Bontrager Node 2.1
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times
in
13 Posts
Bontrager Node 2.1
Based on a little research and recommendations from here I'm looking to get one of these.
Looking for any feedback, positive or negative about these units.
Thanks
Looking for any feedback, positive or negative about these units.
Thanks
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 96
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've got the Node 2 and it's been on the fritz for the past couple of rides, i.e. returning really erratic speed readings. I put new batteries in both the head unit and the speed/cadence sensor and it didn't rectify the problem, however about 2/3 of the way through my last ride it started reading seemingly correctly. Prior to apparently fixing itself it would return speed readings in the mid-80's, average speeds for rides in the mid-30's, etc. I checked and double-checked the wheel size settings and the positioning of the magnet in relation to the sensor and everything seemed fine, so I really have no idea what was causing it. Anyway, prior to these problems I would have recommended the unit but I'm a bit leery of the build quality now.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,272
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4255 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times
in
940 Posts
I have one. I like it. The buttons appear to be flaky once-in-a-while.
The tenths-of-a-mile digit in the distance number needs to be bigger and the speed number doesn't need to be quite as big.
It's too bad it doesn't indicate whether you are faster or slower than the average speed (it looks like there was an intent to do that because there are "unlit" triangles under the tenths digit of the speed.
The battery consumption seems decent (I have about 600 miles on mine).
I like the dual Bontrager sensor. The rubber band attachment can be a bit of a pain to put on (when the rear wheel is installed). Once on, it appears to stay put (I was worried that it might come loose). The sensor has LED's that indicate that it is aligned with the magnets (each lights for 10 counts of its associated sensor).
The computer is expensive but note that it includes a heart rate monitor (I managed to get the sensor free as part of the sale).
The tenths-of-a-mile digit in the distance number needs to be bigger and the speed number doesn't need to be quite as big.
It's too bad it doesn't indicate whether you are faster or slower than the average speed (it looks like there was an intent to do that because there are "unlit" triangles under the tenths digit of the speed.
The battery consumption seems decent (I have about 600 miles on mine).
I like the dual Bontrager sensor. The rubber band attachment can be a bit of a pain to put on (when the rear wheel is installed). Once on, it appears to stay put (I was worried that it might come loose). The sensor has LED's that indicate that it is aligned with the magnets (each lights for 10 counts of its associated sensor).
The computer is expensive but note that it includes a heart rate monitor (I managed to get the sensor free as part of the sale).
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 809
Bikes: Specialized Sirrus Comp
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I like mine, however I have one issue that I haven't figured out:
If you're on a long ride and you want to count the time you're stopped there's no real way to do it, is there? If you stop moving it stops counting. I would like it to keep counting if I stop so that my average speed is a true average speed, not just average for when I was on the bike.
If you're on a long ride and you want to count the time you're stopped there's no real way to do it, is there? If you stop moving it stops counting. I would like it to keep counting if I stop so that my average speed is a true average speed, not just average for when I was on the bike.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,272
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4255 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times
in
940 Posts
I like mine, however I have one issue that I haven't figured out:
If you're on a long ride and you want to count the time you're stopped there's no real way to do it, is there? If you stop moving it stops counting. I would like it to keep counting if I stop so that my average speed is a true average speed, not just average for when I was on the bike.
If you're on a long ride and you want to count the time you're stopped there's no real way to do it, is there? If you stop moving it stops counting. I would like it to keep counting if I stop so that my average speed is a true average speed, not just average for when I was on the bike.
It leaves the much, much easier one for you to do.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 809
Bikes: Specialized Sirrus Comp
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I guess, but for too much more money I could have gotten a Garmin 500. I think I will get one eventually, but for node this Node 2.1 will work just fine.
#8
Rides with Scissors
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Franklin, Tennessee
Posts: 607
Bikes: 2011 Trek Madone 5.2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have one and works well for me; it also links well to my garmin watch and HR Strap. I like it better than the Garmin 500 because the battery lasts about a year and not just 15 hours. So i don't have to think about recharging it constantly before a ride.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 809
Bikes: Specialized Sirrus Comp
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Which brings up a question - can a sensor send data to multiple receivers? I.e. could both an Edge 500 and a Node 2.1 receive a signal from the same sensor at the same time?
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 191
Bikes: 2012 Trek Madone 5.2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I like mine, however I have one issue that I haven't figured out:
If you're on a long ride and you want to count the time you're stopped there's no real way to do it, is there? If you stop moving it stops counting. I would like it to keep counting if I stop so that my average speed is a true average speed, not just average for when I was on the bike.
If you're on a long ride and you want to count the time you're stopped there's no real way to do it, is there? If you stop moving it stops counting. I would like it to keep counting if I stop so that my average speed is a true average speed, not just average for when I was on the bike.
#12
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times
in
13 Posts
Ordered one yesterday from Summit. They include the combo sensor as a bonus right now. Never had a wireless unit before so looking forward to a cleaner look. It's been a long time since I've had cadence and a unit that is both a computer and HR monitor. Looking forward to getting it and using it. Curious to see how much elevation gain is on my usual rides.
Thanks for the feedback.
Thanks for the feedback.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 809
Bikes: Specialized Sirrus Comp
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The only real issue I'm having is that the rubber strap for the combo sensor doesn't seem to work that well. I'm being advised to zip tie it on - I may try that.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,272
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4255 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times
in
940 Posts
I was worried that it would fall off but, even with lots of opportunities, it hasn't.
I have over a month and 1000+ miles with no problems.
The strap is supposed to first fit on the outside and hook on the inside. With the wheel in place, that's a pain to do.
Of course, it could work better on some bikes than others. It's also possible that wet would cause it to slide around a bit.
#17
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times
in
13 Posts
Yes, I keep it on all the time. I carry my bike inside my car.
I was worried that it would fall off but, even with lots of opportunities, it hasn't.
I have over a month and 1000+ miles with no problems.
The strap is supposed to first fit on the outside and hook on the inside. With the wheel in place, that's a pain to do.
Of course, it could work better on some bikes than others. It's also possible that wet would cause it to slide around a bit.
I was worried that it would fall off but, even with lots of opportunities, it hasn't.
I have over a month and 1000+ miles with no problems.
The strap is supposed to first fit on the outside and hook on the inside. With the wheel in place, that's a pain to do.
Of course, it could work better on some bikes than others. It's also possible that wet would cause it to slide around a bit.
I transport on the roof most of the time, might be worth removing since they are $60 a pop for the combo sensor.
#19
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times
in
13 Posts
True. Fortunately I only haul long distances a few times a year. Hopefully heading to Colorado this year and would hate to arrive and find my sensor gone. I'll look into wire ties or some other way for extra security when it arrives.