Noob wheelbuilding question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,141
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Classic, 1984 Schwinn LeTour, 1998 Gary Fisher Marlin, 1969 Hercules, 1977 Sekai 5000 Superlite, 1993 Koga-Myata TerraLiner, 2013 Trek Farley.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Noob wheelbuilding question
I just got these rims, to take my first stab at building up a pair of wheels.
Odd thing - and you can sort of see this in the pictures - one of the rims has the spoke holes more offset than the other.
Does that make one of them more suited to be a "front rim" and one a "rear rim"? Or is it just a trivial variation? Does it matter which rim I use where?
Odd thing - and you can sort of see this in the pictures - one of the rims has the spoke holes more offset than the other.
Does that make one of them more suited to be a "front rim" and one a "rear rim"? Or is it just a trivial variation? Does it matter which rim I use where?
#2
Wrench Savant
Odd. I think you would want the less-offset one in the front, but I may have to think about that a bit. If you can't figure it out, send the rims to me and I'll let you know.
#3
Go Team BH!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: just outside B-ham, AL
Posts: 238
Bikes: Austro Daimler Ultima
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'm not sure, but you may want the rear wheel to use the more offset rim since you will need to dish it for the freewheel. A more experienced wheelbuilder should be able to clarify this. Nice Mavic rims! Have fun!
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 393
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I vote for manufacturing variance because in my wheel building days of yore, I don't remember any older rims (Mavic, Wolber, Matrix, Sun, etc.) that were "front" or "rear" specific.
#5
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,796
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1392 Post(s)
Liked 1,324 Times
in
836 Posts
Given the identical labels, I concur. It probably does not matter at all, but if you want to play the best possible hand with the cards you have been dealt, put the rim with the greater offset in back. If the offsets are asymmetrical, the less-offset row of holes goes on the right/drive/dished side.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#6
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 27,858
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2930 Post(s)
Liked 2,923 Times
in
1,491 Posts
Given the identical labels, I concur. It probably does not matter at all, but if you want to play the best possible hand with the cards you have been dealt, put the rim with the greater offset in back. If the offsets are asymmetrical, the less-offset row of holes goes on the right/drive/dished side.
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#8
Wrench Savant
1). After thinking about it, I agree it does not matter
2). To the extent that it does matter, I would still do the less offset in the back. Offset rims designed for rear use have the offset to the non-drive side to help offset (there is that word again) the dishing. By having more offset towards the drive side, it would be offset in the wrong direction, structurally speaking.
3). Again, it probably dies not matter.
2). To the extent that it does matter, I would still do the less offset in the back. Offset rims designed for rear use have the offset to the non-drive side to help offset (there is that word again) the dishing. By having more offset towards the drive side, it would be offset in the wrong direction, structurally speaking.
3). Again, it probably dies not matter.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,141
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Classic, 1984 Schwinn LeTour, 1998 Gary Fisher Marlin, 1969 Hercules, 1977 Sekai 5000 Superlite, 1993 Koga-Myata TerraLiner, 2013 Trek Farley.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hm ... I count two votes for more offset rim in back ...
One vote that I'm not sure of:
And - I'll need to examine the still-unlaced rim (the more offset one) to see if the offset is symmetrical or not. I hope to be able to lace it with the label facing the correct (right) side.
One vote that I'm not sure of:
balindamood you first said "I think you would want the less-offset one in the front"
and later said "I would still do the less offset in the back"
Could you clarify?
Anyway I hope the majority is right, because I did not notice the variation until I'd already laced one rim (as you can see in my 2nd pic). I can undo it if there is a compelling reason to, but as it happens, I laced the front hub to the less-offset rim.and later said "I would still do the less offset in the back"
Could you clarify?
And - I'll need to examine the still-unlaced rim (the more offset one) to see if the offset is symmetrical or not. I hope to be able to lace it with the label facing the correct (right) side.
Last edited by sekaijin; 03-15-10 at 02:59 PM.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times
in
27 Posts
Frankly, the difference is so small that i don't think it would matter anyway what end of the bike the rims end up at.
I built a new wheelset a couple of months ago and I goofed big time when I had the spokes on one rim on the wrong side offset so that I ended up with spokes that actually went past the center line of the rim to the other side. I only noticed it when I was starting to tension the spokes up. I always wondered after thaqt if I could have left it as it was, but being that it was the rear wheel I decided back then to play it safe by tearing the wheel back down and relacing it correctly...I still wonder....
Chombi
I built a new wheelset a couple of months ago and I goofed big time when I had the spokes on one rim on the wrong side offset so that I ended up with spokes that actually went past the center line of the rim to the other side. I only noticed it when I was starting to tension the spokes up. I always wondered after thaqt if I could have left it as it was, but being that it was the rear wheel I decided back then to play it safe by tearing the wheel back down and relacing it correctly...I still wonder....
Chombi
#12
Wrench Savant
I simply thought about it. The difference is so minor, it probably does not matter. My first post I went with the "offset goes in the back" theory. Then it occured to me that the offset on the freewheel side is going the wrong way. So, it does not matter, but if you think it might, low offset in back, high up front. Just my opinion.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,141
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Classic, 1984 Schwinn LeTour, 1998 Gary Fisher Marlin, 1969 Hercules, 1977 Sekai 5000 Superlite, 1993 Koga-Myata TerraLiner, 2013 Trek Farley.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
2 cross in front, 3 cross in back.
Servizio Corse tubulars, the ones that are 3 for $50 at Yellow Jersey.
Sidewall - you've hit on something I'm really on the fence about. I have a pair of lightly used black sidewall tubulars on hand. Undecided whether to just use those, or spring for some new tan sidewalls. This bike (build in progress) will be more modern than my others, so I'm not sure which is the right way to go.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,141
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Classic, 1984 Schwinn LeTour, 1998 Gary Fisher Marlin, 1969 Hercules, 1977 Sekai 5000 Superlite, 1993 Koga-Myata TerraLiner, 2013 Trek Farley.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I simply thought about it. The difference is so minor, it probably does not matter. My first post I went with the "offset goes in the back" theory. Then it occured to me that the offset on the freewheel side is going the wrong way. So, it does not matter, but if you think it might, low offset in back, high up front. Just my opinion.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,973
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times
in
22 Posts
I've built many over a thousand wheels over the years and I've never understood why any body would ever use a cross two set-up on wheels having this many spokes. What is your reasoning? With 28 spokes there is some justification, but with 32 or 36 spokes, I just don't get it.
Last edited by Citoyen du Monde; 03-16-10 at 10:39 PM. Reason: typo
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: EagleRiver AK
Posts: 1,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 60 Times
in
33 Posts
I've built many over a thousand wheels over the years and I've never understood why any body would ever use a cross three set-up on wheels having this many spokes. What is your reasoning? With 28 spokes there is some justification, but with 32 or 36 spokes, I just don't get it.
I like using a combo of 2X upfront and on the rear non-drive side and then 3X on the drive side, usually works out that you can use the same length of spoke so just need one box of spokes.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,141
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Classic, 1984 Schwinn LeTour, 1998 Gary Fisher Marlin, 1969 Hercules, 1977 Sekai 5000 Superlite, 1993 Koga-Myata TerraLiner, 2013 Trek Farley.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've built many over a thousand wheels over the years and I've never understood why any body would ever use a cross three set-up on wheels having this many spokes. What is your reasoning? With 28 spokes there is some justification, but with 32 or 36 spokes, I just don't get it.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,973
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times
in
22 Posts
Are you saying that you think all 32 and 36 spoke wheels should be built as 4X or are you saying that you think 2X is enough for any wheel with more than 28 spokes?
I like using a combo of 2X upfront and on the rear non-drive side and then 3X on the drive side, usually works out that you can use the same length of spoke so just need one box of spokes.
I like using a combo of 2X upfront and on the rear non-drive side and then 3X on the drive side, usually works out that you can use the same length of spoke so just need one box of spokes.
#21
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Well, radial would be worse than 1x or 2x. But really, what's wrong with 2x on a front wheel?
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,141
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Classic, 1984 Schwinn LeTour, 1998 Gary Fisher Marlin, 1969 Hercules, 1977 Sekai 5000 Superlite, 1993 Koga-Myata TerraLiner, 2013 Trek Farley.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Blarg - new problem - started lacing the second rim and it's missing an eyelet.
#23
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times
in
1,433 Posts
D'oh!
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,141
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Classic, 1984 Schwinn LeTour, 1998 Gary Fisher Marlin, 1969 Hercules, 1977 Sekai 5000 Superlite, 1993 Koga-Myata TerraLiner, 2013 Trek Farley.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Trying to forestall a sinking feeling here.
Am I SOL? Or can I get and install a replacement tubular rim eyelet?
EDIT: think I'm OK after all. Andy Muzi and I emailed some more, and he was very helpful. He said don't try to find a replacement eyelet, too hard to get something to fit by hand, just use a washer.
Last edited by sekaijin; 03-17-10 at 04:14 PM.