Single wall vintage touring rims
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,493
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
393 Posts
Single wall vintage touring rims
I recently purchased 2 different vintage touring miyatas, both with single wall rims. 1988 and 1989, so it seems that the double wall technology was well established by then. I have read that the single wall rims are frowned upon here. I am fairly new to the game except for a 72 Super Sport with the old single wall Weinmanns. I have 3 other C&V bikes with double wall rims that lean more sporty in application, but do seem more fragile.
The Araya and Ukai rims are a bit wider and seem quite sturdy, albeit a bit heavy. Was the single wall just the accepted sturdy standard of the day on touring bikes? I have read that the 40 hole Sansin is well regarded too so I thought about keeping those if I parted out one of the miyatas just in case another vintage tourer in 27” came up that might be a candidate for 700c. Was miyata cutting corners or just being conservative?
The Araya and Ukai rims are a bit wider and seem quite sturdy, albeit a bit heavy. Was the single wall just the accepted sturdy standard of the day on touring bikes? I have read that the 40 hole Sansin is well regarded too so I thought about keeping those if I parted out one of the miyatas just in case another vintage tourer in 27” came up that might be a candidate for 700c. Was miyata cutting corners or just being conservative?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,748
Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 702 Post(s)
Liked 671 Times
in
419 Posts
sd5782 , I wouldn't dismiss the rims based on one aspect of their design. There are other variables that make up a strong wheel. Spokes, tires and how well the wheel is constructed are just as important.
If you're considering using them for light touring, as long as they are built well, they will be okay. Long distance heavy touring would require a stronger rim.
If you're considering using them for light touring, as long as they are built well, they will be okay. Long distance heavy touring would require a stronger rim.
#3
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
Single-wall rims are simpler and cheaper to make. When extruded with thicker walls, they are reasonably strong, too. (See also: Weinmann Concave rims.) Making the metal a bit thicker doesn't seem to add to the cost, so choosing single-wall rims helped keep the cost down for some bikes even after Mavic started to popularize double-wall rims in the 1970s.
Another way to look at it is that a double-wall rim will be heavy if the metal is thick on all sides. So the extruding dies need to be held to a closer tolerance to keep the metal thin but not weak, and more QC is needed to ensure that everything stays in tolerance. That's what pushes up the cost of double-wall rims, especially those that shoot for really light weights.
Another way to look at it is that a double-wall rim will be heavy if the metal is thick on all sides. So the extruding dies need to be held to a closer tolerance to keep the metal thin but not weak, and more QC is needed to ensure that everything stays in tolerance. That's what pushes up the cost of double-wall rims, especially those that shoot for really light weights.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,493
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
393 Posts
Actually, light touring could be in my dreams sometime in the future. Both of these rims are wide and seem fairly thick and strong, especially when compared to some double walled ones on an 83 Trek that I have. That one is quite easy to deform the edges when mounting tires.Perhaps the earliest double walls were narrower and for more sporting applications?
I wouldn’t have thought miyata cut too many pennies on the 1000 level bike. I do like them and will keep them, but was trying to get some perspective on the bad rap. As an aside, I packed up my 72 Super Sport 40 years ago not knowing any different and did a 600 mile solo circle Ohio tour with tent and gear on the old Weinmanns without problems.
I wouldn’t have thought miyata cut too many pennies on the 1000 level bike. I do like them and will keep them, but was trying to get some perspective on the bad rap. As an aside, I packed up my 72 Super Sport 40 years ago not knowing any different and did a 600 mile solo circle Ohio tour with tent and gear on the old Weinmanns without problems.
Likes For sd5782:
#5
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Some single wall rims are pretty good. I have a set of Araya PX-45 rims, concave braking surface (very trendy back then) from my early '90s Univega that withstood riding way too long with floppy untensioned spokes, got warped from a sideways sliding stop on gravel blacktop (didn't crash, fortunately), straightened by the LBS, ran trouble free for another year or so before I was clobbered by a car. And I'll bet those scrapes could be buffed out, the rims straightened and put back into service.
Unlike the single wall rims that came with my mid-2000s Globe Carmel comfort hybrid, those Araya PX-45 rims felt sturdy, good quality. Hefting them you wouldn't know they're single wall.
Unlike the single wall rims that came with my mid-2000s Globe Carmel comfort hybrid, those Araya PX-45 rims felt sturdy, good quality. Hefting them you wouldn't know they're single wall.
Likes For canklecat:
#6
Senior Member
Single wall rims can be as robust as needed for touring if designed correctly. An co-worker of mine did a cross country tour on the Ukai single wall rims that came on the Miyata 1000 and had zero issues. His tour took him into Canada from about Minnesota all the way to the west coast then down into California. I used a set of concave single wall rims for touring through 3 countries without any issues. Double wall is nice and can be light, but a good single wall is just as good with only a slight penalty in weight. Nothing to worry about.
Likes For TiHabanero:
#7
Senior Member
What do you mean when you say single wall? Technically, extruded rims with hollow sections in the corners are not single wall. Box section rims, aside from tubulars, were not historically the typical touring rims. The Super Champion (later Wolber) mod 58 was the defacto standard high end touring rim from the 70s to the 90s. Similar rims were produced by Weinmann, Araya, and others. These are not inferior in any way to the box section rims of the day. True single walls were only seen in the cheapest aluminum rims.
Likes For Salamandrine:
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,493
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
393 Posts
Definition I have seen
What do you mean when you say single wall? Technically, extruded rims with hollow sections in the corners are not single wall. Box section rims, aside from tubulars, were not historically the typical touring rims. The Super Champion (later Wolber) mod 58 was the defacto standard high end touring rim from the 70s to the 90s. Similar rims were produced by Weinmann, Araya, and others. These are not inferior in any way to the box section rims of the day. True single walls were only seen in the cheapest aluminum rims.
As stated, I am fairly new to the game so was trying to figure out if this old tech was really bad, or a bit perfected before the new tech came on. Does anyone have any insight into early box section wider rims? Those Super Champions look like single walls too, except with eyelets. Thanks all for the replies.
#10
Senior Member
As I said, the gold standard in touring rims was the Mod 58. They were/are very sturdy. There really weren't any box section wider rims that I know of until mountain bikes became popular in the 80s.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089
Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times
in
723 Posts
I toured for 6 months on a Weinmann concave rim with no eyelets. It was in the front, but I had a heavy front load and broke two Blackburn lowriders. The wheel never gave me trouble. The rear, a box-section MA3, went through two rims, starting with cracks around the spoke holes before the spoke would pull free from the rim entirely, taking a chunk of rim with it. I find that it's difficult to generalize about these things.
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
#12
Senior Member
I can see how a modern mechanic who has never seen true single wall rims might mistakingly call all non box section rims single wall. True single wall rims are pretty rare these days, but they were very common until the early 90s or so.
See the bottom 3 rims in this picture I pilfered from yellowjersey.com
See the bottom 3 rims in this picture I pilfered from yellowjersey.com
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,493
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
393 Posts
Thanks for the education. All this makes sense, and I have no desire to part with those rims. Probably an interesting time with some newer tech coming in too. I would think some cross application of the early mtn bike stuff to touring was going on by the mid 90s too.
#14
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,641
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2607 Post(s)
Liked 1,694 Times
in
933 Posts
I don't think so either- There's always a balance between weight, strength and price. You have an 89 M1000LT, correct? Where previous versions were often full XT or the closest equivalent, the difference between MT-62 and XT were so minimal- (Deore II was just so good) it just made sense to spec with it- My 90 M1000LT has the black Ukai rims- I've mounted tires a few times, never noticed they were a single layer.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089
Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times
in
723 Posts
Ha, I've totally used kevlar beads with Concave rims!
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
#16
Senior Member
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,890
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4788 Post(s)
Liked 3,914 Times
in
2,545 Posts
I toured for 6 months on a Weinmann concave rim with no eyelets. It was in the front, but I had a heavy front load and broke two Blackburn lowriders. The wheel never gave me trouble. The rear, a box-section MA3, went through two rims, starting with cracks around the spoke holes before the spoke would pull free from the rim entirely, taking a chunk of rim with it. I find that it's difficult to generalize about these things.
A story on Weinmann Concaves and their both strength and stiffness - first summer of my 1979 Peter Mooney. I was living in Santa Cruz, rebuilding my life after my head injury. I'd raced one last season the year before so I had cycling fitness (and a sewup equipped bike). Saturday morning SCCC ride with its town line sprint. If you went long, you started going down small hill. I went. Got clear, briefly. Norm Alvis (if I recall correctly - he was the local hot sprinter) came flying past on my right. A strong rookie was on his wheel. Norm knew all the racing tactics and snapped over to my line as soon as he cleared me to shed the rookie. But the rookie stayed glued to his wheel. Suddenly I had a rear wheel where my front belonged. I steered away to avoid contact, but sooner or later., I've got to bring my bike back under my weight. ( Damned physics.)
So I leaned my front wheel into the rookies' rear and pushed off to get my balance back. There was a loud ripping of metal, then a strong almost un-rideable oscillation of the front of the bike but no crash. I rode the bike to as standstill.
I'd ripped out 8 consecutive spokes on the right and one on the left. Tire was hitting the fork solidly every revolution (and took the brand new Imron paint to bare, shiny steel). Got a ride home from the cyclist on my wheel (an ex-racer who was VERY thankful I kept it up and didn't take him down), replaced the spokes and the wheel was as good as new. I cannot think of another rim I would have rather had on there. (Well a much heavier rim would have not only survived, but kept me from that front of the sprint so I would not have been there.) Oh, and I opened the rookie's quick release. That was what was ripping out spokes as I was pushing off his wheel.
Given where I was in my life, 19 months after a major TBI, 4 months into a new job in a new city and that this happened at about 30 mph, that wheel not holding up might have been completely life changing.
Ben
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,493
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
393 Posts
correct on 1989
I don't think so either- There's always a balance between weight, strength and price. You have an 89 M1000LT, correct? Where previous versions were often full XT or the closest equivalent, the difference between MT-62 and XT were so minimal- (Deore II was just so good) it just made sense to spec with it- My 90 M1000LT has the black Ukai rims- I've mounted tires a few times, never noticed they were a single layer.
I have been going through this bike getting it ready to go, and the tires had to go first, so that led to the rim questions. Another surprise besides the 25c tires on a touring bike with wide rims, was a tire liner for flat protection inside the front tire. Tires were some high pressure folders that were pumped to at least the 100lbs on the sidewall with this flat guard that was sandwiched in. Ride was interesting to say the least.
found this between tube and tire. quite thick and around whole circumference
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089
Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times
in
723 Posts
79pmooney Wow, that is a hell of a story!!
I crashed on a very slippery mud-coated fietspad in the Netherlands with a full touring load with my front Concave wheel. I got into a sort of oversteer-understeer situation at about 10mph, fishtailing increasing to the point where my last front tire-track was completely sideways, wiping the mud clean off the asphalt for five feet, before I flipped off the high-side of the bike and went down on the panniers, tearing one open. And covering myself with mud. The fork was a little bent. The wheel was, of course, fine.
I crashed on a very slippery mud-coated fietspad in the Netherlands with a full touring load with my front Concave wheel. I got into a sort of oversteer-understeer situation at about 10mph, fishtailing increasing to the point where my last front tire-track was completely sideways, wiping the mud clean off the asphalt for five feet, before I flipped off the high-side of the bike and went down on the panniers, tearing one open. And covering myself with mud. The fork was a little bent. The wheel was, of course, fine.
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,890
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4788 Post(s)
Liked 3,914 Times
in
2,545 Posts
79pmooney Wow, that is a hell of a story!!
I crashed on a very slippery mud-coated fietspad in the Netherlands with a full touring load with my front Concave wheel. I got into a sort of oversteer-understeer situation at about 10mph, fishtailing increasing to the point where my last front tire-track was completely sideways, wiping the mud clean off the asphalt for five feet, before I flipped off the high-side of the bike and went down on the panniers, tearing one open. And covering myself with mud. The fork was a little bent. The wheel was, of course, fine.
I crashed on a very slippery mud-coated fietspad in the Netherlands with a full touring load with my front Concave wheel. I got into a sort of oversteer-understeer situation at about 10mph, fishtailing increasing to the point where my last front tire-track was completely sideways, wiping the mud clean off the asphalt for five feet, before I flipped off the high-side of the bike and went down on the panniers, tearing one open. And covering myself with mud. The fork was a little bent. The wheel was, of course, fine.
Likes For 79pmooney:
#21
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
I can see how a modern mechanic who has never seen true single wall rims might mistakingly call all non box section rims single wall. True single wall rims are pretty rare these days, but they were very common until the early 90s or so.
See the bottom 3 rims in this picture I pilfered from yellowjersey.com
See the bottom 3 rims in this picture I pilfered from yellowjersey.com
If we want to be correct in our usage, we should also stop calling wired-on tires "clinchers" since true clinchers are also extinct AFAIK.
#22
Senior Member
So what is the correct term for these rims with hollow extrusions only at the shoulders, that are typically pinned? It's gotta be snappy, because right or wrong, millions of bike people and lots of component manufacturers and retailers are going to keep calling them "single-wall" if there isn't a convenient alternative...
Twin tube? BITD I don't remember anybody calling them by anything but their names: Weinmann Concave, Mod 58, etc. Touring rim maybe. Double box maybe. For that matter box section rims would if anything called double wall. The term "single wall" was used to describe the kind with no hollow sections at all. You basically did not want those except on a very budget bike. The twin tube type rims are far superior and they should not be lumped together. .
If we want to be correct in our usage, we should also stop calling wired-on tires "clinchers" since true clinchers are also extinct AFAIK.
Yep. Probably too late for that though.
I was going to say it's only a matter of time before true clinchers are revived in slightly different form. Then I remembered it already happened.
https://www.tufo.com/en/tubular-clincher/
Last edited by Salamandrine; 05-24-20 at 06:04 PM.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,512
Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 789 Post(s)
Liked 1,739 Times
in
630 Posts
It would be help if you tell us the brand and model rims you have the width and size. Nicer single walled Araya rims were pretty much standard on most Japanese Touring and MTB's from the 80's and have been road thousands of rough miles no issues when when you keep them trued and the hubs well adjusted. Some of the nicer ones like the slightly wider dimpled Araya are actually some what sought after. Myself if there original and in good shape I would just rebuild them with new bearings and some spokes new nipples if need and ride. Also a great way to add some robustness strength to these type rims is to buy some nicer wire bead modern touring or cross tires you can get some Continentalls pr Paseelis from Walmart delivered in a couple of days for about $50.
#25
Senior Member
No, the Tufo sort of revives the idea, but it isn't the same. A true clincher was an early form of 'single tube' tire that was clinched onto the rim without glue, but otherwise it was sort of like a modern tubular tire. Pulling off the tire did not give you access to the inner tube as in a modern wired on tire.
Clinchers is a lot easier to say than wired on tire.
https://www.bikeforums.net/20376062-post210.html
Clinchers is a lot easier to say than wired on tire.
https://www.bikeforums.net/20376062-post210.html
Last edited by Salamandrine; 05-24-20 at 07:03 PM.
Likes For Salamandrine: