Performance vs. Expectations
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 29
Bikes: 07 Specialized Roubaix Elite
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Performance vs. Expectations
Hi everybody,
I’m returning to cycling after a long absence (35 yrs!) and want to get some feedback on personal performance vs. expectations. In my early 20’s I did quite a lot of self supported touring. That of course was B4 the advent of bike computers, so I have no basis for comparison on a personal level. Not that it would valid after all these years anyway!
I bought my current bike in October, just in time for the weather to turn bad and other obligations to get in the way of serious riding. Saturday the stars were aligned and I set out from home on a 30 mile loop of mainly lightly traveled rural roads. The terrain is up or down, very little flat. The hills are steep but short. No idea of grade, but length was typically less than 1/2 a mile. Descents were equally as steep and short. I found myself grinding uphill at 6-8 mph, and descending at speeds near 35. My average for the ride was 13 mph. On flat terrain I’m very comfortable at 18+ mph pace. While I enjoyed the ride, I was hoping for a faster average. Is that realistic?
I’m 57, 6’1”, 170 lbs. I’ve been working out regularly for 5 years; run the equivalent of 15 miles a week at 6 min per mile pace, spin once or twice a week, and do some upper body weight training.
I would appreciate your perspective and any advise. Thanks.
I’m returning to cycling after a long absence (35 yrs!) and want to get some feedback on personal performance vs. expectations. In my early 20’s I did quite a lot of self supported touring. That of course was B4 the advent of bike computers, so I have no basis for comparison on a personal level. Not that it would valid after all these years anyway!
I bought my current bike in October, just in time for the weather to turn bad and other obligations to get in the way of serious riding. Saturday the stars were aligned and I set out from home on a 30 mile loop of mainly lightly traveled rural roads. The terrain is up or down, very little flat. The hills are steep but short. No idea of grade, but length was typically less than 1/2 a mile. Descents were equally as steep and short. I found myself grinding uphill at 6-8 mph, and descending at speeds near 35. My average for the ride was 13 mph. On flat terrain I’m very comfortable at 18+ mph pace. While I enjoyed the ride, I was hoping for a faster average. Is that realistic?
I’m 57, 6’1”, 170 lbs. I’ve been working out regularly for 5 years; run the equivalent of 15 miles a week at 6 min per mile pace, spin once or twice a week, and do some upper body weight training.
I would appreciate your perspective and any advise. Thanks.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,082
Bikes: Trek, Cannondale Tandem, Surly LHT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pedal lber
Hi everybody,
My average for the ride was 13 mph. On flat terrain I’m very comfortable at 18+ mph pace. While I enjoyed the ride, I was hoping for a faster average. Is that realistic?
I would appreciate your perspective and any advise. Thanks.
My average for the ride was 13 mph. On flat terrain I’m very comfortable at 18+ mph pace. While I enjoyed the ride, I was hoping for a faster average. Is that realistic?
I would appreciate your perspective and any advise. Thanks.
#3
In Memory of One Cool Cat
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 2,722
Bikes: Lemond Victoire, Cannondale.Mountain Bike, two 1980s lugged steel Treks, ancient 1980-something Giant mountain bike converted into a slick tired commuter with mustache handlebars, 1960-something Raleigh Sports
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
My guess is, Pedel liber, that you're in better shape most of us. It's been 40 years since I could run a six-minute mile, so my hat is off to you. I'm with Old Hammer Boy, but if that doesn't suit you, maybe check out Carmichael Training Systems or similar. They can set you up with a real program designed to maximize speed and efficiency.
__________________
Dead last finish is better than did not finish and infinitely better than did not start.
Dead last finish is better than did not finish and infinitely better than did not start.
#4
Let's do a Century
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,316
Bikes: Cervelo R3 Disc, Pinarello Prince/Campy SR; Cervelo R3/Sram Red; Trek 5900/Duraace, Lynskey GR260 Ultegra
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 651 Post(s)
Liked 879 Times
in
408 Posts
You're right on track, and probably way ahead of the game at this point. You and I are the same size but you're just a couple years older. My overall average speed is around 17-18 on similar roads. Your climbing speeds will increase with more time in the saddle. Don't rush it....it just takes time to groove climbing to get to where I think you want to be. Your aerobics should be in good shape although I suspect your overall HR will be a little higher for cycling particularly on intervals up the hills. You're also using a little different set of leg muscles than what you're using for running.
Equipment does make a difference-especially going up the hills. What type of bike and gearing are you using?
Equipment does make a difference-especially going up the hills. What type of bike and gearing are you using?
#5
el padre
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South East Kansas
Posts: 1,490
Bikes: Rans Stratus, ICE TRike, other assorted
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Listen to these guys, they know what they are talking about,, in other words, I agree.
#6
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,800
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,329 Times
in
837 Posts
You already have the cardiovascular system; the musculature will come back quickly.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 29
Bikes: 07 Specialized Roubaix Elite
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jppe
You're right on track, and probably way ahead of the game at this point. You and I are the same size but you're just a couple years older. My overall average speed is around 17-18 on similar roads. Your climbing speeds will increase with more time in the saddle. Don't rush it....it just takes time to groove climbing to get to where I think you want to be. Your aerobics should be in good shape although I suspect your overall HR will be a little higher for cycling particularly on intervals up the hills. You're also using a little different set of leg muscles than what you're using for running.
Equipment does make a difference-especially going up the hills. What type of bike and gearing are you using?
Equipment does make a difference-especially going up the hills. What type of bike and gearing are you using?
#8
Wheezing Geezer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Crowley, Tx
Posts: 1,782
Bikes: Bacchetta Corsa, RANS Stratus XP
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
lber, welcome back to cycling, and welcome to the forum! It's a safe bet that you're in better shape than most of us who returned to cycling after a long absence, and I suspect you'll do just great without any advice from me, but I would just remind you of a couple of things you probably already know: 1. Reaching your peak with a new athletic routine will take some time and will include periods when you don't see any improvement at all, and 2. Muscle recovery will be slower for you now than it was 35 years ago, and you should keep that in mind as you schedule. Again, welcome!
#9
OnTheRoad or AtTheBeach
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Weston, FL
Posts: 2,170
Bikes: Ridley Noah RS, Scott CR1 Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think you have a really good starting point and should improve as you cycle more. If you really want to improve your speed you should look at interval training and finding a group to ride with. If you feel comfortable at 18 then find a group that rides at 20-22, if you can hang easily move up. Once you find a group that makes you work hard and drops you on occasion you will find your speed picking up. When I started a couple of years ago I was happy with 15mph, I ride with a friend and we were able to get ourselves into the low 20s for a good portion of our 20mi daily ride. However, when I started riding with my clubs A group which averages in 22-24 and has 3 sprint zones where they crank it up to 28-30mph I found keeping my speed when I was by myself in the 20-21 range become much easier. I still get dropped sometimes but the only way to improve, if that is your goal, is to push the envelop. Riding daily miles at a consistent pace will not get it done.
Btw - many people feel that when start riding you need 1000 or so base miles before you really should start pushing yourself.
Btw - many people feel that when start riding you need 1000 or so base miles before you really should start pushing yourself.
__________________
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard and the shallow end is much too large
2013 Noah RS
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard and the shallow end is much too large
2013 Noah RS
#10
Senior Member
Looks like the spinning classes have set you up for a good start.
If you're already comfortable with 18 mph for extended periods you'll only get faster. 18+ is already
an intermediate club ride pace.
Keep a few things in mind;
It will take time to build the muscles used to turn the cranks, cycling and running use different
muscle groups.
It will take some time before you develop your best spin and really get familiar with maintaining cadence
and maximizing power transfer into the bike under various load conditions.
If you're already comfortable with 18 mph for extended periods you'll only get faster. 18+ is already
an intermediate club ride pace.
Keep a few things in mind;
It will take time to build the muscles used to turn the cranks, cycling and running use different
muscle groups.
It will take some time before you develop your best spin and really get familiar with maintaining cadence
and maximizing power transfer into the bike under various load conditions.
#11
Let's do a Century
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,316
Bikes: Cervelo R3 Disc, Pinarello Prince/Campy SR; Cervelo R3/Sram Red; Trek 5900/Duraace, Lynskey GR260 Ultegra
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 651 Post(s)
Liked 879 Times
in
408 Posts
Originally Posted by pedal lber
Thanks jppe and others. I think you're right about the HR. I was a bit surprised at that. I had thought the cardio side would be my strong point, but found myself huffing and puffing. I ride an 07 Specialized Roubaix Elite. Its a 50-39-30 triple with a 12-27 cassette. I am enjoying the riding for its own sake, and really not trying to rush anything, just wanted to get some perspective and develop some realistic expectation. Thanks again.
You have a great bike/equipment setup so no issues there. The great news is the physical base you have to work from. You're way, way ahead of the curve. You just need time in the saddle and I'd suggest spending time doing more hills-ugh. Progress will come over time as you've probably seen in running events. Sometimes progress is unexplicable but very rewarding. Ride with guys that are a little faster and you have to chase and probably even fall off behind going up hills. You'll get faster doing hills over time. Your heartrate is going to higher at first but over time will moderate and feel more manageable. Just keep working on it.
Glad you're back on the bike!!
#12
Time for a change.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Posts: 19,913
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
It does not matter how fit you are- How fast you can run or how much weight you can lift down at the gym. All that matters on a bike is how "Bike" fit you are. Sounds stupid but you are going to use different muscles and in different ways. You are going to be in a different position on the bike, and the brain has to attune to the new exercise. Some one said it will take about 1,000 miles and I reckon that is about right.
A couple of years ago, we had another Mountain biker join outr group. He was fit and did pretty good on some of the Enduro events he raced at. Only difference was that we ride on a different sort of hill to what he was used to. So here we had a fit biker struggling. Only took him about 5 rides to get accustomed and then we found out how fit he was.
A couple of years ago, we had another Mountain biker join outr group. He was fit and did pretty good on some of the Enduro events he raced at. Only difference was that we ride on a different sort of hill to what he was used to. So here we had a fit biker struggling. Only took him about 5 rides to get accustomed and then we found out how fit he was.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
#13
Get A Life - Get A Bike
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota, You Betcha!
Posts: 1,042
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Bianchi San Jose, '87 Schwinn Super Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pedal lber
I’m 57, 6’1”, 170 lbs. I’ve been working out regularly for 5 years; run the equivalent of 15 miles a week at 6 min per mile pace, spin once or twice a week, and do some upper body weight training.
I would appreciate your perspective and any advise. Thanks.
I would appreciate your perspective and any advise. Thanks.
Take care,
Steve
#14
OM boy
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Goleta CA
Posts: 4,369
Bikes: a bunch
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 517 Post(s)
Liked 646 Times
in
438 Posts
Originally Posted by pedal lber
Hi everybody...
I’m returning to cycling after a long absence (35 yrs!) and want to get some feedback...
I’m 57, 6’1”, 170 lbs. I’ve been working out regularly for 5 years; run the equivalent of 15 miles a week at 6 min per mile pace, spin once or twice a week, and do some upper body weight training.
I would appreciate your perspective and any advise. Thanks.
I’m returning to cycling after a long absence (35 yrs!) and want to get some feedback...
I’m 57, 6’1”, 170 lbs. I’ve been working out regularly for 5 years; run the equivalent of 15 miles a week at 6 min per mile pace, spin once or twice a week, and do some upper body weight training.
I would appreciate your perspective and any advise. Thanks.
... just kiddin...
pretty dang good for being off the bike for so long, but obviously an endorphine junkie
for me, any grades above 9 % and if I;m goin over 7 mph, I'm floggin the horse the whole way.
some rides may just be 13 mph avg rides...
riding with others does help break thru the 'ceiling' we set for ourselves...
road miles are different from trainer miles or spinning time, more road miles and the legs will smooth out even more, the avg will go up, but 12% at 8 mph will still be, and will always be sufferin...
one thing's for sure, you'll be ridin the bike for a lot more years than you will be runnin...
#15
Don't mince words
Welcome back to cycling!
I've been back with a boundless enthusiasm for about 18 mos. From May to Sept. last year I averaged 90-120 mi. a wekk, riding in two different groups, alone, or with a friend. What I found was that every day is different -- some days it's chickens, some days it's feathers, and some days are chicken sh*t (can I say that here?). The time it takes you to get faster on the hills will depend on your training, your discipline, and rest. Just keep having fun, and be patient -- your speed will return.
I've been back with a boundless enthusiasm for about 18 mos. From May to Sept. last year I averaged 90-120 mi. a wekk, riding in two different groups, alone, or with a friend. What I found was that every day is different -- some days it's chickens, some days it's feathers, and some days are chicken sh*t (can I say that here?). The time it takes you to get faster on the hills will depend on your training, your discipline, and rest. Just keep having fun, and be patient -- your speed will return.