Vintage Cannondale Request
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Vintage Cannondale Request
Hi guys,
Does anyone know what year this cannondale is? I tried to look at the catalogs but its weird because it has a front rack and also flat bars. Thanks!
philadelphia.craigslist.org/bik/d/collegeville-vintage-mens-cannondale/6994448773. html
Does anyone know what year this cannondale is? I tried to look at the catalogs but its weird because it has a front rack and also flat bars. Thanks!
philadelphia.craigslist.org/bik/d/collegeville-vintage-mens-cannondale/6994448773. html
#2
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,104
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1782 Post(s)
Liked 1,621 Times
in
927 Posts
Know? No. But I'll hazard a guess that it is late 80's/early 90's on account of the Suntour downtube shifters and quill stem.
Probably an aluminum frame judging by that fat clunky headtube/downtube weld.
The steel non-unicrown forks and caliper & defront derailleur clamp scream late 80's to me as well.
The pics are terrible.
It has no rear brake.
Are those steel wheels?
Someone may have swapped a flat bar onto an otherwise road bike to fashion an early hybrid of sorts. A later hybrid would've had cantilever brakes & a triple crankset. That crankset feels like it's a double but it's too hard to tell.
A converted R300 comes to mind, but that's just a guess. The down tube is big enough but the forks would be wrong.
Probably an aluminum frame judging by that fat clunky headtube/downtube weld.
The steel non-unicrown forks and caliper & defront derailleur clamp scream late 80's to me as well.
The pics are terrible.
It has no rear brake.
Are those steel wheels?
Someone may have swapped a flat bar onto an otherwise road bike to fashion an early hybrid of sorts. A later hybrid would've had cantilever brakes & a triple crankset. That crankset feels like it's a double but it's too hard to tell.
A converted R300 comes to mind, but that's just a guess. The down tube is big enough but the forks would be wrong.
Last edited by base2; 10-29-19 at 03:19 PM.
#3
Newbie
Thread Starter
Thanks for the info! Do you think it's worth trying to do a restoration project with it? The bike seems pretty beat up. And I agree, the pictures are horrible haha
#4
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,104
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1782 Post(s)
Liked 1,621 Times
in
927 Posts
If there's nothing wrong with it besides cosmetic issues, $50 would be fair for a grocery getter. A lot would depend on what you have in your parts bin, though.
I don't think it's something you could restore & flip at a profit if that's what you are asking.
As a hobby though...It could be fun, but it would never be worth more than the $50 you bought it for. So hobby/fun/love of cycling would be the only reasons it would make sense for me if I had an itch to fix it up.
Beer/bar bike? Probably an ok, low stakes purchase. IMO
I don't think it's something you could restore & flip at a profit if that's what you are asking.
As a hobby though...It could be fun, but it would never be worth more than the $50 you bought it for. So hobby/fun/love of cycling would be the only reasons it would make sense for me if I had an itch to fix it up.
Beer/bar bike? Probably an ok, low stakes purchase. IMO
#5
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
Rims look like Weinmann Concaves to me. So no immediate need to replace them if you buy it. Not that I'm saying you should or shouldn't...