Bolt has shipped
#26
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,386
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,686 Times
in
2,509 Posts
there is an ongoing discussion about the bolt on the randonneuring gmail group. I think someone said that the elemnt can be charged while navigating, but it could have been about the bolt. The Bolt seems to meet my relatively limited needs better than my 800.
#27
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,428
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3129 Post(s)
Liked 1,697 Times
in
1,026 Posts
Mine landed today, and it is sa-weet! Setup was not only fast and easy, it was fun! First ride tomorrow!
#28
Senior Member
So I got an Elemnt, Bolt not in stock at REI (yet). I thought I'd give this a try.
Doesn't look like the bike computer software writes calories into Apple Healthkit even when it's set up to sync.
Also, is there a way to force a sync to strava in the event that it doesn't connect up?
So far, the sync is not looking like all it's cracked up to be.....
J.
Doesn't look like the bike computer software writes calories into Apple Healthkit even when it's set up to sync.
Also, is there a way to force a sync to strava in the event that it doesn't connect up?
So far, the sync is not looking like all it's cracked up to be.....
J.
#29
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,428
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3129 Post(s)
Liked 1,697 Times
in
1,026 Posts
So I got an Elemnt, Bolt not in stock at REI (yet). I thought I'd give this a try.
Doesn't look like the bike computer software writes calories into Apple Healthkit even when it's set up to sync.
Also, is there a way to force a sync to strava in the event that it doesn't connect up?
So far, the sync is not looking like all it's cracked up to be.....
J.
Doesn't look like the bike computer software writes calories into Apple Healthkit even when it's set up to sync.
Also, is there a way to force a sync to strava in the event that it doesn't connect up?
So far, the sync is not looking like all it's cracked up to be.....
J.
Regarding Strava, did you use the app to authorize it on Elemnt? Did you run the updates? My BOLT had an update right out of the box. I wonder if you got one of the early ELEMNTs; may be worth checking into. I believe there were several updates to ELEMNT to get it to BOLT release condition, so you may have several to do.
#30
Senior Member
Was there an option to sync w/ Apple Health? I didn't see it.
Regarding Strava, did you use the app to authorize it on Elemnt? Did you run the updates? My BOLT had an update right out of the box. I wonder if you got one of the early ELEMNTs; may be worth checking into. I believe there were several updates to ELEMNT to get it to BOLT release condition, so you may have several to do.
Regarding Strava, did you use the app to authorize it on Elemnt? Did you run the updates? My BOLT had an update right out of the box. I wonder if you got one of the early ELEMNTs; may be worth checking into. I believe there were several updates to ELEMNT to get it to BOLT release condition, so you may have several to do.
I think you're right about the firmware revisions. I wound up unpairing the unit from my phone (don't do that - lost the ride data) and went through two firmware revisions. On today's ride it was fine and uploaded properly.
Two gripes:
1. Grade is so-o-o slow to update as to be not useful. Takes 500' or so. Garmin seems to less than 100'. Wahoo needs to tone down the data smoothing.
2. I love the zooming feature *except* on the visual/graphical fields. The Di2 gear indicator looks positively awful if it's jammed into a small field space and it shouldn't be scaled vertically. The Di2 display should cover the whole width at a fixed height no matter what.
Display is awesome. Connectivity presuming it's working right is awesome. Love buttons over touch screens.
J.
#31
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,428
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3129 Post(s)
Liked 1,697 Times
in
1,026 Posts
Yes, it syncs with apple Health app. Problem though - the active calories are almost 2x Strava and Garmin. That's concerning to me. I'll probably let strava keep writing the calories and updating Garmin Connect. I'll let the elemnt write everything else.
I think you're right about the firmware revisions. I wound up unpairing the unit from my phone (don't do that - lost the ride data) and went through two firmware revisions. On today's ride it was fine and uploaded properly.
Two gripes:
1. Grade is so-o-o slow to update as to be not useful. Takes 500' or so. Garmin seems to less than 100'. Wahoo needs to tone down the data smoothing.
2. I love the zooming feature *except* on the visual/graphical fields. The Di2 gear indicator looks positively awful if it's jammed into a small field space and it shouldn't be scaled vertically. The Di2 display should cover the whole width at a fixed height no matter what.
Display is awesome. Connectivity presuming it's working right is awesome. Love buttons over touch screens.
J.
I think you're right about the firmware revisions. I wound up unpairing the unit from my phone (don't do that - lost the ride data) and went through two firmware revisions. On today's ride it was fine and uploaded properly.
Two gripes:
1. Grade is so-o-o slow to update as to be not useful. Takes 500' or so. Garmin seems to less than 100'. Wahoo needs to tone down the data smoothing.
2. I love the zooming feature *except* on the visual/graphical fields. The Di2 gear indicator looks positively awful if it's jammed into a small field space and it shouldn't be scaled vertically. The Di2 display should cover the whole width at a fixed height no matter what.
Display is awesome. Connectivity presuming it's working right is awesome. Love buttons over touch screens.
J.
Glad the updates did the trick for you.
I've not looked at grade and don't have Di2, so no input there.
#32
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 213
Bikes: Emonda SLR, Salsa Warbird carbon
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#33
Senior Member
I wrote them about this today on a support ticket. I gave them this feedback and several other nits I've noted.
FWIW, That's the only real thing I've seen and there is a workaround. If you are on a route, you can see a graphical depiction of the route in terms of elevation and where you are on the route.
I ride in Minnesota where it tends to be hilly but not typically large hills where you grind away for a long while (i.e. like in the mountains). In that case, the Garmin also has a significant lag but it's smaller than the Elemnt. The tradeoff is that the grade from the Garmin seems to be less accurate too. I've had many cases where I know I've been on a 6% or higher grade and the Edge 1000 reports it as a 3 or 4% grade. So while there is a delay there, it's not at all unlikely that the Elemnt is taking time to be more accurate and double checking (averaging) that over a longer distance. So neither is accurate in the moment, but one you feel better about. That's almost certainly the case.
Grade, I think, is sort of like power but power is more honest about the display choices. You can have 3s, 5s, etc... averaging on power. On grade, becasue of the way both GPS and the barometric sensor works, you do have to cover some distance to allow the computer to detect the change in elevation and compute the grade (distance change in elevation over a given distance as a percent). With GPS, you are going to have to do that in some multiples of the minimum accuracy radius. With a barometric sensor, you can take that over less distance but you have to double check it against a known staring point in elevation and you're subject to variances in air pressure - either way you still need to cover some distance.
So I'd not read a tremendous amount into the grade delay in terms of it being a "showstopper." In one case you're likely getting accuracy at the expense of time and in the other you're getting a less accurate (maybe even wildly inaccurate) reading but faster.
J.
FWIW, That's the only real thing I've seen and there is a workaround. If you are on a route, you can see a graphical depiction of the route in terms of elevation and where you are on the route.
I ride in Minnesota where it tends to be hilly but not typically large hills where you grind away for a long while (i.e. like in the mountains). In that case, the Garmin also has a significant lag but it's smaller than the Elemnt. The tradeoff is that the grade from the Garmin seems to be less accurate too. I've had many cases where I know I've been on a 6% or higher grade and the Edge 1000 reports it as a 3 or 4% grade. So while there is a delay there, it's not at all unlikely that the Elemnt is taking time to be more accurate and double checking (averaging) that over a longer distance. So neither is accurate in the moment, but one you feel better about. That's almost certainly the case.
Grade, I think, is sort of like power but power is more honest about the display choices. You can have 3s, 5s, etc... averaging on power. On grade, becasue of the way both GPS and the barometric sensor works, you do have to cover some distance to allow the computer to detect the change in elevation and compute the grade (distance change in elevation over a given distance as a percent). With GPS, you are going to have to do that in some multiples of the minimum accuracy radius. With a barometric sensor, you can take that over less distance but you have to double check it against a known staring point in elevation and you're subject to variances in air pressure - either way you still need to cover some distance.
So I'd not read a tremendous amount into the grade delay in terms of it being a "showstopper." In one case you're likely getting accuracy at the expense of time and in the other you're getting a less accurate (maybe even wildly inaccurate) reading but faster.
J.
#34
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 213
Bikes: Emonda SLR, Salsa Warbird carbon
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Good analysis but if it takes 500' for it to return a grade figure then it will miss or report inaccurate results for climbs shorter than that. Where I ride there are many climbs shorter than 500' where I'd like to know the grade. Garmin may be trading off something to get quicker results but I've found my 800 to be reasonably good at grade reporting.
I wonder why bike computers don't have pitch sensors like most cell phones do, which give instantaneous display of pitch. Waiting to gather rise over run data from GPS and/or speed sensors seems non-optimal.
I wonder why bike computers don't have pitch sensors like most cell phones do, which give instantaneous display of pitch. Waiting to gather rise over run data from GPS and/or speed sensors seems non-optimal.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,866
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times
in
504 Posts
Good analysis but if it takes 500' for it to return a grade figure then it will miss or report inaccurate results for climbs shorter than that. Where I ride there are many climbs shorter than 500' where I'd like to know the grade. Garmin may be trading off something to get quicker results but I've found my 800 to be reasonably good at grade reporting.
I wonder why bike computers don't have pitch sensors like most cell phones do, which give instantaneous display of pitch. Waiting to gather rise over run data from GPS and/or speed sensors seems non-optimal.
I wonder why bike computers don't have pitch sensors like most cell phones do, which give instantaneous display of pitch. Waiting to gather rise over run data from GPS and/or speed sensors seems non-optimal.
If you have time to sit around you could calibrate it to a GPS reading, but with some of these problems it goes out of cal very quickly.
#36
Senior Member
Just for one, pitch sensors need to be zero-ed for a level condition, which means you have to find where the level ground is. Second, if the computer is in your pocket, its pitch is changing as you pedal or change cycling position, so the zero set is changing. If it's on the bar and it gets knocked, the zero set is instantly wrong.
If you have time to sit around you could calibrate it to a GPS reading, but with some of these problems it goes out of cal very quickly.
If you have time to sit around you could calibrate it to a GPS reading, but with some of these problems it goes out of cal very quickly.
I will also say this - looking at grade while riding on the Edge 1000, it is still lagging the actual terrain significantly.
J.
#37
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 213
Bikes: Emonda SLR, Salsa Warbird carbon
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just for one, pitch sensors need to be zero-ed for a level condition, which means you have to find where the level ground is. Second, if the computer is in your pocket, its pitch is changing as you pedal or change cycling position, so the zero set is changing. If it's on the bar and it gets knocked, the zero set is instantly wrong.
If you have time to sit around you could calibrate it to a GPS reading, but with some of these problems it goes out of cal very quickly.
If you have time to sit around you could calibrate it to a GPS reading, but with some of these problems it goes out of cal very quickly.
Last edited by springs; 04-14-17 at 06:45 PM.
#38
Senior Member
Those are pretty much non-issues for me. I mount my computer on the handlebar and the mount rarely changes position. If it does, push a button to re-calibrate on a flat surface (like my garage floor) or a reasonable flat surface elsewhere. I'd much prefer that to knowing what the rise/run over the past 500 feet was. Actually both would be interesting to know, depending on the situation.
J.
#39
Senior Member
#40
Senior Member
#41
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,428
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3129 Post(s)
Liked 1,697 Times
in
1,026 Posts
Do you use any post-ride data analysis sites, like Strava? You can view elevation and grade profiles there, which may satisfy your curiosity. If you're riding the same routes regularly, once you know the grade from post ride data, you know the grade.
#42
Senior Member
I think the real problem here is in divorcing grade measurement from actual terrain, in that merging the two, for mapping or charting purposes, would be a hot mess. Every little dip and wheelie and power surge would send the pitch sensor swinging. Perhaps it could be stabilized or the data smoothed, and perhaps not reconciled against GPS data, but it would still require a new data field and transmission channel to record. It can be done, for sure, but there's the cost/benefit analysis getting in the way, probably; it's just trivia as opposed to a performance metric or training aid.
Do you use any post-ride data analysis sites, like Strava? You can view elevation and grade profiles there, which may satisfy your curiosity. If you're riding the same routes regularly, once you know the grade from post ride data, you know the grade.
Do you use any post-ride data analysis sites, like Strava? You can view elevation and grade profiles there, which may satisfy your curiosity. If you're riding the same routes regularly, once you know the grade from post ride data, you know the grade.
The more I think about it, Grade as a field on your computer just can't be real time with current sensors. You have to go some non trivial distance to get the calculation to work. So it's ok for later reference but it's not going to be real time on the bike. I'm pretty certain that the instanteous Garmin grade is pretty inaccurate but there is the comfort in seeing a number change (albeit at the expense of accuracy). If needing to see the number NOW even if not accurate, then Garmin is the choice.
On a long consistent grade, they both should work well. In that case, I'd have to believe the calculation over the longer distance would be more accurate.
J.
#43
Senior Member
This is starting to irritate me enough that I'm going to take my Edge 1000 out with the Elemnt and see what they say side by side. I really like the Elemnt in almost all ways - the connectivity is orders of magnitude better than Garmin, the UI is way better, the display is better, but this grade thing is starting to really irritate my OCD cyclist tendencies.
J.
J.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Caymandiver1
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
15
01-28-21 12:33 PM
Machoman121
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
4
05-12-18 05:32 PM