Vintage Takagi GS crank set - rear index shifting?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Vintage Takagi GS crank set - rear index shifting?
I was reading another thread about these and someone mentioned a possible issue with index shifting this crank. Indexing would only be a problem for the FD not the RD, correct?
I'm looking to pair this crank with a 9 speed indexed RD using 9 speed chain.
Thanks!
I'm looking to pair this crank with a 9 speed indexed RD using 9 speed chain.
Thanks!
#2
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,602
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 6,461 Times
in
3,194 Posts
Correct. Rear derailleur indexing is dependent on the rear cluster, rear derailleur, shifters, and cable/housing.
#3
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
+1. If there is a problem with the crankset, it would be from the narrow 9-speed chain, and not the rear indexing. Even then, I'm optimistic that the narrow chain wouldn't be an issue for this crank.
#5
(rhymes with spook)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Winslow, AR
Posts: 2,788
Bikes: '83 univega gran turismo x2, '85 schwinn super le tour,'89 miyata triple cross, '91 GT tequesta, '90 yokota grizzly peak, '94 GT backwoods, '95'ish scott tampico, '98 bonty privateer, '93 mongoose crossway 625, '98 parkpre ariel, 2k'ish giant fcr3
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 919 Post(s)
Liked 745 Times
in
546 Posts
if i may piggyback....
friction > indexing on front: be that as it may, am i correct inferring that a vintage crank can be indexed, though?
friction > indexing on front: be that as it may, am i correct inferring that a vintage crank can be indexed, though?
#6
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,644
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2607 Post(s)
Liked 1,696 Times
in
935 Posts
It depends on if the rings have ramps and pins.
It depends on if the rings are the correct size for the FD in question- modern indexing FDs have sculpted cages that pretty much only pick up the chain when it's in the range it's designed to pick up.
It depends on if the rings are the right thickness.
There's probably other factors as well.
There's a reason front indexing came along much later than rear indexing.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#7
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,644
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2607 Post(s)
Liked 1,696 Times
in
935 Posts
If this is about replacing the N600 crank- you're going WAY down the ladder.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Ok, don't want to do that. How about the Sugino Impel 500? Or what would you recommend?
#9
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,644
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2607 Post(s)
Liked 1,696 Times
in
935 Posts
The only step up (IMO) is the Sugino AT.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Likes For The Golden Boy:
#10
Senior Member
Dave nailed it. I think the AT is the only real suitable replacement if that is truly what you want.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I researched the difference between casting and forging - so now I know.
If I keep the N600 crank and want to change the outer and middle chain rings I need to get replacements with the proper 110/74 BCD, and rings made specifically for outer and middle - anything else?
And, 9 speed chain won't fall/get stuck between the chain rings on the N600 crank, correct?
Thanks.
If I keep the N600 crank and want to change the outer and middle chain rings I need to get replacements with the proper 110/74 BCD, and rings made specifically for outer and middle - anything else?
And, 9 speed chain won't fall/get stuck between the chain rings on the N600 crank, correct?
Thanks.
Last edited by jlaw; 10-01-19 at 06:14 PM.
#12
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,182
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,288 Times
in
859 Posts
It's usually possible to get any double crank to index, for a couple of reasons.
The derailer travel can be tailored using the limit screws and cable tension, plus the newer double front derailer is typically designed to handle a variety of chainring size differential (unlike with modern triple front derailers).
The 9s chain may tend to fall between the chainrings, but a newer small ring should take care of that unless the crank spider tabs are of an unusual thickness. The small ring's teeth can be bent a half-millimeter over using an adjustable wrench (with the chainring removed of course). The chain falling centered over the small ring's teeth can be further fine-tuned using a file held against the rotating chainring, which subtly adjusts the lateral location of the tips of the small ring's teeth. The big ring isn't much of a decider in the chainring spacing, it all comes down to the small ring's tooth offset and tooth beveling.
#13
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,644
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2607 Post(s)
Liked 1,696 Times
in
935 Posts
I researched the difference between casting and forging - so now I know.
If I keep the N600 crank and want to change the outer and middle chain rings I need to get replacements with the proper 110/74 BCD, and rings made specifically for outer and middle - anything else?
And, 9 speed chain won't fall/get stuck between the chain rings on the N600 crank, correct?
Thanks.
If I keep the N600 crank and want to change the outer and middle chain rings I need to get replacements with the proper 110/74 BCD, and rings made specifically for outer and middle - anything else?
And, 9 speed chain won't fall/get stuck between the chain rings on the N600 crank, correct?
Thanks.
I have not done this on my N600.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#14
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,644
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2607 Post(s)
Liked 1,696 Times
in
935 Posts
Was some info perhaps edited/deleted here, I didn't see where the OP mentioned an N600 crankset and don't know what that is.
It's usually possible to get any double crank to index, for a couple of reasons.
The derailer travel can be tailored using the limit screws and cable tension, plus the newer double front derailer is typically designed to handle a variety of chainring size differential (unlike with modern triple front derailers).
The 9s chain may tend to fall between the chainrings, but a newer small ring should take care of that unless the crank spider tabs are of an unusual thickness. The small ring's teeth can be bent a half-millimeter over using an adjustable wrench (with the chainring removed of course). The chain falling centered over the small ring's teeth can be further fine-tuned using a file held against the rotating chainring, which subtly adjusts the lateral location of the tips of the small ring's teeth. The big ring isn't much of a decider in the chainring spacing, it all comes down to the small ring's tooth offset and tooth beveling.
It's usually possible to get any double crank to index, for a couple of reasons.
The derailer travel can be tailored using the limit screws and cable tension, plus the newer double front derailer is typically designed to handle a variety of chainring size differential (unlike with modern triple front derailers).
The 9s chain may tend to fall between the chainrings, but a newer small ring should take care of that unless the crank spider tabs are of an unusual thickness. The small ring's teeth can be bent a half-millimeter over using an adjustable wrench (with the chainring removed of course). The chain falling centered over the small ring's teeth can be further fine-tuned using a file held against the rotating chainring, which subtly adjusts the lateral location of the tips of the small ring's teeth. The big ring isn't much of a decider in the chainring spacing, it all comes down to the small ring's tooth offset and tooth beveling.
The N600 is the 600 level triple chainset that came on the 85 Trek 620. It was 600 level, carried a 6206 model number, but was only marked "Shimano." Effectively, it was Shimano's high end road triple.
1985 Trek 620 by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr
Do you know if Shimano had another cold forged triple that's as graceful as the Sugino AT?
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I'm using a 10 speed with my Sugino AT. I have a modern middle ring, but an old granny and big ring. I have had 2 instances of the chain falling between the middle and granny in the past 3 years or so. I do need to get a newer granny-
I have not done this on my N600.
I have not done this on my N600.
The more I look at these vintage 5 arm cranks the more I like them compared to more modern stuff - especially once they are shined-up. I'm going to get a buffing wheel.
If I upgrade the wheels/drivetrain at some point I'll likely stay with 9 speed.
Good to know that you haven't had major problems using a narrow chain.
Thanks.
Last edited by jlaw; 10-06-19 at 08:33 AM.