Search
Notices
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area Looking to enter into the realm of track racing? Want to share your experiences and tactics for riding on a velodrome? The Track Cycling forums is for you! Come in and discuss training/racing, equipment, and current track cycling events.

Selecting crank length

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-13, 10:56 AM
  #1  
Dolamite02
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Dolamite02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 960

Bikes: Bianchi Pista, Bianchi via Nirone 7, GT Zaskar 9r Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Selecting crank length

On my road bike, I'm running 172.5 cranks, while my stock Pista has 165's. I'm interested in swapping cranksets for DA before I start buying rings, but don't know the right length to go with. I've heard that shorter lengths help prevent pedal strike on the track, but I'm wondering a) if that's true, and b) either way, what's the common advice for crank sizing on the track?
Dolamite02 is offline  
Old 04-02-13, 12:02 PM
  #2  
theblackbullet
Senior Member
 
theblackbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 748

Bikes: I don't even

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times in 77 Posts
a) yes, but that doesn't necessarily mean that you will have issues with a longer crank. I've ridden both the Dick Lane Velodrome (36° banking) and the Giordana Velodrome (42.5° banking) using 172.5 cranks without any issues.

b) Generally you will see shorter crank lengths at the velodrome. Most riders find the shorter crank length easier to spin at higher cadences. As mentioned earlier though, I use 172.5 cranks which is the same length that I use on my road bike. It's all personal preference. What I did was buy cheap used cranks to play around with length before investing in a set of cranks that I really wanted in the length that I preffered.
theblackbullet is offline  
Old 04-02-13, 12:03 PM
  #3  
theblackbullet
Senior Member
 
theblackbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 748

Bikes: I don't even

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times in 77 Posts
and assuming you stay with a true track crankset with a 144bcd, there isn't any reason you shouldn't be able to start investing in chainrings
theblackbullet is offline  
Old 04-02-13, 12:32 PM
  #4  
Hermes
Version 7.0
 
Hermes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 13,127

Bikes: Too Many

Mentioned: 297 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1340 Post(s)
Liked 2,482 Times in 1,457 Posts
I have used 172.5 at Velo Sports Center 45 Deg, Superdrome Frisco, TX, 45 deg and Anadia Portugal 42 deg banking with no problem. Generally, one is going fast enough that pedal strike is not a problem meaning one is perpendicular to the track in the turns. If one slows enough to strike a pedal, more than likely, one will slip down the track anyway. So for pursuit and mass start racing, 172.5 is fine. For match sprint competition, it can be a problem. If one uses sticky tires and the right technique, one can go slower in the turns.

For example, the Superdrome in Frisco, TX is a 250 track with 45 degree banking but has a rougher painted surface. So racers can go very slow in the turns. I watched 3 racers strike a pedal and slide down the track going too slow. I do not know what crank length they were using.

Traditional theory on crank length is sprinters use shorter cranks and pursuiters use longer cranks. Experimentation and testing is the best way to determine optimum crank length and gearing.
Hermes is offline  
Old 04-02-13, 01:14 PM
  #5  
Dolamite02
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Dolamite02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 960

Bikes: Bianchi Pista, Bianchi via Nirone 7, GT Zaskar 9r Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the input, guys. As to the investment in cranks, unfortunately my Pista came stock with FSA F. Gimondi cranks which run 130BCD. I'd prefer to jump to a 144 crank early rather than replace rings later.
Dolamite02 is offline  
Old 04-02-13, 01:58 PM
  #6  
Jaytron
Brown Bear, Sqrl Hunter
 
Jaytron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 4,244

Bikes: CAAD 10 4, Dolan DF4, Fuji Track Classic

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 26 Times in 15 Posts
It's hard to recommend crank length because a lot of it boils down to preference. What Hermes said:
Traditional theory on crank length is sprinters use shorter cranks and pursuiters use longer cranks. Experimentation and testing is the best way to determine optimum crank length and gearing.
is generally true. I did a search for this answer a while back, and it seems that sprinters will go for about 5mm shorter than their road bike for crank arm length.

FWIW, I couldn't decide so I went in the middle. I have a 172.5 on my road bike and went with 170mm on my track bike. Can't really tell the difference, but I've been injured so I haven't been riding much.
Jaytron is offline  
Old 04-02-13, 04:49 PM
  #7  
Dalai
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,163
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
I ride the length which came stock on my track bike which was 170mm. I have 175mm arms to swap over for pursuiting but haven't done so yet. Otherwise I ride a range of crank lengths - Road, TT and MTB 175mm, CX and commuter 172.5mm...
Dalai is offline  
Old 04-02-13, 04:58 PM
  #8  
carleton
Elitist
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by Dolamite02
On my road bike, I'm running 172.5 cranks, while my stock Pista has 165's. I'm interested in swapping cranksets for DA before I start buying rings, but don't know the right length to go with. I've heard that shorter lengths help prevent pedal strike on the track, but I'm wondering a) if that's true, and b) either way, what's the common advice for crank sizing on the track?
Let me confuse you:

1) The rule of thumb is to go 5mm shorter than your road cranks.

2) If you are over 6' use 170mm, under 5'8 or so use 165, in between use 167.5

3) If you are a pursuiter add 2.5mm. If you are sprinter subtract 2.5mm

4) Measure your femur.

5) If you mash, go longer. If you spin go shorter.

6) Do what feels good as one study has shown that self-selected length made the most power.


Soooo... basically you have to try several out to see what works. There is no magic formula or right answer.

I'd suggest buying 167.5mm which is in the middle of the most common 165, 167.5, and 170mm trio. It's really going to come down to trial and error. I've raced 165, 167.5, and 170...and you know what? It didn't make that much of a difference in my results. What I lost in torque I gained in leg speed and vice-versa.

So, how tall are you?
carleton is offline  
Old 04-02-13, 05:00 PM
  #9  
carleton
Elitist
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
I've read stories of elite athletes who change crank length based on the event, shorter for mass start and longer for pursuits.

Finding the right crank length is like finding the right saddle. It could be a short or long journey.
carleton is offline  
Old 04-02-13, 05:51 PM
  #10  
queerpunk
aka mattio
 
queerpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,586

Bikes: yes

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 35 Posts
To carleton's list, I'd add, "pick one and don't stress too much about it."
queerpunk is offline  
Old 04-03-13, 10:27 AM
  #11  
Dolamite02
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Dolamite02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 960

Bikes: Bianchi Pista, Bianchi via Nirone 7, GT Zaskar 9r Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by carleton
Let me confuse you:

1) The rule of thumb is to go 5mm shorter than your road cranks. 172.5-5=167.5

2) If you are over 6' use 170mm, under 5'8 or so use 165, in between use 167.5 I'm 6'1"

3) If you are a pursuiter add 2.5mm. If you are sprinter subtract 2.5mm Don't know the answer yet. This is only season 2 on the track.

4) Measure your femur. 20"

5) If you mash, go longer. If you spin go shorter.

6) Do what feels good as one study has shown that self-selected length made the most power. 10-4


Soooo... basically you have to try several out to see what works. There is no magic formula or right answer.

I'd suggest buying 167.5mm which is in the middle of the most common 165, 167.5, and 170mm trio. It's really going to come down to trial and error. I've raced 165, 167.5, and 170...and you know what? It didn't make that much of a difference in my results. What I lost in torque I gained in leg speed and vice-versa.

So, how tall are you? 6'1"
Bolded
Dolamite02 is offline  
Old 04-03-13, 10:53 AM
  #12  
carleton
Elitist
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by Dolamite02
Bolded
I'm also 6'1" and I'm a spinner. I liked 167.5. I'd start there. You'll like it.
carleton is offline  
Old 04-03-13, 11:11 AM
  #13  
Dolamite02
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Dolamite02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 960

Bikes: Bianchi Pista, Bianchi via Nirone 7, GT Zaskar 9r Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sounds like a winner to me. Grassy ass, Carleton. In thanks, I offer the following photo.

Attached Images
Dolamite02 is offline  
Old 04-03-13, 11:42 AM
  #14  
carleton
Elitist
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Thanks, bro

Profile updated.
carleton is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
colnago62
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
40
02-22-19 04:03 PM
Velocirapture
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
5
09-05-13 11:04 PM
GMJ
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
9
07-12-13 05:30 PM
hobkirk
Road Cycling
17
07-31-12 11:33 AM
thisisbenji
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
11
08-07-11 05:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.