Amazingly clever shift-once two-speed fixie drivetrain arrangement from the 80s
#1
Senile Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 506
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Amazingly clever shift-once two-speed fixie drivetrain arrangement from the 80s
I just came across this page that deals with the bizarre idea of running two chains on a bike, when I read the following nugget at the end of the page:
However it got me thinking about another bike I'd seen with a similar set-up but this one made a lot of sense. In 1982 Canadian rider Jocelyn Lovell rode the kilometre time trial at the World Championships in Leicester, England using a bike with two transmissions. His arrangement gave him two gear ratios, a lower gear to get away from the line and a higher gear that kicked in after about seventy metres. His ride in Leicester wasn't as good as he hoped for but the transmission worked well and it could not be faulted by the UCI commisaires.
Jocelyn's bike had a freewheel sprocket on the normal right hand side and a fixed sprocket on the left hand side. As he moved away from the line he drove through the RH sprocket and the left hand fixed sprocket began to unscrew from the hub. It being of smaller diameter it turned at a slower rate than the RH sprocket and being on the "wrong side" of the hub it would naturally unscrew. After about seventy metres the LH fixed sprocket came up against the lockring and at that point drive was through the LH side and the RH sprocket freewheeled. The distance traveled before the higher gear engaged could be adjusted by setting the position of the lockring. The bigger the space between lockring and sprocket at the start the longer the distance before the higher gear engaged.
Jocelyn experimented for some considerable time to come up with a combination of sprockets and chainrings that would not only give two suitable ratios but that would need chain lengths that would be at the correct tension. He settled on a low gear of 42x13 (87.2") and a high gear of 53x15 (95.4")
Wow, that is incredibly clever and a very elegant working around (or within?) the UCI rules. Lovell was a genius. I'm almost tempted to try it myself to see what it feels like
(There's just a small misunderstanding of how the system worked in the above explanation: the LH sprocket unscrews because it is smaller and thus spins *faster* than the wheel in the first 70m, not slower)
However it got me thinking about another bike I'd seen with a similar set-up but this one made a lot of sense. In 1982 Canadian rider Jocelyn Lovell rode the kilometre time trial at the World Championships in Leicester, England using a bike with two transmissions. His arrangement gave him two gear ratios, a lower gear to get away from the line and a higher gear that kicked in after about seventy metres. His ride in Leicester wasn't as good as he hoped for but the transmission worked well and it could not be faulted by the UCI commisaires.
Jocelyn's bike had a freewheel sprocket on the normal right hand side and a fixed sprocket on the left hand side. As he moved away from the line he drove through the RH sprocket and the left hand fixed sprocket began to unscrew from the hub. It being of smaller diameter it turned at a slower rate than the RH sprocket and being on the "wrong side" of the hub it would naturally unscrew. After about seventy metres the LH fixed sprocket came up against the lockring and at that point drive was through the LH side and the RH sprocket freewheeled. The distance traveled before the higher gear engaged could be adjusted by setting the position of the lockring. The bigger the space between lockring and sprocket at the start the longer the distance before the higher gear engaged.
Jocelyn experimented for some considerable time to come up with a combination of sprockets and chainrings that would not only give two suitable ratios but that would need chain lengths that would be at the correct tension. He settled on a low gear of 42x13 (87.2") and a high gear of 53x15 (95.4")
Wow, that is incredibly clever and a very elegant working around (or within?) the UCI rules. Lovell was a genius. I'm almost tempted to try it myself to see what it feels like
(There's just a small misunderstanding of how the system worked in the above explanation: the LH sprocket unscrews because it is smaller and thus spins *faster* than the wheel in the first 70m, not slower)
#2
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
That's pretty ingenious.
I've seen a double freewheel setup using a standard freewheel on the right side of the cranks combined with a LSD (left side drive) BMX freewheels for the left side setup.
LSD exists because some BMXers want the chainring on the left side to get it out of the way if they like to do grinding tricks on the right side.
I've seen a double freewheel setup using a standard freewheel on the right side of the cranks combined with a LSD (left side drive) BMX freewheels for the left side setup.
LSD exists because some BMXers want the chainring on the left side to get it out of the way if they like to do grinding tricks on the right side.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,744
Bikes: Miele Azsora, Kuwahara Cascade
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
That's pretty ingenious.
I've seen a double freewheel setup using a standard freewheel on the right side of the cranks combined with a LSD (left side drive) BMX freewheels for the left side setup.
LSD exists because some BMXers want the chainring on the left side to get it out of the way if they like to do grinding tricks on the right side.
I've seen a double freewheel setup using a standard freewheel on the right side of the cranks combined with a LSD (left side drive) BMX freewheels for the left side setup.
LSD exists because some BMXers want the chainring on the left side to get it out of the way if they like to do grinding tricks on the right side.
#6
I Like to Bike
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 554
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSoMkOhvaUQ three chains, three chain rings,three cogs!
#8
*
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 6,876
Bikes: https://velospace.org/node/18951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
if every edge really mattered, why would you want to uselessly spin a freewheel for the bulk of the race?
__________________
α
α
#12
extra bitter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSoMkOhvaUQ three chains, three chain rings,three cogs!
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 282
Bikes: Leader 722ts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
funny, my bro and i were just joking talking about putting on 2 cranks and 2 cogs just for kicks when i was changing out my drivetrain.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 520
Bikes: 2013 Specialized Allez, Iro Mark V
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Or something like that.
I dont know Im just making a hypothesisisisness.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: PDX
Posts: 389
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This would only be useful if a single chainring/cog was slipping, which it wouldn't be. I imagine the triple chainring/cog setup is just a vanity thing.
#16
Senile Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 506
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
3 chains on one side are useless, and so are 2 chains on both sides. One chain is plenty strong to withstand the effort of any cyclist. Mechanically, only one cog can be fully screwed onto the hub, and only one of the chains can be fully engaged anyway.
So yes, it's all vanity.
So yes, it's all vanity.
#17
I Like to Bike
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 554
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: East coast
Posts: 2,671
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac Expert, Cannondale R700, Specialized Langster, Iron Horse Hollowpoint Team, Schwinn Homegrown
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#20
Antarctica awaits
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tucson, Zona
Posts: 1,965
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
When I brought my double freewheel to my lbs, he said back in the 80s or 90s some BMX racers had double freewheels with some kind of "shift once" mechanism to get a quick start. That's what I thought you were talking about.