need to change gearing what to do
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
need to change gearing what to do
not sure of best choice go down size of chain ring or up cog. how does one decide.
44 x16 is what came on bike.
just unable to pushwith comfort in my area.
44 x16 is what came on bike.
just unable to pushwith comfort in my area.
#2
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,556
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4361 Post(s)
Liked 4,005 Times
in
2,674 Posts
Six of one half dozen of the other. I would personally go up in cog but that is me. Maybe a little easier? Plus you could upgrade the cog which is a nice thing.
44/17 is a fine ratio and I have been enjoying mine fairly well.
44/17 is a fine ratio and I have been enjoying mine fairly well.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
thanks...in hilly nwnj i am just not able to enjoy the current set up.
#4
Junior Member
A 44 tooth is already a small size for a chainring so I would change the cog for something like a 17 or 18 tooth since it'll be easier and cheaper.
#5
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,508
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7353 Post(s)
Liked 2,480 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Cogs are cheaper than chainrings, so there is that.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Greenwood SC USA
Posts: 2,252
Bikes: 2002 Mercian Vincitore, 1982 Mercian Colorado, 1976 Puch Royal X, 1973 Raleigh Competition, 1971 Gitane Tour de France and others
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 823 Post(s)
Liked 1,395 Times
in
694 Posts
I'm with Tom/noglider - cogs are less expensive and having a small collection of them isn't a bad thing!
You didn't mention wheel or tire size, but I'm gonna assume 700C, and that you're running somewhere around 25 or 28 mm tires. If those assumptions are true, you currently have around 72 gear inches, 44x17 would get you around 68-70 gear inches, while 44x18 lands you around 64-65 gear inches. If you go play around with the late (and much-missed!) Sheldon Brown's gear calculator you can fine tune which gears for your riding style. Somewhere around 70-point-something is the sweet spot for me in what South Carolina real estate types have taken to calling The Lakelands, with lots of rollers and a few nasty but mercifully short spikes. I get that using 42x16 and 45x17 on 28 mm tires or 44x17 on 35 mm tires.
The old British time trialing guys used to (and perhaps still do) run a trials series with a 72 gear inch limit. British cycling manuals written when single-speeds and fixed-wheel were still the norm often advocated a 65-in gear for gentlemen and a 60-in gear for ladies. 42x16 seems to be a widely used gear for a lot of fixed conversions, though that may be the result of ready availability of 42T chainrings.
On the other hand, the old C.O.N.I. manual called for lower gears (my copy is long gone) in the low 60s and into the 50s to perfect one's form. I don't think they were thinking so much in terms of general riding, though so much as early season training.
You didn't mention wheel or tire size, but I'm gonna assume 700C, and that you're running somewhere around 25 or 28 mm tires. If those assumptions are true, you currently have around 72 gear inches, 44x17 would get you around 68-70 gear inches, while 44x18 lands you around 64-65 gear inches. If you go play around with the late (and much-missed!) Sheldon Brown's gear calculator you can fine tune which gears for your riding style. Somewhere around 70-point-something is the sweet spot for me in what South Carolina real estate types have taken to calling The Lakelands, with lots of rollers and a few nasty but mercifully short spikes. I get that using 42x16 and 45x17 on 28 mm tires or 44x17 on 35 mm tires.
The old British time trialing guys used to (and perhaps still do) run a trials series with a 72 gear inch limit. British cycling manuals written when single-speeds and fixed-wheel were still the norm often advocated a 65-in gear for gentlemen and a 60-in gear for ladies. 42x16 seems to be a widely used gear for a lot of fixed conversions, though that may be the result of ready availability of 42T chainrings.
On the other hand, the old C.O.N.I. manual called for lower gears (my copy is long gone) in the low 60s and into the 50s to perfect one's form. I don't think they were thinking so much in terms of general riding, though so much as early season training.
#7
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
I generally swap out chainrings, just because the difference is more subtle.
I was riding 40 X 17 (61.8 gear inches) and went to a 39 X 17 (60.23 gear inches).
Had I instead switched the freewheel to an 18T, it would have dropped to 58.3 gear inches, which was lower than I wanted.
I was riding 40 X 17 (61.8 gear inches) and went to a 39 X 17 (60.23 gear inches).
Had I instead switched the freewheel to an 18T, it would have dropped to 58.3 gear inches, which was lower than I wanted.
#8
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,792
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3591 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times
in
1,935 Posts
Sprockets tend to be less expensive than chainrings. Keep in mind that changing by more than a couple teeth up or down will probably require changing the chain length as well. A 1-tooth change on the rear will make a bigger difference than 1-tooth change on the front. If you do skid-stops, consider going to a prime number tooth count on either the front or the rear (e.g. 17 tooth rear or 43 tooth front) to maximize the number of skid patches on your tire.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
Sprockets tend to be less expensive than chainrings. Keep in mind that changing by more than a couple teeth up or down will probably require changing the chain length as well. A 1-tooth change on the rear will make a bigger difference than 1-tooth change on the front. If you do skid-stops, consider going to a prime number tooth count on either the front or the rear (e.g. 17 tooth rear or 43 tooth front) to maximize the number of skid patches on your tire.
wanna up grade crankz come spring.
#10
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,556
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4361 Post(s)
Liked 4,005 Times
in
2,674 Posts
In case someone was wondering my crazy dream bling bling fixed gear which is a little close to what I am currently riding but downgrading in a bunch of areas:
Firefly titanium fixed gear road frame with engraved logos with red anodizing in the engraving and Gold S3 style anodized panels surrounding them. Polished titanium stem and seatpost with the same anodizing and Zipp SL-70 Ergo carbon bars. Phil Wood hubs laced to Velocity A23 rims and Double Butted Silver Phil Wood spokes and nipples (all polished and just hubs and rim anodized to the Gold S3 coating) Cane Creek eeBrakes in polished silver with red Jagwire Elite Link Housing linked up to gutted SRAM Red AXS levers (if possible). Of course Sugino Super Zen DD2 crankset and EAI Gold medal cog with Izumi Super Toughness chain.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
My favorite cranks at the moment are the Sugino 75 Direct Drive cranks for road usage. I like external bottom bracket cranks and I cannot lie. Upgrades are awesome and I just wish I could afford to build up the ultimate dream fixed gear road bike they have my crank now, Sugino Super 75 Direct Drive so it can be done. Unfortunately a new bike is way out of the question now and that bike is even further out of the question.
In case someone was wondering my crazy dream bling bling fixed gear which is a little close to what I am currently riding but downgrading in a bunch of areas:
Firefly titanium fixed gear road frame with engraved logos with red anodizing in the engraving and Gold S3 style anodized panels surrounding them. Polished titanium stem and seatpost with the same anodizing and Zipp SL-70 Ergo carbon bars. Phil Wood hubs laced to Velocity A23 rims and Double Butted Silver Phil Wood spokes and nipples (all polished and just hubs and rim anodized to the Gold S3 coating) Cane Creek eeBrakes in polished silver with red Jagwire Elite Link Housing linked up to gutted SRAM Red AXS levers (if possible). Of course Sugino Super Zen DD2 crankset and EAI Gold medal cog with Izumi Super Toughness chain.
In case someone was wondering my crazy dream bling bling fixed gear which is a little close to what I am currently riding but downgrading in a bunch of areas:
Firefly titanium fixed gear road frame with engraved logos with red anodizing in the engraving and Gold S3 style anodized panels surrounding them. Polished titanium stem and seatpost with the same anodizing and Zipp SL-70 Ergo carbon bars. Phil Wood hubs laced to Velocity A23 rims and Double Butted Silver Phil Wood spokes and nipples (all polished and just hubs and rim anodized to the Gold S3 coating) Cane Creek eeBrakes in polished silver with red Jagwire Elite Link Housing linked up to gutted SRAM Red AXS levers (if possible). Of course Sugino Super Zen DD2 crankset and EAI Gold medal cog with Izumi Super Toughness chain.
new white brakes just got.
#12
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,556
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4361 Post(s)
Liked 4,005 Times
in
2,674 Posts
Curious though on the Vision brake levers, what cables are you running? I do remember noting in my brain cavity that they required special cables but that could have changed at some point or I could be remembering wrong.
Love a good bullhorn/base bar set up. I keep waffling back and forth on that for myself as my old Langster had it but I do like the hoods on my drops. The look is always good.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
It is a start and you gotta start somewhere. Sometimes it is incremental upgrades but you learn what you like and don't like so you can shape your next bike or a dream bike down the road.
Curious though on the Vision brake levers, what cables are you running? I do remember noting in my brain cavity that they required special cables but that could have changed at some point or I could be remembering wrong.
Love a good bullhorn/base bar set up. I keep waffling back and forth on that for myself as my old Langster had it but I do like the hoods on my drops. The look is always good.
Curious though on the Vision brake levers, what cables are you running? I do remember noting in my brain cavity that they required special cables but that could have changed at some point or I could be remembering wrong.
Love a good bullhorn/base bar set up. I keep waffling back and forth on that for myself as my old Langster had it but I do like the hoods on my drops. The look is always good.
wheels smoorh but cheap heavy. 54cm i ride 56 road i was surprised it fit so well. heavy steel rides very nice.
i do love it. i will end up havinf $1k in parts on what is $100 frame before i upgrade. frame is in great shape just shat.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 2,087
Bikes: Soma Pescadero, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker, Gravity SS 27.5, Monocog 29er
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times
in
166 Posts
https://www.statebicycle.com/collect...8t-40t-42t-44t
Here you go. Normally I'd recomend a new cog, but you are running a freewheel. You also don't have much adjustment left, so an 18 tooth freewheel would also require a new chain. Front chainring seems cheaper in this case.
Here you go. Normally I'd recomend a new cog, but you are running a freewheel. You also don't have much adjustment left, so an 18 tooth freewheel would also require a new chain. Front chainring seems cheaper in this case.
#15
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,556
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4361 Post(s)
Liked 4,005 Times
in
2,674 Posts
yes, i had some sweet bars and levers from an old Tribike build 26mm clamps crap generic cables added cheapo white calipers to fancy the bike up.
wheels smoorh but cheap heavy. 54cm i ride 56 road i was surprised it fit so well. heavy steel rides very nice.
i do love it. i will end up havinf $1k in parts on what is $100 frame before i upgrade. frame is in great shape just shat.
wheels smoorh but cheap heavy. 54cm i ride 56 road i was surprised it fit so well. heavy steel rides very nice.
i do love it. i will end up havinf $1k in parts on what is $100 frame before i upgrade. frame is in great shape just shat.
54,56...don't always mean the same thing in different brands. I found my ideal size for All-City for instance is generally a 52 and my main road bike is a 54.5 and my touring bike and Langster is a 56. Now that I have been pouring over geo charts more often I find myself looking at different sizes rather than just relying on a number they give.
Likes For thehammerdog:
#18
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Liked 115 Times
in
78 Posts
Because the chainring is bigger than the sprocket, a change of one tooth on the sprocket makes more difference to the ratio.
The percentage effect of a change can be calculated by:
Chainring: new size divided by old size.
For example, a change from 46 to 49 would make your ratio 49/46 as big. 49/46 = 1.07, so a 7% increase.
Or, a change from 49 to 46 would make your ratio 46/49 as big. 46/49 = 0.94, so a reduction of 6%.
Sprocket: old size divided by new size.
For example, a change from 16 to 20 would make your ratio 16/20 as big. 16/20 = 0.8, meaning a reduction of 20%.
Or, a change from 20 to 16 would make your ratio 20/16 as big. 20/16 = 1.25 meaning an increase of 25%
This is why on a multi speed derailleur, the 2 (or 3) chainrings are very different in size, but the adjacent cogs on the rear block are much closer in size. It is also why very small cogs on the block tend to be 1t different, and the larger ones (lower ratio) are often a few teeth different.
So you can always estimate what difference a change of one or the other will make. As a general rule, as with derailleurs, changes at the back for fine tuning, changes at the front for fundamental changes to allow for very different conditions.
A change much less than 10% is unlikely to be worthwhile. Much more than 15% would be very noticeable.
The percentage effect of a change can be calculated by:
Chainring: new size divided by old size.
For example, a change from 46 to 49 would make your ratio 49/46 as big. 49/46 = 1.07, so a 7% increase.
Or, a change from 49 to 46 would make your ratio 46/49 as big. 46/49 = 0.94, so a reduction of 6%.
Sprocket: old size divided by new size.
For example, a change from 16 to 20 would make your ratio 16/20 as big. 16/20 = 0.8, meaning a reduction of 20%.
Or, a change from 20 to 16 would make your ratio 20/16 as big. 20/16 = 1.25 meaning an increase of 25%
This is why on a multi speed derailleur, the 2 (or 3) chainrings are very different in size, but the adjacent cogs on the rear block are much closer in size. It is also why very small cogs on the block tend to be 1t different, and the larger ones (lower ratio) are often a few teeth different.
So you can always estimate what difference a change of one or the other will make. As a general rule, as with derailleurs, changes at the back for fine tuning, changes at the front for fundamental changes to allow for very different conditions.
A change much less than 10% is unlikely to be worthwhile. Much more than 15% would be very noticeable.
Likes For Mikefule: