. So frt ders designed for 9 speeds are only intended to have to move enough to match the ring to ring dimension. A 9 speed ft der with a 7/8 speed crank means that the der is likely to not move enough to prevent rub. Andy
2- A 9 speed chain will only lessen the amount of possible rub by half the width difference (between it and an 8 speed chain, that's about .2mm at most of clearance gain). If the rub is greater that this width half difference then the 9 speed chain will likely rub some too. Note that as the chain get's narrower the tendency to ride on top of the middle/small ring's teeth when down shifting (and not settle into the teeth's valleys fully) grows.
One aspect to understand is the ring to ring distance is reduced for 9, 10 and more speed cranksets. So frt ders designed for 9 speeds are only intended to have to move enough to match the ring to ring dimension. A 9 speed ft der with a 7/8 speed crank means that the der is likely to not move enough to prevent rub. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
1- The system will work as it will. Given the tolerance range some chain rub might or might not remain in some crossing combos. Refresh our memories and tell us if the Claris shifters have trim features. If not then the chance of rub is far greater then if the shifters can trim the cage position.
2- A 9 speed chain will only lessen the amount of possible rub by half the width difference (between it and an 8 speed chain, that's about .2mm at most of clearance gain). If the rub is greater that this width half difference then the 9 speed chain will likely rub some too. Note that as the chain get's narrower the tendency to ride on top of the middle/small ring's teeth when down shifting (and not settle into the teeth's valleys fully) grows.
One aspect to understand is the ring to ring distance is reduced for 9, 10 and more speed cranksets. So frt ders designed for 9 speeds are only intended to have to move enough to match the ring to ring dimension. A 9 speed ft der with a 7/8 speed crank means that the der is likely to not move enough to prevent rub. Andy
2- A 9 speed chain will only lessen the amount of possible rub by half the width difference (between it and an 8 speed chain, that's about .2mm at most of clearance gain). If the rub is greater that this width half difference then the 9 speed chain will likely rub some too. Note that as the chain get's narrower the tendency to ride on top of the middle/small ring's teeth when down shifting (and not settle into the teeth's valleys fully) grows.
One aspect to understand is the ring to ring distance is reduced for 9, 10 and more speed cranksets. So frt ders designed for 9 speeds are only intended to have to move enough to match the ring to ring dimension. A 9 speed ft der with a 7/8 speed crank means that the der is likely to not move enough to prevent rub. Andy
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Huh this suggests I do need a new FD: https://www.bikeforums.net/6352110-post5.html
Maybe I'll just run with one downtube shifter for now. At least if that works I know it is a cable pull issue.
Maybe I'll just run with one downtube shifter for now. At least if that works I know it is a cable pull issue.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times
in
723 Posts
Observing where it rubs on the cage is key to diagnosing this. I would first make certain that the FD limit screws are not too tight. The first step is setting up the low limit to make sure that the small front/big rear does not rub, but only a millimeter or so of clearance is needed. If you leave too much clearance you may run out of pull at the other end of its travel. Leave the low limit alone from now on. Then slack off the high limit screw and shift to big front/small rear, it is easier to shift by pulling the exposed cable rather than using the shifter, to get the shifter adjustment out of the picture. If it rubs on the outside of the cage you do not have enough derailleur throw or the indexing is too loose if using the shifter, if it rubs on the inside you need to slacken off the indexing adjustment, it has shifted too far. If you can get satisfactory shifts (or you can over-shift past the big ring) then tighten the high limit until you cannot then back it off until it shifts OK. I cannot say whether your Claris shifter is compatible with your older derailleur. A narrower chain might be helpful, as might a judicious widening (by bending) of the derailleur cage; as I said before it depends on where it is rubbing.
I would make certain that the FD is dead parallel to the chainrings, because any angle will make it rub on one ring or the other, and the height should have little effect.
I would make certain that the FD is dead parallel to the chainrings, because any angle will make it rub on one ring or the other, and the height should have little effect.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times
in
723 Posts
Huh this suggests I do need a new FD: https://www.bikeforums.net/6352110-post5.html
Maybe I'll just run with one downtube shifter for now.
Maybe I'll just run with one downtube shifter for now.
#7
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,945
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6172 Post(s)
Liked 4,787 Times
in
3,305 Posts
When you backed the limit screws all the way, did you ensure that there wasn't any cable tension that may have kept the front DR from going all the way to the low limit or that there was enough pull on the cable to pull it to the high stop?
If you have a mix match of shifter and DR, then someone else will have to say if that is okay.
2x or 3x front? Anything special about the crankset that it might have wider ring spacing than cranks made for that group at that time period?
If you have a mix match of shifter and DR, then someone else will have to say if that is okay.
2x or 3x front? Anything special about the crankset that it might have wider ring spacing than cranks made for that group at that time period?
Last edited by Iride01; 11-15-20 at 11:23 AM.
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Both limits are backed out. Basically I think the derailleur is not sweeping through enough range but it sure seems like it could because I can adjust the cable tension so that it won't rub on the small ring, or won't rub on the big ring, but not both--so it's not a limit issue. (2X setup, seems to be a normal RX100 crankset which I think was 105 with worse finishing). I have been playing with the angle, maybe got it to work a little better. I just realized I have a 9-speed Sora derailleur in a box somewhere so I may try that next, although the box is in storage blech. For the meantime it's now really only rubbing on little ring-biggest cog so rideable, just noisy on steepest ascents. Thx for all help.
Last edited by coffeecherrypie; 11-15-20 at 11:31 AM.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,888
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4788 Post(s)
Liked 3,911 Times
in
2,544 Posts
Try disconnecting the cable and simply observing where the FR sits (inner ring) and push it fully out until it hits the stop (outer ring). Does that do the trick? If yes, it's a cable pull/FD-shifteer mis-match issue. The friction shifter will solve that nicely, If no, the set screws are not fully out, the FD isn't up to he job or it isn't aligned/setup to best match crankset and chain. (Have you checked chainline to make sure the crankset is sitting where it is supposed to be inboard/outboard?)
I'm not up on the standards but I played with a bunch of FDs to set up a triple using a 5-speed standard triple crankset, 9-spped rings and a 9-speed chain, using a Phil BB to bring the cranks in as far as possible. (The old Suginos had far less Q-factor than most modern cranks. A narrow Q-factor allows me to keep running my OEM knees. $$-wise saving me enough to buy FDs to play with by the case.)
Ben
I'm not up on the standards but I played with a bunch of FDs to set up a triple using a 5-speed standard triple crankset, 9-spped rings and a 9-speed chain, using a Phil BB to bring the cranks in as far as possible. (The old Suginos had far less Q-factor than most modern cranks. A narrow Q-factor allows me to keep running my OEM knees. $$-wise saving me enough to buy FDs to play with by the case.)
Ben
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Try disconnecting the cable and simply observing where the FR sits (inner ring) and push it fully out until it hits the stop (outer ring). Does that do the trick? If yes, it's a cable pull/FD-shifteer mis-match issue. The friction shifter will solve that nicely, If no, the set screws are not fully out, the FD isn't up to he job or it isn't aligned/setup to best match crankset and chain. (Have you checked chainline to make sure the crankset is sitting where it is supposed to be inboard/outboard?)
I'm not up on the standards but I played with a bunch of FDs to set up a triple using a 5-speed standard triple crankset, 9-spped rings and a 9-speed chain, using a Phil BB to bring the cranks in as far as possible. (The old Suginos had far less Q-factor than most modern cranks. A narrow Q-factor allows me to keep running my OEM knees. $$-wise saving me enough to buy FDs to play with by the case.)
Ben
I'm not up on the standards but I played with a bunch of FDs to set up a triple using a 5-speed standard triple crankset, 9-spped rings and a 9-speed chain, using a Phil BB to bring the cranks in as far as possible. (The old Suginos had far less Q-factor than most modern cranks. A narrow Q-factor allows me to keep running my OEM knees. $$-wise saving me enough to buy FDs to play with by the case.)
Ben
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,385
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1557 Post(s)
Liked 1,732 Times
in
972 Posts
Which RX100 front derailleur do you have? The FD-A550 was designed for downtube shifting, and the pull ratio is not right for STI brifters. The FD-A551 is the right one to use.
The FD6401 was designed to be used with either downtube shifting or STI shifting. It has two cable clamp positions:
The 'north' position further from the pivot, is meant for DT shifters. The south position closer to the pivot is meant for STI. So clearly the STI uses a different pull ratio than the DT shifters. The FD-A550 doesn't have this dual position clamp. If you are want to experiment, you could file a groove south of the clamp screw and try to duplicate this. But the path of least resistance would be to just buy a FD-A551
The FD6401 was designed to be used with either downtube shifting or STI shifting. It has two cable clamp positions:
The 'north' position further from the pivot, is meant for DT shifters. The south position closer to the pivot is meant for STI. So clearly the STI uses a different pull ratio than the DT shifters. The FD-A550 doesn't have this dual position clamp. If you are want to experiment, you could file a groove south of the clamp screw and try to duplicate this. But the path of least resistance would be to just buy a FD-A551